Author: Neville

  • Chinese smog chokes Japan

    Chinese smog chokes Japan

    By North Asia correspondent Mark Willacy

    Updated 9 minutes ago

    Related Story: Beijing choked by dangerous pollution levels

    Map: Japan
    Smog from China is now drifting over parts of Japan, triggering health warnings for the young and sick.

    Japanese media has been saturated with coverage of the thick, choking smog blanketing Beijing and other Chinese cities in recent days.

    News programs have also broadcast maps showing the pollution being pushed east by the winds, towards southern Japan.

    Japanese health experts are warning that people with respiratory problems and small children are susceptible to the smog, which is worst on the southern island of Kyushu.

    The website of Japan’s environment minister has been choked with users logging on to monitor the level of pollution heading their way.

    Topics:air-pollution, pollution, environment, japan, china

    First posted 1 hour 17 minutes ago

  • Maybe climate change is closer than we think

    Maybe climate change is closer than we think
    By ABC’s Tracee Hutchison

    Posted Mon Feb 4, 2013 2:57pm AEDT
    Record flooding has swamped Jakarta’s CBD for the first time in history. Photo: Record flooding has swamped Jakarta’s CBD for the first time in history. (AFP: Bay Ismoyo)

    While Australia faced another summer of floods, Indonesia’s capital grappled with its own watery chaos and smog brought Beijing to a choking halt, writes Tracee Hutchison.

    Australia’s recent re-acquaintance with devastating flooding in Queensland and northern NSW this summer has been another sobering reminder of the climatic shape-shifting wreaking havoc with lives and livelihoods across the country.

    Yes, Dorothea Mackellar might well have written of droughts and flooding rains in the early 1900s (while homesick for Australia as a teenager in England), but you’d be hard-pressed to find much wistful fondness among the many farmers who have watched livestock, equipment and expanses of primary produce wash away their livelihoods for the second time in two years.

    For many of these much-heralded “country folk”, the financial and emotional struggle of staying on the land will be too much; they’ve said as much in shocked-filled resignation as the water came back too soon.

    Watching on, from the fire-prone drier states, the unspoken narrative is screaming; where will these people go? What will they do for a living? And who will grow the food they were growing for both domestic and export markets?

    There’s even been talk from Queensland Premier Campbell Newman that some flood-prone residential areas in Queensland might have to be relocated to avoid what looks increasingly like the recurring reality of extreme flooding.

    So what about when the city in question has numbers nudging the entire population of Australia? That’s the reality in Jakarta right now, where record flooding has swamped the CBD for the first time in history. There is increasing talk that relocating the Indonesian capital is the only feasible solution to an escalating problem.

    Jakarta is sinking. Literally. Years and years of unregulated private water-bores has drained the city’s below-sea-level water table dry. The record rain, coupled with an underdeveloped drainage system and the penchant of Jakartans to use the city’s waterways as rubbish dumps, brought this city of 20-odd million to a standstill of a different kind.

    For the first time in years there were no cars on Jakarta’s streets (other than floating ones); instead, the city more used to lumbering in a grinding traffic gridlock was incapacitated by metre-high water that turned the city’s roads into Venice-style canals. It put a whole new – and rather ironic – spin on Jakarta’s car-free day campaign to reduce pollution in the city.

    Australians remember the massive economic and political impact when Brisbane flooded two year ago – the disruption and cost to business, the national flood levy, the daily Bligh/Newman media show, the rebuild. Try expanding that impact to one of the most important capitals in South East Asia, a regional heavyweight and ASEAN powerbroker.

    The implications of a non-functioning Jakarta are immense and wide-ranging both for Indonesia and the region. But this is the reality facing the new Jakartan governor Joko Widodo and outgoing Indonesian president Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono and his government, who are canvassing alternate-capital locations in higher and drier locations.

    And while the Indonesian capital grappled with a watery chaos, further north a different kind of stultification was engulfing the Chinese capital. The soupy and toxic coal-fuelled smog that has descended across northern China sent monitoring devices off the scale in Beijing.

