Author: Neville

  • Betting on Extinction MONBIOT

    Betting on Extinction

    Posted: 01 Feb 2013 07:51 AM PST

    Ladbroke’s is offering odds on fish populations collapsing; the government is shortening them.

    By George Monbiot, published on the Guardian’s website 1st February 2013

    I’ve come across some odd ways to make a living, but few as strange as this. The gambling company Ladbrokes has been offering odds on the conservation status of various fish species. Until last night it was taking bets on mackerel; recently it has encouraged people to punt on the survival prospects of stocks of yellow fin tuna, swordfish and haddock. You can, if you wish, gamble on extinction.

    It’ll be a while before I put my money on the recovery of any species in British waters.

    Just before Christmas (which could explain the paucity of coverage the story received), the British government gleefully tore up the scientific advice, trampled the evidence, ignored the pleas of conservationists and gave two fingers to common sense by fighting to prevent the European Union from cutting the catch in the seas surrounding this country.

    Thanks to British lobbying, a proposed 55% cut in the tonnage of haddock caught in the Celtic Sea was reduced to 15%, while off other parts of the British coast, plaice, sole, scampi, whiting and herring quotas were increased, though the stocks are at a tiny fraction of their historic levels. All our main commercial species are constantly teetering on the edge of ecological collapse, as the industry fishes right up to and often beyond the point at which they can sustain even their desperately depleted numbers.

    All this was accompanied by what the government department, Defra, called “another major success, achieved during the first day of negotiations, when the UK successfully stopped a cut in the number of days that fishermen are allowed to spend fishing at sea.” The cut was to have been a central feature of the EU’s Cod Recovery Plan. Defra boasts that it “overturned this agreement”. Another triumph for British diplomacy, seeing off the dark forces of science and reason.

    The minister responsible, Richard Benyon, describes this idiocy as “the best possible deal for the UK fishing industry.” For 2013 perhaps. And the worst possible deal for its future prospects, let alone for the health of our marine ecosystems.

    Last month the UK topped this madness by successfully resisting the other means by which cod stocks were to have been allowed to recover: a 20% cut in the quota. Thanks to the UK government, there is now no cut at all. The owners of the trawlers are delighted: once again they’ll be allowed to destroy their own prosperity.

    The chief executive of the Scottish Fishermen’s Federation, Bertie Armstrong, who plainly has a lively sense of humour, called it “a good outcome based on the science”. To show how badly this industry has been rolled up in its own nets, he added that “the decision [by the EU] to set our overall share of the mackerel at the traditional level was also a sensible move.”

    What he is celebrating here is the EU’s refusal to resolve the mackerel dispute with Norway, Iceland and the Faroes. All four players insist on awarding themselves a quota way in excess of what the stock can tolerate, with the result that mackerel , until a year ago one of the few species not in serious trouble, are now being wildly overexploited. That, dear reader, is a “sensible move”.

    Again and again over the past few decades, our fishing industry has clamoured noisily to cut its own throat, then responded with astonishment and fury when it collapses as a result. Is there a clearer example of being blinded to your long-term interests by short-term greed?

    All this has been accompanied by the government’s failure to establish the 127 marine conservation zones it promised, and even more astonishing refusal to exclude industrial activities (principally commercial fishing) from any of the 31 it deigns to designate. (I’ll write about this next week). The fishing industry – principally the owners of the biggest industrial trawlers – is the only interest this government will heed. It too is gambling with extinction.

    www.monbiot.com

  • Australian government pledges to protect Great Barrier Reef

    Australian government pledges to protect Great Barrier Reef

    Unesco warned last year that the World Heritage Site could be listed as ‘in danger if there was no progress by 1 February
    Share127

    inShare.6
    Email

    Reuters

    guardian.co.uk, Friday 1 February 2013 11.05 GMT

    Jump to comments (14)

    Unesco warned last year that the World Heritage Site could be listed as ‘in danger’ if there was no evidence of progress by1 February. Photograph: Australian Institute For Marine/PA

    The Australian government pledged to stop coal port or shipping developments that would cause damage to the Great Barrier Reef as it responded to a Friday deadline amid UN warnings that the reef’s conservation status could be downgraded.

    Unesco warned last year that the World Heritage Site could be listed as “in danger” if there was no evidence of progress by1 February on protecting the reef from threats that also include climate change and the predatory crown-of-thorns starfish, which is wearing away the world’s largest living structure.

    “The Great Barrier Reef is an iconic Australian environmental asset, the government is absolutely committed to the protection of the reef and our oceans,” said federal environment minister Tony Burke as he released the country’s report to Unesco. “We will not cut corners or give an inch on protecting it.”

    Heralded as one of the seven natural wonders of the world, the 2,000 km (1,200 mile) Great Barrier Reef is home to 400 types of coral, 240 species of birds and 1,500 species of fish. It is worth AU$6bn a year in tourism to the local economy.

    But coal is one of Australia’s top export earners and the state of Queensland is the country’s largest coal producer. The reef faces growing threats from shipping driven by coal project expansions.

    Unesco, which gave the reef World Heritage status in 1991, made a number of proposals to the national and Queensland state governments on managing the reef, such as halting further port construction and limiting ship numbers.

