Author: Neville

  • 80 die in record Bangladesh cold snap

    80 die in record Bangladesh cold snap

    Posted 2 hours 40 minutes ago

    Map Data – Terms of Use

    Map

    Map: Bangladesh
    A cold snap which saw temperatures drop to 40-year lows in Bangladesh has killed around 80 people, officials said.

    Shah Alam, the deputy head of the weather office, said the lowest temperature was recorded at 3 degrees Celsius in the northern town of Syedpur.

    He said the last time the temperature dropped below that level was in February 1968 when Bangladesh was still part of Pakistan.

    “The temperature is the lowest in Bangladesh’s history,” he said.

    The Red Crescent said hospitals were packed with patients suffering respiratory illness.

    The society’s general-secretary Abu Bakar said impoverished rural areas had been worst hit as many people could not afford warm clothing or heating.

    “They are not prepared for such extreme weather. Many could not even go to work,” he said.

    “According to the reports of our district offices and local administrations, about 80 people have died due to cold-related diseases such as respiratory problems, pneumonia and cough.”

    Bangladesh, which is a tropical country, normally sees temperatures fall to around 10 degrees Celsius at this time of year.

    The weather office said temperatures were expected to rise from Saturday.

    AFP

  • Magma in Mantle Has Deep Impact: Rocks Melt at Greater Depth Than Once Thought

    Magma in Mantle Has Deep Impact: Rocks Melt at Greater Depth Than Once Thought

    Jan. 9, 2013 — Magma forms far deeper than geologists previously thought, according to new research at Rice University.

    ——————————————————————————–

    Share This:

    10

    Related Ads:
    •Earth Science
    •Global Warming
    •Study Geology
    •Magma

    See Also:

    Earth & Climate
    •Volcanoes
    •Geology
    •Global Warming
    •Earth Science
    •Oceanography
    •Climate

    Reference
    •Mid-ocean ridge
    •Lithosphere
    •Seismic wave
    •Mantle plume

    A group led by geologist Rajdeep Dasgupta put very small samples of peridotite under very large pressures in a Rice laboratory to determine that rock can and does liquify, at least in small amounts, as deep as 250 kilometers in the mantle beneath the ocean floor. He said this explains several puzzles that have bothered scientists.

    Dasgupta is lead author of the paper to be published this week in Nature.

    The mantle is the planet’s middle layer, a buffer of rock between the crust — the top 5 miles or so — and the core. If one could compress millions of years of observation down to minutes, the mantle would look like a rolling mass of rising and falling material. This slow but constant convection brings materials from deep within the planet to the surface — and occasionally higher through volcanoes.

    The Rice team focused on mantle beneath the ocean because that’s where the crust is created and, Dasgupta said, “the connection between the interior and surface world is established.” Silicate melts — aka magma — rise with the convective currents, cool and spread out to form the ocean crust. The starting point for melting has long been thought to be at 70 kilometers beneath the seafloor.

    That has confounded geologists who suspected but could not demonstrate the existence of deeper silicate magma, said Dasgupta, an assistant professor of Earth science at Rice.

    Scientists determine the mantle’s density by measuring the speed of a seismic wave after an earthquake, from its origin to other points on the planet. These waves travel faster through solids than liquids, and geologists have been surprised to detect waves slowing down through what should be the mantle’s express lane. “Seismologists have observed anomalies in their velocity data as deep as 200 kilometers beneath the ocean floor,” Dasgupta said. “Based on our work, we show that trace amounts of magma are generated at this depth, which would potentially explain that.”

    The research also offers clues to the bulk electrical conductivity of the oceanic mantle, he said. “The magma at such depths has a high enough amount of dissolved carbon dioxide that its conductivity is very high,” Dasgupta said. “As a consequence, we can explain the conductivity of the mantle, which we knew was very high but always struggled to explain.”

    Because humans have not yet dug deep enough to sample the mantle directly — though some are trying — researchers have to extrapolate data on rocks carried up to the surface. A previous study by Dasgupta determined that melting in Earth’s deep upper mantle is caused by the presence of carbon dioxide. The present study shows that carbon not only leads the charge to make carbonate fluid but also helps to make silicate magma at significant depths.