    Hospitals recorded a 30 per cent increase in admissions for respiratory-related illnesses and residents were ordered to stay indoors as state-run manufacturing was put on the kind of state-instructed ‘go-slow’ not seen since the Blue Sky policies of the Beijing Olympic preparations. China’s coal-powered construction boom had brought its capital to a choking halt.

    Things were so bad in Beijing that billionaire entrepreneur Chen Guangbiao started selling air in cans with sweet smelling fragrances of “Pristine Tibet”, “Post Industrial Taiwan” and “Revolutionary Yanan”. At the height of the smog, Chen sold 8 millions cans in 10 days at about 75 cents AUD a can, with proceeds going to poor regions of China, the ones most likely to be forced into poorly regulated manufacturing jobs.

    There is something darkly delicious about China’s state-run manufacturing boom on a state-imposed go-slow because Beijing’s middle class, the beneficiaries of the boom, can’t breath. It’s a vexing Catch-22 for China’s new leadership – how to keep a slowing economy buoyant but avoid a widespread public health crisis – and a new twist on boom or bust. Not to mention the regional economic implications for trading partners like Australia, whose coal-exporters might possibly be the elephant in the (Beijing hospital) room.

    It doesn’t seem that long ago that “environmental refugees” living on increasingly brackish low-lying Pacific island states of Kiribati and Tuvalu were dismissed as the political fodder of fear-mongering climate change campaigners. Now, sadly, relocations from what were once primary food-producing areas are a new way of life – and it’s not just Kiribatins and Tuvaluans feeling the watery heat.

    Widespread record flooding and deadly landslides have been a common theme across the Pacific this summer – PNG, Fiji, Samoa and the Cook Islands have all battled extreme weather events from ferocious cyclones and record rains.

    It used to be that a few thousand people with wet feet in the Pacific never got much traction outside environmental campaigner circles; perhaps this faraway time of a planet impacted by a changing climate might be closer than we think.

    Tracee Hutchison broadcasts throughout Australia and the Asia Pacific for ABC News Radio and Radio Australia. View her full profile here.

    Topics: world-politics, air-pollution, floods, climate-change

  • Understanding Earth’s Climate Prior to the Industrial Era

    Understanding Earth’s Climate Prior to the Industrial Era

    Feb. 1, 2013 — Climate signals locked in the layers of glacial ice, preserved in the annual growth rings of trees, or fingerprinted in other so-called proxy archives such as lake sediments, speleothems, and corals allow researchers to quantify climate variation prior to instrumental measurements. An international research team has now investigated hundreds of these proxy records from across the globe and compared them with both simulations of the Earth’s climate and instrumental measurements of temperature and precipitation.

    ——————————————————————————–

    Share This:

    8

    Related Ads:
    •Climate Change
    •Global Warming
    •Weather
    •Temperature

    See Also:

    Earth & Climate
    •Climate
    •Global Warming
    •Ice Ages
    •Environmental Issues
    •Weather
    •Environmental Science

    Reference
    •Temperature record
    •Temperature record of the past 1000 years
    •Instrumental temperature record
    •Climate

    Climate extremes not always recognized in proxy archives

    The scientists learned that these proxy archives provide an incomplete record of climate variation. The annual width or density of tree-rings is not only influenced by temperature while the ring is developing, but also from the climate of the past years and other factors like tree age. This makes it difficult to extract pure temperature signals from these natural archives. Importantly, the researchers found out that proxy data underestimate climate fluctuations of, for example, air temperature over the land surface where large year-to-year variability is common. In contrast, long-term trends in precipitation tend to be exaggerated by the proxy records. These findings indicate that the proxy data often result in a “blurry picture” of climate variation. The researchers were able to conclude from their work that short-term extreme climate events, such as individual years with hot summers, are not well captured by the proxy reconstructions.

    Temperature trends can’t be used to understand rainfall

    Investigations on the individual factors and processes fingerprinted in tree-ring, ice-core and speleothem records are needed to develop a more accurate history and understanding of the climate system. The authors explicitly warn that proxy records that predominately reflect temperature variation should not be used to make conclusions about precipitation change and vice-versa. “Our results point to uncertainties in the global climate system that were previously not recognized,” says David Frank, co-author of this study. He continues: “This might be surprising because we know more about the Earth’s climate now than say 20-years ago. Part of the scientific process is to confront and uncover these unknowns while developing climate reconstructions.” There is still a lot of basic research needed to reduce uncertainties about how the Earth’s climate system operated prior to the industrial era and how it may operate in the future.