    “The World Heritage Committee can be assured that no new port developments or associated port infrastructure have been approved outside existing long-established major port areas since the committee made this recommendation,” the government’s report said.

    “A project will only be approved by the Australian government environment minister if the residual impacts on protected matters, including ‘outstanding universal value’, are determined to be not unacceptable.”

    The Australian government has already invested A$200m in its Reef Rescue programme and said on Friday it would provide an additional $800,000 to fight the crown-of-thorns starfish, which prey on the reef and have multiplied amid nutrient rich flood waters in the past few years.

    Most of the extra funding will be used to employ a second boat to remove the starfish from “high-value tourism reefs” identified as under threat, with the remainder going to the Australian Institute of Marine Science (AIMS) to investigate a long-term solution.

    A recent study by AIMS researchers found that the pace of coral loss on the reef has increased since 2006 and if the trend continues, coral cover could halve again by 2022, with the southern and central areas most affected.

    Globally, reefs are being assailed by myriad threats, particularly rising sea temperatures, but the threat to the Great Barrier Reef is even more pronounced, the AIMS study found.

    The government said in its report it believed the reef has the “capacity to recover if the right conditions are in place.”

    Green groups, who are hoping place the reef on the political agenda this year amid campaigning for a federal election in September, said the report does not go far enough.

    “The sheer size and speed of port and associated development along the reef coast is unprecedented, said Robert Leck, the campaign director of the World Wildlife Fund. “There’s more dredging, more ships and more turtles and coral dying.”

  • Federal seat of Greenway is Labor’s litmus test for the 2013 Federal Election

    Federal seat of Greenway is Labor’s litmus test for the 2013 Federal Election

    Staff Writer
    The Daily Telegraph
    February 01, 201311:00PM

    Increase Text Size
    Decrease Text Size
    Print
    Email
    Share

    1

    Voters head to the polls in Greenway in 2010. Picture: Simon Bullard Source: The Sunday Telegraph

    GREENWAY in Sydney’s northwest is the canary in the mine shaft for Labor.

    Party polling shows its chances are already dead in the electorate with the tightest margin – 0.88 per cent.

    Without it the Liberal Party does not think Tony Abbott can win the election but internal problems which have left the Libs without a candidate could yet breathe new life into a dead bird for Labor.

    Internal polling shows “Greenway is gone”, according to a Labor figure.

    Greenway, taking in suburbs such as Seven Hills and Lalor Park, was held by Labor for 20 years until it was won in 2004 by Liberal MP Louise Markus, who now represents neighbouring Macquarie.

    It was reclaimed for Labor by Michelle Rowland at the 2010 election.

    The Liberal Party state executive was expected to meet last night to finalise a preselection date, possibly in March.

    It is expected the party will preselect Jaymes Diaz, who is not Mr Abbott’s preferred candidate after he missed out on winning the seat in 2010.

    Most Greenway voters yesterday said they were unimpressed by either of the major party leaders and were undecided about who they would back. Not one person The Daily Telegraph spoke to knew their federal MP.

    The biggest issues for local residents include high unemployment, a lack of services for youths, transport and education.

  • Aftershocks strike off Solomon Islands

    Aftershocks strike off Solomon Islands

    ABCUpdated February 2, 2013, 4:36 pm

    tweet1

    Email
    Print

    Related Links

    : Weather bureau summer concern

    Six aftershocks have been recorded off the coast of the Solomon islands following a powerful earthquake earlier on Saturday.

    The magnitude 6.6 quake was centred out to sea about 70 kilometres southwest of Lata in the Santa Cruz islands.

    Geoscience Australia says the quake was extremely shallow.

    The Pacific Tsunami Warning Centre says there is no widespread tsunami threat based on historical earthquake and tsunami data.

    The US Geological Survey puts the quake’s magnitude at 6.7.

    It was followed by a series of smaller aftershocks, including a magnitude 5.6 quake which struck 82 kilometres southwest of Lata with a depth of nearly 30 kilometres.
    Two smaller magnitude 4.9 tremors struck the same region at a depth of nearly 20 kilometres and 35 kilometres.

  • A body blow

    A body blow

    Date February 2, 2013 – 1:49PM Category Opinion 230 reading now

    Read later

    Michael Gordon

    inShare.
    Pin It
    submit to reddit
    Email article
    Print
    Reprints & permissions

    .

    .

    Gillard announces double resignation

    The Prime Minister says both Nicola Roxon and Chris Evans had been in discussions with her about their respective resignations for some time.
    Autoplay OnOff
    Video feedback
    Video settings

    THE surprise departure of two of the Government’s most senior figures is a very bad look on two levels.

    First, because it undermines the message of stability and certainty that Julia Gillard delivered at significant political cost just four days ago when she gave up the tactical advantage of being able to call the election at five weeks’ notice.

    Suddenly, the detailed plan the Prime Minister unveiled at the National Press Club for the election year will have to proceed without two of its most important ingredients.

    Attorney General Nicola Roxon Photo: Janie Barrett

    Second, because it suggests a lack of confidence about Labor’s prospects of securing an unlikely third term under Gillard on September 14.

