Author: Neville

  • A career taken to pieces

    A career taken to pieces

    Date February 16, 2013
    Read later

    Deborah Snow

    Ian MacDonad rose through Labor ranks effortlessly switching allegiances. But the political chameleon has come unstuck.

    inShare.
    Pin It
    submit to reddit
    Email article
    Print
    Reprints & permissions

    .

    Ian Macdonald … the man known as ” Sir Lunchalot”.

    Labor elder statesman John Faulkner has a reputation for stark candour. Even so, the speech he delivered to a private gathering of the Left faithful at a Chinese restaurant in the Haymarket two years ago left his audience gasping.

    The event was a farewell for Luke Foley, the bespectacled, somewhat cherubic-looking party functionary who was leaving his post as the party’s assistant state secretary and migrating to the state upper house.

    Foley was taking the place vacated by Ian Macdonald, who’d been forced to fall on his sword – finally – by then premier Kristina Keneally over an overseas travel rort exposed by the Herald.

    The full, breath-taking panorama of Macdonald’s alleged misdeeds had yet to be laid before the Independent Commission Against Corruption.

    Advertisement

    But enough thunder clouds were rumbling over the man known as ” Sir Lunchalot” for party hardheads to know more trouble lay ahead.

    The left stalwarts gathered that evening were expecting a paean of praise for Foley, one of their rising stars. They were not expecting the other half of Faulkner’s message – a ringing condemnation of his own faction for having bred and nurtured Macdonald over decades.

    ”It [Macdonald’s rise] reflects well on none of us in the Left,” Faulkner chided, in remarks previously unreported outside the party.

    ”It is a particularly unpleasant reflection for anyone in the leadership of our faction …

    ”Again and again he received the misplaced and mindless loyalty of the Left, supporting him for year after year in the Upper House.”

    Macdonald was, he said, ”our creation” and a ”terrible indictment of us all.”

    As the agony of ICAC drags on, one left-winger confided this week, ”it’s the barbecue conversation we are all having. Is it Shakespearean? Is he someone who was genuinely an idealist in the beginning, and it all went wrong, with the power and money? Or was he just always this way? I don’t know the answer.”

    Macdonald might have sprung from the bosom of the Left, but he prospered through hitching his star to key players on the party’s more powerful and numerically superior Right. It was Right powerbrokers such as John Della Bosca, Joe Tripodi and Eddie Obeid who found their separate uses for Macdonald, and whose coat-tails he rode into positions of ever greater trust.

    It was on the watch of a right-wing premier,

    Bob Carr, that he first entered the ministry in 2003. It was another right-wing premier, Morris Iemma, who expanded Macdonald’s ministerial empire after the 2007 election, fooled by the man’s energy and seeming reliability.

    It was a third right-wing premier, Kristina Keneally, who initially restored Macdonald to the ministry after he had been dropped towards the end of Nathan Rees’ ill-starred turn in the top job.

    Ian Macdonald was a political shape-shifter. He could be, says former Left minister and party historian, Rodney Cavalier, ”anything his audience wanted him to be. He knew the language, he could spout the ideology of the group with blithe conviction.”

    And he ”always wanted to be on the inside of the deal – that was central to his nature.”

    Raised on a housing commission estate in Victoria, Ian Michael Macdonald knew the travails of life without money. His mother raised five kids single-handed and earned a living housekeeping for Catholic clergy. Once, he told an interviewer, his mother had hidden them under beds, fearful ”the welfare” was coming to whisk the kids away.

    At La Trobe university he cut a dash as a student radical, latching on to the burning causes of the day – the Vietnam war and apartheid. His flair for rhetoric took him to the presidency of the Australian Union of Students in 1974.

    By the mid-1970s he’d been talent-spotted by two left-wing senators, George Georges and Arthur Gietzelt.

    Georges hired him as a staffer. But Gietzelt had bigger plans. He wanted to plant Macdonald inside the NSW party as a ”purer” left operative to head off a young John Faulkner for the coveted assistant state secretary’s post. As one insider of the time recalls it, Faulkner was ”not enough of a lickspittle” and ”not enough of a Marxist” for Gietzelt’s liking. But despite the senator’s backing, Macdonald couldn’t match Faulkner’s support and dropped out of the contest.

