Category: General news

Managing director of Ebono Institute and major sponsor of The Generator, Geoff Ebbs, is running against Kevin Rudd in the seat of Griffith at the next Federal election. By the expression on their faces in this candid shot it looks like a pretty dull campaign. Read on

  • We’re going to shut down a Coal Port

    AdI want to retire abroadwww.escapologist.com.au – Now you can live in luxury for less These 3 countries are safe & cheap

    We’re going to shut down a coal port

    Inbox
    x

    Milañ Loeak – 350 Pacific <350@350.org> Unsubscribe

    3:01 PM (32 minutes ago)

    to me

    My name is Milañ Loeak, I’m from the Marshall Islands, and I bring you a message on behalf of my Climate Warrior brothers and sisters from across Oceania.

    You’ve probably heard it all before — that the climate is changing, that the ocean is rising, that my home in the islands will be the first to go. But the people of the Pacific are not drowning, we are fighting. And the biggest threat to our homes is the fossil fuel industry.

    So here’s how we’re fighting back: there’s a coal port in Newcastle, Australia and it’s the largest in the world, shipping approximately 560,000 tonnes of coal every single day. If the port were a country, it would be the 9th highest emitting country in the world. That’s why I have travelled to Australia to shut it down for a day.

    Using traditional canoes, I and 30 other Pacific Climate Warriors are going to paddle into the oncoming path of coal ships. Behind us will be hundreds of Australians in kayaks, on surfboards and whatever else they can find, united with us as we stand up to the fossil fuel industry.

    But we need more than hundreds of Australians standing with us, we are going to need you too.

    The fossil fuel industry will try to dismiss us. They will launch their PR machine to say that we are just a small group acting alone and that we do not speak for others. But we know that we are not acting alone. We are standing with front line communities around the world when we say it is time to end our addiction to fossil fuels before it destroys our homes, our communities and our culture.

    As the Pacific Climate Warriors paddle into the water on October 17th, show that you stand with us — click here to sign on to our call for solidarity.

    Stopping one day of coal exports alone won’t keep our homes above water, but it marks the rise of the Pacific Climate Warriors, and the beginning of our defence of the Pacific Islands.

    I ask you to join us in this fight — because we cannot save the Pacific Islands on our own.

    Warm Pacific wishes,

    Milañ Loeak, Republic of the Marshall Islands


    350.org is building a global climate movement. You can connect with us on Facebook, follow us on Twitter, and become a sustaining donor to keep this movement strong and growing.

  • IOWA roots,Speaking Truth to Power. (HANSEN)

    1 of 1
    AdI want to retire abroadwww.escapologist.com.au – Now you can live in luxury for less These 3 countries are safe & cheap

    Iowa Roots: Speaking Truth to Power

    Inbox
    x

    James Hansen via mail8.atl161.mcsv.net Unsubscribe

    12:28 AM (8 hours ago)

    to me
    Email not displaying correctly? View it in your browser.
     Iowa Roots: Speaking Truth to Power
    Iowa Roots: Speaking Truth to Power, published in the Des Moines Register, is available here in pdf format, on my web site, or on our blog.

    ~Jim
    12 October 2014

    Like my Facebook page
    Like https://www.facebook.com/jimehansen on Facebook
    Share on social media
    Facebook Twitter
    Visit our program webpage
    csas.ei.columbia.edu

  • 25 Devastating Effects Of Climate Change

    Allure Media
    Business Insider

    Tech
    Money & Markets
    Briefing
    Ideas
    Executive Life
    Video

    Briefing
    25 Devastating Effects Of Climate Change
    Leslie Baehr, Chelsea Harvey Today at 7:43 AM 60
    Melting Arctic Ice

    The world is getting warmer and that’s already causing disasters that will devastate lives and cost hundreds of billions of dollars.

    Those problems are only getting worse, as shown by recent reports from the United Nation’s Intergovernmental Panel On Climate Change (IPCC) and the White House, among others.

    The greenhouse gas emissions that drive warming “now substantially exceed the highest concentrations recorded in ice cores during the past 800,000 years,” the IPCC said. Atmospheric carbon dioxide levels, which primarily come from the burning of fossil fuels, have risen 40% since preindustrial times.

    Last month, world leaders convened at the UN Climate Summit 2014 to discuss plans to reduce carbon emissions — though there were some notable absences. Most attendees recognised that failure to address these issues could spell terrible consequences for people all over the world.

    We’ve gathered some of those terrible consequences of climate change below.

