Author: Neville

  • Landsat Data Continuity Mission Awaits Liftoff

    Landsat Data Continuity Mission Awaits Liftoff

    Feb. 8, 2013 — When the newest Landsat spacecraft trains its state-of-the-art sensors on Earth’s surface, it will provide images of our ever-changing planet in unparalleled clarity.

    ——————————————————————————–

    Share This:

    2

    Related Ads:
    •Satellite View
    •NASA Images
    •Sustainability
    •Dry Weather

    See Also:

    Earth & Climate
    •Floods
    •Earth Science
    •Geology
    •Weather
    •Geography
    •Sustainability

    Reference
    •Antarctic ice sheet
    •Solar radiation
    •Mount Kilimanjaro
    •Greenland ice sheet

    Launched by NASA in partnership with the U.S. Geological Survey, the Landsat Data Continuity Mission (LDCM) will add a new chapter to an enduring program. Since 1972, Landsat has enabled people around the globe to observe our planet’s land masses. The enhanced images that will be provided by improved Landsat data come at a time when such information is vitally important.

    “With increasing population, and with advances in technology, our land cover and land use are currently changing at a rate unprecedented in human history,” said Jim Irons, LDCM project scientist at NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Md.

    LDCM will be lofted into orbit aboard a two-stage United Launch Alliance Atlas V rocket. The five-year mission will begin with a launch from Space Launch Complex 3 at Vandenberg Air Force Base in California. Once in orbit, after three months of extensive testing, the LDCM satellite will be renamed Landsat 8 and operational control will then be transferred to USGS.

    Six Landsat satellites have successfully launched since the first made its debut in 1972. Jointly managed by NASA and the U.S. Geological Survey, the Landsat program has provided continuous views of Earth’s surface for more than four decades. Landsat 7, the most recent in the series, launched in April 1999.

    The Landsat Data Continuity Mission builds on this foundation and brings with it two advanced science instruments that will deliver more data — and clearer images — than ever before. The Operational Land Imager (OLI) is designed to measure visible, near infrared, and short wave infrared wavelengths, while the Thermal Infrared Sensor (TIRS) monitors temperatures on Earth’s surface. Using what scientists call a “push-broom” approach, these detectors will record a constant stream of data as the spacecraft passes 438 miles overhead in a near-circular, near-polar orbit.

    “All earlier Landsat sensors, on Landsats 1 through 7, were called ‘whisk-broom sensors.’ Each one of these sensors used a mirror that oscillated back and forth,” Irons said.

    “In contrast, both of the sensors on the Landsat Data Continuity Mission, OLI and TIRS, instead of using an oscillating mirror, they will use long arrays of detectors across the focal plane of each instrument.”

    During each satellite pass, OLI and TIRS will observe and collect image data for a 185-kilometer-wide swath of land. As Earth rotates beneath the satellite’s orbit, subsequent seams of land will come into view, providing a complete picture of the planet’s surface every 16 days.

    To keep Landsat over water during the critical period of liftoff and ascent, managers selected Vandenberg Air Force Base as the mission’s launch site. LDCM will be the first NASA mission launched at Space Launch Complex 3 since the agency’s Terra satellite launched more than a dozen years ago. But despite a few changes, the launch team hasn’t encountered any difficulties during launch preparations, said Omar Baez, senior launch director in NASA’s Launch Services Program based at Kennedy Space Center in Florida.

    “They’re operating out of a new control center since we launched back then,” Baez said. “But it’s still the Atlas V, still the Atlas V crew. There are folks we’ve worked with for years. It’s like coming home.”

    The rocket’s booster and Centaur stages were erected at the pad in October 2012. The LDCM spacecraft arrived at Vandenberg in December and underwent final prelaunch tests and closeouts before it was installed atop the rocket Jan. 25.

    With launch only a few days away, LDCM/Landsat 8 will soon begin sending home data to be used for years to come.

    “The data is used by thousands of users all over the world for things like land resource monitoring, crop health identification, crop yield calculations, monitoring urban sprawl, urban planning — the data is used all over the place,” said Del Jenstrom, deputy project manager for the mission.

    “And to me, that’s very rewarding, to work with such a great team of people on a mission that really does affect people’s lives.”

