Author: Neville

  • 140 countries agree mercury treaty

    140 countries agree mercury treaty

    Delegates at UN talks approve measures to curb pollution, but some campaigners say they are not tough enough
    Share121

    inShare.7
    Email

    Staff and agencies

    guardian.co.uk, Saturday 19 January 2013 12.02 GMT

    Proponents of the treaty say it will set meaningful controls and reductions on products, such as thermometers, that use mercury. Photograph: Carol and Mike Werner

    More than 140 nations have agreed on the first legally-binding treaty to curb mercury pollution.

    Delegates at UN talks in Geneva approved measures to control the use of the highly toxic metal, which is widely used in chemical production and small-scale mining, in order to limit mercury emissions.

    The executive director of the UN Environment Programme (UNEP), Achim Steiner, said: “To agree on global targets is not easy to do. There was no delegation here that wished to leave Geneva without drafting a treaty.”

    “We have closed a chapter on a journey that has taken four years of often intense, but ultimately successful negotiations and opened a new chapter towards a sustainable future,” said Fernando Lugris, the Uruguayan diplomat who chaired the negotiations.

    A signing ceremony will be held later this year in Japan, and then 50 nations must ratify it before it comes into force, which UN officials said they would expect to happen within about three to four years.

    But some supporters of a new mercury treaty said they were not satisfied with the agreement.

    Joe DiGangi, a science adviser with advocacy group IPEN, said that while the treaty was “a first step,” it was not tough enough to achieve its aim of reducing overall emissions.

    He noted there was no requirement that each country create a national plan for how it will reduce mercury emissions.

    But proponents of the treaty say it will set meaningful controls and reductions on a range of products, processes and industries where mercury is used, released or emitted.

    These would include medical equipment such as thermometers, energy-saving light bulbs, mining and cement and coal-fired power industries.

    Swiss environmental ambassador Franz Perrez said the treaty would “help us to protect human health and the environment all over the world”.

  • Rare marsupials found fat and happy in new home

    Rare marsupials found fat and happy in new home

    Updated 49 minutes ago

    Photo: The eastern bettongs were released into Canberra’s Mulligans Flat Nature Reserve in May 2012. (ANU: Dr Adrian Manning)

    Related Story: Scientists threatened by vandals

    Map: Canberra 2600
    A rare marsupial that had disappeared from Australia’s mainland is thriving near Canberra, with reports the population is fat and happy.

    Last year a group of 17 eastern bettongs were brought to protected forest areas in Canberra from Tasmania, their first appearance on the mainland for 80 years.

    Adrian Manning, from the Australian National University, says health checks show the small members of the kangaroo family are faring well, with about 35 bettongs leaving the pouch and about 20 more young on the way.

    “They’ve hit the ground running, digging for truffles – which is what they do – and they’ve actually put weight on,” he said.

    “The fact that six months in, most of the animals seem to be doing well, putting on weight, breeding, those are all signs that they’re happy.

    “I don’t think we could really have expected any better than we’ve got, so the whole team’s really pleased.”

    This year, researchers will examine how the bettongs adapt to the environment, and what effect they have on the ecosystem.

    And there are plans to eventually move some of the bettongs to sanctuaries and restoration projects in other parts of south-east Australia.

    Topics:animals, conservation, canberra-2600, australia

    First posted 2 hours 30 minutes ago

  • Government a home for lost Labor and dumped premiers

    Government a home for lost Labor and dumped premiers

    LINDA SILMALIS
    The Sunday Telegraph
    January 20, 201312:00AM

    Increase Text Size
    Decrease Text Size
    Print
    Email
    Share

    6

    THE Gillard government has become a Labor refugee camp for out-of-work premiers and ex-Labor government and union officials.

    An analysis of recent Commonwealth appointments reads like a who’s who of former high-profile Labor figures. The Opposition has accused the Gillard government of engaging in a “jobs for the boys” program.

    Appointments include former Victorian premier John Brumby to the chair of the Council of Australian Governments Reform Council on December 7.

    Former Queensland premier Anna Bligh was appointed to the board of Medibank Private three days earlier.