    Unless otherwise noted, each effect assumes a temperature rise of 2 degrees Celsius (3.6 F) by 2100, a number the IPCC has suggested we are “more likely than not” to exceed, and a sea level rise of 0.5 meters (1.5 feet) by 2100, about the average of all the IPCC’s most recent climate scenarios. This is a conservative estimate — other studies predict significantly more sea level rise.
    1. Climate change will cost hundreds of billions of dollars a year.

    Asset destruction, forced relocations, droughts, extinctions, and all of the other bad things we’re going to discuss will add up in costs to the global economy. Already the Natural Resources Defence Council estimates that the US Climate Disruption Budget — i.e., stuff related to drought, storms, and growing climate disruptions — was nearly $US100 billion. And that’s just the start.

    By 2030, climate change costs are projected to cost the global economy $US700 billion annually, according to the Climate Vulnerability Monitor.

    As climate change continues, costs will go up. Indeed, the release of a 50-billion-ton reservoir of methane from melting Arctic ice, which may advance global warming by 15-to-35 years, could by itself cost $US60 trillion to the global economy, researchers told Nature last summer.

    Stopping the damage won’t be cheap either. For instance, putting the world on a path for sustainable energy production will cost $US53 trillion, according to the International Energy Agency’s World Energy Investment Outlook.

    But in the long run, these investments could wind up saving money, says a new report from The Global Commission on the Economy and Climate. By spending money now on measures like green infrastructure, governments can save themselves the money that would otherwise be spent on damages caused by climate change in the future.
    2. Hundreds of millions of people will be forced to move by 2050.
    Disaster-induced displacement’98% of all displacement in 2012 was related to climate- and weather-related events,’ according to the Internal Displacement Monitoring Center.

    Climate change may become the biggest driver of displaced people, according to António Guterres, the UN High Commissioner for Refugees.

    In 2008, 36 million people were displaced by natural disasters. At least 20 million of those people were driven from their homes by disasters related to climate change, like drought and rising sea level, Guterres said.

    He anticipates that countries in the Southern Hemisphere will be most affected by displacement in the future. If this happens, “not only states, but cultures and identities will be drowned,” Guterres said at a 2009 conference.

    The Internal Organisation for Migration estimates that 200 million people by 2050 could be forced to leave due to environmental changes.

    Even more alarming, a 2014 study published in Environmental Research Letters predicted that sea level rise created by a temperature increase of 3 degrees C would force more than than 600 million people to find new homes.
    3. Dangerous infectious diseases could spread in the U.S.
    Mosquito

    The deadliest vector-borne disease is malaria, claiming 627,000 lives in 2012. (A vector-borne disease is one carried from one person to another through a third organism, like a blood-sucking bug). “However, the world’s fastest growing vector-borne disease is dengue, with a 30-fold increase in disease incidence over the last 50 years,” the World Health Organisation wrote.

    As summers become longer, temperatures go up, and rainfall patterns change along with species patterns. Mosquitoes carrying diseases will likely have a longer season in a wider area, according to the Natural Resources Defence Council.

    “The same is true on a global scale: increases in heat, precipitation, and humidity can allow tropical and subtropical insects to move from regions where infectious diseases thrive into new places,” they wrote. Increases in international travel, “means that the U.S. is increasingly at risk for becoming home to these new diseases.”

    Without proper management, waterborne diseases could also spread as floods become more common. Floodwaters can contain disease-causing bacteria or viruses, including noroviruses and enteroviruses.
    4. Western wildfires could burn up to eight times as much land by 2100.
    Fires burn east of San Diego in 2007.

    For each one degree Celsius of warming, the area burned by western wildfires will increase by a factor of two to four, according to a report by the National Academy of Sciences.

    Temperatures in the Southwest have increased by more than one degree Celsius since the 1970s, according to the National Climate Assessment.

    The major fire increases will occur in the northern Great Plains, the Rocky Mountains, and the Southwest, according to a 2012 report for firescience.gov. The fire season could also become several months longer.
    5. Water scarcity will hit hundreds of millions of additional people by 2100.
    Earth20140225 fullThe California water crisis, in one photo.

    In 2013, about 1.3 billion people lived in water-scarce regions, according to one study. The researchers calculated that an additional 8% of the population would enter a state of “new or aggravated water scarcity” solely due to climate change with a temperature increase of 2 degrees C by 2100.

    The National Climate Assessment detailed some of our nation’s record-breaking droughts. In 2011, Texas and Oklahoma saw more than 100 days over almost 28 degrees C and also set records for the hottest summer since 1895, when people began keeping reliable climate records.