    Share this story on Facebook, Twitter, and Google:

  • Minister’s ex-aide lobbied for mine firms

    Minister’s ex-aide lobbied for mine firms

    Amy Dale
    The Daily Telegraph
    February 11, 20133:20PM

    Increase Text Size
    Decrease Text Size
    Print
    Email
    Share

    0

    Called before ICAC … Ian McDonald / Pic: Craig Greenhill Source: The Daily Telegraph

    IAN Macdonald has started a fiery stint in the ICAC witness box, telling the inquiry he cannot explain how a new mining tenement was created “smack bang on top of the Obeid family farm.”

    He was smiling as he walked into ICAC’s headquarters, but the grin is gone from the face of the former mining minister as he now faces a grilling from the inquiry’s counsel assisting Geoffrey Watson SC.

    Mr Watson asked him to explain how a mining tenement, created by his department in June 2008, ended up being “smack bang on top of the Obeid family farm.”

    “I didn’t know about the Obeids’ having a farm in the new area,” Mr Macdonald said.

    “It has to be by chance.”

    He said the family “obviously took a lot of actions I wasn’t aware of” which resulted in them earning as much as $100 million from mining ventures in the Bylong Valley.

    Recommended Coverage

    .

    ICAC set to sink teeth into ex-MP»

    FOR Ian Michael Macdonald, 22 years in public life as an MP and seven years as a minister could be about to end in disgrace.
    ..

    The former resources minister is the second last witness in the long-running Operation Jasper inquiry.

    Mr Macdonald arrived at the corruption watchdog’s Castlereagh St headquarters just before the end of the lunch break.

    Mr Macdonald’s former chief of staff was receiving departmental emails from his ex boss’s staff in his new role lobbying for mining companies, ICAC hears.

    The inquiry has been told Tony Hewson, who was the former resources minster’s chief of staff from 2004 to 2007 earned $740,000 from Felix Resources and White Energy while working as a lobbyist for them.

    The corruption watchdog is tomorrow due to finish its explosive inquiry into Mr Macdonald and the allegation he rigged the tender process in 2008 for a coal mining exploration licence in the Bylong Valley to the potential $100 million benefit of the Obeid family.

    White Energy were on the verge of taking over the Obeid linked Cascade Coal for $500 million, but the deal collapsed in 2011 as White Energy directors got a “whiff” of the controversial family’s involvement.

    He was shown copies of emails from the resources department with details about the reopening of a coal mining licence at Moolarben.

    Geoffrey Watson SC, the counsel assisting the inquiry, suggested to Mr Hewson that he was in “a very powerful position…being provided with direct access to inter-departmental advice (on mining licences).”

    But Mr Hewson said much of the information he received from Mr Macdonald’s department was “valueless.”

    The inquiry heard Mr Macdonald rang Mr Hewson 145 times in 2008, the year the Mt Penny tenement was created.
    Mr Macdonald may take the stand this afternoon.

  • Burke approves huge gas and coal plans

    Burke approves huge gas and coal plans

    Date February 12, 2013 94 reading now

    Read later

    Ben Cubby, Paddy Manning

    inShare.
    Pin It
    submit to reddit
    Email article
    Print
    Reprints & permissions

    .

    Conditional approval … Tony Burke. Photo: Andrew Meares

    A CLUTCH of big coal and coal seam gas projects, including the controversial Whitehaven mine near Narrabri in NSW, have been approved by the federal Environment Minister, Tony Burke.

    He signed conditional approvals for Whitehaven’s Maules Creek mine, planned for the Leard State Forest, Idemitsu’s neighbouring Boggabri coalmine expansion, and a coal seam gas development planned by AGL for Gloucester in NSW.

    Together, the three resources projects would have a huge carbon footprint of 47 million tonnes of greenhouse gases a year – about 8 per cent of Australia’s total emissions – according to environmental impact assessments.

    Whitehaven, part-owned by embattled coal baron Nathan Tinkler, was subject to a damaging hoax when anti-coal campaigner Jonathan Moylan issued a fake press release claiming ANZ had stopped funding the project, causing a temporary drop in the miner’s share price. His protest is being investigated by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission.

    Advertisement

    The mining projects had all been approved at state level. Mr Burke’s signature was seen as the final obstacle to development.

    ”Of all the decisions I have ever made, this is the one where I have the least idea of whether the projects are going to go ahead,” he said. ”For all three projects there are substantial issues.”

