Category: News

Add your news
You can add news from your networks or groups through the website by becoming an author. Simply register as a member of the Generator, and then email Giovanni asking to become an author. He will then work with you to integrate your content into the site as effectively as possible.
Listen to the Generator News online

 
The Generator news service publishes articles on sustainable development, agriculture and energy as well as observations on current affairs. The news service is used on the weekly radio show, The Generator, as well as by a number of monthly and quarterly magazines. A podcast of the Generator news is also available.
As well as Giovanni’s articles it picks up the most pertinent articles from a range of other news services. You can publish the news feed on your website using RSS, free of charge.
 

  • Oceanography News

    Deconstructing a mystery: What caused Snowmaggedon?

    Posted: 09 Feb 2012 12:28 PM PST

    Scientists are using computer models to help unravel the mystery of a record-setting snowfall in the Washington, DC area in early 2010.

    Ocean microbe communities changing, but long-term environmental impact is unclear

    Posted: 09 Feb 2012 11:40 AM PST

    As oceans warm due to climate change, water layers will mix less and affect the microbes and plankton that pump carbon out of the atmosphere – but researchers say it’s still unclear whether these processes will further increase global warming or decrease it. It could be either, they say.

    Ocean warming causes elephant seals to dive deeper

    Posted: 09 Feb 2012 11:02 AM PST

    Global warming is having an effect on the dive behavior and search for food of southern elephant seals. Researchers have discovered that the seals dive deeper for food when in warmer water. The scientists attribute this behavior to the migration of prey to greater depths and now wish to check this theory using a new sensor which registers the feeding of the animals below water.

    Global sea level rise: NASA mission takes stock of Earth’s melting land ice

    Posted: 09 Feb 2012 07:05 AM PST

    In the first comprehensive satellite study of its kind, researchers have used NASA data to calculate how much Earth’s melting land ice is adding to global sea level rise. Using satellite measurements from the NASA/German Aerospace Center Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE), the researchers measured ice loss in all of Earth’s land ice between 2003 and 2010, with particular emphasis on glaciers and ice caps outside of Greenland and Antarctica. The total global ice mass lost from Greenland, Antarctica and Earth’s glaciers and ice caps during the study period was about 4.3 trillion tons (1,000 cubic miles), adding about 0.5 inches (12 millimeters) to global sea level. That’s enough ice to cover the United States 1.5 feet (0.5 meters) deep.
    You are subscribed to email updates from ScienceDaily: Oceanography News
    To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now.
    Email delivery powered by Google
    Google Inc., 20 West Kinzie, Chicago IL USA 60610
  • Can miners love the future?

    The facts are that the economic fairytale of enfettered and infinite growth promoted by Wall Street is directly responsible for the unfolding of the Global Financial Crisis (GFC). In addition, the cavalier approach to resource management that was the hallmark of the oil-fuelled Bush administration’s approach to foreign policy in the middle-east was one of the GFC’s root causes.

     

    The Greens, on the other hand, promote the simple old fashioned values of nurturing the available resources, fixing things rather than throwing them away, and limiting greed with a good rap on the knuckles. This, quite sensibly, involves putting governments back in charge of corporations rather than the other way around.

    The Greens are the natural mainstream progressive party of this century, just as the labour/social democrats were the mainstream progressive party of the twentieth. Protesting against this inevitable fact of political evolution is the response of a petulant teenager refusing to acknowledge parental authority.

    We can work together to create a sustainable future that ensures our grandchildren have some hope of enjoying a degree of affluence similar to our own, or we can squabble amongst ourselves as we consume the dwindling resources that should be their heritage.

    It is not reasonable to expect the denizens of Canberra, Washington and Beijing to cool their rhetoric, that should be the role of journals such as Project Notes.

    I call on the editors of all such journals to show some real leadership and work with the emerging political forces to solve the very real problems that we face, rather than throwing rocks at the only political party that has a long-term plan for the future.

    Giovanni Ebono is the general manager of environmental consultancy Simmonds & Bristow and a good friend of many miners. He stood as the Greens candidate for Richmond in the 2007 and 2010 federal elections.

     

  • Gas projects wait for no one

    Gas drilling companies will have to submit proposed work plans detailing environmental impacts and what chemicals would be used during extraction.

    However, what is the policy of the NSW National Party? How will they address this issue, if as expected they are elected to government in a coalition with the Liberals?

    It was disturbing to read in the Sydney Morning Herald earlier this month (04/12/10) that two of the companies with licences to explore for coal seam gas in NSW are chaired by former National Party leaders: Aston Resources by Mark Vaile and Eastern Star Gas by John Anderson.

     

    The Northern Rivers Greens are very concerned about the explosion in exploration of coal seam gas mining in our region eg Keerong, and its impact on farmers, prime agricultural land and our aquifers.

     

    The Greens are calling for a moratorium on all coal seam gas (CSG) mining activities in NSW.

    Overseas experience as seen in the movie “Gasland”, has shown that CSG presents significant environmental risks to water supplies and can have a devastating impact on productive farming lands as gas wells and surface infrastructure such as roads and pipelines limit their use for agricultural purposes.

    Queensland campaigners fear that up to 40,000 gas wells could be drilled by 2030 with 4000 exploration wells already in place across that state.

    NSW should not wait until it is too late to put appropriate regulation of the coal seam gas industry into place. The vast majority of NSW residents live on top of coal reserves.

    Susan Stock and Wayne Wadsworth

    Co Convenors

    Northern Rivers Greens

    Lismore

     

  • Federal government caves in on Gas restrictions

    Courier Mail – Dec 03

    Evidence of the threat came as the Government’s own National Water Commission raised fears of long-term impacts from the multiple projects planned for the Surat Basin.

    A letter dated October 16 from Queensland Gas chief executive Catherine Tanna to Federal Environment Minister Tony Burke said the conditions placed on the company’s plans were too severe.

    “We have indicated to your officers that we have significant concerns with the proposed conditions relating to coal seam gas water management, offsets and the timing of various approvals,” Ms Tanna said.

    “In their proposed form, these matters present sufficient difficulty to prevent my recommending the project to the BG Group board for a final investment decision.”

    Two weeks after the letter, the BG board approved the project, on which the Federal Government had placed 300 environmental conditions.

    The company confirmed the Government changed its mind on some water issues after officials were shown how they had misinterpreted the plan.

    Friends of the Earth activist Drew Hutton doubted all the conditions would be enforced.

    “Queensland has a long history of non-enforcement of environmental regulation with regard to the mining industry which, basically, regulates itself,” he said. “This industry is too big and too powerful to be effectively regulated.”

    Documents tabled in Federal Parliament last week show that at least one of the three projects approved had raised its own concerns about shallow groundwater contamination from salt ponds and chemical and fuel storage sites associated with processing plants.

    There have also been warnings that underground acquifers would be so depleted by the projects that it could take centuries to replenish them.

    The National Water Commission estimates the CSG industry would extract about 7500 gigalitres of water during the next 25 years – six times the capacity of Wivenhoe Dam.

    “If not adequately managed and regulated, it risks having significant, long-term and adverse impacts on adjacent surface and groundwater systems,” the NWC said.

    On the BG approval, Mr Bourke said all proponents were given a chance to comment on the proposed decision before the final ruling is made.

    “It is common practice for changes to be made to proposed conditions, in response to such comments,” he said.

  • What the Frack?

     

    What are we doing anyway?

    The best place to start is with the gas that we are trying to extract. Whether it is the layers of shale (fossilised mud) in the US or coal (fossilised plant matter – peat, swamp plants) there are small pockets of methane gas distributed through the fossil bed.

    The protein and other nitrogen based compounds in any ecosystem eventually break down into relatively simple forms like ammonia, urea or methane. Natural gas is methane and can be basically described as fossilised farts.

    In a coal seam (or shale bed) there are microscopic layers of methane coating the individual coal particles. Some coal beds are gassier than others. The tragic Pike Hill coal mine in New Zealand was notoriously gassy. As the coal was mined it gave off lots of methane.

    It is that methane that we are after.

    Frack my coal seam

    The process we are employing to extract the methane from these underground coal seams is to drill a well into the coal seam, fracture the coal seam to expose the gas, and extract the gas by using water to wash the gas off the surface of the coal.

    The term fracking is an abbreviation of fracturing. The process being used in most of the extraction being undertaken now is called hydraulic fracturing. In this process the gas company injects a mixture of high pressure water and sand into the coal seam, forcing the sand into minute cracks that appear under pressure so that the cracks will remain open as the high pressure water rushes out.

    After the initial well is dug, the gas capturing equipment is installed at the top of the well and then the well is fracked. The water that emerges is the process water or the production water, the gas is extracted and the water disposed of.

    A well may be fracked many times in its life before the volume of methane being removed becomes too small to make it worthwhile.

    So the simple picture is water and sand in, water and methane out.

    The methane is then extracted from the water at the surface.

    This sounds like quite a benign process but there are a number of additional extras that need to be considered.

    Unpack that fracking fluid

    As well as the methane, the coal is also coated with a range of other chemicals, including a high volume of salt.

    Remembering that coal is a fossilised swamp and consists of all the carbon that was in the plants growing in the swamp, the stuff that is clinging to the coal is all the non carbonaceous material from the swamp. Most swamps are smelly, slimy places oozing with a rich mixture of living things. Oily slicks of aromatic hydrocarbons, like phenols are common place and sulphurous gases are not uncommon.

    This cocktail of extras comes out with the methane in the water.

    That water is also incredibly salty. It is significantly more salty than the saltiest inland bores and is a great potential danger to the inland water ways.

    In addition to the “natural” compounds that are part of the coal seam, there are the fluids used to assist with the fracturing process. Even where pure water is being used to do the fracturing, there are lubricants, anticorrosion chemicals and emulsifiers just to get the process working properly.

    In most cases, though, there is a cocktail of chemical extras involved.

    If you are trying to wash the methane of the surface of the coal, why wouldn’t you add a little detergent or other surfactants to assist in the process, to dissolve some of the sticky hydrocarbons that are gumming up the coal seam, it might be useful to add some acids or alkalis to assist in the process.

    The truth is that every coal seam is different, and there are a range of fracking fluids designed to maximise the methane production from each well. The fracking fluids may be selected or mixed on the spot based on the results being obtained in the field.

    The other F word

    We might be fracking the coal seam, but the real concern is what we are doing to the rest of the environment.

    The damage to the landscape done by at least 22,000 wells in an arc from south west Queensland to the Capricorn Coast is one thing, the extraction of one hundred and fifty tonnes of salt a day is another#. The potential damage to the Great Artesian Basin is a third aspect that deserves special attention.

    (# Coal Seam Gas Discussion Paper)

    The Great Artesian Basin covers a huge part of Australia, larger than the area covered by the Murray Darling Basin. It is an enormous resource of fossilised water, on which a large amount of Australian agriculture depends for its existence. Without the Great Artesian Basin there would be no outback beef industry and many of the irrigation areas in Australia’s inland would not exist.

    There are two primary threats to the Great Artesian Basin.

    One is that we could use all the water up.

    This water has been underground for hundreds of millions and it is inconceivable that we might consider it a renewable resource. We are mining that water, on which future generations depend to extract a non renewable energy source at very high cost*.

    We are mining the water at incredible volumes. We are talking about tens to hundreds of gigalitres per year, that is hundreds of Megalitres per day over the lifetime of the project.

    That is a vast amount of water. That is a similar quantity of water flowing down the Murray River in a good year. The natural discharge from the Great Artesian Basin, is estimated to be around 400Megalitres per day#, which is reasonable to assume is of a similar order of magnitude to the inflows. That means, that the Coal Seam Gas project could potentially use all the water that flows naturally from the Great Artesian Basin, meaning that any extractions by farmers, towns or industry anywhere else in the basin is depleting this ancient water supply.

    So what we are doing is using a water supply that takes millions of years to create, that could supply us with water to grow food for centuries at current usage rates to satisfy twenty years demand for energy.

    It is clearly insane.

    # See Hydrogeological Framework Report on Great Artesian Basin – Qld Dept Natural Resources and Mines 2005

    * See my article The Nett Energy Profit of Coal Seam Gas.

    The other threat is that we could poison it

    The interconnections between the various layers of groundwater and the coal seam are complex and varied. They differ widely from location to location.

    The high profile problem that has been detected in this form of natural gas production is the mixing of methane with water that has led to the spectacular images of people setting fire to their tap water. Of more concern, however, is the appearance of carcinogenic hydrocarbons in people’s drinking water. Whether this is from substances washed off the coal during production, or from the fracking fluid itself is largely irrelevant, it is dangerous to allow these chemicals into drinking water.

    It is these additional chemicals that have led to widespread illness in humans and stock across the US shale fields.

    To poison the water coming to the surface during the mining operations is one thing, the greater danger is that this process is opening connections between the coal seam and the artesian water that have not previously existed. The problems that are emerging now may be the worst of the problems that this process will exist, or they may just be the beginning of much worse problems that will emerge in the future. We simply do not know.

    Neither do we know what the long term result of injecting these chemicals into the coal seam will be. They might just sit there and remain a strange addition to the fossil record they might become a catalyst for a reaction we cannot predict. The truth is that we simply do not know.

    Where the frack from here?

    In an energy starved world, Australia has vast reserves of fossil and renewable energy resources. It is in our interests as a nation, and as individual members of this nation, to exploit those resources in a manner that allows us to build a robust vibrant future.

     

    We simply need to make sure that we are not doing anything that could endanger this.

    There is no urgency to get this energy out of the ground. The world’s demand for energy is not going to go away, the longer we wait, the higher the price of energy will be.

     

    We simply need to proceed in an orderly fashion, well informed by the best science possible. If we rush we may make mistakes and these resources are too precious to destroy.

     

    There is only one Great Artesian Basin, if we break it, the sound of “whoops” will resound so far into the future that our mistake will become part of the mythology of cultures we cannot even imagine yet.

     

    Let’s no “go there”.