    Share this story on Facebook, Twitter, and Google:

  • Obeid faces ‘criminal conspiracy’ claim

    Obeid faces ‘criminal conspiracy’ claim
    Updated: 15:27, Monday February 4, 2013
    Obeid faces ‘criminal conspiracy’ claim

    Former Labor powerbroker Eddie Obeid engaged in a criminal conspiracy with former minister Ian Macdonald and members of the Obeid family to defraud the people of NSW, a corruption inquiry has heard.

    The accusation was put to Mr Obeid in the witness box by counsel assisting the Independent Commission Against Corruption (ICAC) inquiry, Geoffrey Watson SC, on Monday.

    Mr Obeid was not asked to respond to the claim.

    Mr Watson said he was merely outlining his case and his line of questioning to Mr Obeid at an inquiry which has heard the Obeid family stood to make at least $75 million, and possibly much more, from decisions made by Mr Macdonald regarding rich coal land in the Bylong Valley, 150km west of Newcastle.

    Mr Watson’s allegation came after a testy series of exchanges surrounding ethical issues in which Commissioner David Ipp warned Mr Obeid that failing to answer simple questions detracted from the credibility of his evidence, and Mr Obeid declared he would not be intimidated.

    Mr Watson at one stage told Mr Obeid not to smile, prompting an objection from Mr Obeid’s counsel, Stuart Littlemore QC.

    A defiant Mr Obeid told Mr Watson: ‘I will not be intimidated by you or anyone else.’

    Commissioner Ipp said being asked questions was not intimidation.

    ‘If I smile I don’t expect to be insulted,’ Mr Obeid said.

    ICAC is investigating claims that Mr Macdonald rigged a 2008 tender process for coal exploration licences in the Bylong Valley.

    It is also investigating whether Eddie Obeid and his family gained substantial financial benefit from it.

    The ethical argument centred on a hypothetical question about whether it was appropriate for a minister to knowingly create a mining tenement over property owned by his friend, who also happened to be an MP, and whether the friend had any ethical obligation to disclose his status as an MP.

    Mr Obeid said he didn’t believe a minister should do that. ‘It’s inappropriate. I consider it wrong,’ he said, but could not furnish reasons why he held this opinion.

    But the friend had no choice in the matter, he said.

    ‘The minerals are owned by the state. The individual has no say in it. It’s up to the government and the department to decide what to do in the best interests of the state. You can’t stop progress.’

    The hearing continues.
    SHARE THIS ARTICLE:

  • Obeid threatened with contempt charge as ICAC erupts

    Obeid threatened with contempt charge as ICAC erupts
    By court reporter Jamelle Wells and Peter Lloyd

    Updated 18 seconds ago
    Video: ‘Under oath’ Obeid denies coal mine conspiracy (The Midday Report)
    Related Story: New rules force NSW Labor MPs to reveal taxable incomes
    Related Story: Eddie Obeid’s son faces further ICAC grilling
    Related Story: ICAC to call Eddie Obeid to the witness stand
    Map: Bylong 2849

    Former Labor powerbroker Eddie Obeid was warned he could be charged with contempt of court and told to “stop arguing” during bad-tempered exchanges at the Independent Commission Against Corruption today.

    In a tense and heated session, Mr Obeid was questioned about allegations he had inside knowledge of mining tenders and colluded with his Labor colleague, the former mining minister Ian Macdonald.

    He said he was not involved in any alleged criminal conspiracy to defraud the people of New South Wales, but clashed repeatedly with counsel-assisting the commission Geoffrey Watson and with Commissioner David Ipp.

    In the afternoon, after Mr Obeid had avoided answering certain questions all day, Mr Ipp warned Mr Obeid he could be charged with contempt of court.
    Audio: Reporter Peter Lloyd discusses today’s events (The World Today)

    “Mr Obeid, stop arguing. I’m warning you, answer the question, otherwise you will be held guilty of contempt,” he said.

    “You persist in not answering the question, deliberately, and interrupting.

