Author: Neville

  • Planet’s oldest fossils found in Pilbara, experts say

    Planet’s oldest fossils found in Pilbara, experts say

    Date January 1, 2013 – 11:27PM 346 reading now
    Read later

    Devin Powell

    inShare.
    Pin It
    Email article
    Print

    .

    The Pilbara discovery, if proven, could help Curiosity’s search for the building blocks of life on Mars. Photo: NASA/JPL-Caltech

    Scientists analysing Australian rocks have discovered traces of bacteria that lived a record-breaking 3.49 billion years ago, a mere billion years after Earth formed.

    If the find withstands the scrutiny that inevitably faces claims of fossils this old, it could move scientists one step closer to understanding the first chapters of life on Earth. The discovery could also spur the search for ancient life on other planets.

    These traces of bacteria “are the oldest fossils ever described. Those are our oldest ancestors,” said Nora Noffke, a biogeochemist at Old Dominion University in Norfolk who was part of the group that made the find and presented it last month at a meeting of the Geological Society of America.

    Strelley Pool in the Pilbara, where 3.4 billion-year-old fossils have been found. Photo: David Wacey

    Unlike dinosaur bones, the newly identified fossils are not petrified body parts. They’re textures on the surfaces of sandstone thought to be sculpted by once-living organisms. Today, similar patterns decorate parts of Tunisia’s coast, created by thick mats of bacteria that trap and glue together sand particles. Sand that is stuck to the land beneath the mats and thus protected from erosion can over time turn into rock that can long outlast the living organisms above it.

    Advertisement

    Finding the earliest remnants of this process required a long, hard look at some of the planet’s oldest rocks, located in Western Australia’s Pilbara region. This ancient landscape was once shoreline. Rocks made from sediment piled up billions of years ago are now exposed and available for examination. Relatively pristine in condition, such outcrops, along with others in South Africa, have long been a popular place to look for traces of life from the Archean aeon, which ended 2.5 billion years ago.

    There are older rocks on Earth, said Maud Walsh, a biogeologist at Louisiana State University in Baton Rouge. “But these are the best-preserved sedimentary rocks we know of, the ones most likely to preserve the really tiny structures and chemicals that provide evidence for life.” Last year, another team of researchers published the discovery of microscopic fossils in Pilbara’s Strelley Pool Formation, about 3.4 billion years old.

    “It’s not just finding this stuff that’s interesting,” says Alan Decho, a geobiologist at the University of South Carolina’s Arnold School of Public Health. “It’s showing that the life had some organisation to it.” Ridges that crisscross the rocks like strands in a spider web hint that primitive bacteria linked up in sprawling networks. Like their modern counterparts, they may have lived in the equivalent of microbial cities that hosted thousands of kinds of bacteria, each specialised for a different task and communicating with the others via chemical signals.

    Many of the textures seen in the Australian rocks had already shown up in 2.9-billion-year-old rocks from South Africa, reported on by Noffke and colleagues in 2007.

    Still, old Australian rocks have proved deceptive before. As early as 1980, rippling layers within the Strelley Pool were thought to be the handiwork of bacteria. But such stromatolites, which are different from the structures that Noffke studies, can also be the work of natural, non-living processes. For instance, water flowing along a seafloor can create similar structures under the right conditions. So can spraying jets of liquid loaded with particles onto a surface, as scientists at Oxford University demonstrated in laboratory experiments.

    That’s why Noffke and her colleagues corroborated their story by measuring the carbon that makes up the textured rocks. About 99 per cent of carbon in non-living stuff is carbon-12, a lighter version of the element than the carbon-13 that accounts for most of the remaining 1 per cent. Microbes that use photosynthesis to make their food contain even more carbon-12 and less carbon-13. That bias, a signature of “organic” carbon that comes from a living being, showed up in the Australian rock.

    “It’s always nice to have a number of different lines of evidence, and you definitely want to see organic carbon,” says geomicrobiologist John Stolz of Duquesne University in Pittsburgh.

