Category: Archive

Archived material from historical editions of The Generator

  • Tanks a cheaper solution

    Have Your Say

    Latest Comments:

    Time for once a week baths and just a "freshen up" every other day. we need a combination of strategies to ensure in 50 years our grandchildren aren’t in the same predicament. poor children of today can’t play under sprinklers or collect things from the dump.

    Posted by: Lizzie mcpoc of brissy 8:38am today

    Certainly something to aim for Rich but I don’t think too many people would want to leave their comfortable coastal areas.However,if the situation became so drastic that living conditions, standard of living and great loss of income occurred the situation would certainly change.

    Posted by: macca of brisbane 5:05pm April 26, 2007

    Tanks are not the answer. They could be part of a parcel of measure, but the only way to ensure a supply for the furure is a better dam infrastructure and a water grid. To say tanks are the answer could be compared with one other suggestion of doing away with water closets and bringing back thunder boxes…but that would devastate the the timber cvresource by requiring more saw dust. NIMBY, NIMBY, NIMBY !!!!

    Posted by: Jeremy Bentham of Brisbane 1:53pm April 26, 2007

    Macca, why don’t we try living where the water is instead of bringing it to us? No jobs there? They why are we setting up new industry here instead of in areas where the water is plentiful?

    Posted by: Rich of Logan 9:29am April 26, 2007

    Of course water tanks are the solution.It’s too much common sense and not enough public funds for the fatcats to dive into to be bothered with.Rudds wife has probably already lined up the contractors for the dams. But whats the big rush anyway? Don’t you’s all want every square inch of the southeast covered in foreigners, cement and bitumen from the border to bundaberg.Think of the big traffic jam we could have then. You’s are just all jealous.Can’t you get on the public funds bandwagon with some big idea and push to go with it?

    Posted by: Jim of Bribie 7:28pm April 25, 2007

    Water infrastructure doesn’t just appear overnight Ben, it’s an expensive and time-consuming process and one that arguably should have begun decades ago. But now it is critical to seek solutions at a variety of levels, and water tanks are an important step in ensuring that we have adequate water before and during the construction of any new water infrastructure. If every new and existing house in SEQ was to invest in a well-configured water tank system, our small amounts of rain could be of great use, if only to give government officials more time to come up with suitable long-term solutions rather than expensive knee-jerk reactions.

    Posted by: Katherine of Brisbane 1:01am April 25, 2007

    Water tanks offer no solution as the increasing population will/has obviously overtaken the token addition that would bring. A complete immigration halt is required as an emergency measure as we are currently adding another million users every 5 years. Even the article only suggests it will extend the day of reckoning another 10 years. Stop immigration or be doomed. And forget the economic growth argument because economic growth will go into permanent reverse when there’s insufficient water to go around.

    Posted by: Ben of World’s Driest Continent 1:32pm April 24, 2007

    Source: Couriermail.com.au

  • No bees? Not just strange, but scary

    Dave Lindorff’s most recent book is The Case for Impeachment (St. Martin’s Press, 2006).

    His work is available at www.thiscantbehappening.net.

    Sourced from: philly.com 

  • GM contributes to bee death

    The problem, says Haefeker, has a number of causes, one being the varroa mite, introduced from Asia, and another is the widespread practice in agriculture of spraying wildflowers with herbicides and practicing monoculture. Another possible cause, according to Haefeker, is the controversial and growing use of genetic engineering in agriculture.

    As far back as 2005, Haefeker ended an article he contributed to the journal Der Kritischer Agrarbericht (Critical Agricultural Report) with an Albert Einstein quote: “If the bee disappeared off the surface of the globe then man would only have four years of life left. No more bees, no more pollination, no more plants, no more animals, no more man.”

    Mysterious events in recent months have suddenly made Einstein’s apocalyptic vision seem all the more topical. For unknown reasons, bee populations throughout Germany are disappearing — something that is so far only harming beekeepers. But the situation is different in the United States, where bees are dying in such dramatic numbers that the economic consequences could soon be dire. No one knows what is causing the bees to perish, but some experts believe that the large-scale use of genetically modified plants in the US could be a factor.

    Felix Kriechbaum, an official with a regional beekeepers’ association in Bavaria, recently reported a decline of almost 12 percent in local bee populations. When “bee populations disappear without a trace,” says Kriechbaum, it is difficult to investigate the causes, because “most bees don’t die in the beehive.” There are many diseases that can cause bees to lose their sense of orientation so they can no longer find their way back to their hives.

    Manfred Hederer, the president of the German Beekeepers Association, almost simultaneously reported a 25 percent drop in bee populations throughout Germany. In isolated cases, says Hederer, declines of up to 80 percent have been reported. He speculates that “a particular toxin, some agent with which we are not familiar,” is killing the bees.

    Politicians, until now, have shown little concern for such warnings or the woes of beekeepers. Although apiarists have been given a chance to make their case — for example in the run-up to the German cabinet’s approval of a genetic engineering policy document by Minister of Agriculture Horst Seehofer in February — their complaints are still largely ignored.

    Even when beekeepers actually go to court, as they recently did in a joint effort with the German chapter of the organic farming organization Demeter International and other groups to oppose the use of genetically modified corn plants, they can only dream of the sort of media attention environmental organizations like Greenpeace attract with their protests at test sites.

    But that could soon change. Since last November, the US has seen a decline in bee populations so dramatic that it eclipses all previous incidences of mass mortality. Beekeepers on the east coast of the United States complain that they have lost more than 70 percent of their stock since late last year, while the west coast has seen a decline of up to 60 percent.

    In an article in its business section in late February, the New York Times calculated the damage US agriculture would suffer if bees died out. Experts at Cornell University in upstate New York have estimated the value bees generate — by pollinating fruit and vegetable plants, almond trees and animal feed like clover — at more than $14 billion.

    Scientists call the mysterious phenomenon “Colony Collapse Disorder” (CCD), and it is fast turning into a national catastrophe of sorts. A number of universities and government agencies have formed a “CCD Working Group” to search for the causes of the calamity, but have so far come up empty-handed. But, like Dennis vanEngelsdorp, an apiarist with the Pennsylvania Department of Agriculture, they are already referring to the problem as a potential “AIDS for the bee industry.”

    One thing is certain: Millions of bees have simply vanished. In most cases, all that’s left in the hives are the doomed offspring. But dead bees are nowhere to be found — neither in nor anywhere close to the hives. Diana Cox-Foster, a member of the CCD Working Group, told The Independent that researchers were “extremely alarmed,” adding that the crisis “has the potential to devastate the US beekeeping industry.”

    It is particularly worrisome, she said, that the bees’ death is accompanied by a set of symptoms “which does not seem to match anything in the literature.”

    In many cases, scientists have found evidence of almost all known bee viruses in the few surviving bees found in the hives after most have disappeared. Some had five or six infections at the same time and were infested with fungi — a sign, experts say, that the insects’ immune system may have collapsed.

    The scientists are also surprised that bees and other insects usually leave the abandoned hives untouched. Nearby bee populations or parasites would normally raid the honey and pollen stores of colonies that have died for other reasons, such as excessive winter cold. “This suggests that there is something toxic in the colony itself which is repelling them,” says Cox-Foster.

    Walter Haefeker, the German beekeeping official, speculates that “besides a number of other factors,” the fact that genetically modified, insect-resistant plants are now used in 40 percent of cornfields in the United States could be playing a role. The figure is much lower in Germany — only 0.06 percent — and most of that occurs in the eastern states of Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania and Brandenburg. Haefeker recently sent a researcher at the CCD Working Group some data from a bee study that he has long felt shows a possible connection between genetic engineering and diseases in bees.

    The study in question is a small research project conducted at the University of Jena from 2001 to 2004. The researchers examined the effects of pollen from a genetically modified maize variant called “Bt corn” on bees. A gene from a soil bacterium had been inserted into the corn that enabled the plant to produce an agent that is toxic to insect pests. The study concluded that there was no evidence of a “toxic effect of Bt corn on healthy honeybee populations.” But when, by sheer chance, the bees used in the experiments were infested with a parasite, something eerie happened. According to the Jena study, a “significantly stronger decline in the number of bees” occurred among the insects that had been fed a highly concentrated Bt poison feed.

    According to Hans-Hinrich Kaatz, a professor at the University of Halle in eastern Germany and the director of the study, the bacterial toxin in the genetically modified corn may have “altered the surface of the bee’s intestines, sufficiently weakening the bees to allow the parasites to gain entry — or perhaps it was the other way around. We don’t know.”

    Of course, the concentration of the toxin was ten times higher in the experiments than in normal Bt corn pollen. In addition, the bee feed was administered over a relatively lengthy six-week period.

    Kaatz would have preferred to continue studying the phenomenon but lacked the necessary funding. “Those who have the money are not interested in this sort of research,” says the professor, “and those who are interested don’t have the money.”

    Translated from the German by Christopher Sultan

  • Mitsui sells Aussie oil and gas assests

    Perth’s Arc Energy winning bidder for the oil and gas assets sold off by Japan’s Mitsui; pays $US14.03 per boe of reserves According to Jamie Freed in The Sydney Morning Herald (26/04/07, p. 23), Perth company ARC Energy has emerged as the winning bidder for the Australian oil and gas assets sold off by Japan’s Mitsui. The deal with Mitsui will transform ARC – a company with a $303 million market value before the purchase – into a midsize Australian oil and gas player. ARC would pay $US14.03 per boe of reserves, which is less than the $US17.95 per boe global average acquisition price since January 2006.

    ARC’s production to increase by 336pc: ARC Energy said it would pay $US315 million ($381 million) for non-operating stakes in three producing fields off Western Australia and Victoria. The move would more than double ARC’s 2008 financial year production to 4.2 million barrels of oil equivalent (boe) and increase its reserves by 336 per cent to 29.1 million boe.

    Worldwide Exploration was interested in BassGas:Last week, the Herald reported the sale of Mitsui’s stakes in the Cliff Heads and BassGas projects was imminent. Sydney’s Australian Worldwide Exploration said it had been interested in purchasing an additional 12.5 per cent interest in BassGas but did not want to buy all three stakes as a package.

    ARC upgraded to midsize oil and gas player: ARC already owned 6 per cent of the Cliff Heads oilfield, which is offshore from Perth, but the Mitsui purchase will increase its stake to 30 per cent. It should also receive 40 per cent of the Wandoo oilfield off north-west Western Australia, although that stake is subject to a pre-emptive purchase right by its operator and majority owner, Canada’s Vermillion Energy Trust.

    The Sydney Morning Herald, 26/4/2007, p. 23 

  • 2003 alpine fires reduced Murray River inflows by 20pc

    Reference: Senator The Hon. Eric Abetz, Minister for Fisheries, Forestry and Conservation, Manager of Government Business in the Senate, 20 April 2007. Joint Natural Resource Management and Primary Industries Ministerial Council, Item 313 – Effects and Impacts of Bushfires.

    Erisk Net, 20/4/2007

  • Ethanol from Carbon Monoxide breakthrough

    Vinod Khosla, a co-founder of Sun Microsystems who formed Khosla Ventures in 2004, has invested in more than a dozen start-ups involved in “clean fuel” technologies. He said in a telephone interview that LanzaTech stood out from the scores of proposals he sees each day for both its ability to scale up to industrial proportions and the credibility of the company’s founding scientists.

    “When I passed it on to my partners for due diligence, the technology stood up to every test, and the intellectual property protection was awesome,” Mr. Khosla said.

    Then, referring to the bacteria that are key to the process, he said, “The performance of the bugs was frankly mind-boggling to me, not something I would have expected from a tiny research effort in New Zealand.” He said his firm “sent the best process engineers we know to evaluate the technology and could it be industrialized, and the answer was yes.”

    People have been using yeast to turn sugar into alcohol for thousands of years. Corn, the main source of ethanol in this country, provides carbohydrates that are easily broken into sugars.

    LanzaTech’s innovation lies in using a bacterium to produce ethanol not from a carbohydrate, but from a gas, carbon monoxide. Carbon monoxide is a waste product of a number of industrial processes, including the production of steel.

    “The feed stock of corn ethanol accounts for 60 percent of the cost, so we felt that the place to attack was to move away from a farmed crop,” said Mr. Simpson of LanzaTech. “We started to focus on high-volume industrial waste, which led to carbon monoxide. The steel industry globally makes around half a ton of carbon monoxide per ton of steel made.”

    A spokesman for the American Iron and Steel Institute said that the industry does not monitor the total volume of carbon monoxide it produces, some of which is recycled and reused.

    Regardless of how it is made or what it is made from, ethanol as a fuel has its detractors. Some plastics and rubber materials commonly used in fuel lines are degraded by ethanol, and depending on the blend of ethanol and gasoline, ethanol may raise levels of nitrogen oxides produced. Ethanol also contains less energy than an equivalent amount of gasoline, so mileage may be reduced.

    For Mr. Khosla, the positives of ethanol fuel, including reduced pollution and freedom from oil dependence, far outweigh the negatives. “There are many more weapons in the war on oil than the narrow-minded folks who do prognostication imagine,” Mr. Khosla said. “Most of the action in energy is coming from biotechnology, and the most interesting work in biotechnology is energy.”