    Some of the hurdles yet to be overcome are the preservation of a ”biodiversity corridor” in the Leard Forest to allow koalas and other vulnerable animals to survive, high quality offsets to partially compensate for sections of the forest which would be cut down, and a hydrogeological survey around Gloucester.

    Mr Burke compared Monday’s decision to the approval granted by former environment minister Malcolm Turnbull to the proposed Gunns pulp mill in Tasmania. That process involved a series of separate ”modules” that stretched the approvals process out for years, before the project was finally canned.

    Asked if his coal and coal seam gas decisions then amounted to ”Clayton’s approvals”, Mr Burke said: ”It’s a completely fair criticism. I would have much preferred to do things in the usual way, and give clear approvals or rejections. Unfortunately the NSW government chose to leak commercial information, and caused this process.”

    Mr Burke was referring to a confidential letter from him to the NSW government, obtained by Fairfax Media, flagging his intention to approve the Whitehaven mine late last year. He said NSW would be excluded from the further approvals process because the letter was leaked.

    Also on Monday, the NSW government granted conditional approval for an expansion of BHP Billiton’s Dendrobium coalmine south-west of Sydney. Five longwall coal panels will be dug beneath Sydney’s drinking water catchment, with some damage surface expected to eight ”upland swamps” – rare ecosystems that support a variety of plants, birds and amphibians.

    The managing director of Whitehaven, Tony Haggarty, welcomed the approval and said: ”Notwithstanding the stringent environmental conditions which have been placed on the project and the difficult coal market at present, this is an excellent project and Whitehaven will be seeking to bring it into production as soon as possible.”

    An AGL spokeswoman also welcomed the approval and said it would work on satisfying the 36 conditions on matters of national environmental significance and protection of groundwater.

    ”Conservationists are furious about Minister Burke’s decision,” said the chief executive of the Nature Conservation Council of NSW, Pepe Clarke.

    ”Leard Forest is a rich natural habitat, teeming with life, and this decision marks the death knell of this extraordinary area.”

    The NSW Greens said the series of approvals made for ”a very black day for the environment in NSW”.

    Ads by Google

    Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/environment/burke-approves-huge-gas-and-coal-plans-20130211-2e8vh.html#ixzz2KaCw91AZ

  • Minister secretly controlled coal trading company

    Minister secretly controlled coal trading company
    PUBLISHED: 10 hours 43 MINUTES AGO | UPDATE: 0 hour 0 MINUTES AGO

    Share Links:email

    print-font+font

    Former mines minister Ian Macdonald, centre, will face another day before the NSW corruption inquiry on Monday and will have explain payments. Photo: Edwina Pickles

    Michaela Whitbourn and Neil Chenoweth

    Former NSW mines minister Ian Macdonald secretly controlled a ­Singapore coal trading company which was set up in May 2008 six days after he asked the mines department for information about coal tenements over a farm owned by Labor powerbroker Eddie Obeid.

    Macdonald faces questions about payments made to the company, Bridgewater Energy Pte Ltd, when he appears on Monday before a corruption hearing over allegations he stood to make millions of dollars after Cascade Coal won coal exploration licences worth $489 million.

    Searches of Singapore corporate records show the company’s shares are owned by a Sydney director, ­Hessam Bahramali, who could not be contacted for comment on Sunday.

    Investigators found details of Bridgewater’s bank account at the United Overseas Bank in Singapore in a bundle of documents relating to Cascade Coal in the office of Sydney accountant Bill Sweeney.

    Consultant Greg Jones, a lifelong friend of Macdonald and a shareholder in Cascade, used Sweeney’s accounting firm to channel $195,000 to Macdonald in late 2009 as a loan. Macdonald repaid only $50,000.

    Jones has denied that handwritten notes made by him and lawyer John Gerathy about a “5 per cent –$4 million” payment and references to a 5 per cent “facility fee” of up to $24.3 million refer to payments to be made to Macdonald.

    For Macdonald, it’s groundhog day. He will be asked – again –to explain his actions as mining ­minister, one of four separate corruption investigations covering the same 18-month period.

    Gattellari to be sentenced

    They include receiving the services of a prostitute, Tiffanie, provided by property developer Ron Medich and “Lucky” Gattellari in July 2009.

    In an unrelated development. Gattellari will be sentenced this week in connection with the murder of businessman Michael McGurk in September 2009.