    He had, however, found a berth on the staff of the fast-rising and charismatic young attorney-general Frank Walker, a star in the Wran government. There, fate threw Macdonald together with Greg Jones, also on Walker’s staff.

    The pair formed the core of a rat-pack, notorious good-time boys, known for roistering lunches and dinners and for overseas trips on the public purse. They experimented with the first ethnic branch stacks in NSW. They found creative uses for ministerial consultants, paid for out of the departmental budget, to run blatant political campaigns. Former housing department staff recall Macdonald consistently lobbying for Housing Department land to be made available to developers. Says one Labor insider of the time, ”People didn’t so much see things about Macca as sense things. It was the style of the operation, the sense of the snout in the trough. He always seemed to have money, always seemed to be lunching, dinnering, it always seemed to be expensive.”

    When Nick Greiner came to power in 1988 he slammed Walker’s office for ”consistent, persistent and widespread rorting of the public purse” with Jones and Macdonald coming in for special mentions.

    Cavalier says ”personal venality is the essence of Macdonald.”

    The Jones-Macdonald friendship continued to prosper, outlasting two of Macdonald’s three marriages. (ICAC has heard how Jones stood to make up to $60 million from the inside maneuverings over the Obeid family’s rotten coal deals, allegedly facilitated by Macdonald who, the ICAC evidence suggests, was to pocket $4 million. They now no longer speak).

    Surviving the scandals of Walker’s office, Macdonald managed to gain preselection for the Legislative Council in 1988. Key to this was a power base he’d managed to cultivate among some important left unions, particularly the metal-workers, now known as the AMWU.

    He’d struck up a particularly close alliance with the union’s then assistant secretary, later its head, George Campbell (who went on to become a senator). The union’s backing would see him safely through several preselections and would later help save his skin in an internal Left showdown in 2006, when Foley tried to dislodge Macdonald from the Left faction’s ticket for the upper house.

    Macdonald also became friendly with an up-and-coming Anthony Albanese, now a federal minister. Campbell, Macdonald, Albanese and a later head of the AMWU, Doug Cameron, all ended up in the ”hard” left after the faction split into two sub-groups in the 1980s. These were loyalties that, for a long time, Macdonald could draw on.

    ”When Luke Foley tried to move heaven and earth to remove him, the metal workers union saved him” says Cavalier, now. ”The union bloc vote [inside Labor] guarantees Macdonald is protected from the judgment of the ALP membership.”

    Macdonald languished as a factional organiser in the Legislative Council for the first four years of Carr’s premiership but his fortunes improved when former state Labor secretary Della Bosca entered the upper house in 1999. Macdonald became ”Della’s” parliamentary secretary and made himself useful on plans to revive the Snowy River and drive through reforms to workers compensation, which were bitterly resisted by the unions.

    By 2003, Macdonald had redeemed himself enough to become a minister, accepted by Carr as part of the left ticket for ministry slots.

    Those close to Carr say Della Bosca was a key voice supporting Macdonald’s promotion.

    Says one senior party source, ”Della in particular was a big promoter of the view that Macca was misunderstood. Della would often say that Bob had made a big strategic mistake in not bringing him into the ministry earlier, that it was better to have his rat cunning inside the tent than out. Della would say, that if you needed to take a pragmatic decision in pre-selections, or deliver a union, it was always Macca and his part of the Left that you could deal with, and you would know where you stood.”

    Asked about this, Della Bosca told Fairfax Media, ”Ian Macdonald became a minister by a process entirely internal to the Left, over which I had no influence.”

    He also said the decision to make Macdonald his parliamentary secretary had been Carr’s but that he’d become grateful for it as ”Ian and I, though a political ‘odd couple’, made a formidable and constructive reformist team.”