    What wasn’t preserved: any proteins or fats or body fossils that would clinch the case for life and identify what types of bacteria left behind this organic carbon. Most microbial mats today contain lots of photosynthetic cyanobacteria, which make the food that sustains the other bacteria. Named after the blue-green pigment they use for this process, called phycocyanin, cyanobacteria also make oxygen and are given the credit for creating Earth’s atmosphere about 2.4 billion years ago.

    Cyanobacteria living in microbial mats nearly 3.5 billion years ago could shake up the history of the air we all breathe.

    “Studying this kind of past life is really about learning how the Earth got to be the way it is today,” says Michael Tice, a geobiologist at Texas A&M University.

    Ultimately, the fossils found on Earth could help those looking for the building blocks of life on Mars, where NASA’s Curiosity rover has recently found evidence for ancient waterways. Remnants of life on the Red Planet might even be better preserved than they are here on Earth, says Harvard University paleontologist Andrew Knoll. That’s because old terrestrial rocks tend to get banged around by the movement of tectonic plates and cooked by the extreme heat of the planet’s depths. Mars, a planet that’s nearly dead geologically, lacks such tectonic activity.

    Though no signs of ancient Martian microbes have been found, fossil hunters may now have something new to start looking for.

    Washington Post

    Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/technology/sci-tech/planets-oldest-fossils-found-in-pilbara-experts-say-20130101-2c3qs.html#ixzz2Gm9jbwDU

  • Macklin says dole is enough to live on

    Macklin dole gaffe edit ‘a mistake’

    SUE DUNLEVY
    News Limited Network
    January 02, 201312:00AM

    Increase Text Size
    Decrease Text Size
    Print
    Email

    Watch

    Macklin says dole is enough to live on

    As changes to Government payments for single parents take effect, the Minister for Families, Jenny Macklin, says she could live on the dole












    .

    .

    .

    Play

    0:00 / 1:06

    Scrubber

    mute

    Share

    Fullscreen.

    Related Coverage
    Welfare groups call for more dole help
    I could live on the dole, Macklin declares
    ‘I could live on the dole’: Minister
    Macklin says dole is enough to live on
    Dole reforms for disabled fail
    Kiwi PM’s accent confuses officials

    A SENIOR Federal Government minister’s controversial claim that she could live on the $38-a-day dole has been edited out of an official transcript.

    Families Minister Jenny Macklin, a Cabinet member earning $903 a day, pushed 84,000 single mums off the parenting payment and on to the dole yesterday as part of a budget cut designed to save $738 million over four years. The move will cost a single mum who works part-time up to $233 a week.

    When asked: “Could you live off the dole?”, Ms Macklin told reporters at the Mercy Hospital in Melbourne: “I could”.

    The National Welfare Rights Network immediately challenged the minister to prove it.

    “We would welcome the minister taking up the challenge to understand first hand the extreme hardship facing parents raising children alone in difficult circumstances,” National Welfare Rights vice president Kate Beaumont said.

    The minister’s claim that she could survive on the dole is at odds with statements by her own ministerial colleagues and puts her under pressure to prove it.

    The sensitivity of the remark became clear when a ministerial transcript issued just hours after the event described as “inaudible” the reporters question and the crucial first part of Ms Macklin’s reply. Last night, her office claimed its recording had been affected by a revving car.

    The last MP from a major party to put such a claim to the test was National Party MP Stephen Lusher who in 1984 had to concede after a week living on the dole that it couldn’t be cut.

    Three parliamentary inquiries, the OECD, the Business Council of Australia, former Treasury Secretary Ken Henry and even Employment Minister Bill Shorten admit the dole is inadequate.

    A spokeswoman for Ms Macklin yesterday accepted full responsibility for the transcript ommission.

    The minister’s press conference was taped by the spokeswoman on a smart phone and she said a vehicle carrying a camera crew turned up as the press conference was under way, revving its engine.

    “It was me trying to transcribe it quickly and get it out using a tape that was not good, I wish I had relistened to it,” the spokeswoman said.

    “Her comments are a matter of record and were recorded by a number of television stations,’ she said.

    The transcript issued by the minister’s office lists one journalist’s question as inaudible and the minister’s remarks on the dole and two questions after the remark as inaudible. Video footage is crystal clear.

