Category: Sustainable Settlement and Agriculture

The Generator is founded on the simple premise that we should leave the world in better condition than we found it. The news items in this category outline the attempts people have made to do this. They are mainly concerned with our food supply and settlement patterns. The impact that the human race has on the planet.

  • Study shows feedlots increase methane

    New research being done on farms in Vermont in the USA indicates that the artificial diet fed to cattle since the second world war is responsible for a large part of the methane emitted by agriculture. The experiment introduced plants like alfalfa and flax seed into the cattle’s diet mimicing the natural grasses that cows ate earlier last century and replacing corn and soya bean feed. Milk production remained steady while methane emissions dropped by 18 per cent. The first of 15 farmers to try the experiment, Guy Choiniere, said that the cows are healthier, their coats are shinier and their breath is sweeter. Methane is a greenhouse gas, twenty times as effective as carbon dioxide at trapping the sun’s heat. Feedlot cattle produce well over 100kilograms of methane each year as well as consuming 700litres of water for every litre of milk they produce.

    Read related story

  • Diet helps to reduce methane from cattle

    The program was initiated by Stonyfield Farm, the yogurt manufacturer, at the Vermont farms that supply it with organic milk. Mr. Choiniere, a third-generation dairy herder who went organic in 2003, said he had sensed that the outcome would be good even before he got the results.

    “They are healthier,” he said of his cows. “Their coats are shinier, and the breath is sweet.”

    Sweetening cow breath is a matter of some urgency, climate scientists say. Cows have digestive bacteria in their stomachs that cause them to belch methane, the second-most-significant heat-trapping emission associated with global warming after carbon dioxide. Although it is far less common in the atmosphere than carbon dioxide, it has 20 times the heat-trapping ability.

    Frank Mitloehner, a University of California, Davis, professor who places cows in air-tight tent enclosures and measures what he calls their “eruptions,” says the average cow expels — through burps mostly, but some flatulence — 200 to 400 pounds of methane a year.

    More broadly, with worldwide production of milk and beef expected to double in the next 30 years, the United Nations has called livestock one of the most serious near-term threats to the global climate. In a 2006 report that looked at the environmental impact of cows worldwide, including forest-clearing activity to create pasture land, it estimated that cows might be more dangerous to Earth’s atmosphere than trucks and cars combined.

    In the United States, where average milk production per cow has more than quadrupled since the 1950s, fewer cows are needed per gallon of milk, so the total emissions of heat-trapping gas for the American dairy industry are relatively low per gallon compared with those in less industrialized countries.

    Dairy Management Inc., the promotion and research arm of the American dairy industry, says it accounts for just 2 percent of the country’s emissions of heat-trapping gases, most of it from the cows’ methane.

    Still, Erin Fitzgerald, director of social and environmental consulting for Dairy Management, says the industry wants to avert the possibility that customers will equate dairies with, say, coal plants. It has started a “cow of the future” program, looking for ways to reduce total industry emissions by 25 percent by the end of the next decade.

    William R. Wailes, the head of the department of animal science at Colorado State University who is working on the cow of the future, says scientists are looking at everything from genetics — cows that naturally belch less — to adjusting the bacteria in the cow’s stomach.

    For the short run, Professor Wailes said, changes in feed have been the most promising.

    Stonyfield Farm, which started as a money-raising arm for a nonprofit organic dairy school and still has a progressive bent, has been working on the problem longer than most.

    Nancy Hirshberg, Stonyfield’s vice president for natural resources, commissioned a full assessment of her company’s impact on climate change in 1999 that extended to emissions by some of its suppliers.

    “I was shocked when I got the report,” Ms. Hirshberg said, “because it said our No. 1 impact is milk production. Not burning fossil fuels for transportation or packaging, but milk production. We were floored.”

    From that moment on, Ms. Hirshberg began looking for a way to have the cows emit less methane.

    A potential solution was offered by Groupe Danone, the French makers of Dannon yogurt and Evian bottled water, which bought a majority stake in Stonyfield Farm in 2003. Scientists working with Groupe Danone had been studying why their cows were healthier and produced more milk in the spring. The answer, the scientists determined, was that spring grasses are high in Omega-3 fatty acids, which may help the cow’s digestive tract operate smoothly.

    Corn and soy, the feed that, thanks to postwar government aid, became dominant in the dairy industry, has a completely different type of fatty acid structure.

  • It’s raining birds on Western Australia

    The birds were found on Friday at a rubbish tip and near a quarry site in the Perth suburb of Henderson.

    Ken Raine, environmental hazards manager of the DEC Pollution Response Unit, said that birds were seen frothing at the mouth and staggering around at the site before scores of dead birds were discovered within a kilometre radius of the landfill site.

    “Autopsies carried out on the birds found Fenthion in high concentration,” the DEC told The Times. “It was in a landfill site and the birds were found close to the site, but we don’t yet know where the pesticide came from.”