    Carr made ”Macca” the minister for agriculture and fisheries, no doubt thinking Macdonald’s years of cattle breeding on the side would make him popular in the bush.

    After Carr stepped down as Premier in 2005, Della Bosca’s power waned. The new kingmaker was Obeid, then a key lieutenant around the incoming premier Iemma. ”Somehow Macca slipped seamlessly from Della’s patronage to Eddie’s” said one insider who watched the migration with wry amusement and some disgust.

    As Iemma – now a fierce critic of both Obeid and Macdonald – has testified before ICAC, Macdonald initially impressed him as a minister.

    ”There was never any shortage of events that he would yield up,” says a former minister. ”He made sure our country cabinets were always well attended, by farmers, miners and regional manufacturers, and there was always a farm lined up for us to visit.”

    Iemma added minerals and energy to Macdonald’s ministerial responsibilities.

    ”If there was any culpability by Bob, or Morris” says one Labor insider now, ”it’s that there wasn’t any appreciation of how much potential for corruption there was in the minerals portfolio.”

    Macdonald survived the transition to Rees’ premiership in September 2008 but was under notice he should step down the following year, to honour a deal hammered out inside the Left in the aftermath of Foley’s earlier attempt to dislodge him in 2006. Macdonald reneged. Rees dropped him from the ministry anyway in late 2009 (this time backed by Albanese), attracting the revenge of Obeid’s forces, which then removed Rees.

    It was ultimately only Macdonald’s own stupidity that forced Keneally to pressure him out, after she’d initially reinstated him as minister. He’d fiddled the expenses one time too many.

    Reflecting back on Macdonald’s inglorious career, Cavalier says he believes the former student firebrand might always have been a saboteur, a plant inside the Left. It’s cold war language which finds an echo in the stinging words Faulkner uttered two years ago. ”By his final term Ian Macdonald was a fully-fledged – and by then finally public – operative for the Obeid and Tripodi sub-faction of the NSW Right,” said Faulkner.

    ”There were no secrets any more. Ian Macdonald had finally come in from the cold.”

    Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/nsw/a-career-taken-to-pieces-20130215-2eijh.html#ixzz2L27UL2eu

  • $188 Billion Price Tag: Extreme Weather From 2011 To 2012

    $188 Billion Price Tag: Extreme Weather From 2011 To 2012

    Like it?

    1

    comment
    1

    Posted February 15, 2013

    Keywords: Climate, Environmental Policy, Environment, News

    6

    37

    0

    43

    .

    By Daniel J. Weiss and Jackie Weidman

    The United States was subjected to many severe climate-related extreme weather over the past two years. In 2011 there were 14 extreme weather events — floods, drought, storms, and wildfires — that each caused at least $1 billion in damage. There were another 11 such disasters in 2012. Most of these extreme weather events reflect part of the unpaid bill from climate change — a tab that will only grow over time.

    CAP recently documented the human and economic toll from these devastating events in our November 2012 report “Heavy Weather: How Climate Destruction Harms Middle- and Lower- Income Americans.” Since the release of that report, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, or NOAA, has updated its list of “billion-dollar”-damage weather events for 2012, bringing the two-year total to 25 incidents.

    From 2011 to 2012 these 25 “billion-dollar damage” weather events in the United States are estimated to have caused up to $188 billion in total damage. [1] The two costliest events were the September 2012 drought — the worst drought in half a century, which baked nearly two-thirds of the continental United States — and superstorm Sandy, which battered the northeast coast in late October 2012. The four recently added disastrous weather events were severe tornadoes and thunderstorms.

    Here is an update of vital extreme weather event data after the addition of these four events:
    •67 percent of U.S. counties and 43 states were affected by “billion-dollar damage” extreme weather events in 2011 and 2012.
    •1,107 fatalities resulted from these 25 extreme weather events in 2011 and 2012.
    •Up to $188 billion in damage was caused by these severe weather events in 2011 and 2012.
    •$50,346.58 was the average household income in counties declared a disaster due to these weather events—3 percent below the U.S. median household income of $51,914. [2]
    •356 all-time high temperature records were broken in 2012.
    •34,008 daily high temperature records were set or tied throughout 2012, compared to just 6,664 daily record lows—a ratio of 5-to-1.
    •19 states had their warmest year ever in 2012.