    Advertisement

    While Chris Evans’ departure, after eight years as Labor’s Senate leader, was relatively easy to manage, Nicola Roxon’s decision to quit after just 12 months as the country’s first female Attorney-General is a body blow to Gillard.

    Not only is she one of the government’s most articulate, appealing and able ministers, she has been one of the prime minister’s staunchest and most effective supporters.

    Resigned … Chris Evans. Photo: Jeffrey Chan

    Moreover, Chris Bowen’s request to vacate the immigration portfolio while so many issues are unresolved further undermines Gillard’s mantra or stability and certainty.

    His promotion to Evan’s tertiary education policy is reward for his work in arguably the toughest job outside the prime ministership, but a huge challenge now confronts his replacement in Brendan O’Connor.

    Fortunately for Gillard, the damage done is less because of way both Evans and Roxon explained their decisions at their media conference with the Prime Minister.

    Both projected sincerity, grace and humility as they maintained their reasons were personal and their confidence in Gillard and Labor’s prospects was undiminished. Evans even managed to inject a good dose of wry humour.

    Both deserve praise for deciding after lengthy political careers that they have other priorities and other responsibilities that now deserve attention.

    For her part, Gillard projected confidence that the departures will pave the way for fresh talent, new ideas and new energy in the months leading up to September 14, but this doesn’t change this immediate impact.

    If the plan was to commence the parliamentary year with momentum and brimming with confidence, the reality is that Labor is, once again, in damage control.

    Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/opinion/politics/a-body-blow-20130202-2dqzd.html#ixzz2JjDcKzME

  • Labor heavy takes aim at ‘cockroaches’ within party

    Labor heavy takes aim at ‘cockroaches’ within party

    By chief political correspondent Simon Cullen and Lateline’s Tom Iggulden

    Updated 1 hour 37 minutes ago

    Photo: Tony Sheldon says claims of corruption should shame the ALP into action. (AAP: Tracey Nearmy)

    Related Story: ICAC turns up heat on Moses Obeid

    Related Story: Jesus may have drawn mining map: Moses Obeid

    Related Story: Thomson lawyer threatens to sue over O’Farrell remarks

    Map: Australia
    One of Labor’s most senior officials has launched a blistering attack on sections of the ALP, warning the party is facing a “potentially catastrophic situation” because of the corrupt behaviour of “B-grade” politicians.

    In a speech delivered to the Young Labor movement last night, ALP national vice-president Tony Sheldon pointed the finger at his own faction – the New South Wales Right – and declared the need for change.

    Audio: Tony Sheldon speaks to the ABC’s Alexandra Kirk (AM)

    “There must be no understating of the gravity of the crisis in my home state, no blame shifting, and no dodging of the responsibility to set things right,” he said.

    “The headlines about corruption emanating from ICAC (the Independent Commission Against Corruption) and the HSU (Health Services Union) scandal must shame us all into action.

    “Our crisis is more than just a crisis of trust brought on by the corrupt behaviour of property scammers and lobbyists.

    “It’s a crisis of belief brought on by a lack of moral and political purpose.”

    The ICAC in New South Wales is currently investigating allegations of corruption involving former ministers Eddie Obeid and Ian Macdonald.

    Mr Sheldon has described the pair as “B-grade wannabes”, declaring the party needed to expunge itself of that culture.

    “Like cockroaches, B-grade politicians are able to thrive on the corruption and detritus that lies under the dishwasher.”

    Like cockroaches, B-grade politicians are able to thrive on the corruption and detritus that lies under the dishwasher.

    Tony Sheldon

    He says Labor instead needs to foster a culture that promotes justice, equality and responsibility to the community and nation.

    Mr Sheldon, who is also the head of the Transport Workers Union, says that cannot be done solely through changing party rules, but by putting forward ideas and policies that reflect the party’s purpose.

    “I believe that over a long period of time, the philosophy of economic liberalism has taken too firm a psychological hold on our policy elite.

    “The memory of what we once stood for has started to fade.

    “Some of our MPs and ministers – including some members of this faction – have even called for Labor to become a true liberal or even a libertarian party.

    “I struggle to see what else but fading Labor values can account for the inexplicable decisions that sometimes come from Canberra – like (Immigration Minister) Chris Bowen’s recent decision to give approval for flight attendants to be added to the 457 visa consolidated sponsored occupation list.

    “It gives Qantas the green light to hire overseas flight attendants and prevents those jobs being filled by Australian citizens.

    “How can that be justified by a party with Labor as its middle name?”

    Despite the stinging criticism directed at sections of his party, Mr Sheldon praised Prime Minister Julia Gillard’s policy initiatives including the National Disability Insurance Scheme and the proposed overhaul of education funding, saying they reflect “solid Labor values”.

    “If we want to save our party, we have to reach out to the Australian people with the values that have always inspired our movement: a just society that empowers every community and every citizen to share in our nation’s success,” he said.

    Topics:alp, political-parties, states-and-territories, federal-government, australia, nsw, vic

    First posted Fri Feb 1, 2013 8:45pm AEDT

    Contact Simon Cullen