    Her South Australian counterpart Mike Rann, was given the role of Australia’s High Commissioner to the UK on August 23. In November, ex-Queensland Treasurer Andrew Fraser was appointed to Australian Sports Commission board.

    Related Coverage

    »Brumby to head COAG reform council The Daily Telegraph, 7 Dec 2012
    »Redmond slams EPA job for ‘Labor girl’ The Australian, 22 Nov 2012
    »Brumby job above board, says Mayor Herald Sun, 30 Aug 2012
    »Power plays expose live wires The Daily Telegraph, 10 Aug 2012
    »EDITORIAL: Test of merit Courier Mail, 18 Jun 2012
    .

    A month later, Mr Fraser also joined the board of the new Moorebank Intermodal Company. Former Queensland attorney-general Cameron Dick was appointed to the chair of the Safety, Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission on November 30. And ex-Victor- ian Deputy Premier John Thwaites was given the chair of the National Sustainability Council in October.

    Mr Thwaites was also appointed chairman of the Australian Building Codes Board in the previous year.

    Former WA premier Geoff Gallop was given a job on the International Education Advisory Council and appointed chairman of the Australia Awards Board. Former NSW Labor party president and Electrical Trades Union secretary, Bernie Riordan, has the role of commissioner of Fair Work Australia.

    Mr Riordan quit the presidency after writing in his union magazine that Labor was highly unlikely to win.

    “If there is one thing Julia Gillard has implemented successfully, it is an employment program for her Labor mates,” Opposition waste spokesman Jamie Briggs said.

    “Labor should be focused on creating jobs.”

  • Welfare cut puts Gillard in hot seat

    Welfare cut puts Gillard in hot seat

    Date January 20, 2013 74 reading now
    Read later

    Stephanie Peatling

    Political Correspondent for the Sun-Herald

    View more articles from Stephanie Peatling

    Follow Stephanie on TwitterEmail Stephanie

    inShare.
    Pin It
    Email article
    Print
    Reprints & permissions

    .

    Welfare issue close to home … Julia Gillard. Photo: Andrew Meares

    The largest number of single parents affected by the federal government’s decision to reduce their welfare payments live in the Prime Minister’s electorate in Melbourne’s west.

    Labor MPs represent six of the 10 electorates with the largest number of people receiving the payment, according to an analysis done by the Department of Human Services late last year.

    Ms Gillard’s electorate of Lalor is home to 4829 people, mostly women, who receive the single parent payment.

    The Sydney seat of Chifley, held by Ed Husic, has the next highest number – 4548.

    Advertisement

    Other Labor seats that feature in the top 10 are Wakefield in South Australia, held by Nick Champion, Rankin in Queensland, held by the Minister for Trade, Craig Emerson, Fowler in Sydney, held by Chris Hayes, and Port Adelaide in South Australia, held by the Minister for Ageing, Mark Butler.

    According to the department’s figures, three of the remaining four seats in the top 10 are held by Coalition MPs. The final one is Kennedy in far north Queensland, held by Bob Katter of Katter’s Australian Party.

    Mr Katter said last week he thought the January 1 change that moved single parents on to the lower-paying unemployment payment was ”savage”.

    ”Those single mothers just won’t be able to afford to feed the kids properly,” Mr Katter said.

    People affected by the changes are planning protests to coincide with the return of Parliament early next month.

    The protest’s organiser, Samantha Seymour, said it was ”time to come together and tell the government that these changes are simply not acceptable”.

    The Greens senator Rachel Siewert will use the resumption of Parliament to introduce legislation that would increase the unemployment payment, Newstart, by $50 a week.

    This would cost the government $2 billion a year, according to the Parliamentary Budget office.

    Some Labor MPs have also been angry at the changes, which will save the government $728 million over the next four years.

    The change represents a drop in weekly income of between $60 and $180 for the 84,000 affected people.

    It also curtails the amount of work people are able to do because of the different rules governing the single parent and unemployment payments.

    The government will not roll back the change although it is considering increased employment assistance and allowing people to work more before their welfare payments are reduced.

    The Greens will use Senator Siewert’s bill to try to keep momentum behind the push to raise the dole.