    The dole stumble occurred as the minister was trying to publicise another government change that saw fathers of newborn babies eligible to receive up to $1200 in Dad and Partner Pay from January 1.

    The cost of prescription medicine also rose on January 1 by 70 cents a script for general patients who will now have to pay $36.10 per script, up from $35.40.

    Macklin dole gaffe edit ‘a mistake’

    SUE DUNLEVY
    News Limited Network
    January 02, 201312:00AM

    Increase Text Size
    Decrease Text Size
    Print
    Email

    Watch

    Macklin says dole is enough to live on

    As changes to Government payments for single parents take effect, the Minister for Families, Jenny Macklin, says she could live on the dole












    .

    .

    .

    Play

    0:00 / 1:06

    Scrubber

    mute

    Share

    Fullscreen.

    Related Coverage
    Welfare groups call for more dole help
    I could live on the dole, Macklin declares
    ‘I could live on the dole’: Minister
    Macklin says dole is enough to live on
    Dole reforms for disabled fail
    Kiwi PM’s accent confuses officials

    A SENIOR Federal Government minister’s controversial claim that she could live on the $38-a-day dole has been edited out of an official transcript.

    Families Minister Jenny Macklin, a Cabinet member earning $903 a day, pushed 84,000 single mums off the parenting payment and on to the dole yesterday as part of a budget cut designed to save $738 million over four years. The move will cost a single mum who works part-time up to $233 a week.

    When asked: “Could you live off the dole?”, Ms Macklin told reporters at the Mercy Hospital in Melbourne: “I could”.

    The National Welfare Rights Network immediately challenged the minister to prove it.

    “We would welcome the minister taking up the challenge to understand first hand the extreme hardship facing parents raising children alone in difficult circumstances,” National Welfare Rights vice president Kate Beaumont said.

    The minister’s claim that she could survive on the dole is at odds with statements by her own ministerial colleagues and puts her under pressure to prove it.

    The sensitivity of the remark became clear when a ministerial transcript issued just hours after the event described as “inaudible” the reporters question and the crucial first part of Ms Macklin’s reply. Last night, her office claimed its recording had been affected by a revving car.

    The last MP from a major party to put such a claim to the test was National Party MP Stephen Lusher who in 1984 had to concede after a week living on the dole that it couldn’t be cut.

    Three parliamentary inquiries, the OECD, the Business Council of Australia, former Treasury Secretary Ken Henry and even Employment Minister Bill Shorten admit the dole is inadequate.

    A spokeswoman for Ms Macklin yesterday accepted full responsibility for the transcript ommission.

    The minister’s press conference was taped by the spokeswoman on a smart phone and she said a vehicle carrying a camera crew turned up as the press conference was under way, revving its engine.

    “It was me trying to transcribe it quickly and get it out using a tape that was not good, I wish I had relistened to it,” the spokeswoman said.

    “Her comments are a matter of record and were recorded by a number of television stations,’ she said.

    The transcript issued by the minister’s office lists one journalist’s question as inaudible and the minister’s remarks on the dole and two questions after the remark as inaudible. Video footage is crystal clear.

    The dole stumble occurred as the minister was trying to publicise another government change that saw fathers of newborn babies eligible to receive up to $1200 in Dad and Partner Pay from January 1.

    The cost of prescription medicine also rose on January 1 by 70 cents a script for general patients who will now have to pay $36.10 per script, up from $35.40.

  • BREAKING NEWS Tuesday, January 1, 2013 2:25 AM EST Senate Backs Legislation to Raise Taxes on Wealthiest Americans

    BREAKING NEWS Tuesday, January 1, 2013 2:25 AM EST
    Senate Backs Legislation to Raise Taxes on Wealthiest Americans
    The Senate, in a pre-dawn vote two hours after the deadline passed to avert automatic tax increases, overwhelmingly approved legislation Tuesday that would allow tax rates to rise only on affluent Americans while temporarily suspending sweeping, across-the-board spending cuts.
    The deal, worked out in furious negotiations between Vice President Joseph R. Biden and Republican Senate leader Mitch McConnell, passed 89-8, with just three Democrats and five Republicans voting no.
    READ MORE »
    http://www.nytimes.com?emc=na

  • Annus Horribilis

    Annus Horribilis

    Posted: 31 Dec 2012 12:47 PM PST

    2012 was the worst year for the environment in living memory.