  • Wetland Trees are Overlooked as Source of Methane

    Wetland Trees are Overlooked as Source of Methane

    Fri, 02/15/2013 – 7:00am

    by
    Univ. of Bristol

    Get daily news for laboratory professionals – Sign up now!

    Sunitha Pangala sampling methane emissions from trees in a peat swamp in Borneo. Image: Univ. of BristolWetland trees are a significant overlooked source of the potent greenhouse gas methane, according to a new study by researchers at The Open Univ. and the Universities of Bristol and Oxford. The study, led by Vincent Gauci of The Open Univ. and published in the journal New Phytologist, may help to resolve an ongoing controversy about the origins of methane in the tropics.

    Wetlands are a well-established and prolific source of atmospheric methane. Yet despite an abundance of seething swamps and flooded forests in the tropics, ground-based measurements of methane have fallen well short of the quantities detected in tropical air by satellites.

    In 2011, Sunitha Pangala, a PhD student at The Open Univ., who is co-supervised by Univ. of Bristol researcher Ed Hornibrook, spent several weeks in a forested peat swamp in Borneo with colleague Sam Moore, assessing whether soil methane might be escaping to the atmosphere by an alternative route.

    Pangala says, “Methane emissions normally are measured by putting sealed chambers on the ground to capture gas seeping or bubbling from the soil. We also enclosed tree stems in chambers and the results were surprising. About 80 percent of all methane emissions was venting through the trees.”

    The roots of trees, like all plants, need oxygen to survive. One strategy that trees use to cope in waterlogged soil is to enlarge porous structures, known as lenticels, in their stems to allow air to enter and diffuse to their roots. Pangala and colleagues have shown that these common adaptations in wetland trees are two-way conduits that also allow soil gas to escape to the atmosphere.

    Gauci says, “This work challenges current models of how forested wetlands exchange methane with the atmosphere. Ground-based estimates of methane flux in the tropics may be coming up short because tree emissions are never included in field campaigns.”

    Although willow is a familiar inhabitant of wet soil, it was not among the trees studied in the Sebangau River catchment in Borneo. However, the eight tree species investigated by the team are common in the tropics, including the vast Amazon Basin. Establishing whether tree-mediated emissions of methane are ubiquitous in tropical wetlands is now the focus of a new three-year Natural Environment Research Council grant to Gauci and Hornibrook that begins later this year.

  • East Coast Sea Level Rise Tied to Slowing of Gulf Stream

    East Coast Sea Level Rise Tied to Slowing of Gulf Stream

    By Tom Yulsman | February 14, 2013 9:09 pm

    Sea level rise has been accelerating along the mid-Atlantic coast of the United States, and now, a paper published in the February issue of the Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans confirms the cause: the Gulf Stream is slowing.

    My colleague Michael Lemonick has an excellent post over at Climate Central explaining the science and the background in some detail. But for ImaGeo, I thought it would be valuable to add a visual perspective in the form of the visualization above.

    Produced by a computer model, it shows in breathtaking detail the Gulf Stream meandering and looping from the Gulf of Mexico up the East Coast and across the North Atlantic towards Western Europe. It was produced as part of of a NASA project called ECCO2. The colors correspond to sea surface temperature, with the warmer temperatures of the current quite evident.

    Looking at the visualization, you might be able to get a sense of how a slowing Gulf Stream may contribute to sea level rise along the East Coast. It’s northeasterly flow actually sucks water away from the land — and the effect isn’t really subtle. As Lemonick reports, it has kept sea level in the region up to a meter and a half lower than it would otherwise be.

    But as the Gulf Stream slows — a predicted consequence of global warming — the effect is lessening, and sea level is now rising faster than in the past. For cities like New York, this could mean trouble over the coming decades, especially when storms like Superstorm Sandy pile a significant surge of water atop a higher ocean.