    The researchers also found carbonated rock melts at significantly lower temperatures than non-carbonated rock. “This deep melting makes the silicate differentiation of the planet much more efficient than previously thought,” Dasgupta said. “Not only that, this deep magma is the main agent to bring all the key ingredients for life — water and carbon — to the surface of the Earth.”

    In Dasgupta’s high-pressure lab at Rice, volcanic rocks are windows to the planet’s interior. The researchers crushed tiny rock samples that contain carbon dioxide to find out how deep magma forms.

    “Our field of research is called experimental petrology,” he said. “We have all the necessary tools to simulate very high pressures (up to nearly 750,000 pounds per square inch for these experiments) and temperatures. We can subject small amounts of rock samples to these conditions and see what happens.”

    They use powerful hydraulic presses to partially melt “rocks of interest” that contain tiny amounts of carbon to simulate what they believe is happening under equivalent pressures in the mantle. “When rocks come from deep in the mantle to shallower depths, they cross a certain boundary called the solidus, where rocks begin to undergo partial melting and produce magmas,” Dasgupta said.

    “Scientists knew the effect of a trace amount of carbon dioxide or water would be to lower this boundary, but our new estimation made it 150-180 kilometers deeper from the known depth of 70 kilometers,” he said.

    “What we are now saying is that with just a trace of carbon dioxide in the mantle, melting can begin as deep as around 200 kilometers. And when we incorporate the effect of trace water, the magma generation depth becomes at least 250 kilometers. This does not generate a large amount, but we show the extent of magma generation is larger than previously thought and, as a consequence, it has the capacity to affect geophysical and geochemical properties of the planet as a whole.”

    Co-authors of the paper are Rice graduate student Ananya Mallik and postdoctoral researcher Kyusei Tsuno; Research Professor Anthony Withers and Marc Hirschmann, the George and Orpha Gibson Chair of Earth and Planetary Sciences, at the University of Minnesota, and Greg Hirth, a professor of geological sciences at Brown University.

    The study was supported by the National Science Foundation and a Packard Fellowship to Dasgupta.

    Share this story on Facebook, Twitter, and Google:

  • Information Required for Short-Term Water Management Decisions Outlined

    Information Required for Short-Term Water Management Decisions Outlined

    Jan. 9, 2013 — Adapting to future climate change impacts requires capabilities in hydroclimate monitoring, short-term prediction and application of such information to support contemporary water management decisions. These needs were identified in a report, “Short-Term Water Management Decisions: User Needs for Improved Climate, Weather, and Hydrologic Information,” published by the Bureau of Reclamation and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers with the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.

    ——————————————————————————–

    Share This:

    2

    Related Ads:
    •Water Shortage
    •Climate Change
    •Environmental
    •Science News

    See Also:

    Earth & Climate
    •Water
    •Environmental Issues
    •Environmental Policy

    Science & Society
    •Resource Shortage
    •Environmental Policies
    •World Development

    Reference
    •Environmental impact assessment
    •National Weather Service
    •Consensus of scientists regarding global warming
    •Soil science

    The report identifies how Federal agencies, along with state, local, tribal and non-governmental organizations and agencies are working together to identify and respond to the needs of water resource managers in the face of a changing climate. The report is broken into four categories: Monitoring Product Needs, Forecasting Product Needs, Understanding and Using Information Products in Water Management, and Information Services Enterprise.

    “Climate change is adding to the challenges we face in managing a multitude of issues, including water supply, water quality, flood risk, wastewater, aquatic ecosystems, and energy production,” Reclamation Commissioner Michael L. Connor said. “Meeting these challenges requires close collaboration among water resource management agencies, operational information service providers, stakeholders and the scientific community.”

    “This document describes the short-term needs of the water management community for monitoring and forecast information and tools to support operational decisions,” said U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Director of Civil Works Steven L. Stockton. “Large water resources systems with water supply goals have very different needs from smaller systems that primarily service flood control purposes. Because of those differences, having a unified report such as this one communicates not only the national-level water resource needs but the local interactions between the water resource management agencies and the weather, climate and hydrologic service and information providers.”

    Technical specialists from the Corps of Engineers and the Bureau of Reclamation with NOAA’s National Weather Service prepared the report as part of the Climate Change and Water Working Group. It is the second in a series of reports from the working group.