    By George Monbiot, published in the Guardian 1st January 2013

    It was the year of living dangerously. In 2012 governments turned their backs on the living planet, demonstrating that no chronic problem, however grave, will take priority over an immediate concern, however trivial. I believe there has been no worse year for the natural world in the past half century.

    Three weeks before the minimum occurred, the melting of the Arctic’s sea ice broke the previous record(1). Iconic remnants of the global megafauna – such as rhinos and bluefin tuna – were shoved violently towards extinction(2). Novel tree diseases raged across continents(3). Bird and insect numbers continued to plummet, coral reefs retreated, marine life dwindled. And those charged with protecting us and the world in which we live pretended that none of it was happening.

    Their indifference was distilled into a great collective shrug at the Earth Summit in June. The first summit, 20 years before, was supposed to have heralded a new age of environmental responsibility. During that time, thanks largely to the empowerment of corporations and the ultra-rich, the square root of nothing has been achieved. Far from mobilising to address this, in 2012 the leaders of some of the world’s most powerful governments – the US, the UK, Germany and Russia – didn’t even bother to turn up.

    But they did send their representatives to sabotage it. The Obama administration even sought to reverse commitments made by George Bush senior in 1992(4). The final declaration was a parody of inaction. While the 190 countries that signed it expressed “deep concern” about the world’s escalating crises, they agreed no new targets, dates or commitments, with one exception. Sixteen times they committed themselves to “sustained growth”, a term they used interchangeably with its polar opposite, “sustainability”(5).

    The climate meeting in Doha at the end of the year produced a similar combination of inanity and contradiction. Governments have now begun to concede, without evincing any great concern, that they will miss their target of no more than two degrees of global warming this century(6). Instead we’re on track for between four and six(7,8,9). To prevent climate breakdown, coal burning should be in steep decline. Far from it: the International Energy Agency reports that global use of the most carbon-dense fossil fuel is climbing by around 200 million tonnes a year(10). This helps to explain why global emissions are rising so fast.

    Our leaders now treat climate change as a guilty secret. Even after the devastations of Hurricane Sandy and the record droughts and wildfires that savaged the United States, the two main presidential contenders refused to mention the subject, except for one throwaway sentence each(11). Has an issue this big ever received as little attention in a presidential race?

    The same failures surround the other forces of destruction. In 2012 European governments flunked their proposed reform of the Common Agricultural Policy, which is perfectly designed to maximise environmental damage. The farm subsidies it provides are conditional upon farmers destroying the vegetation (which also means the other wildlife) on their land(12). We pay €55bn a year to trash the natural world.

    This contributes to what I have come to see as a great global polishing: a rubbing away of ecosystems and natural structures by the intensification of farming, fishing, mining and other industries. Looking back on this year a few decades hence, this destruction will seem vastly more significant than any of the stories with which the media is obsessed. Like governments, media companies have abandoned the living world.

    In the UK in 2012, the vandals were given the keys to the art gallery. Environmental policy is now in the hands of people – such as George Osborne, Owen Paterson, Richard Benyon and Eric Pickles – who have no more feeling for the natural world than the Puritans had for fine art. They are busy defacing the old masters and smashing the ancient sculptures. They have lit a bonfire of environmental regulations(13), hobbled bodies such as Natural England and the Environment Agency and ensured that the countryside becomes even more of an exclusive playground for the ultra-rich, unhampered by effective restraints on the burning of grouse moors, the use of lead shot, the killing of birds of prey and the spraying of pesticides that are wiping out our bees and other invertebrates(14,15).

    In the same spirit, the government has reduced the list of possible marine conservation zones from 127 to 31(16). Even these 31 will be protected in name only: the fishing industry will still be allowed to rampage through them. A fortnight ago, the UK lobbied successfully for quotas of several overexploited fish species to be raised, while pouring scorn on the scientific evidence which shows that this is madness(17).