    “Rates of water loss, due in part to evaporation, were double the long-term average. The heat and drought depleted water resources and contributed to more than $US10 billion in direct losses to agriculture alone,” said the Assessment.

    When parched areas do get rain, it does not necessarily make it into groundwater supplies since dry ground is not good at absorbing water, according to the convention report.

    While some places are becoming drier, others are in danger of serious floods (see 8 and 13).
    6. Hurricanes could become even scarier.
    Screen Shot 2014 05 08 at 11.52.18 AMThe primary billion-dollar disaster for coastal states is hurricanes. Northern and interior states are hit mostly by winter storms and tornadoes, said NOAA.

    The recent National Climate Assessment found that Category 4 and 5 hurricanes (the strongest) have increased in frequency, intensity, and duration since the 1980s. It’s not yet clear how much can be attributed to human or natural causes but scientists said the “the trend is projected to continue,” and that climate change is not going to help the situation moving forward.

    One of the factors responsible for this increase in hurricane intensity is warmer waters, which make great fuel for storms. “Hurricanes tend to be self-limiting, in that they churn up deeper (usually cooler) water that can stop them from gaining strength and also weaken them. So since global warming also warms the deeper ocean, it further helps hurricanes stay stronger longer,”according to climate writer Joseph Romm.

    One model predicts up to an 11% increase in hurricane intensity, as well as about a 20% rain increase within about a 60-mile radius of the storm’s center (these numbers are based on a climate scenario with an average of 2.8 degree Celsius warming).
    7. Four times as many New Yorkers could live in areas that flood by 2050.
    New York City Flooding

    One day, New York City may have flood days the way it has snow days, Malcolm Bowman, oceanography professor at Stony Brook University in Long Island, warned on WNYC.

    The graphic above shows what the Federal Emergency Management Agency flood zone might look like should extreme sea level rise occur (2.5 feet or about 0.8 meters by 2050).

    “Areas in the 100-year flood zone have a 1 per cent chance of being flooded annually and are particularly vulnerable to rising sea levels,” NOAA said.

    This zone includes several areas devastated by Hurricane Sandy, including the Brooklyn-Queens Waterfront, the East and South Shores of Staten Island, South Queens, Southern Brooklyn, and Southern Manhattan.
    14 22 NOAA tide data graphicHigher sea levels mean higher tides and surges.

    Since the mid-1800s, the chances of storm tide over-topping the Manhattan sea wall have increased 20%, according to one recent study, as storm water levels have risen. The researchers expect the seawall to be submerged about once every four to five years. In the 19th century, that only happened once every 100 to 400 years.

    “What we are finding is that the 10-year storm tide of your great-, great-grandparents is not the same as the 10-year storm tide of today,” the lead author of the study said in the press release.
    8. Millions of people and trillions in assets are at risk in coastal cities.

    Assuming a sea-level rise of .5 meters by 2070, with an extra .5 to 1.5 meters to account for storms, a 2008 study ranked the most exposed cities in the world. The analysis found staggering potential losses in cities around the world.

    Calcutta, India, may be the most exposed, with 14 million people and $US2 trillion in assets at risk. Miami is also in big trouble with 4.8 million people and $US3.5 trillion at risk.
    Miami 43

    Business Insider
    9. 136 of the world’s most historic places could be lost to sea-level rise.

    If global temperatures rise one degree C, more than 40 of the more than 700 UN world heritage sites will be seriously threatened by water within the next 2,000 years, according to a study published in Environmental Research Letters.

    If temperatures rise 3 degrees C, that number rises to 136 sites. Historical city centres like Venice, Istanbul, and St. Petersburg would be among those impacted.
    UNESCO SitesThe rainbow scale labelled ΔT, refers to a rise in degree Celsius. The open black circles are the sites which have already been impacted today ΔT = .8.
    10. Global wheat and maize yields are already beginning to decline.

    While warming temperatures might initially help certain crops, the overall picture is negative. Global crop yields are slowing down as a result of events related to climate change, like reduced rainfall and higher temperatures.

    Wheat and maize have already been negatively affected in certain regions, as shown in the chart below. The IPCC points out several scenarios in which food and cereal prices have rapidly increased following extreme weather events since their last report in 2007. The new report predicts continued drops in global wheat and maize production, which could lead to food scarcity and political unrest.
    IPCC chart
    11. Small island nations could be destroyed.
    Sea Level Rise

    “Loss of cultural world heritage and currently inhabited places to sea-level rise,” by Ben Marzeion and Anders Levermann
    ΔT= Change in degree Celsius.