    The first report, “Addressing Climate Change in Long-Term Water Resources Planning and Management,” was issued in January 2011.

    Further information: http://www.ccawwg.us/index.php/activities/short-term-water-management-decisions-user-needs-for-improved-climate-weather-and-hydrologic-information

    Share this story on Facebook, Twitter, and Google:

  • Police investigate suspicious grassfires at Blackheath

    Police investigate suspicious grassfires at Blackheath

    The Daily Telegraph
    January 10, 20131:56PM

    Increase Text Size
    Decrease Text Size
    Print
    Email
    Share

    POLICE in the Blue Mountains are appealing for public assistance as they investigate a number of suspicious grassfires.

    Emergency services were alerted to three small grassfires burning behind houses on Evans Lookout Road at Blackheath about 9.15pm yesterday.

    Rural Fire Service personnel extinguished the blazes before police arrived.

    There were no injuries or damage to property.

    The fires were contained to a small area and are believed to have been deliberately lit.

    Anyone who witnessed any suspicious behaviour in the area, or who has information that may assist investigators, is urged to come forward.

    Print
    Email
    ShareAdd to Digg
    Add to del.icio.us
    Add to Facebook

    Add to Myspace

    What are these?

    .

  • Just how different can the Greens afford to be?

    Just how different can the Greens afford to be?

    Date January 10, 2013 – 5:31PM Category Opinion 68 reading now
    Read later

    Judith Ireland

    Breaking News Reporter

    View more articles from Judith Ireland

    Follow Judith on Twitter

    inShare.
    Pin It
    Email article
    Print
    Reprints & permissions

    .

    Greens leader Christine Milne Photo: Jeffrey Chan

    When Greens senator Lee Rhiannon hit send on a tweet earlier this week, congratulating activist Jonathan Moylan for his hoax against Whitehaven Coal, the Twittersphere held its breath.

    Surely Rhiannon would delete the tweet quick smart. Maybe Greens leader Christine Milne would even force an apology, as is sometimes the case when a politician says something outre.

    After all, Moylan’s hoax, which saw Whitehaven’s share price temporarily tumble, had already stirred up some hefty public outrage about the cost to mum and dad investors. ASIC was also making inquiries.

    But Rhiannon did no deleting whatsoever and Milne came out to back her senator with fighting words.

    Advertisement

    The Greens leader told Fairfax Media Moylan’s actions were ”part of a long and proud history of civil disobedience, potentially breaking the law, to highlight something wrong”.

    Eyebrows were raised.

    Online commentators called Rhiannon’s tweet ”ludicrously ignorant & idiotic” and ”breathtakingly odd”, while Liberal frontbencher Eric Abetz deemed the Greens to be the ”epitome of extremism”, and chief government whip Joel Fitzgibbon labelled the remarks ”outrageous”.

    Yet for Greens digital communications coordinator, David Paris, the snafu was in fact no snafu at all, but a positive development for the party.

    ”If there is a little bit of controversy and it kicks up a great discussion, I think that’s a good thing,” he told The Australian Financial Review on Thursday.

    On paper, a ”no such thing as bad publicity” mentality would seem to be unusual for any party – let alone the Greens – as they head into an election year.

    The party has long had to deal with accusations that they were ”loopy” and ”extreme”. And we’ve all heard the old joke about watermelons.

    It is an issue the party appear to acknowledge themselves.

    Last month, the Greens revealed a new platform, to present smaller targets to critics. Many of their core beliefs are now listed under ”aims and principles”, rather than explicit policies.

    It is of course, possible that in speaking their minds – going against the political consensus and standing up to big companies – the Greens might get some electoral thumbs up. Particularly among younger voters who like a bit of bolshiness.

    Some voters may appreciate the Greens having the guts to stand by their more controversial statements, rather than hastily backtracking with the usual weasel words and ‘‘I-was-taken-out-of-contexts’’.

    The Greens hoax-stance also paints newish leader Milne as strong and definite as she shapes the party in the post Bob Brown era. And yet, in recent times, the Greens standing by their principles hasn’t necessarily pleased the electorate.

    The party copped flack last year during the asylum seeker debate. In September, the party’s Newspoll vote dropped to 8 per cent – its lowest in more than three years – in the wake of the parliamentary impasse.