    George Osborne has done the same thing to the UK’s climate change policies. Though even the big power companies oppose him(18), he is seeking to scrap or delay our targets for cutting carbon emissions and to ensure that we remain hooked on natural gas as our primary source of power. The green investment bank which was supposed to have funded the transition to new technologies is the only state bank in Europe which is forbidden to borrow(19). It might as well not be there at all.

    If there is hope, it lies with the people. Opinion polls show that voters do not support their governments’ inaction. Even a majority of Conservatives believe that the UK should generate most of its electricity from renewables by 2030(20). In the United States, 80% of people polled now say that climate change will be a serious problem for their country if nothing is done about it: a substantial rise since 2009(21). The problem is that most people are not prepared to act on these beliefs. Citizens, as well as governments and the media, have turned their faces away from humanity’s greatest problem.

    To avoid another terrible year like 2012, we must translate these passive concerns into a mass mobilisation. Groups like 350.org show how it might be done(22). If this annus horribilis tells us anything it’s that action, in the absence of such mobilisation, is simply not going to happen. Governments care only as much as their citizens force them to care. Nothing changes unless we change.

    www.monbiot.com

  • Wettest year ends with downpours

    Wettest year ends with downpours

    Hundreds of Environment Agency flood alerts and warnings in place as New Year’s celebrations take place
    Share3

    inShare.1
    Email

    Maev Kennedy

    The Guardian, Monday 31 December 2012 19.13 GMT

    Flooding near the Yorkshire town of Boroughbridge in September. Photograph: Christopher Furlong/Getty Images

    Hours of rain continued across much of the country on New Year’s Eve, from downpours in some parts to the merely miserable, meaning that as 2012 ended, Britain was on course for the wettest year since records began.

    The Met Office said just 46mm (1.8in) of rain by midnight would make this year the wettest – and six steady hours of rain in some places should have ensured that. England, which had drought orders in place in many areas in the spring, has already set a record, with 1,095.8mm of rain between 1 January and Boxing Day.

    Parts of upland Cumbria, south Wales and south-west England saw torrential overnight rain, raising the likelihood of further flooding. Hundreds of Environment Agency flood alerts and warnings remain in place, and the Met Office has issued yellow warnings of more heavy rain and gales in many parts of Scotland, the north-east of England, London and the south-east, and Wales.

    The ancient Tarr Steps bridge on Exmoor was washed away when fallen trees, swept down the swollen river Barle, snapped protective steel cables installed after a flood more than half a century ago. A spokeswoman for Exmoor national park said the stone slabs, some believed to be up to 1,000 years old, are all numbered, and will be replaced.

    After an afternoon track inspection, Cheltenham racecourse cancelled New Year’s Day racing because the course is under water in places. Ticket holders will have their money refunded.

    In west Dorset, where the Undercliff path near Lyme Regis was closed several days ago, there were further landslips.

    One of the flood warnings covers the river Thames near Hampton Court, where tourists were startled to see part of the Tudor moat filling with water.

    However, the rain was set to clear in time for midnight celebrations for most, including Derry, which was kicking off its year as UK city of culture with plans for a fireworks display; Edinburgh, where up to 60,000 were expected in the streets around the castle; and London, where hundreds of thousands came to line the banks of the Thames in a city mostly closed to through traffic but with the underground running through the night, and free public transport for all from just before midnight into the small hours.

    The year has seen a dismal succession of floods in many places, with at least 8,000 homes and business flooded, many repeatedly. The Environment Agency said almost 200,000 more were protected by flood defences.

    In April, parts of Devon and Cornwall endured more than 24 hours of nonstop rain and, in June, Honister in Cumbria had eight inches of rain in one day. In July, the river Axe at Weycroft Bridge in Devon rose to 3.58 metres, the highest level ever recorded and the river Ouse in York reached its second highest recorded level in September.

    The forecast for the first day of 2013 is much better, with calmer, drier weather, giving thousands of households a respite from weeks spent filling sandbags.

  • US set to head over fiscal cliff as talks go down to the wire

    US set to head over fiscal cliff as talks go down to the wire

    Date January 1, 2013 – 10:30AM 643 reading now
    Read later

    inShare.
    Pin It
    Email article
    Print

    .