    Low-lying islands in the tropics are particularly vulnerable to sea-level rise. “It has been suggested that the very existence of some atoll nations is threatened by rising sea levels associated with global warming,” the IPCC said.

    Out of the 10 nations rated with the highest protection cost compared to their GDP, eight were island nations, according to the IPCC.

    Some of the threats to these islands are less obvious such as “airborne dust from the Sahara and Asia, distant source ocean swells from mid high latitudes, invasive plant and animal species and the spread of aquatic pathogens,” the report said.

    Sea-level rise leads to flooding, stronger storm surge, and erosion, which can cause even more damage to small islands and coastal regions.

    Climate change will also hurt fisheries, agriculture, and tourism in these regions.

    In September, Baron Waqa — chair of the Alliance of Small Island States and president of Nauru — presented an address at the 2014 UN Climate Summit in which he reiterated, “No one better understands the grave risks posed by climate change than SIDS [Small Island Developing States]. Climate change and sea level rise are already threatening our viability and even our existence as sovereign nations.”
    12. There could be no more reefs after 2050.
    Reef DieoffWhen reefs die …

    Climate change creates unfavorable conditions for the survival of coral reefs. If global and local reef threats continue, including those related to climate change, all reefs could be at risk of disappearing by 2050, according to the key findings of the World Resources Institute.

    Rising ocean acidity created by higher carbon dioxide levels means fewer carbonate ions, a key ingredient for coral skeleton building. Since preindustrial times, ocean carbonate levels have dropped by 25% according to the report.

    “Corals cannot survive more than a 2 degree global average temperature increase over pre-industrial levels before coral is no longer able to replace itself faster than coral bleaching will destroy it,” the report said. Temperatures are expected to rise at least that much by 2100.
    Warming WorldWelcome to our warming world.

    Losing the reefs will also take a major toll on tourism and industry, according to the World Wildlife Fund and Earth Hour report. Coral reefs provide tourism-related income to at least 94 countries, according to the World Resources Institute. Australia faces losses of up to $6 billion and over 63,000 jobs, from Great Barrier Reef damage.

    Seventy per cent of the 27 countries and territories most vulnerable to reef damage are small-island states. The nine countries most vulnerable to reef degradation, including Haiti and Fiji, are very dependent on the reefs and “have limited capacity to adapt to reef loss,” wrote the World Resources Institute.

    Besides being biodiversity hotspots and holding potentials for medicine, coral reefs act as a buffer to storms and erosion. One-hundred countries could lose coastal protection along almost 100,000 miles of shoreline, according to the World Resources Institute.
    13. The marine food chain could fall apart.

    Corals aren’t the only organisms that suffer from ocean acidification. Other animals, such as mollusks, sea urchins, and some types of plankton are also expected to suffer as the ocean’s pH drops. Many of these species are crucial to the marine ecosystem, providing an important food source for larger organisms. Their decline has the potential to cause a shift in the entire marine food web.
    Change in ocean PH and effect on species number
    Transportation‘Along the Northern Gulf Coast, an estimated 2,400 miles of major roadway and 246 miles of freight rail lines are at risk of permanent flooding within 50 to 100 years as relative sea level is expected to rise in the range of 4 feet,’ according to NOAA.
    14. Within 300 years, 88% of New Orleans could be underwater.

    Since 1993, mean world sea level rise has gone up between 0.11 to 0.14 inches a year, according to NOAA. As this trend continues, coastal areas of the world will be inundated with water.

    This is especially disconcerting considering nearly 40% of people in the US live in these coastal areas. Eight out of the 10 largest cities in the world are near the coast.

    (The percentages above are based on a New York Times interactive, which used a 5-foot sea level rise, a number that is expected to occur within 300 years.)
    15. Increasing droughts will make the driest regions even drier.

    Using daily precipitation data from 28 models, a 2014 study published in the journal Nature projected the frequency of dry days around the world. It found that the Mediterranean Sea region, parts of Central and South America, and western Indonesia would suffer greatly, with up to 30 extra dry days a year compared to the 1960 to 1989 average by the end of the century.

    “Short-term (seasonal or shorter) droughts are expected to intensify in most U.S. regions. Longer-term droughts are expected to intensify in large areas of the Southwest, southern Great Plains, and Southeast,” according to the National Climate Assessment.

    Droughts could pose a variety of threats, the IPCC said. In areas of higher drought, water stores will not be replenished and water pollutant concentrations could rise. “Climate change is projected to reduce raw water quality and pose risks to drinking water quality even with conventional treatment.”
    DroughtThis month, nearly 15% of the country was in extreme drought, according to NOAA.
    16. 63% of major wine regions will no longer be suitable for grape-growing by 2050.