    Last week, Fairfax Media revealed Centrelink wrongly told 63,000 single parents to destroy their concession cards. Centrelink later admitted this was a mistake.

    Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/opinion/political-news/welfare-cut-puts-gillard-in-hot-seat-20130119-2czy2.html#ixzz2IT4eRudO

  • Vietnam and Cambodia tell Laos to stop $3.5bn Mekong River dam project

    Vietnam and Cambodia tell Laos to stop $3.5bn Mekong River dam project

    Food security issues lead to disagreement over concerns that dam will hit livelihood of tens of millions
    Share110

    inShare.4
    Email

    Reuters

    guardian.co.uk, Friday 18 January 2013 12.50 GMT

    An abandoned toilet bowl sits on steps on the banks of the Mekong river, as a Laos fisherman fishes, at the river front of Vientiane. Photograph: Barbara Walton/EPA

    Vietnam urged Laos to halt construction of a $3.5bn (£2.2bn) hydropower dam on Mekong River pending further study, environmental activists said on Friday.

    Cambodia, downriver from the Xayaburi dam, accused Laos of failing to consult on the project, activists said. The Mekong River commission (MRC), made up of member states Vietnam, Cambodia, Laos and Thailand, held a three-day meeting in northern Laos to discuss river development projects.

    The dam in northern Laos, the first of 11 planned for the lower Mekong River running through south-east Asia, threatens the livelihood of tens of millions who depend on the river’s aquatic resources, activists say.

    “Vietnam requested that no further developments on the Mekong mainstream occur until the … dams study agreed upon at least year’s council meeting is completed,” International Rivers, an NGO devoted to river conservation, said in a statement.

    “The Cambodian delegation asserted that Laos had misinterpreted the Mekong agreement.” Officials from Cambodia and Vietnam were not available for comment.

    The MRC is bound by treaty to hold inter-governmental consultations before dams are built. But members have no veto.

    “In the absence of an agreement, other countries can disagree if they like but this can’t stop Laos,” said Jian-hua Meng, a specialist in sustainable hydropower at the World Wildlife Fund. “The role of the MRC is now being questioned along with the level of investment put in the organisation.”

    In December 2011, MRC member states agreed to conduct new environmental impact assessments before construction proceeded, but last August Ch Karnchang PCL, the Thai construction company behind the project, said it had resumed work.

    A groundbreaking ceremony in November signalled the formal start of construction, said Meng.

    Ch Karnchang’s 50%-owned subsidiary, Xayaburi Power Co, has received a 29-year concession from the Laotian government to operate the dam’s power plant and Thailand is set to buy 95% of the electricity generated.

    Milton Osborne of the Lowy Institute, an Australian foreign policy thinktank, said Xayaburi marked a turning-point that would enable others to build their own dams, including Cambodia.

    He described as a “monstrous disaster” a proposal for a Chinese power company to build a dam at Sambor in northeastern Cambodia, on a tributary of the Mekong. “It would be so disastrous, blocking one of the main fish migratory systems,” he said.

    Laos, Thailand, Vietnam and Cambodia share the lower stretches of the 2,500-mile (4,000km ) Mekong. Activists say dams could threaten food security in Cambodia and Vietnam.

    The river provides up to 80% of the animal protein consumed in Cambodia and sediment and changes to river flow threaten the Mekong Delta, which contributes half of Vietnam’s agricultural GDP.

    Cambodia approved its own hydroelectric dams in November.

    A second Cambodian project, the Lower Sesan dam in northern Stung Treng province, is a joint venture between Cambodian, Chinese and Vietnamese companies. Campaigners say it would reduce the fish catch in a country with malnutrition issues.

  • Planners need to allow for Coastal wetlands migration due to sea level rise, climate change

    Planners need to allow for Coastal wetlands migration due to sea level rise, climate change

    Sat 19 Jan 2013
    By takver

    New South Wales
    Australia
    climate change
    blue carbon
    carbon sink
    rising sea level
    sea level rise
    wetlands

    Coastal Wetlands are under pressure. They face rising seas from climate change, but their biggest obstacle to migrate naturally inland is human development with roads, houses and other infrastructure blocking their way. And our urban planners are largely unaware of this tricky situation.