  • What does carbon dioxide do to the ozone layer?

    What does carbon dioxide do to the ozone layer?

    Aerogard Insect RepellentTrusted Protection from Mozzies & Insects Since 1963! Find Out More.aerogard.com.au
    Recycling systemsMercury recovery and cleanup Download free product informationwww.econindustries.com/
    Ads

    Answer:

    CO2 (carbon dioxide) does not affect the ozone layer.

    CO2 is a greenhouse gas and does exactly what it says on the label. The CO2 builds up in the atmosphere and hangs there in one huge, extra thick layer which reflects the heat back down that would ordinarily float off into space. It gets reflected from the ground back up to the greenhouse gas layer over and over again. This happens all the time, and that thick layer is only getting thicker – thus global warming occurs.

    But it has nothing to do with the ozone layer.

  • MP retirement threatens Gillard numbers

    MP retirement threatens Gillard numbers

    Paul Osborne, AAP Senior Political Writer, AAPUpdated February 15, 2013, 1:30 pm

    tweet

    Email
    Print

    The NSW coalition government could cause a headache for Prime Minister Julia Gillard if it appoints former federal minister Robert McClelland to a key job in the next couple of months.

    Mr McClelland, a 17-year parliamentary veteran, told the NSW ALP last month he would not stand for Labor preselection in his Sydney seat of Barton ahead of the September 14 federal vote.

    The former attorney-general is understood to be considering the role of commissioner with the NSW Industrial Relations Commission, which pays $265,000 a year.

    “Mr McClelland is considering a number of potential opportunities for his post-parliamentary career,” a spokeswoman for Mr McClelland told AAP on Friday.

    “He does not intend to publicly discuss those or to speculate on the course of action he may take.”

    But unlike two other retiring ministers – Nicola Roxon and Chris Evans – Mr McClelland hasn’t specifically ruled out standing down before the election campaign begins on August 12.

    That’s fuelled concerns he could retire earlier and trigger a by-election in Barton, particularly if the NSW job is confirmed.

    The NSW IRC advertised only on Friday for commissioners, seeking expressions of interest by February 22.

    Potential candidates will meet with a panel of officials before a selection is made.

    But the final decision is up to NSW Treasurer and Industrial Relations Minister Mike Baird, who will make a recommendation to his cabinet colleagues.

    The recruitment process was “midway” and a decision on the new commissioners was expected within the next four to eight weeks, a source close to the process said.

    A spokeswoman for Mr Baird told AAP the state government did not discuss internal recruitment processes.

    “All appointments are based on merit and ensuring that the candidate has the right experience and skills to deliver in the role,” she said.

    Mr McClelland said in his retirement statement he looked forward to “continuing to make a contribution to the Australian community in the next stage of my professional career”.

    A by-election loss would take Labor’s numbers in the House of Representatives to 70.

    But the government could survive because there are six independents and one Greens MP on the crossbenches of the 150-member house from whom it draws support.

    Speaker Anna Burke is yet to say whether or not she would approve a by-election ahead of September 14 – she has the option of deferring a vote until the national poll.

    Mr McClelland was dumped from cabinet in 2012 after speaking out in favour of Kevin Rudd’s unsuccessful quest to regain the leadership.

    Labor frontbencher Simon Crean, who attended a dinner for his long-time friend Mr McClelland in Canberra on Wednesday, said he had spoken with him on Friday.

    “He has not confirmed that he has sought another job … and why should he if it’s confidential,” Mr Crean told reporters in Canberra.

    Mr Crean did not think speculation about Mr McClelland’s early exit was destabilising for the government.

    “It’s not destabilising … there is no by-election,” he said.

    “The government has announced the election date and we are getting on with the task of trying to win at the next election.”

    Mr Crean said the dinner, which was also attended by another former Labor leader Kevin Rudd, had been held in Canberra this week because of convenience.
    “It wasn’t a farewell dinner. It was a dinner for a mate who had announced the fact that he was ending his parliamentary career and there aren’t many parliamentary sitting weeks left,” Mr Crean said.