    Fenthion is an organophosporous insecticide used in horticulture to control pests such as fruit fly and aphids and pest birds such as weaver birds. It is also sold for domestic use to control fleas on dogs and in domestic fruit fly sprays.

    The DEC was unable to say what quantity of the pesticide would have been present to kill birds in such large numbers.

    Birds began dropping out of the sky in the beachside Perth suburb of Woodman Point over several days last July, sparking a big investigation into local industries. Post-mortem examinations on dozens of carcasses failed to establish a cause of death, but Fenthion poisoning was ruled out at the time, according to the DEC.

    In December 2007, 5000 birds including yellow-throated miners, honey eaters and wattle birds were killed by lead carbonate blowing through Esperance as it was being exported through the town’s port.

    An investigation into the birds’ deaths found that local children and adults had dangerously high levels of lead in their blood. A local company, Magellan Metals, escaped prosecution over the way it handled the transportation of lead through the town, but fears remained over the potential threat to humans.

  • Coal more important than food: NSW

    The NSW Premier, Nathan Rees and Primary Industry Minister Ian MacDonald have both claimed that mining is more important than farming to the state of NSW. The government has based the statement on the relative export value. NSW exported $12.6 billion worth of minerals, largely coal, and only $5.6 billion worth of food. Pam Allan headed up the working group to determine the terms of reference for an inquiry into whether coal miners should be allowed to undercut the rich farmlands of NSW’s Liverpool Plains. The Generator put it to her that food was a more fundamental human need than energy. She described that as a “radical green stance that made discussion impossible” and then refused to discuss the matter any further.

    Industry Minister backs Rees

  • 90 months and counting

     

    In the last ten months, support for needing to take radical action over countdown period has been far and deep. Nobel prize winners from Rajendra Pachauri of the IPCC to Wangari Maathai of the Kenyan Green Belt movement have leant support, thousands of individuals have too, along with groups whose memberships run into the many millions. Even “spiderman”, in the form of French free climber Alain Robert, has risen, literally, to the cause.

    Yet, in spite of the support that investing in the great transition could give to a weakened economy, the new and additional resources being made available are paltry compared to the support given to the financial sector. Around the world, as states become more acutely aware of the threats to food and energy security stemming from our ecological overreach, they are taking action. But they are just as likely to be eyeing the natural resources of other, weaker states to meet their rising consumption, as they are to be changing consumption patterns to live within their environmental means. Land grabs for food and biofuels seem to hit the news with growing frequency.

    Technological optimism is all around us. “You cannot predict the future and unimagined solutions come along; they always have done,” we are reassured. Whenever there is a great problem, human ingenuity finds a techno-fix. Who could have predicted the chemical fertilisers for our food system, which thwarted Malthusian pessimists? The problem is, with the timeframe to act on climate change, those solutions that are meant to allow us to carry on as usual should have arrived years ago and be in place now. Now, with at best 90 months left on our clock, we have a challenge that will be a bit like the first time a child jumps from the top diving board into the swimming pool.

    Both terrifying and thrilling, we need to brace ourselves for the fastest descent in the use of fossil fuels that a society like ours will ever have faced. It will need technology, behaviour change and regulations to ensure fair shares and equity on the way down. We don’t know everything that will happen on the way down. But if we get it right, I suspect that we will rediscover several important things along the path that have been largely lost or forgotten: something about the importance of community, about our own ingenuity and ability to do things for ourselves, and something also about how deeply connected to, and ultimately dependent on nature, we really are.

  • Green Group backs Great Barrier Reef proection Bill

     

    “It’s going to be great if we can keep that, those really expensive fertilisers and pesticides on the paddock where they can grow a crop, not on the reef turning it into rubble.”

    However, tourism operators say tougher laws to protect the Great Barrier Reef from farm run-off will need to be monitored and enforced.

    Farm groups claim it is unnecessary Government interference in agricultural practice.

    But Col McKenzie from the Association of Marine Park Tourism Operators says farmers who ignore the new rules should be punished.

    “Everything is coming together, it needed to be both federal and state government response and now we need to make sure we encourage the farmers to invest in the right practices,” he said.

    “Failing that, if we can’t get them to pick up and do the right thing and be compensated for it then certainly we need a big stick to follow up.”

    Mr McKenzie says the legislation should have been introduced years ago.

    “The legislative changes I might add are changes that we felt and expressed out views on more than five years ago,” he said.

    “When the reef rescue plan was first put out we said then that asking people to make voluntary change would not be enough that they would have to follow it up with legislation.”

    Meanwhile, the Proserpine Milling Co-operative, north of Mackay in north Queensland, says the sugar industry is already implementing environmentally friendly practices.

    Secretary Ian McBean says the government is over-regulating.

    “We really seem to be heading down a nanny state path here,” he said.

    “The sugar industry has made a very concerted effort to improve it’s environmental performance and yet it seems to me that the State Government is claiming that those very practices that the industry has implemented will only work if they’re under Government control.”