Category: Sustainable Settlement and Agriculture

The Generator is founded on the simple premise that we should leave the world in better condition than we found it. The news items in this category outline the attempts people have made to do this. They are mainly concerned with our food supply and settlement patterns. The impact that the human race has on the planet.

  • Keneally budget delivers for the big end of town

    Keneally budget delivers for the big end of town
     
    Media release: 8 June 2010
     
    Premier Kristina Keneally and Treasurer Eric Roozendaal have delivered
    a budget for the big end of town, according to Greens NSW MP and
    Treasury spokesperson John Kaye.
     
    Dr Kaye said: “Developer donors to the ALP have received a big windfall
    from this budget.
     
    “The benefits from the big ticket items in the NSW 2010-2011 budget
    flow almost entirely to the big end of town.
     
    “The cost of this largesse has been borne by real cuts to important
    areas of education and community services.
     
    “Treasurer Roozendaal and his department can take no credit for the
    $773 million surplus. Increased activity in the NSW property market has
    driven up revenue, highlighting to on-going vulnerability of the NSW
    budget to global economic circumstances.
     
    “Treasurer Roozendaal is squandering the opportunities of an economic
    recovery. Real cuts in spending on important areas such as public
    education will impose untold long term social costs on this state.
     
    Developer gain, community pain
     
    “Developers have received a massive boost. Treasurer Roozendaal pushed
    the industry’s products to the front of the housing market delivering
    windfall profits.
     
    “Capping developer contribution levies will hamstring local councils
    and inflict poorly serviced new developments onto lower income
    homebuyers.
     
    “This is a further blow to an already over-stretched local government
    sector.
     
    “Treasurer Roozendaal is pushing the state towards a two-tiered housing
    sector.
     
    “Pumping up the developer model is an irresponsible move that will only
    contribute to another housing bubble, further pricing people on modest
    incomes out of the market.
     
    Keneally government abandons public education
     
    “While NSW government funding for private schools continues to run well
    ahead of inflation, Treasurer Roozendaal delivered cuts in real terms to
    service funding in both public schools and TAFE colleges.
     
    “NSW’s Independent and Catholic schools, already exceptionally well
    funded by the Commonwealth government, will see their state subsidies
    jump by 4.9 percent, which equates to a 2 percent increase in real
    terms.
     
    “The same budget cuts public school recurrent funding by 0.6 percent
    and TAFE by a savage 1.3 percent in real terms.
     
    “The state’s public education budget has lost $73.16 million, while
    private schools have gained $16.6 million.
     
    “Treasurer Roozendaal has made life much harder for public school and
    TAFE students while continuing to prop up luxury conditions in wealthy
    private schools.
     
    Roads given priority over public transport
     
    “The massive $2.8 billion being sunk into major capital works on roads
    dwarfs the $655 million slated for development of the rail network in
    2010/11.
     
    “The Keneally government continues to undermine the importance of
    public transport and bikeways.
     
    Community to bear pain from developer and big business handouts
     
    “The major beneficiaries of the move to across the board cuts to
    payroll tax are large corporations. The lost revenue will undermine the
    delivery of services.
     
    “The Greens support cutting payroll tax for small to medium sized
    business. Treasurer Roozendaal is using the tax system to pump up the
    profits of large corporations at the expense of the community.
     
    Poor priorities on job creation
     
    “Spending $75 million chasing 1,500 defence jobs at a special precinct
    in north-western Sydney amounts to $30,000 per job created.
     
    “Defence has always offered a poor employment return on investment. It
    locks the workers into an inflexible industry.
     
    “While squandering $75 million on low return defence projects, the
    Keneally government struggled to muster $21.7 million for major
    renewable energy projects, where the real job creation of the future
    will occur.
     
    Risk of further privatisation
     
    “The Keneally government is risking the future of the budget bottom
    line by sacrificing the revenue from enterprises slated for sell
    -off.
     
    “The budget continues the myth that electricity privatisation is an
    urgent priority while failing to acknowledge the important contributions
    of publicly owned retailers and generators to the budget,” Dr Kaye
    said.
     
    For more information: John Kaye 0407 195 455
     
     

    Another message from the Greens Media mailing list.

  • UN urges gkobal move to meat and dairy free diet

     

    Professor Edgar Hertwich, the lead author of the report, said: “Animal products cause more damage than [producing] construction minerals such as sand or cement, plastics or metals. Biomass and crops for animals are as damaging as [burning] fossil fuels.”

    The recommendation follows advice last year that a vegetarian diet was better for the planet from Lord Nicholas Stern, former adviser to the Labour government on the economics of climate change. Dr Rajendra Pachauri, chair of the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), has also urged people to observe one meat-free day a week to curb carbon emissions.

    The panel of experts ranked products, resources, economic activities and transport according to their environmental impacts. Agriculture was on a par with fossil fuel consumption because both rise rapidly with increased economic growth, they said.

    Ernst von Weizsaecker, an environmental scientist who co-chaired the panel, said: “Rising affluence is triggering a shift in diets towards meat and dairy products – livestock now consumes much of the world’s crops and by inference a great deal of freshwater, fertilisers and pesticides.”

    Both energy and agriculture need to be “decoupled” from economic growth because environmental impacts rise roughly 80% with a doubling of income, the report found.

    Achim Steiner, the UN under-secretary general and executive director of the UNEP, said: “Decoupling growth from environmental degradation is the number one challenge facing governments in a world of rising numbers of people, rising incomes, rising consumption demands and the persistent challenge of poverty alleviation.”

    The panel, which drew on numerous studies including the Millennium ecosystem assessment, cites the following pressures on the environment as priorities for governments around the world: climate change, habitat change, wasteful use of nitrogen and phosphorus in fertilisers, over-exploitation of fisheries, forests and other resources, invasive species, unsafe drinking water and sanitation, lead exposure, urban air pollution and occupational exposure to particulate matter.

    Agriculture, particularly meat and dairy products, accounts for 70% of global freshwater consumption, 38% of the total land use and 19% of the world’s greenhouse gas emissions, says the report, which has been launched to coincide with UN World Environment day on Saturday.

    Last year the UN’s Food and Agriculture Organisation said that food production would have to increase globally by 70% by 2050 to feed the world’s surging population. The panel says that efficiency gains in agriculture will be overwhelmed by the expected population growth.

    Prof Hertwich, who is also the director of the industrial ecology programme at the Norwegian University of Science and Technology, said that developing countries – where much of this population growth will take place – must not follow the western world’s pattern of increasing consumption: “Developing countries should not follow our model. But it’s up to us to develop the technologies in, say, renewable energy or irrigation methods.”

  • Kevin Rudd driving the electorate green

     

    Especially when you consider that according to the latest Morgan poll, while at the last election Green preferences broke 80:20 Labor’s way things are now radically altered.

    “Today’s Morgan poll shows the federal lection is set to be a lot closer than many had anticipated only a few months ago with the ALP (52.5 per cent, down 2 per cent from May 22-23, 2010) holding a narrow two-party preferred lead over the L-NP (47.5 per cent, up 2 per cent),” Gary Morgan says.

    “Attention has now returned to the real issues the federal election will be fought upon, the most contentious being the Rudd government’s proposed resource super profits tax.

    “The primary votes of the two major parties are even closer with the ALP (42 per cent, down 0.5 per cent) just ahead of the L-NP (41 per cent, unchanged). Only the traditional flow of Greens preferences is predicted to return the government.

    “However, close analysis of recent Morgan poll trends shows Greens preferences are now closer to 65:35 in the ALP’s favour . . . likely caused by the Rudd government’s effective abandonment of its emissions trading scheme legislation.”

    Morgan’s conclusions are backed by the Greens’ research.

    “There is a general feeling that the Labor government started well but are not performing as strongly as before. This feeling was stronger with younger males, where refugee issues and climate change were raised as issues that Labor had disappointed them on. Rudd’s backflip on climate change and approach to asylum-seekers were named specifically,” it summarises.

    “The older voters showed a marked increase in feelings of disappointment towards the government, and a much stronger overall feeling of disempowerment and a feeling of having been conned.”

    An individual comment: “Before the election Rudd was fresh-faced compared to [John] Howard. All my life I’ve voted Labor, and this is the sorriest time.”

    “The Greens,” says the summary “were seen by all groups as having a strong set of values that they don’t compromise on.

    “Of a range of messages about the Greens that were tested, the strongest was ‘It is important to have a third party in the Senate to break deadlocks between the government and opposition’.”

    Another surveyed voice: “More Greens in parliament would provide more independent voices, a different voice for a change.”

    Significantly this is not just the youth vote speaking. “The older group also agreed more Greens in the Senate would be a good thing. Participants wanted another party to criticise the majors.

    Said one grey beard: “The way I see it there are two major parties, and they are not really running the country effectively. But a green party can come up with ideas not just in their field. I’m totally disillusioned with the major parties and I see it as an opportunity and it would be good to have more in parliament.”

    According to the Greens’ research paper: “The concept of the Greens being a wasted vote did not have much traction with any of the groups although there was discussion of local (lower house) candidates’ likelihood of election in the older group.

    “In terms of reasons not to vote Green, one younger male brought up concern regarding ‘Stopping Tony Abbott getting in’, but when asked to differentiate between upper and lower house vote, this was less of an issue.”

    Says one senior Green who parsed the research: “On my analysis, asylum-seekers was an issue that symbolised a general value set for all the parties. For younger males the government’s failure to do better than the Howard government on the issue encapsulated their broader disappointment with Rudd Labor.

    “For older voters, treatment of asylum-seekers was an important symbol of compassion and demonstration of looking after the vulnerable, ‘doing the right thing’ and assisting the disempowered, like themselves.”

    Another thing to worry both main parties. If the Greens’ 16 per cent vote was maintained at election time they would gain an extra Senate seat in every state plus those senators not up for re-election; Milne, (no relation) Brown, Siewart, Hanson-Young and Ludlum.

    A powerful force indeed. Not that Bob Brown is kidding himself, which makes him somebody to be reckoned with. The last time a minor party’s vote peaked in this fashion, he says, was in the run-up to the 1990 election, where one month out from polling day under the leadership of Janine Haines, who ran for a lower house seat, the Democrats rated 17 per cent. On election day that dropped to 11.5 per cent.

    Against that scenario, and according to the preference flow vagaries of the proportional representation of the Senate, Family First’s Steve Fielding is in the Senate on 1.8 per cent of the primary vote. The point being that as a result of Rudd’s catastrophic policy and political failures the Greens now have the best opportunity in a decade of exercising real clout.

    And do you know what Bob Brown told me yesterday would be his first priority after the election, with an additional senator in each state; to sit down with whoever the government of the day was and work out how to implement a national carbon tax.

    Now that’s power.

  • Device captures leaking oil in Gulf

    Device captures leaking oil in Gulf

    AAP June 6, 2010, 2:42 PM!

     

    BP’s latest bid to contain the massive Gulf of Mexico oil spill has registered a first small success, capturing 6,000 barrels of oil in 24 hours, the US official overseeing the spill response said.

    The figure is dwarfed by estimates that up to 19,000 barrels a day could be spewing from the leaking well, but was a rare note of success for the embattled British firm.

    “In the first full 24-hour cycle, yesterday (Friday) as they bring the production level up, they were able to bring up and produce 6,000 barrels of oil from the well,” said retired Coast Guard Admiral Thad Allen at a press briefing on Saturday.

    “The goal is to continue that production, and raise it up,” he added.

    The latest containment effort involves a cap placed over the leak that gathers the oil, allowing it to be siphoned up via a pipe to a container ship.

    It is a modified version of an effort tried earlier in BP’s six-week effort to stem the crude gushing from a ruptured underwater pipe after the Deepwater Horizon rig it leased exploded before sinking into the sea on April 22.

    The earlier attempt failed because cold temperatures and high pressure at the leak site, some 5,000 metres down, caused the oil to form a sludge that could not be siphoned.

    The cap has been redesigned with valves that can be slowly shut down to help prevent the buildup of gas hydrates – similar to ice crystals – that doomed the first attempt.

    “What they’re slowly doing is increasing production to the well bore and up to the ship,” Allen said.

    “They want to raise that up to the maximum extent possible on a daily rate basis, and then slowly start turning off those vents where the oil is coming out of right now when they’re sure they don’t have sea water coming in.”

    BP has said it will provide daily updates on how much oil is being captured by the containment device.

    Overnight, all was not smooth sailing with the oil collection. “The flow of oil and gas to the Enterprise was shut down for three hours overnight,” said Coast Guard spokesman First Class Petty Officer Zach Zubricki.

    News of any successful effort to contain the disastrous spill will be welcomed by the four states so far affected by what is now the worst environmental disaster in US history.

    Saturday, US President Barack Obama pledged in his weekly radio address to use “every resource” to help those affected.

    “We will continue to leverage every resource at our disposal to protect coastlines, to clean up the oil, to hold BP and other companies accountable for damages,” he said.

    An estimated 20 million gallons of crude has poured into the Gulf since the Deepwater Horizon sank April 22, 80 kilometres off Louisiana.

    Eleven workers were killed in the blast, and Obama will meet their families in a White House ceremony next week.

    The president said the spill had “upended whole communities,” and local residents were angry not just about lost income, but because of “the wrenching recognition that this time their lives may never be the same.”

    The scale of the disaster forced Obama to postpone a trip to Australia and Indonesia for the second time, as images of seabirds writhing in oil along the Louisiana coast blanketed US television networks and the front pages of newspapers, underscoring the rising environmental toll.

    Spreading in oily ribbons, the slick is now threatening Alabama, Mississippi and Florida after contaminating more than 200 kilometres of Louisiana coastline.

    Amid criticism over his handling of the crisis, BP chief executive Tony Hayward has announced the formation of a team to work with locals and officials in the aftermath of the cleanup.

    The team will be led by one of the oil giant’s managing directors, Bob Dudley, a US citizen, and was seen as a sign that the cleanup and looming legal battles will likely last for years.

    BP said Saturday it has paid out $US46 million ($A54.66 million) in more than 17,000 claims checks since the disaster began and expected to pay the same amount in June,

    “It’ll be 84 million plus… at least what it was in May if not more,” BP’s lead claims coordinator Darryl Willis told reporters in a conference call from Orange Beach, Alabama.

    BP has not set aside any budget for compensations, “we’ll do this until it’s finished… We’ll stay with it until people are able to return to their normal way of life on the Gulf Coast,” Willis added.

     

  • Don’t shore up minister’s seat: Greens

     

    ‘That’s because of the Greens but it’s unfair,’ Senator Brown told ABC Television on Sunday.

    ‘I would like to see some independent watch again on electorates because why should seats that aren’t marginal be left out of spending on playgrounds and bike ways and refurbishing of buildings?

    ‘And it oughtn’t be happening because the minister feels threatened.’

    Mr Tanner suffered a 5.7 per cent swing against him at the 2007 election, despite a nationwide swing towards Labor, as the Greens candidate Adam Brandt, an industrial lawyer, outpolled the Liberals.

    Labor could lose the seat to the Greens with a swing of less than five per cent against Mr Tanner.

    The Melbourne seat has not been held by a political party other than Labor since 1904.

    The electorate, held for three-decades by former federal Labor leader Arthur Calwell, includes the Melbourne city centre and the now gentrified suburbs of Carlton, Fitzroy and Richmond

  • Poll puts Rudd in trouble on home turf

     

    A poll shows the Federal Government is in electoral trouble in Prime Minister Keven Rudd’s home state of Queensland.

    The Galaxy poll published in the Courier Mail has the Coalition ahead of the Labor Party on a two-party-preferred basis of 52 to 48 per cent.

    The poll says 54 per cent of respondents are opposed to the Government’s proposed resources tax, while 37 per cent support it.

    The poll found 68 per cent of respondents say the Government has done a bad job explaining the tax.

    Mr Rudd and Opposition Leader Tony Abbott are neck-and-neck in the preferred prime minister stakes, with 44 per cent supporting Mr Abbott and 45 per cent supporting Mr Rudd.

    Support for the Greens has increased from 9 per cent to 13 per cent since the last poll in February.

    Tags: government-and-politics, elections, federal-government, labor-party, liberal-party, australia, qld