|
AdI want to retire abroad – www.escapologist.com.au – Now you can live in luxury for less These 3 countries are safe & cheap
|
Nuclear waste in Australia
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Managing director of Ebono Institute and major sponsor of The Generator, Geoff Ebbs, is running against Kevin Rudd in the seat of Griffith at the next Federal election. By the expression on their faces in this candid shot it looks like a pretty dull campaign. Read on
|
AdI want to retire abroad – www.escapologist.com.au – Now you can live in luxury for less These 3 countries are safe & cheap
|
Nuclear waste in Australia
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
AdI want to retire abroad – www.escapologist.com.au – Now you can live in luxury for less These 3 countries are safe & cheap
|
New secret report
“GP co-payment would crush NSW emergency departments: report” — The Sydney Morning Herald, October 8 2014 Neville, The evidence is growing: Tony Abbott’s $7 GP tax will hurt Australians and destroy our universal health care system.A secret report out today from NSW Health has found that an extra 500,000 people a year would choke NSW emergency departments at a cost of $80 million if the Abbott Government proceeds with its $7 GP tax. That’s because Australians can’t afford a GP tax. That’s why we’ve have been fighting against it — we’ve signed petitions and held community rallies. But we need to do everything we can to keep up the pressure to stop the Abbott Government from dismantling Medicare and make sure everyone knows what this awful policy would mean. Can you share this graphic on Facebook and help get out the facts to your friends and family? Because of the thousands of other people just like you who get this email we know that together we can reach millions. That’s why it’s so important we do little things like sharing graphics on Facebook — your actions form part of a bigger picture. Click here to share it today. And if you don’t have Facebook, please email it to your friends. We can keep up the fight and together we can make a difference. Thanks for your support, Catherine King |
|||||||||||
|
AdI want to retire abroad – www.escapologist.com.au – Now you can live in luxury for less These 3 countries are safe & cheap
|
The Toll-Booth Economy – monbiot.com
|
||||||||||||||
«
»
Burning off fossil fuel investments
Victoria Thieberger
43 min ago
Industries
Resources and Energy
Climate
Markets
Be afraid. Be very afraid. That’s the message to companies involved in the exploration, extraction and production of fossil fuels following the sudden snowballing effect of funds announcing divestments from these industries just this week.
Investment bank UBS says in a new report that, following a series of meetings with clients, it sees the fossil fuel divestment campaign as significant and potentially effective.
“Many of those engaged in the debate are the consumers, voters and leaders of the next several decades. In our view, this single fact carries more weight than any other data point on the planet for this issue,” UBS said in the report out of London.
In just one week, more than $40 million has been earmarked to be pulled out of target companies.
The latest mandates from three key sectors of the Australian institutional investor landscape – university, local government and church funds – have decided to opt out of some or all of their coal and fossil fuel related investments.
So far, the dollar amounts are modest. But they may multiply as the divestment movement gains momentum.
In the past week, the Australian National University has said it will sell its stakes in seven resource companies after a student-led campaign that lasted several years. While press reports have bandied about the $1.1 billion total value of the ANU’s investment portfolio, it is actually selling a total of $16.025 million worth of shares, or 5.5 per cent of the Australian equities component of its entire portfolio.
At the weekend, the Anglican Diocese of Perth said it would switch its investments from fossil fuels and towards renewables instead. The Uniting Church has taken a similar stand.
The New South Wales local council employees’ super fund, Local Government Super, says it will sell $25 million of shares in companies that derive over a third of revenue from coal mining or coal-fired electricity generation, including AGL Energy and Whitehaven Coal.
Last month, HESTA, the super fund for health and community services with $29 billion in funds under management, announced it is progressively implementing a restriction on investments in thermal coal, becoming the first major Australian super fund to do so across all of its investment options.
So while each super fund’s investment decision will have a negligible impact on any single resource company’s share register, this appears to be the start of a structural shift out a sector based on ethical investment principles.
“There is a massive increase in public scrutiny from the members of super funds and the clients of financial advisers,” said Simon O’Connor, chief executive of the Responsible Investment Association Australasia.
RIAA is the peak industry body for responsible investors, claiming some 160 members that manage a collective $500 billion and include the country’s 50 largest super funds.
In some ways, this is a logical progression from the trends towards conscientious consumption (fair-trade coffee, free-range eggs) as well as the move by super funds out of other ethically dubious investments in gambling or tobacco. University endowment funds in the US such as the one run by Stanford and more than 30 cities including Seattle and San Francisco have made such ethical calls.