    The road to downfall of Macdonald, the man known as Sir Lunchalot, began in Dubai on January 15, 2008 when he booked in for five nights at Le Royal Meridien Beach Resort in Dubai. The bill for Macdonald, his wife, deputy chief of staff Jamie Gibson and a departmental officer came to $32,886.

    For all the controversial deals linked to Macdonald, it’s this one that would kick him out of politics. When details of that trip emerged in June 2010, then NSW premier Kristina Keneally demanded that Macdonald resign as minister.

    He resigned from the NSW upper house three days later. And Keneally announced she had referred the matter to the Independent Commission Against Corruption (ICAC), Macdonald’s first brush with investigators.

    That outcome was the furthest thought from his mind as he returned to Australia in late January 2008. His friend and political ally Eddie Obeid had a question for him about a farm he had just bought.

    Obeid and Macdonald were the Legislative Council’s odd couple. How did a creature of the Labor Left come to be allied with senior figures in the party’s dominant Right faction, including Obeid?

    ‘Wheel and deal’

    “Obeid and Macdonald were the two personalities who stood out as the guys who loved to wheel and deal with the odds and sods who make up the crossbench in the NSW upper house and cobble together a majority,” a source says. “They both love the deal, the horse-trading, the game, you know.

    “They were both in the upper house, OK, so that’s a small house, there’s only 42 members, obviously everyone gets to know each other pretty well. The . . . were drawn to each other, I think ,because of a similar make-up.”

    That didn’t make Macdonald a friend, Obeid told ICAC. Obeid said that after he bought Cherrydale Park at Mount Penny in the Bylong Valley for $3.65 million, he asked Macdonald about an exploration licence (soon to expire) held by mining giant Anglo American that included part of his property.

    Obeid insists that while he told Macdonald about the property he never told him where it was. On May 9, 2008, Obeid met a businessman from Mudgee, near his Bylong farm. He told ICAC they might have discussed Cherrydale but “not too much”. Macdonald was present.

    The following day, May 10, Macdonald’s staff were emailing queries to the mines department about coal tenements around Mount Penny – a location Macdonald’s officials had never heard of. More queries about Mount Penny followed on May 14. The next day Macdonald flew to Asia on a business tour to promote coal mining.

    The Australian Financial Review can reveal that on May 16, Bridgewater Energy Pte was incorporated in Singapore with 100 shares, with Hessam Bahramali as a director.

    Two extra singapore directors

    It operates as a coal and commodities trader. The 100 shares initially were held by Nicholas Waters, a Singaporean national living in Jakarta. The shares were transferred to Bahramali on October 5, 2011.

    Besides Bahramali and Waters, the company has two extra Singapore directors, Ragini Dhanvantray, from the incorporation date, and Katarina Iramawaty, appointed last year.

    “We’ve got evidence that this is a company, Bridgewater Energy, which Macdonald conducts with [John] Gerathy and another partner and that this is an account that is conducted in Singapore,” counsel assisting ICAC, Geoffrey Watson SC, said last week.

    While Gerathy and Macdonald are partners in an advisory firm, Resource Image, neither is a director of Bridgewater.

    Watson tendered a printout of the details of Bridgewater’s bank account details at the United Overseas Bank in Singapore.

    “We found this document, which are banking details for Bridgewater Energy, in a bundle of documents which related to John Gerathy and Cascade Coal which we found on Bill Sweeney’s office, could you explain what Sweeney would be doing with it?” Watson asked Greg Jones. Jones was a political staffer with Macdonald in the 1980s before becoming a consultant with Cascade Coal’s principals, Travers Duncan and John Kinghorn.

    Jones said he was unaware of any payments into the Bridgewater account.

    Cascade Coal denied links

    Sweeney is due to give evidence on Monday.

    Cascade Coal said in a statement last week that it had no knowledge of any financial links between Jones and Macdonald.

    On June 6, 2008, days after his return to Sydney, Macdonald directed his department to redraw the coal tenement about Mount Penny. The new tenement fitted “like a blanket” over the Obeid family farm, Watson has told ICAC.

    Macdonald’s world had become very complicated. The Labor government was enmeshed in efforts to privatise the power industry; Obeid was pressing then premier Morris Iemma to dump Frank Sartor as planning minister and replace him with Macdonald; and Macdonald had two sets of coal deals up in the air.

    On June 16, Macdonald had lunch with racehorse trainer Anthony Cummings and Eddie Obeid’s son Moses at the Credo restaurant at Cammeray.

