admin /5 July, 2007
Shell must take responsibility, Sylvia Hale, Member of the NSW Legislative Council, NSW said, for hydrocarbon contamination at Coramba, a small village about 25 kilometres west of Coffs Harbour, which had ruined the water supply for the whole town. Hale said "The New South Wales Government should take immediate steps to call Shell to account. The clean-up program should include a fair acquisition program for residents wishing to sell their properties and leave the area".
Former Shell service station: Due to the spillage of 3,000 litres of petrol in 2002 from an underground tank at the former Shell service station in Coramba, the groundwater and river were contaminated, so much so that the water intake from the Orara River, which supplied the town’s water, was closed off after Coramba resident Peter Attwill reported a strong odour of petrol in 2002.
Whistleblower cops the lot: Hale said "For a start, when a citizen reports pollution, as Peter Attwill did, you would expect the government agency, in this case the Environment Protection Authority, to investigate and remediate, or ensure that the polluter who caused the pollution is liable to pay for the investigation and remediation. Not so.
Victim burdened with proof: In this case, instead of the Government seeking money from the polluter—Shell and the operator of the service station on Gale Street—the Environmental Protection Authority, utilising an innocent victim scheme, asked Mr Attwill to virtually take over the investigation and remediation process. Just why the Government placed this burden on his shoulders is still unclear to me and to residents of Coramba.
Why does the victim pay? Hale said "Mr Attwill has done his best, but the Environmental Trust simply did not give him enough money for the various consultants he hired to do a thorough job of investigating the extent of the hydrocarbon plume. To date, the western side of the hill behind the service station has not been tested. It is inexplicable to me why a series of test bores in a radial pattern around the service station were not sunk to determine the exact extent of the plume. The residents of Coramba are involved in a committee with the Department of Environment and Climate Change [DECC] and the Coffs Harbour City Council, but they have shouldered so much of the burden already".
What of the polluter? "The situation in Coramba is unacceptable. Shell must take responsibility. The partial clean-up that has taken place so far is completely inadequate, but local families are stuck in Coramba because it is extremely difficult to sell a house in a town so severely affected by hydrocarbon contamination.
Shell faces loss of reputation: Hale said "Shell’s response has been completely inadequate. Residents should not bear the costs of cleaning up a major leak from a Shell petrol station. Shell makes billions of dollars a year from distributing petrol. It has a responsibility to make good any damage it causes to communities arising from the distribution of its petrol products. Shell’s record of corporate responsibility is not good".
Shell is not new to spillages: This is the company that poisoned the land of the Ogoni people in Nigeria. Members will recall that the Nigerian Government hanged nine environmental activists in 1995 for speaking out against exploitation by Royal Dutch/Shell. Members will also recall that Shell was intending to dump the Brent Spar oil rig platform in the North Sea until Greenpeace activists intervened and occupied it. Shell was forced to break up the rig and take it back to land by ferry. Shell is not new to spillages. Some 150 tons of thick Venezuelan crude leaked from a Shell pipeline into the River Mersey in the United Kingdom. The incident was made worse because Shell, against the warnings of local police and councillors, flushed the pipeline with lighter crude and water to stop oil from solidifying and blocking the pipe.