    “Mr [Stuart] Littlemore is your barrister, you do not have to argue the case yourself.

    “If you want me to I’ll ask Mr Littlemore to leave the hearing room, because you want to conduct the case yourself. Would you like me to do that?”

    Mr Obeid replied, “No I wouldn’t.”

    The ICAC inquiry has previously heard allegations the Obeid family and their associates stood to profit $100 million from mining deals in the Bylong Valley, west of Newcastle.

    “It’s my intention to submit to the Commissioner that you, you Mr Obeid, engaged in a criminal conspiracy,” Mr Watson said as he opened proceedings today.

    “You engaged in that with Ian Macdonald, and with members of your family. And the design was to effect a fraud on the people of New South Wales.”

    Mr Obeid replied: “That’s incorrect.”

    When asked by the counsel-assisting if he thought it was “appropriate for a government minister to put a tenement over a friend’s property”, Mr Obeid replied: “No.”

    He said it is “wrong and inappropriate”.

    After laughter erupted in the public gallery when Mr Obeid was questioned about ethics and responsibility, Mr Ipp warned people to restrain themselves.

    “This is not a theatre,” he said.
    Friends or rivals?

    Mr Obeid was questioned about his relationship with Mr Macdonald.

    Mr Obeid was the leader of ‘the Terrigals’, the right faction in the New South Wales Labor caucus, while Mr Macdonald came from the left faction – making them political rivals in theory.

    Mr Obeid told the inquiry he regarded Mr Macdonald as a “political” as opposed to an ordinary friend.

    But he did concede they had dined together many times and they had been together a lot in social settings.

    Mr Obeid told the inquiry he made hundreds of phone calls to Mr Macdonald at a time when the former Labor government was was in turmoil.

    He said they were only discussing politics.

    Mr Obeid was grilled about whether or not he got inside knowledge about mining tenders from Mr Macdonald.

    He said he did not know how confidential maps which were found during ICAC raids came to be in his family’s offices.

    He also denied being the beneficiary of a family trust.

    When asked what he told the ALP about the Obeid family making huge profits from a decision made by Mr Macdonald, Mr Obeid said: “Nothing.”

    Mr Obeid later admitted he accepted phone calls from journalists.

    “From friendly ones who tell the truth ” he said.

  • ‘Under oath’ Obeid denies coal mine conspiracy

    ‘Under oath’ Obeid denies coal mine conspiracy

    By court reporter Jamelle Wells, ABCUpdated February 4, 2013, 12:47 pm

    tweet

    Email
    Print

    Former Labor powerbroker Eddie Obeid has told a corruption inquiry he was not involved in a criminal conspiracy to defraud the people of New South Wales.

    Mr Obeid is being questioned about allegations he had inside knowledge of mining tenders and colluded with his Labor colleague, the former mining minister Ian Macdonald.

    The Independent Commission Against Corruption (ICAC) inquiry has so far heard allegations the Obeids and their associates stood to profit $100 million from the deals.

    On his way to the ICAC today, Mr Obeid told one reporter he is under oath and will tell the truth.

    Counsel-assisting the commission Geoffrey Watson put the allegations to the former minister.

    “It’s my intention to submit to the Commissioner that you, you Mr Obeid, engaged in a criminal conspiracy,” he said.

    “You engaged in that with Ian Macdonald, and with members of your family. And the design was to effect a fraud on the people of New South Wales.”

    Mr Obeid replied: “That’s incorrect.”

    When asked by the counsel-assisting if he thought it was “appropriate for a government minister to put a tenement over a friend’s property”, Mr Obeid replied “No.”

    He said it is “wrong and inappropriate”.

    After laughter erupted in the public gallery when Mr Obeid was questioned about ethics and responsibility, the Commissioner David Ipp warned people to stop laughing.

    “This is not a theatre,” he said.

    In a heated exchange, Mr Obeid was also told to stop smiling in the witness box. He replied that he had been insulted.

    The Commissioner also reminded the former minister who was in charge.

    Commissioner Ipp later snapped, “please answer the question, not some other question”.

    Mr Obeid’s barrister Stuart Littlemore was also chastised for speaking out of line.
    The hearing continues.

    tweet