    As temperature rises, many of our current wine producing regions will become unsuitable for vineyards. The number above uses a 1.8 degree C warming and is from a 2012 study in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

    Problems could be compounded as owners relocate their vineyards to higher elevations — an ecosystem destroying process. Establishing a vineyard requires “removal of native vegetation, typically followed by deep plowing, fumigation with methyl bromide or other soil-sterilizing chemicals, and the application of fertilizers and fungicides,” said the study.

    Since “[v]iticulture is famously sensitive to climate,” the study said, it “may be illustrative of conservation implications of shifts in other agricultural crops.”

    While not all agree with the percentages above, scientists have shown repeatedly that climate change will cause a variety of habitats to become unsuitable for their current inhabitants. This will send many plants and animals in search of new homes, invading those of others.
    17. Some reptile species could turn mostly female, potentially leading to their extinction.
    He may soon have way more sisters than he bargained for.

    Because many reptiles rely on ambient temperatures to regulate physiological processes, they will be directly affected by global temperature change.

    For turtles, nest temperature determines the sex of the offspring. A cooler nest hatches only males while a warmer nest is all females. Changes in sex ratio could affect the potential to produce offspring as well as the evolutionary fitness of the species, according to the Forest Service — both factors which do not bode well for the survival of the reptiles.

    One study in the Cape Verde Islands found that as rising temperatures heated sands in which sea turtles laid their eggs, the nest produced more females. While this may lead to an initial increase in population, 100 years in the future it could spell disaster, study author Graeme Hays told The Guardian. “You have so few males left that it’s likely to be a problem. There will be heaps of female but not enough males to fertilize all those eggs,” he said.

    Animals with similar problems could include other turtles, alligators, crocodiles, and some lizards.
    18. Atlanta and New York could see twice as many stormy days by 2100, compared to the 1962 to 1989 average.
    This map compares the summer thunderstorm potential change from 1962-1989 with 2073-2099.

    One study found that when greenhouse gases increased, conditions prime for intense thunderstorms in the eastern and southern US also increased. Other climate studies have suggested there will be “robust increases in the occurrence of severe thunderstorm environments” in the eastern US, often occurring before the 2 degrees C global warming baseline.

    One key factor that fuels thunderstorm formation is how much “raw energy” — called convective available potential energy, or CAPE — is available. CAPE is affected by how much heat and moisture is in the air, as well as that air’s tendency to rise, explains NASA’s Earth Observatory.

    “CAPE can provide storms with the raw fuel to produce rain and hail, and vertical wind shear can pull and twist weak storms into strong, windy ones,” meteorologist Harold Brooks of NOAA’s National Severe Storms Laboratory told the Earth Observatory. Signs indicate that CAPE will be increasing as the climate warms.
    19. Many countries are losing essential water sources.
    Screen shot 2014-05-02 at 8.27.14 am….What it looks like when a glacier dies.

    More than 1 billion people worldwide rely on glaciers and snow for freshwater as they melt, according to the IPCC.

    When glaciers are in equilibrium with the climate, they act as valuable and stable sources of freshwater for many regions including the Andes, Bolivia, Ecuador, Peru, and parts of India and China. They store water during cold or wet years and release it during warm years as they melt. “As glaciers shrink, however, their diminishing influence may make the water supply less dependable,” the report said.

    Because glaciers are currently out of equilibrium, “total meltwater yields from stored glacier ice will increase in many regions during the next decades but decrease thereafter,” the IPCC said. This can lead to floods in the immediate future but result in a lack of meltwater in the long term.
    20. Air pollution in California could cause a public health disaster.

    Adverse conditions associated with a changing climate could worsen Southern California’s air quality, the state’s clean air progress report suggested.

    “The higher number of extreme heat days and heat waves predicted to occur as a result of climate change will increase smog formation, increase the number and severity of wildfires, worsen heat island effects in urban areas, and increase adverse health effects due to the public’s increased exposure to harmful air pollutants,” the report said.

    Air pollution has been linked to a to a long list of health ailments, including asthma, heart and lung damage, respiratory and cardiovascular diseases, and heatstroke, the report noted.

    Fine particulate matter is the “greatest risk to public health.” This pollutant has been linked to heart disease, premature mortality and perhaps even diabetes, autism, and cognitive impairment.
    21. Equatorial regions and parts of the Antarctic will see up to a 50% decrease in their fisheries.