    Analysis suggested people did not like the Greens refusal to make and back a compromise.

    The polls have continued to look unpromising since. The Greens had a disastrous showing in the October ACT elections, losing three of their four members in the territory’s Assembly.

    The party finished the year with a Fairfax/ Nielsen polled primary vote of 10 per cent, down from the 11.8 per cent it captured in the last federal election.

    According to fundraising material, the Greens are hoping to attract an extra 400,000 votes across Australia in this year’s contest.

    The Greens have long prided – and pitched – themselves as being different from the other parties.

    The question is, how different can they afford to be if they want an extra 400,000 votes. Let alone the ones they already have?

    Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/opinion/politics/just-how-different-can-the-greens-afford-to-be-20130110-2cifm.html#ixzz2HYz2XcFp

  • New Weather, New Politics MONBIOT

    Monbiot.com

    ——————————————————————————–

    New Weather, New Politics

    Posted: 09 Jan 2013 05:46 AM PST

    The extremes now hammering Australia leave old perspectives stranded.

    By George Monbiot, published on the Guardian’s website, 8th January 2012

    I wonder what Tony Abbott will say about the record heatwave now ravaging Australia. The opposition leader has repeatedly questioned the science and impacts of climate change. He has insisted that “the science is highly contentious, to say the least” and asked – demonstrating what looks like a wilful ignorance – “If man-made CO2 was quite the villain that many of these people say it is, why hasn’t there just been a steady increase starting in 1750, and moving in a linear way up the graph?”. He has argued against Australian participation in serious attempts to cut emissions.

    Climate change denial is almost a national pastime in Australia. People like Andrew Bolt and Ian Plimer have made a career out of it. The Australian – owned by Rupert Murdoch – takes such extreme anti-science positions that it sometimes makes the Sunday Telegraph look like the voice of reason.

    Perhaps this is unsurprising. Australia is the world’s largest exporter of coal – the most carbon intensive fossil fuel. It’s also a profligate consumer. Australians now burn, on average, slightly more carbon per capita than the citizens of the United States, and more than twice as much as the people of the United Kingdom. Taking meaningful action on climate change would require a serious reassessment of the way life is lived there.

    Events have not been kind to the likes of Abbott, Bolt and Plimer. The current heatwave – so severe that the Bureau of Meteorology has been forced to add a new colour to its temperature maps – is just the latest event in a decade of extraordinary weather: weather of the kind that scientists have long warned is a likely consequence of manmade global warming.

    As James Hansen and colleagues showed in a paper published last year in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, the occurence of extremely hot events has risen by a factor of around 50 by comparison to the decades before 1980. The extreme summer heat which afflicted between 0.1 and 0.2% of the world 40 years ago now affects 10%. They warned that “An important change is the emergence of a category of summertime extremely hot outliers, more than three standard deviations (3σ) warmer than the climatology of the 1951–1980 base period.” An extremely hot outlier is a good description of what is roasting Australia at the moment.

    So far Tony Abbott has commented, as far as I can tell, only on the fires: “Our thoughts are with the people and the communities across the country who are impacted by the bushfires,” he says. Quite right too, but it’s time his thoughts also extended to the question of why this is happening and how Australian politicians should respond. He says he’s currently on standby with his local fire brigade, but as his opposition to effective action on climate change is likely to contribute to even more extreme events in the future, this looks like the most cynical kind of stunt politics.

    To ask him and others to change their view of the problem could be to demand the impossible. It requires that they confront some of the most powerful interests in Australia: from Rupert Murdoch to Gina Rinehart. It requires that they confront some of the powerful narratives that have shaped Australians’ view of themselves, just as we in the United Kingdom must challenge our own founding myths. In Australia’s case, climate change clashes with a story of great cultural power: of a land of opportunity, in which progress is limited only by the rate at which natural resources can be extracted; in which this accelerating extraction leads to the inexorable improvement of the lives of its people. What is happening in Australia today looks like anything but improvement.

    This, I think, is too much for Abbott to take on: as a result he has nothing to offer a nation for which this terrible weather is a warning of much worse to come. Australia’s new weather demands a new politics; a politics capable of responding to an existential threat.

    www.monbiot.com