    Related: Australian Research Council (ARC) Centre of Excellence for Environmental Decisions (CEED) | WetlandCare Australia | UNEP bluecarbonportal.org

    We all love to live beside the sea, but coastal urban development and rising seas will increasingly threaten sensitive coastal wetlands with no room to move and imperilling the survival of their unique plants, birds and fish.

    Our urban planners have taken a stable sea level for granted with development to date, often destroying wetland environments for coastal development, agriculture and aquaculture.

    More recent urban planning incorporating sea level rise predictions places an emphasis on the threat to peoples houses, roads, railway embankments and other human infrastructure. But planning also needs to encompass the coastal wetland environments that share our coastlines. These ecosystems will also need to migrate inland as the ocean rises.

    You can see in this November 2009 report from ABC News posted on youtube that all the emphasis on the impact of rising seas on Australian coasts is on the damage to human infrastructure. Adaptation by coastal ecosystems is not mentioned at all

    Researchers at the Australian Research Council (ARC) Centre of Excellence for Environmental Decisions (CEED) say Australia’s planners and coastal communities need to think up to 100 years ahead to ensure the survival of mangroves, salt marshes, sedge lands and melaleuca swamps and their wildlife.

    “Sea levels are currently predicted to rise by up to 1 metre during this century – and there are indications they may be rising even faster than this,” says Dr Jonathan Rhodes of CEED and The University of Queensland. A recent study published in November 2012 found that Sea Level rising 60% faster than IPCC projections.

    “In past periods of rising sea levels, coastal wetlands have coped by migrating inland as the salt waters rose – but today, especially along the east coast of Australia, they are likely to run into urban development on and behind the coast.

    “Unless we can make room for them to move, there is a risk they may go locally extinct – along with the bird, fish and other wildlife they support, and the services they provide to humans.”

    Coastal wetlands, mangroves and salt marshes are important hotspots for biodiversity providing nursery facilities for many fish species, and important wetland environments for endemic and migratory bird species, the more important ones listed as RAMSAR wetlands. Australia’s extensive areas of mangroves (100,000 hectares) and seagrass (>500,000 hectares) are a significant proportion of the global carbon-intensive vegetated coastal ecosystems.

    They are high efficiency carbon sinks sequestering carbon in the sediment layers that build up over time. Along with seagrass meadows, they are known as ‘blue carbon’ sinks. They can sequester carbon far more effectively (up to 100 times faster) and more permanently than terrestrial forests.

    In an email comment Dr Jonathon Rhodes said “Coastal wetland are important carbon sinks and is another reason why don’t want to lose them.”

    Dr Rhodes and his colleagues Ms Rebecca Runting and Dr Morena Mills have been using a computer model called SLAMM (Sea Level Affecting Marshes Model) to identify areas where coastal wetlands would naturally retreat to as the ocean comes up – and where existing or future urban development may clash with this.

    “It isn’t just about looking at the land contours – you also have to factor in changes in erosion and sediment deposition, in salinity levels and the effects of man-made structures, if you want to work out where mangroves and salt marshes could move to in the future,” Ms Runting says.

    “These models give you a much better idea of what is going to happen than the so-called ‘bath-tub’ models that only account for water level. Importantly too, if you’re a coastal planner or conservation manager, it makes planning decisions much more cost-effective.”

    Dr Rhodes says that while many Australian coastal cities and towns now take steps to conserve their existing mangroves and salt marshes, these may prove in vain if they don’t look and plan a century or more ahead to account for rising sea levels, which will bring dramatic change to coastal landscapes.

    Another important ecological service of coastal wetlands is the natural shield they provide from coastal flooding, the impact of storms and storm surge. “they are really important as coastal defences. We can put up sea walls as defences, but there is no guarantee that they will work, and we will also lose the wetlands in the process. The services provided by coastal wetland in terms of coastal defence provide solutions that provide much more resilience to coastal communities than sea walls.” said Dr Rhodes.