Figures from the RIAA show that 16 Australian super funds divested a total of $1.2 billion from tobacco stocks over a two-year period.
Ten years ago, fund managers argued that pulling out of tobacco would be costly and interfered with modern portfolio theory. Now, advisers at Mercer believe that the key argument for super funds to divest out of a sector is connected with the reputation of the fund.
The risk is that the super fund will be perceived to be disconnected from their members’ attitudes if they continue with status quo investment practices.
When UniSuper refined its approach to its $1.4 billion sustainable investment options last month, it added alcohol, gaming, weapons and companies involved in fossil fuel exploration and production to its screening of tobacco, as exclusions from its funds.
While it is too early to aggregate industry figures from the fossil fuel divestment campaign, it’s clear that companies are feeling the pressure to respond.
The Minerals Council has set up a committee to develop low emissions technologies for fossil fuels.
Sandfire Resources, one of the companies to lose ANU as an investor, has threatened to sue the advisers behind the decision, according to media reports.
“It’s basically a Pandora’s box,” one fund manager told me. The question is whether investors wanting to take the ethical high ground avoid pure-play fossil fuel producers, explorers, and/or mining services companies. Or is it companies with a certain threshold of revenues from these activities? What about diversified miners?
He added, with a note of cynicism, that it is “easy to make these investment decisions” with coal prices where they are now. Investment returns are unlikely to be damaged by such decisions taken at the low point of the cycle.
But for the longer term, there is a greater issue at play. Australia’s superannuation system holds around $1.8 trillion in funds, and about 40 per cent of the super savings are managed by investment managers.
If domestic institutional investors, pressured by their members, systematically withdraw from certain sectors over time, those companies will have a diminishing pool of domestic capital on which to rely. And that may create an opening for investors from other countries, with different thresholds and different long-term goals, to move in.
|
Ad350% + Investment Returns – private-client-investments.com – High Yield Recession Proof Products -Minimal Risk- Special Tax Credits!
|
Daily update: No progressive ideas, please, we’re Australian
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
There’s a lot to like about solar power: It’s clean, it’s getting less expensive, and it’s probably the most sustainable form of energy available. But conventional solar cells have their drawbacks, and one is that up to 20 percent of the Sun’s energy they capture is lost when the electrons move from the solar panel to its storage battery.
Now a team of researchers at Ohio State University (OSU) working under Yiying Wu, a professor of chemistry and biochemistry, has devised a hybrid solar battery that not only can capture solar energy but store virtually all the energy it collects.
At the heart of the solution is a solar panel in mesh form, which permits a free flow of air, and a new technique for transferring electrons from the solar panel to the battery’s electrode. In the device, oxygen and light work to enable the multiple chemical reactions necessary to charge the battery.
Related: Could Solar Provide 27% Of World’s Energy By 2050?
“The state of the art is to use a solar panel to capture the light, and then use a cheap [lithium-ion] battery to store the energy,” Wu said in an interview with the OSU Newsroom. “We’ve integrated both functions into one device. Any time you can do that, you reduce cost.”
By how much? By one-fourth, Wu says.
The OSU technology, described in detail in the Oct. 3 issue of the journal Nature Communications, works this way: The solar panel allows sunlight captured by the solar cell to be converted into electrons inside the battery, a process that wastes virtually none of the electrons. These electrons are produced from sunlight that shines onto the mesh of the solar panel.
The built-in battery, meanwhile, contains lithium peroxide, which decomposes into lithium ions and oxygen. The oxygen is released into the air that flows through the mesh, while the lithium ions are transformed into lithium metal and stored safely in the battery.
The current design is based, at least in part, on a high-efficiency, air-powered battery developed previously by Wu and a doctoral student, Xiaodi Ren. That battery feeds power through a chemical reaction between oxygen and potassium.
Related: How A Mistake May Lead To More Efficient Solar Power
“Basically, it’s a breathing battery,” Wu explained. “It breathes in air when it discharges, and breathes out when it charges.”
That design was awarded the $100,000 clean energy prize from the U.S. Department of Energy in 2014, allowing Wu to form KAir Energy Systems LLC to develop the new technology. And that development was to combine the KAir battery with a solar panel.
Conventional solar cells, however, are made of solid panels, which keep air away from the battery. So another of Wu’s doctoral students, Mingzhe Yu, developed the mesh for the hybrid, made from titanium gauze on which he managed to grow vertical rods of titanium dioxide as if they were blades of grass on a lawn. Air flows through the gauze while the rods capture the sunlight.
By Andy Tully of Oilprice.com
More Top Reads From Oilprice.com: