Category: Sustainable Settlement and Agriculture

The Generator is founded on the simple premise that we should leave the world in better condition than we found it. The news items in this category outline the attempts people have made to do this. They are mainly concerned with our food supply and settlement patterns. The impact that the human race has on the planet.

  • Major parties vote against Hunter & Lithgow health study

    Media Release – 10 June 2010

    Major parties vote against Hunter & Lithgow coal health study

    Greens MP and health spokesperson Lee Rhiannon said the major parties’
    vote yesterday against her motion in NSW Parliament calling for a
    comprehensive population health study to investigate the links between
    the Hunter and Lithgow region’s coal and power industries and poor
    health outcomes exhibited a lack of real commitment to the issue
    (extract from motion below).

    “In the face of compelling evidence that the health of residents in the
    Hunter and Lithgow regions is suffering, the opposition and government
    joined forces to vote down the Greens motion calling for an independent
    population health study and better monitoring and enforcement measures,”
    Ms Rhiannon said.

    “The failure of the Keneally government to allocate funding in this
    week’s budget to the study suggests it is not committed to finding
    answers.

    “If a study finds evidence of a link between the coal and power
    industries and ill-health the government could be liable and would be
    forced to reassess its existing firm relationship with these polluting
    industries, ” Ms Rhiannon said.

    Motion voted down by the major parties in the NSW Upper House

    3. That this House calls on the Government to:

    (a) restore its faith with the Upper Hunter community by agreeing to
    design and undertake a comprehensive independent population health study
    to assess the impact of coalmining and coal-fired power stations on the
    health of residents in the Hunter region, and any impact on the local
    water supply and food chain,

    (b) extend NSW Health’s investigation of the link between the coal
    and power industries in the Upper Hunter and poor health outcomes to the
    Greater Lithgow Area,

    (c) ensure adequate air quality monitoring networks in the Upper Hunter
    and Greater Lithgow areas, that can measure particles to 2.5 microns,
    and can test and analyse the composition and toxic properties of dust
    pollution in these regions,

    (d) make the findings of the health study and all pollution monitoring
    and any pollution testing data readily available to the public in an
    accessible format via the internet, and

    (e) establish permanent and well resourced EPA offices in the Upper
    Hunter and Lithgow regions to investigate and monitor coal mining and
    coal-fired power related pollution.

  • Land sale puts Gunns’ trees in firing line

     

    Gunns has previously told the stock exchange that it plans to use the timber from the plantations to ensure its Tamar Valley pulp mill is 100 per cent plantation based.

    But Pulp and paper analyst Robert Eastment says Great Southern’s receivers will consider the possible sale of land and trees.

    “If that is the case then the management of the trees, or the responsible entity with Gunns, may or may not go with that so there’s a degree of uncertainty at this stage,” he said.

    A Gunns spokesman says the matter is up to Great Southern investors.

    Tags: company-news, timber, tas, hobart-7000, launceston-7250

  • Bill passed to allow elite tourist accommodation and facilties in national parks

    Media Release                                                   10 June
    2010
     
    Bill passed to allow elite tourist accommodation and facilities in
    National Parks
     
    Legislation passed late last night by the NSW Upper House will see some
    of the State’s most iconic national parks subject to commercial tourist
    facilities for the elite end of the tourist market at the expense of the
    general public and environment, the NSW Greens said tonight.
     
    “The passing of this legislation with the support of the Opposition
    threatens the integrity of our National Park estate by allowing areas
    within the boundaries of National Parks to be developed,” said NSW
    Greens MP Ian Cohen.
     
    “The Government is keen to adopt the Tourism and Transport Forum’s
    ‘high yield, low volume’ approach to visitors to National Parks which
    could see elite tourist resorts built in some of our most precious
    natural areas.
     
    “This Bill will now make it easier for the public to be excluded from
    some parts of National Parks with private operators being granted
    ‘exclusive access’.
     
    ‘The Government is sending a clear message to the public about the
    future enjoyment of some National Parks – if you can’t pay, stay away.
     
    “With commercial development comes associated infrastructure such as
    powerlines, roads and waste services. These all have an impact on the
    biodiversity values that National Parks are there to protect.
     
    “This legislation has been driven by the bureaucracy in its effort to
    meet performance measures pertaining to increased numbers of visitors to
    our National Parks.
     
    “Allowing elite tourist resorts in National Parks is not the way to get
    more people to enjoy them. Investing in basic park infrastructure and
    upgrades and marketing their natural values is.
     
    “More people appreciating the beauty of the State’s National Parks is a
    great thing, but not if it’s at the expense of the nature with the Parks
    itself,” said Mr Cohen.
     
     

    Further Information: Cate Faehrmann 0412 207 043
     
    Cate Faehrmann
    Adviser
    Greens MLC Ian Cohen
    NSW Parliament
    Macquarie St
    SYDNEY NSW 2000

  • Miners reject Rudd’s $6Bn olive branch

     

    “Perhaps if there had been negotiations earlier it would have been different, but now the damage to Australia has gone on for too long,” she said.

    But the Prime Minister has shown no signs of backing away from his planned reforms.

    During his press club address Mr Rudd invoked the name of Sir John Forrest, the former premier of Western Australia and a long-distant relative of mining magnate Andrew Forrest.

    Mr Rudd says Sir John also started a program of infrastructure building during the gold rush boom and in the face of protests at the time.

    The Prime Minister promised billions from the controversial tax would go to the regions responsible for the mining boom.

    But the announcement sank like a stone, with one journalist claiming Mr Rudd had shot himself in the foot with the tax and his policy on asylum seekers.

    He was blasted for allegedly failing to genuinely consult the industry on the tax changes.

    Mr Forrest rose to his feet to challenge the Prime Minister.

    “Would you now be consulting with your cabinet colleagues… about how you’ve taken your government from their great chance at the next election to no great chance at all now?” Mr Forrest asked.

    Mr Rudd, well versed in the art of diplomacy, trod carefully.

    “As I say to other companies here in the room today, the reason we are here in the west is to consult,” he said.

    “The reason we are here in the west is to listen… [and] to make sure we have heard clearly how the proposed tax change effects your individual company’s circumstances.”

    Under pressure

    The Prime Minister no doubt will face similar tough questions at the community cabinet hearing in south Perth this evening and it is believed he will sit down with Mr Forrest tomorrow to discuss his concerns.

    Mr Rudd is under pressure from mining companies to compromise on the tax proposal, with a strong push for him to change the definition of a “super profit”.

    But before his entrance to the press club, he indicated the tax rate was not going to change.

    “I’ve said we’re consulting with industry on implementation, on detail and on generous transitional arrangements. And that’s precisely what the treasury consultation panel is doing with companies right across Australia,” he said.

    Mr Rudd also revealed for the first time that his talks with BHP Billiton chief Marius Kloppers were as well as expected.

    “We had a cordial and frank discussion and I’m sure we’ll continue to do that in the future,” he said.

    He says the Federal Government has got the tax rate correct and will help mining companies with generous transition arrangements.

    Federal Opposition Leader Tony Abbott says it is hard to see what compromises the Government can make.

    Mr Abbott says the tax needs to be dropped before it causes more damage.

    “The problem with this tax is that he can’t change it without destroying his budget strategy and he can’t keep it without destroying the resources sector’s expansion in this country,” he said.

    “He’s in a very difficult position.”

  • Millions starved after Niger drought

     

    Save the Children says more than seven million people are suffering from some form of malnutrition in a country that has a population of around 15 million.

    Of those, more than three million are described as severely malnourished or starving.

    The aid group’s country director Ibrahima Fall said the extent of the crisis was being grossly under-estimated.

    ‘The transitional government in Niger has appealed for urgent assistance but the response from other rich governments and international donors has been slow and insufficient,’ he said.

    ‘Far more children will die if we don’t act fast.’

    Sky News was given pictures showing some of those being brought to the Aguie centre for emergency treatment.

    Seventeen-month-old Tsahirou was a fragile bundle when he arrived.

    Most of his short life has been spent fighting a seemingly never ending cycle of disease and malnutrition – so far without success.

    His mother Salmey said the family’s food ran out 40 days ago and they have nothing left to eat.

    Two-year-old Rahina was also given urgent treatment.

    The small child struggles to breathe, but her mother Hadija said it was hunger that could kill her.

    ‘We grow crops to sell to feed ourselves, but we received little rain in the last growing season and it wasn’t enough,’ she said.

    ‘We didn’t harvest any beans or peanuts and the yield of millet was very small. There is no food left over from our last harvest. Really there is nothing.’

  • Give decision makers access to the value of nature’s services

     

    Unlike the impacts of climate change, biodiversity – and the ecosystem services it harbours – disappears in a mostly silent, local and anonymous fashion. This may explain in part why the devastation of nature has triggered fewer alarm bells than a hotting-up planet. However, complex systems such as rainforests, wetlands, coastal estuaries and mangroves are very difficult to restore once they have been felled, dug up, polluted or filled in.

    If the true value of the economic, social and spiritual services of ecosystems were factored into decision making, wetlands, forests and reefs would be viewed and treated very differently. For there is mounting evidence to show that the value of preserving ecosystems can far outweigh that of destroying them. Some companies – although too few of them – are also becoming aware that factoring biodiversity into their policies is important to their survival. The above-mentioned Vittel, for example, has launched a project to preserve water quality through the management of ecosystems and farmlands.

    The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity project , part of the UN Environment Programme’s Green Economy Initiative, has compiled a database of more than 1,000 examples showing a high ratio of economic benefits to the costs of conserving ecosystems and biodiversity. In Vietnam, to give just one illustration, planting and protecting nearly 12,000 hectares of coastal mangroves cost US$1.1m but saved the government $7.3m annually on dike maintenance. Environmental NGOs including the World Resources Institute are also developing information and tools to make nature’s services visible for decision makers, including business risk assessment, valuation, mapping, and indicators.

    Unfortunately, government officials, local planning authorities, international development banks, corporations and myriad other decision makers rarely have access to such data and tools. As a result, they lack the necessary information to weigh up accurately either the trade-offs among ecosystem services that stem from development choices, or the resulting consequences for people. And every day the world’s ecosystems, and the essential life-support services they provide us, are further degraded by human activity.

    If we are to preserve Earth’s dwindling natural assets, accounting for ecosystem services must become second nature for decision makers. Just as they weigh up economic and social factors, leaders at every level of government and business should be able to answer the following three questions:

     

    • What ecosystem services do I depend upon?

    • How will my decision affect ecosystem services?

    • What is the condition of these services and how will this create risks and opportunities for me?

    This may sound like a tall order given that the phrase “ecosystem services” is not even part of most policy makers’ lexicons. But urgently needed help may be on the way.

    A proposal for a new body, modelled on the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, is in the making. This week, governments from all regions of the world will meet in Busan, Republic of Korea, to decide on whether to establish a new Intergovernmental Panel on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. The effort is championed by France and Japan – whose leaders have made it a personal priority – and strongly supported by environmental and conservation groups, including the World Resources Institute.

    The new panel would provide a long overdue forum in which scientists engaged in research on biodiversity and ecosystem services, and their links to economics and human wellbeing could provide policy makers and other stakeholders with the independent, authoritative, peer-reviewed scientific information needed to promote more sustainable, nature-friendly development. The panel would provide regular assessments of the condition of, and trends in, biodiversity and ecosystem services, and develop a common terminology and indicators. It could also organise information by biome – enabling research and exchange between scientists and policy makers for ecosystems such as grasslands, mangroves, woodlands or deserts.

    Such a panel could also improve knowledge on the links between climate change and ecosystem change, and facilitate sharing of ecosystem management and climate change adaptation strategies. To be truly effective, however, the panel must bridge the institutionally divided worlds of environment and development. Rather than just preaching to the converted (environment ministries), the information it generates must serve the decision-making needs of national ministries of finance, planning, agriculture, forests, fisheries and energy.

    In France, the ministry of environment is also that of energy, transport and the sea. But in times of economic crisis, issues such as biodiversity conservation may be put aside – even where environmental ministries have a broader scope. The fate of ecosystems, therefore, does not lie primarily in the hands of the environmental ministries who will be at the table in Busan. Rather, it is the world’s finance and development ministries who must learn – and act on – the lesson that mounting devastation of ecosystem services jeopardises economic development goals.

    How to ensure cross-governmental participation and buy-in is therefore the key question for countries gathering at Busan this week. The future health of the natural world – and humanity’s wellbeing – may depend upon it.

     

    • Chantal Jouanno is secretary of ecology at the French Ministry of Ecology, Energy, Sustainable Development and the Sea. Janet Ranganathan is vice president of science and research at the World Resources Institute