    .

    Will the Fiscal Cliff affect Australia?

    Senior business writer Paddy Manning explains the American ‘Fiscal Cliff’ and its impact on Australia.
    Autoplay OnOff
    Video feedback
    Video settings

    House expected to reconvene overnight
    Senate could vote today
    What is the fiscal cliff?

    The United States looked on track to tumble over the “fiscal cliff”, at least for a day, as lawmakers remained reluctant to back last-minute efforts by Senate leaders to avert severe tax increases and spending cuts.

    The US House of Representatives might not vote on any “fiscal cliff” plan before midnight (4pm AEST), possibly pushing a legislative decision into New Year’s Day, when financial markets will be closed, said a Republican aide.

    President Barack Obama addresses the media at the White House as fiscal cliff talks continue in Washington. Photo: AP

    The House was expected to reconvene at noon on Tuesday (4am AEST on Wednesday), Republican Representative Steven LaTourette said.

    Advertisement

    Republican Senator Bob Corker said it was “highly likely” the US Senate will vote on Monday night.

    The Senate plan was heavy on tax increases and light on spending cuts, raising concerns that it would repel rank-and-file lawmakers, particularly in the Republican-controlled House.

    On a day of political drama and ill feeling, US President Barack Obama said a deal was close though not done and the top Senate Republican, Mitch McConnell, agreed.

    “It appears that an agreement to prevent this New Year’s tax hike is within sight. It’s not done. There are still issues left to resolve, but we’re hopeful that Congress can get it done,” Obama said at the White House.

    McConnell added: “We are very, very close.”

    A possible deal between Mr McConnell and Vice President Joe Biden to avert the “fiscal cliff” would include a two-month delay in automatic federal spending cuts that were due to begin this week, Republican Senator John McCain said.

    Mr McCain said the deal would include $US 24 billion in other spending cuts to cover the cost of the delay, and would also include a one-year extension of unemployment benefits. But it was unclear if such a deal would go up for a vote in the Democratic-controlled Senate before midnight. It also faces an uncertain future in the Republican-controlled House of Representatives.

    As Mr McConnell and Mr Biden kept working on unresolved parts of the deal, there was deep discontent among Senate Democrats.

    “The caucus as a whole is not sold” on the proposal, said a Senate Democratic aide. “We just don’t have the votes for it.”

    If Congress fails to act, about $US600 billion in tax increases and government-wide spending cuts will begin taking effect after midnight, harsh measures that could push the US economy into recession.

    But lawmakers could still vote for any deal on New Year’s Day and prevent the worst of the fiscal cliff effect.

    Under the Senate plan, those with household income above $US450,000 or individual income above $US400,000 would be taxed at 39.6 per cent, up from 35 per cent. Those with lower income would be taxed at the current, reduced tax rates put in place under former President George W. Bush.

    The aide said Democrats did not like the $US450,000 threshold for raising taxes on the rich – they wanted $US250,000 – or the higher threshold for raising estate taxes. Democrats also are upset that there is no agreement yet to put off the first round of $US1.2 trillion in automatic spending cuts.

    Republicans already are pushing for switching those across-the-board cuts to savings in Medicare and Social Security and threatening to block a debt limit increase in February unless they get their way. But that is a fight that would most likely play out in January and February.

    A group of liberal senators met with Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid to register anger with the deal being negotiated by Biden, and some aides were dispirited that the vice president, a fellow Democrat, had gone further than they wanted, just as he did in December 2010 when all Bush tax cuts were extended for two years.

    Shortly after the plan emerged, President Barack Obama said agreement was within sight, but he sounded a cautious note.

    “There are still issues to resolve, but we’re hopeful that Congress can get it done, but it’s not done,” Obama, a Democrat, said at a White House event.

    US stocks rose on the day, with the market closing before the latest news broke about the House not voting. The benchmark Dow Jones industrial average closed up 1.3 per cent at 13,104.

    Reuters with AFP

    Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/business/world-business/us-set-to-head-over-fiscal-cliff-as-talks-go-down-to-the-wire-20130101-2c3f2.html#ixzz2Gg1W0ndX