    When the IPCC modelled about 1,000 marine species, it found almost a 50% decrease in catch in certain areas by 2060, using a scenario with an estimated 2.8 degree C temperature change. These analyses were made without even considering ocean acidification or overfishing.
    Change in catch potential to world fisheries
    22. Climate change may lead to more depression and anxiety.

    One strange consequence of climate change is an increase in mental illnesses like depression and anxiety. In a study published by the Journal of the American Medical Association, researchers found that climate-caused disasters, such as floods, storms, and wildfires, can increase human anxiety and despair. Such events can even cause post-traumatic stress disorder in some people.
    23. Some animals are shrinking.
    Shrinking Horses Due To Climate ChangeAn artist’s rendering of the early horse Hyracotherium (right) alongside a modern-day horse. Researchers found that Hyracotherium body size decreased 19% during a global warming event about 53 million years ago.

    Fossil evidence tells us that when the planet was last at its warmest — about 55 million years ago during the Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum — many animals got smaller.

    For example: One horse, Hyracotherium, usually the size of a small dog, shrunk in size by 30%.

    The horse returned to its normal size when the temperature went back down. But 2 million years later, during another smaller global warming event, Hyracotherium shrunk by 19%.

    “The fact that it happened twice significantly increases our confidence that we’re seeing cause and effect,” said University of Michigan Paleontologist Philip Gingerich, who presented his preliminary findings at the end of 2013. Past global warming, he said, appears to have caused many mammals to shrink.

    Scientists are now starting to see history repeat itself. Studies have shown that many animals, including polar bears and some reptiles, have started shrinking as carbon dioxide levels increase.
    24. Thousands of plants and animal species will lose their native habitats.

    While over-exploitation and habitat destruction are the major threats to most species today, many experts agree that climate change will be the greatest cause of declines and extinctions in the future. A study published last year in the journal Nature Climate Change projected that half of all plants and a third of animals will lose more than 50% of their current range by 2080. As a result, the researchers predicted a “substantial reduction in biodiversity” by the end of the century.
    25. 20 million more children will go hungry by 2050.

    A report from the World Food Program expects extreme weather events like floods, droughts, forest fires, and tropical cyclones to damage farmlands, threatening food security for millions of people. Climate impacts on crop yields will increase the number of malnourished children by around 11 million in Asia, 10 million in Africa, and 1.4 million in Latin America, the report said.

    By 2050, crop yields in Asia are expected to fall by 50% for wheat and 17% for rice compared to 2000 levels, according to the report. This will threaten billions of people who rely on agriculture for their livelihoods.

  • The Energy to Fight Injustice

    The Energy to Fight Injustice

    by | August 20, 2014
    Category: Blog

    The Energy to Fight Injustice

    Published 23 July 2014 in Chemistry World

    The energy to fight injustice

                                                                                                               © Xinhua / Alamy

    As I peer into Beijing’s impenetrable smog, I feel nauseous.

    Air pollution from burning coal kills over 1 million people per year in China. And those living suffer its ill effects.1 One scientist told me that he was using his savings to send his child out of the country, to grow for a while in clean air.

    I have long been troubled by the injustice that climate changes we have brought about will be inherited by our children. China’s air is another tragic consequence of our choices.

    Prevention is better

    What makes me sick is that these tragedies were preventable. Scientists informed political leaders decades ago that carbon-free energies must be phased in to replace fossil fuels. However, we failed to communicate the implications.

    Scientists should have made it clearer that there is a limited ‘carbon budget’ for the world – a limit on the amount of fossil fuels that can be burned without disastrous consequences. We should have made it clear that removing carbon from our energy supplies – particularly for developing countries such as China and India – requires a suite of carbon-free technologies: hydro, solar, wind and nuclear power.

    This last is a key part of the solution, and one we unfortunately abandoned. Years ago, the US, as the leader in nuclear R&D, had an opportunity to help find a carbon-free path for the world. In 1976, nuclear scientists were ready to build a demonstration ‘fast’ nuclear power plant. Today’s ‘slow’ reactors use less than 1% of the nuclear fuel. A ‘fast’ reactor can utilise more than 99% of the nuclear fuel and can ‘burn’ nuclear waste, which will be needed in the future as easily available uranium is used up.

    However, anti-nuclear forces in politics and ‘green’ organisations eliminated this opportunity – the project was stopped by President Jimmy Carter. Research continued at a low level until 1993 when President Bill Clinton delivered the coup de grace, declaring ‘We are eliminating programs that are no longer needed, such as nuclear power research and development.’