    A day later Macdonald had dinner with former CFMEU boss John Maitland, who was pressing for a coal lease for a mine to be used to train mining workers. Two years ago the resulting lease was worth $290 million to Maitland and his fellow investors. It will be the subject of the third leg of the current ICAC inquiry that begins on March 18.

    It was a long way from his beginnings.

    “It’s no coincidence that Obeid and Macdonald were in the upper house [where candidates are not directly elected by voters],” a NSW Labor source says. “They were creatures of the factional system, the union bloc votes that make up the backbone of the factional machines.”

    Macdonald was adviser to frank walker

    Macdonald’s political patrons were drawn from the Left, including former Hawke government minister Arthur Gietzelt, whom he thanked in his maiden speech to Parliament (a speech which deplored then Liberal premier Nick Greiner’s attempt to set up ICAC as a “permanent inquisition” into Labor administrations).

    Macdonald spent a decade working as an adviser in Sydney to left-wing NSW Labor minister and former attorney-general Frank Walker. Yet it is clear that some in the faction were suspicious of him even at the start of his parliamentary career in 1988, when he was installed in the state’s upper house with the support of the Metal Workers Union.

    Chief among them, according to Labor sources, was senator John Faulkner, who emerged victorious from a tussle in 1980 with Macdonald for the job of assistant secretary of the NSW ALP.

    Faulkner declined to speak to the Financial Review  for this article. Others say privately that Macdonald was adept in the art of telling people what they wanted to hear.

    “A big problem with the organised factions in the Labor Party and the Liberal Party is [that] often complete frauds and chancers can get through the system by just mouthing the orthodoxies that a particular faction wants to hear,” a source says. “I think Macdonald [is] exhibit A.

    “When he owed his preselection to the Left of the party he told them what they wanted to hear – you know, he was an opponent of privatisation, he was a hero of the working class, he mouthed every cliche that went down well with some pretty gullible people.”

    When Macdonald was in a position to influence state policy as a minister, he pursued an agenda that was “wildly at odds with that that he’d mouthed to the supporters of the Left of the Labor Party for the previous 25 years”, the source says. This would lead, in part, to his expulsion from the faction in December 2009.

    Enthusiastic supporter of development

    The prime example of Macdonald’s policy shifts was his stance on electricity privatisation, which is opposed by the Left. In 2008, just over a decade after he threatened then NSW treasurer Michael Egan over his privatisation push at the ALP state conference at the Sydney Town Hall, Macdonald would be one of the principal advocates of a power sell-off under premier Iemma.

    He became an enthusiastic supporter of development and primary industries, including forestry and coal, as opposed to premier Bob Carr’s pro-environment policies.

    This was something Macdonald had in common with Obeid and other cabinet colleagues from the Right – powerbroker Joe Tripodi, former treasurers Michael Costa and Eric Roozendaal and Tony Kelly.

    It’s unclear the extent to which Macdonald’s colleagues were aware of any allegedly corrupt behaviour while he was a minister. One source says he was known as “a bit of a rogue but not a crook”.

    “He was a wheeler dealer type but that doesn’t make you Robinson Crusoe in the Labor Party or in party politics,” the source says.

    But it was not until July last year that he was suspended from the party, pending ICAC’s findings. Late last year when the Labor Left issued a public apology for Macdonald, it was at Faulkner’s urging.

    READ NEXT:
    ■Jennifer Hewett | A stink we can’t ignore

  • Warragamba dam is at the 7.2.2013 95.2 % Full

    Warragamba dam is at the 7.2.2013 95.2 % Full

    If rain continues at the rate we are are currently seeing, it will spill over and cause major flooding
    in the Nepean/Hawkesbury Basin.

  • Do we need a Plan B for the fossil fuel industry?

    Do we need a Plan B for the fossil fuel industry?

    Posted: 09 Feb 2013 02:15 PM PST
    by Graeme Taylor

    Is their any future for the oil and coal industries without doing what they do now: burning the stuff? In Global Warming’s Terrifying New Math, Bill McKibben argues that:

    We have five times as much oil and coal and gas on the books as climate scientists think is safe to burn. We’d have to keep 80 percent of those reserves locked away underground to avoid that fate. Before we knew those numbers, our fate had been likely. Now, barring some massive intervention, it seems certain.