    “It’s true you can build a one kilometre long sea wall at a cost of about $7-8 million per metre in height and put urban development in behind it – but the reality is that we’re not going to be able to defend the entire Australian coastline with such measures, as sea levels will keep on rising as long as the climate is warming and the polar ice melting.”

    The Australian Marine Climate Report Card for 2012 section on Tidal wetlands describes the major problem facing coastal wetlands caught between the rising ocean and human development: (pp159)

    “The largest threat to the resilience of intertidal wetlands with climate change is the presence of barriers that will prevent the landward migration of intertidal wetland communities. Barriers to landward migration of intertidal communities can be imposed by natural features e.g. steep slopes, but urban, agricultural and other human developments that build berms, bunds, seawalls and roads on coastal plains impose significant threats to resilience of mangroves, salt marsh and salt flats with sea level rise. Barriers also reduce connectivity between ecosystems and overall productivity (Skilleter et al. 2005). Landward barriers to wetland migration will have particularly negative consequences for salt marsh and salt flat communities that are compressed between human imposed landward barriers and encroaching mangroves (Saintilan and Williams 1999, Adam 2002, Saintilan et al. 2009). Landward retreat is currently inhibited in NSW by in excess of 4000 impediments to tidal flow (Williams and Watford 1997). One third of these impediments, if removed or regulated, would provide opportunities for wetland restoration (Williams and Watford 1997).

    As the Greenland and West Antarctic Ice sheets disintegrate rising seas will be a process that will last for centuries and eventually raise sea levels by tens of metres, scientists fear.

    “It means that low-lying communities and their native ecosystems are going to have to move – and we should begin planning right now for where they might move to.”

    The team’s research indicates that under sea level rise, mangroves may be initial winners and salt marshes losers in the struggle for new places to survive – but if the rise accelerates, even mangroves may fail to keep up, and require human assistance to translocate and protect them. The same applies to threatened native animals such as the false water rat, which suffers from cat predation as its mangrove habitat becomes increasingly impacted by urbanisation.

    Tidal marshes and mudflats near Queenscliff on Port Philip – Image by Takver

    Dr Mills says that many cities and towns are proud of the way they are managing to incorporate native Australian landscapes, vegetation and wildlife into their plans for the future. Now, for sea-side communities, these plans need to take account of the area of land needed to accommodate coastal wetlands displaced by the rising tides.

    Dr Rhodes added “Potentially, low lying suburbs that become increasingly flood-prone under climate change may need to be abandoned as the cost of defending them becomes too high – but if these were highly urbanised, it may be very difficult to return some of these areas to natural wetlands”.

    “Sea level rise means that anyone and anything that lives along the coast has to be ready and willing to move – and our research is helping provide the answers about where they might move to, in plenty of time to do something about it.”

    According to the Australian Marine Report Card for 2012, mangroves have been able to hold their own with current sea level rise of 1 to 3 mm per year. “Whether mangroves and saltmarshes will persist in their current distribution and abundance will depend on the rate of sea-level rise. Preliminary results from the SE Australian surface elevation table (SET) network indicate that mangroves have been able to increase elevation primarily as a result of sediment accretion, at a rate comparable to the rate of sea-level rise over the past decade, of 1-3 mm per year. Saltmarshes have not been able to maintain this rate of vertical accretion and have been colonised by mangroves.”

    Under the IPCC projections of the rate of sea level rise by the end of the century of 10mm per year, “It is unlikely that mangroves will persist in their current position in the landscape given these rates of sea-level rise.” says the report (pp158)

    I asked Dr Rhodes what would be the impact if sea levels rose much faster than the 1 metre rise they currently use in their models. Some sea level projections give a maximum rise this century of 1.9 metres, and if sea level rise adopts an exponential rate as argued as a possibility by NASA climatologist James Hansen, then it may be 5 metres or more.

    Dr Rhodes responded to my question, “Yes, you’re right seal levels could rise much more than 1 m. In this case, wetlands have more difficulty “keeping up” and we tend to see reductions in coastal wetland extent. This makes it even more important that we plan for these possibilities and not prevent any potential migration of wetlands.”