    The enormity of these anti-nuclear policy decisions is difficult to exaggerate. Energy consumption is an inescapable requirement of development, and renewable energy sources alone cannot satisfy the energy demands of China and other developing nations. They now have no choice but to burn massive amounts of coal if they wish to raise their living standards

    China is already doing more to safeguard the environment than we are in the West. For example, where possible, new buildings in China use geothermal heat and other renewables, and efficiency standards are ratcheted up when improved technologies appear.

    But we should not expect China to use renewable energy for base-load electricity.

    As an example, the new US solar power plant, Ivanpah, near the Nevada–California border, which cost $2.2 billion (£1.28 billion) and covers 13km2, will generate 0.82TWh of electricity per year. In contrast, Westinghouse is nearing completion of two AP-1000 nuclear plants in China. These nuclear facilities each require about 1.3km2 and cost China about $3.5 billion. Each plant will produce 8.8TWh per year. It would take more than 10 Ivanpahs to yield as much electricity and an area of more than 128km2.

    The AP-1000 is a fine nuclear power plant, incorporating several important safety improvements. However, further advances in nuclear plants beyond AP-1000 are possible. The US must cooperate with China and assist in its nuclear development.

    Training nuclear engineers and operators in the US could help assure safe operations during a challenging period of rapid expansion. And the benefits of cooperation will eventually come back to the US and other countries as cost effective power plants are perfected.

    Crime of inaction

    Such progress is crucial. Events are spiraling down so rapidly that I struggle to sleep. Declining production and rising costs of conventional oil are making it commercially viable to extract unconventional fossil fuels, such as shale gas and tar sands, that should be left in the ground. Ironically, environmental groups’ insistence that renewables are the only alternative to fossil fuels actually assures expansion of fracking, locking in long-term dependence on gas for electricity, and crude oil for vehicles.

    Yet my greatest frustration is with our own inability as scientists to communicate the energy story. We could phase down fossil fuel emissions with a simple rising fee on carbon collected from fossil fuel companies, with funds distributed uniformly to the public. This would drive efficiency and carbon-free energies, thus discharging our responsibility to future generations, other cultures and other life on Earth. Instead, our governments subsidise fossil fuels and facilitate more and more invasive mining practices.

    It is still possible to minimise climate change effects and it is still possible to solve the air pollution problem. But if we don’t help developing countries obtain abundant, affordable carbon-free energy, I believe that our children, and the world as a whole, will find us guilty of the world’s greatest crime against humanity and nature.

    James Hansen is former director of the NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies and is now adjunct professor at the Columbia University Earth Institute, USA

    References

    1 See, for example: Y Chen et al, Proc Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 2013, 110, 12936 (DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1300018110); and data in: Global burden of disease study 2010, The Lancet, 2012, 380, 2053

  • Southern oceans heating up faster than scientists realized

    NEWS
    OPINION

    Previous
    Next

    Science
    Southern oceans heating up faster than scientists realized
    The Conversation
    10 Oct 2014
    TwitterHootsuiteMore
    Huge iceberg (Shutterstock)
    Huge iceberg (Shutterstock)
    Don’t miss stories. Follow Raw Story!

    The upper layers of the world’s oceans have been warming much faster than oceanographers realised over the past few decades, according to a new study.

    Sparse sampling of the Southern Hemisphere’s oceans have led to conservative estimates of warming. But the new research, published in Nature Climate Change, suggests that the amount of heat energy entering the upper 700 metres of these oceans has been underestimated by anything from 48% to 152%.

    Because the Southern Hemisphere contains 60% of the world’s ocean, this means that globally, the oceans have been heating between 24% and 58% faster than previously thought.

    Meanwhile, a separate study has found that very little of the warming since 2005 has penetrated the “bottom half” of the oceans, below 2 kilometres, although shallower waters have continued to warm.
    Models and boats

    More than 90% of the excess heat generated by global warming goes into the oceans, causing sea levels to rise as the water expands.

    But while climate models were good at replicating the precise satellite observations of sea-level rise since 1993, they were inconsistent with global estimates of the oceans’ changing heat content, as calculated using the relatively few direct measurements of temperature taken in southern regions.

    Paul Durack, a researcher at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, who led the new study, said temperatures in the Southern Ocean had only been sparsely sampled, which had led previous observations to underestimate the actual warming.

    “Historical observations are much more numerous in the Northern Hemisphere because the developed countries (Europe, US, Japan) had boats which were travelling across the Northern Hemisphere oceans. As there’s less land in the Southern Hemisphere, this led to far fewer observations,” he said.

