Category: Articles

The facts on population growth

admin /5 January, 2008

TBest case scenario for 2020he Australian government supported the US in proposing that future climate change agreements should include some real targets for China, India and Brazil, the fastest growing economies on the planet. The logic is that these large and rapidly growing nations will contribute most to the growth in climate change over the next 12 years.

Hear Malcolm and Giovanni discuss the numbers on The Generator

 

Others point out that the US is still the world’s largest emitter and that reducing consumption by the mega rich is more important than limiting growth in the developing countries. Still others point out that any limits on consumption are meaningless if population continues to grow exponentially.

The figures given in the graph here demonstrate the reasonably generous scenario that total global resource consumption doubles, population growth rates halve and we reduce the wealth gap between the rich and poor nations to almost half what it is now. Whether the world can sustain this growth rate is extremely unlikely but this is commonly given as a politically palatable solution.

 

Blogger calls for end to Greenwash

admin /4 January, 2008

Dr Glen Barry of the popular Earth Meanders blog believes that now climate change and the environmental stresses are on the mainstream agenda, it is time to ramp up the message. His article It is Time to Stop the Greenwash is attached here.

The Ebono Institute publishes it here, because it reflects what we have been writing and saying on The Generator for the last 12 months. It is not a matter of whether green politics is right or not, or whether we can influence the mainstream or not, it is a matter of how quickly we can shift the agenda and take the action we need to take.

Read about TerraChoice’s initiative on GreenWash  

In Australia we have immediate pressures from coal and uranium miners, an agricultural lobby keen to develop Australia’s tropical north and suburban dwellers worried about their future water supply and traffic congestion. On all of these issues we need to take immediate action to change the expectations of the public and the decisions of government. 

Dr Glen Barry puts it very forcefully. 

Population growth and consumption

admin /4 January, 2008

Author, Jared Diamond, pointed out in a New York Times opinion piece this week that citizens of the North America, Europe, Japan and Australasia consume about 32 times the amount of resources as people in the developing world. The implications of this are that the 1 billion people in developed countries consume the equivalent of 32 billion people in the developing world or 6 billion Chinese or Inidan people. There are in fact 3.5 billion people in the poorest parts of the developing world and around 2 billion people in China, India and Brazil.

People concerned about population growth need to take this into account when looking at the relationship between world population and resource consumption. If the world population continues to increase at existing levels, world population will double by 2020 with most of that growth occuring in the poorest  parts of the world. Assuming relative wealth levels remain the same, they would still consume less than one quarter of the world’s resources and we would consume over 60 per cent.

Say we decided to halve resource consumption across the planet, there are a number of ways we could do this.

  • Halving the population of the world and maintaining current consumption levels and acheiving zero population growth
  • Halving consumption levels and eliminating population and consumption growth
  • Halving population growth and allowing everyone in the world to consume at current levels of China or India. This would be a three fold increase for the world’s poorest and a ten fold decrease for the world’s wealthiest.

Worth thinking about.

Population growth and consumption

admin /4 January, 2008

Author, Jared Diamond, pointed out in a New York Times opinion piece this week that citizens of the North America, Europe, Japan and Australasia consume about 32 times the amount of resources as people in the developing world. The implications of this are that the 1 billion people in developed countries consume the equivalent of 32 billion people in the developing world or 6 billion Chinese or Inidan people. There are in fact 3.5 billion people in the poorest parts of the developing world and around 2 billion people in China, India and Brazil.

People concerned about population growth need to take this into account when looking at the relationship between world population and resource consumption. If the world population continues to increase at existing levels, world population will double by 2020 with most of that growth occuring in the poorest  parts of the world. Assuming relative wealth levels remain the same, they would still consume less than one quarter of the world’s resources and we would consume over 60 per cent.

Say we decided to halve resource consumption across the planet, there are a number of ways we could do this.

  • Halving the population of the world and maintaining current consumption levels and acheiving zero population growth
  • Halving consumption levels and eliminating population and consumption growth
  • Halving population growth and allowing everyone in the world to consume at current levels of China or India. This would be a three fold increase for the world’s poorest and a ten fold decrease for the world’s wealthiest.

Use the Ebono Institute calculator to test the relative ease of acheiving these scenarios.

Garrett saves shark habitat

admin /15 December, 2007

Environment minister Peter Garrett used his federal powers last week to save Grey Nurse habitat in NSW. He insisted that the NSW Environment Minister Ian McDonald place conditions on the Trap and Line Fishing Export license to protect critical shark habitat. “With fewer than 500 Grey Nurse sharks surviving in NSW waters it was important Continue Reading →

53 million tyres are thrown out in Australia every year

Recycling is just rubbish

Geoff Ebbs /16 March, 2007

Carefully sorting your rubbish is no way to save the planet, writes Giovanni Ebono

Waste is big business. Australians spend over  $2billion each year on disposing of around 30 million tonnes of waste. Over 1700 companies operate in the waste disposal sector employing about 10,000 people. The waste management industry is bigger than sugar or cotton and only marginally smaller than Australia’s annual export of grapes. 

Big business it may be, but that two billion dollars produces nothing and, while it adds to the published GDP, adds no value to the economy. In an attempt to reduce the rising costs of landfill governments actively promote recycling. 

As individuals, Australians enthusiastically embrace recycling. We separate paper, glass, metals and recyclable plastic from the rest of our rubbish. Many of us compost kitchen scraps and garden waste, some councils offer a third, green topped bin for garden waste.

We get a warm inner glow from carting the yellow (or purple) topped wheelie bin into the street once a fortnight, confident that we can save our grandchildren from a mad Max future. They shall not fight over the few, remaining resources among the remnants of a once great civilisation, just so long as we sort our rubbish. 

This view is over simplistic. In fact, something about the waste management business smells and it is not just the unwashed wheelie bins.