    I have been aware of the importance of coastal wetlands only relatively recently through my reading of scientific studies of their ecological biodiversity, the environmental services and benefits they provide, and climate importance as carbon sinks. At the Climate Commission Melbourne Public Forum in July 2012 I asked Professor Lesley Hughes, an ecologist in the Department of Biological Sciences at Macquarie University and an expert on the impacts of climate change on species and ecosystems, about what long term planning had been done so far to encourage the migration of coastal wetlands inland as sea level rises. Her brief answer to me? None.

    This is a major failing in climate adaptation planning for coastal areas and needs to be urgently addressed at all levels of Government to take into account the importance of wetland ecosystems and the valuable services they provide to human communities.

    When I asked Dr Rhodes how do you convince planners of the importance of long term planning for wetlands and to make significant allowance in planning schemes for wetlands migration inland he responded:

    “I don’t think the migration of wetlands inland has really been considered yet by planners. So, one of the first things we need to do is make planners aware that this is likely to happen and to provide predictions of where wetlands may move to. Also, emphasising what the consequences are if sea level rise is not considered in their environmental planning is also important. This is what we are trying to do at the moment.” explained Dr Rhodes.

    Sea level rise for coastal wetlands is a global problem. This timelapse video on youtube from the US Geological Service of a high tide in 2010 shows how sea-level rise will affect the China Camp marsh in the San Francisco Bay. Only 12 percent of salt marshes in San Francisco Bay will still be around by 2100 due to sea-level rise, according to a USGS report. “Seven of the marsh sites we surveyed had adjacent open space, but five marshes were surrounded by urban infrastructure prohibiting upslope movement.”

    The importance of coastal wetlands for blue carbon has been recognised by the United Nations Environment Program who launched a new web portal in December 2012 – bluecarbonportal.org – to provide news and initiatives for people ac­tively working in or in­te­res­ted in blue car­bon and the ro­le of our coasts and oceans as car­bon sinks. The UNEP media release describes the global problem of degradation and destruction of coastal wetland and marine environments:

    “More than half of the world’s original mangrove forest has disappeared, often due to the conversion of habitat for shrimp and fish aquaculture. Over-exploitation of wood products, urbanization, and diversion of fresh water flow are other major drivers or degradation. The annual global rate of mangrove loss is presently between 1 and 2 per cent.”

    “Seagrass meadows are found on every continent except Antarctica, with a global area estimated to exceed 177,000 km2. This is a reduction of 30 per cent in the last 100 years, and the rate of loss is thought to have accelerated considerably in the past 40 years.”

    There is an active Australian program of protection of wetlands and restoration of degraded coastal ecosystems from pollution and siltration. WetlandCare Australia have been protecting, promoting and restoring Wetlands in Australia since 1991.

    But we also need to start long range planning, by all levels of Government, to allow coastal wetland ecosystems to migrate inland as sea level rises. The work of Dr Rhodes and his colleagues is an important start in providing the necessary tools and ecosystem information for planners to use effectively. It would be an environmental disaster to see these ecosystems, and the valuable economic and environmental services they provide, decline due to poor planning as we ramp up adaptation plans for sea level rise due to climate change.

    Sources:
    •Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Environmental Decisions. (CEED’) media release, 14 January 2013 – Australia’s Coastal Wetlands ‘need room to move’ (PDF)
    • Interview by email with Dr Jonathon Rhodes, 18 January 2013
    • Lovelock CE et al. (2012) Tidal wetlands. In Marine Climate Change Impacts and Adaptation Report Card for Australia 2012 (Eds. E.S. Poloczanska, A.J. Hobday and A.J. Richardson). Retrieved from www.oceanclimatechange.org.au 17 January 2013
    •United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) media release, 19 December 2012 – New Website Puts Spotlight on Blue Carbon
    •Australian Online Coastal Information – Changes in coastal wetland coverage
    •Images of coastal wetlands on the Eyre peninsula and near Queenslcliff by Takver

    Attachment

    Size

    DSC01616_tidal_marshes_near_queenscliff.JPG

    114.33 KB

    20060400_coastal_wetland_Eyre_peninsula_IMG_6298.JPG

    97.61 KB