    That situation was not remedied until 2004, when the Argo network of 3600 submersible floats began to produce global data on the world’s oceans.

    Dr Durack and his colleagues calculated that southern ocean warming has been underestimated between 1970 and 2004, before researchers had access to the Argo network.
    Heat not reaching the deepest seas

    The Argo floats were used in the second study, to profile the movement of heat down to depths of 2 km.

    The results suggest that sea-level rise is due to changes in the shallower oceans and to the addition of meltwater from land, rather than to thermal expansion in the deeper parts of the ocean, report researchers led by William Llovel of NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory, also in Nature Climate Change.

    “One thing that is clear from both these studies is the ocean is continuing to warm,” Dr Durack said.

    Richard Allan, a climatologist at the University of Reading, said the results were consistent with his own previous research showing continued ocean heating from 1985 to 2012.

    Professor Allan said the new research “helps to reconcile observed ocean heating with sea level rise”. Over the past two decades, seas have risen by an average of 3 mm a year.

    Previously, the lack of data on Southern Hemisphere ocean temperatures led oceanographers to assume, for the sake of conservatism, that unsampled areas were not warming. The new data paint a much more realistic picture, Prof Allan said.

    The new research also gives a clearer explanation of where the excess heat of global warming is going, Prof Allan said.

    “The ocean heating rate is consistent with rising greenhouse gas concentrations. The slowing in global surface warming reflects a change in the vertical distribution of the heating to deeper layers below around 300 metres,” he said.

    He added that the lack of heating expansion in the deepest oceans is “unfortunately not reassuring”, given that this situation may change in the future.

    “Heating of the deep ocean below is not yet detectable, nor is any contribution to current rates of sea-level rise. Since the layer below 2000 metres contains half the ocean volume, as this begins to warm over many hundreds of years in response to the surface warming there is the potential for accelerating sea level rise.”

    This article was amended on October 8, 2014, to clarify that the previous problem was with the sparse pre-2004 temperature measurements, not the climate models.

    The Conversation

    By Michael Hopkin, The Conversation

    This article was originally published on The Conversation.
    Read the original article.

  • Let’s stop degrees from costing a mortgage (Australian Unions team

    1 of 4
    AdMaster of Public Healthtua.edu.au/Scholarships – Up to 30% Scholarships Available For 2015 Enrolment. Enquire Today!

    Let’s stop degrees from costing a mortgage

    Inbox
    x

    Ged Kearney <info@actu.org.au>

    5:02 PM (3 minutes ago)

    to me
    Neville —
    One of the most vicious and spiteful parts of Tony Abbott’s agenda is the plan to deregulate the university sector. This plan–driven by his attack-dog Christopher Pyne—will see massive rises in universities fees and laden students with a lifetime of debt, locking many young people out of the university system. 

    These “reforms” aren’t just bad, they are horrible.

    The National Tertiary Education Union have been fighting one heck of a campaign to stop these changes – and they are so close to winning. That’s why the NTEU is teaming up with the National Union of Students and online campaigning organisation Getup! for a big advertising push to get the campaign over the line and ruin Christopher Pyne’s dreams of bringing American-style student debt to Australia.  

    Together they have made an ad that highlights just how terrible these changes will be. The whole community–not just students and university staff–are chipping in to get the ad on air and stop these horrible reforms. Let’s help them make a difference.

    Click here to chip in $10 or $20 and make a difference in the fight to stop Pyne’s changes: https://actuonline.nationbuilder.com/auction_ad_fundraiser

    This is yet another example of where Tony Abbott and his mates have massively overreached. A clear majority of the public–63% in recent polling–oppose Pynes plans for American-style student debt. It is less popular than the Medicare co-payment, increasing the pension age and cutting funding to the ABC.

    In fact, according to the polls, these changes are more than twice as unpopular as Tony Abbott himself – and that says a lot.

    Australians are right about this. We should work on making the future brighter for young people and not saddle them with a lifetime of debt for $100k degrees.  Degrees shouldn’t cost a mortgage. People get that.

    Click here to stand with members of the NTEU, NUS and Getup!–and the vast majority of Australians–and help get this ad on the air: https://actuonline.nationbuilder.com/auction_ad_fundraiser

    The Government’s harsh budget strategy is in disarray. It was always headed that way – Australians are much smarter than Tony Abbott gives us credit for. We are always willing to stand up for the things that matter – and quality, affordable tertiary education matters.

    Let’s push this campaign over the line and stop Tony Abbott’s plans to wrap students up in a lifetime of debt.

    In union –

    Ged K and the Australian Unions team