    Yes, this coal and gas and oil is still technically in the soil. But it’s already economically aboveground – it’s figured into share prices, companies are borrowing money against it, nations are basing their budgets on the presumed returns from their patrimony. It explains why the big fossil-fuel companies have fought so hard to prevent the regulation of carbon dioxide – those reserves are their primary asset, the holding that gives their companies their value. It’s why they’ve worked so hard these past years to figure out how to unlock the oil in Canada’s tar sands, or how to drill miles beneath the sea, or how to frack the Appalachians.
    If you told Exxon or Lukoil that, in order to avoid wrecking the climate, they couldn’t pump out their reserves, the value of their companies would plummet. John Fullerton, a former managing director at JP Morgan who now runs the Capital Institute, calculates that at today’s market value, those 2,795 gigatons of carbon emissions are worth about $27 trillion. Which is to say, if you paid attention to the scientists and kept 80 percent of it underground, you’d be writing off $20 trillion in assets. The numbers aren’t exact, of course, but that carbon bubble makes the housing bubble look small by comparison. It won’t necessarily burst – we might well burn all that carbon, in which case investors will do fine. But if we do, the planet will crater. You can have a healthy fossil-fuel balance sheet, or a relatively healthy planet – but now that we know the numbers, it looks like you can’t have both. Do the math: 2,795 is five times 565. That’s how the story ends.

    I agree with his logic. Because corporations, governments, investors and pension funds will do everything possible to avoid bankruptcy, efforts by environmentalists to simply shut down fossil fuel production will inevitably meet enormous resistance. For this reason it is hard to imagine any scenario in which preventative action will be taken in time to prevent catastrophic climate change.
    McKibben then concludes that because the pollution caused by the oil, gas and coal companies will destroy most life on Earth, they are our enemies. While I understand his frustration, I believe that his analysis is incomplete, with the result that he is making serious theoretical and strategic mistakes.

    His theoretical error is to analyse the fossil fuel industry in isolation from the rest of the global industrial political economy: in reality ending the use of fossil fuels will stop most existing industrial processes. We cannot create an environmentally sustainable economic system without completely transforming our wasteful, polluting pyrotechnical system to one based on renewable, recyclable, non-polluting processes. This will require a whole-systems paradigm shift — of not only the energy sector but also transportation, manufacturing and consumption. The political and economic power of the fossil fuel industry comes from its essential role in maintaining the industrial economy: because poverty is not an acceptable option, almost everyone on the planet wants the global industrial system to continue growing and will oppose policies that threaten economic collapse.
    His strategic error is to position the environmental movement in opposition to the fossil fuel industry. This win/lose approach fails to give the industry and its investors any alternative other than to directly or indirectly oppose environmental initiatives. This is a particularly inappropriate strategy given the relative strength of the two groups and the (ultimately common) need for a rapid resolution to the problem.

    We are likely to be more successful if, instead of trying to force the energy industry to write off $20 trillion, we provide constructive alternative uses for their assets — ones that support the development of an environmentally, economically and socially viable global system.
    We need to put “Plan B” — a strategy for creating a sustainable fossil fuel industry — on the global agenda. It will work if:

    Technologies are developed to utilise hydrocarbons as feedstocks to manufacture fully recyclable products in non-polluting (e.g. non-aerobic) processes. Carbon based products (e.g. plastics, fibres, carbon nanotubes) could then be used to create much of our built environment and transportation infrastructure.
    While these technologies already exist (e.g. steam-methane reforming), they need to be refined and scaled up to commercially competitive levels.
    Using fossil fuels to produce manufactured products should add value in three ways:
    instead of burning coal, oil and gas, it will be more profitable to use them to produce finished products;
    through creating recyclable products, the life of finite resources will be greatly extended; and
    the (ultimately catastrophic) environmental, health and social costs of pollution will be avoided.
    An emergency approach is taken to developing and scaling up the new technologies (similar to that of war mobilisation).
    An international regime of sanctions and rewards is used to encourage industries and consumers to make the transition from polluting to non-polluting products.

    Dr Graeme Taylor is the coordinator of BEST Futures (www.bestfutures.org) and the author of Evolution’s Edge: The Coming Collapse and Transformation of Our World, which won the 2009 IPPY Gold Medal for the book “most likely to save the planet”.
    You are subscribed to email updates from Climate Code Red
    To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. Email delivery powered by Google
    Google Inc., 20 West Kinzie, Chicago IL USA 60610