Category: News

Add your news
You can add news from your networks or groups through the website by becoming an author. Simply register as a member of the Generator, and then email Giovanni asking to become an author. He will then work with you to integrate your content into the site as effectively as possible.
Listen to the Generator News online

 
The Generator news service publishes articles on sustainable development, agriculture and energy as well as observations on current affairs. The news service is used on the weekly radio show, The Generator, as well as by a number of monthly and quarterly magazines. A podcast of the Generator news is also available.
As well as Giovanni’s articles it picks up the most pertinent articles from a range of other news services. You can publish the news feed on your website using RSS, free of charge.
 

  • Liberal tactics support Greens strategy

    It is inevitable is that thinking voters will desert the old left right dichotomy of the industrial era and start to vote on the basis of long term marshalling of resources in the interests of future generations and the country, generally.

    From a Labor dominated Canberra, the view is somewhat different. There, an increasingly shrill and desparate Liberal opposition scores points by railing against a Labor Green Coalition. As the Labor Left attempts to reclaim the progressive tag, the Liberals can successfully use that as a wedge to paint the Greens as driving the government agenda.

    The opposite will happen in the Liberal led states. WA, Vic and soon NSW will get on with destroying the long term future of those states, while shoring up their immediate cash flow and isolate Labor as the incompetent past. The Greens will continue to present themselves as the rational voice of an alternative future and Labor will have no where to go.

    Whether the Liberal parties’ desperation reaches such a fever pitch that it escapes human hearing and disappears in a pouffe of smoke, or the Labor party becomes so earnest it cannot ever finish a sentence for the endless sops it makes to the mythical left, the culturally correct as well as the aspirational worker is irrelevant.

    What happens now is that the old, industrial parties blend, somehow, while the Greens work out how to manage a coalition of deep Green environmentalists, socialist watermelons, swinging voters who care and the increasingly important blue green pragmatists. That coalition will gradually come to represent the minority.

    As well as managing the increasingly complex agenda of a broad politically party, The Greens have to work out how to manage the grass roots. A century ago the ALP was working with the unions and the catholic church to build a network of workers clubs, adult education institutes, railway institutes and so on in preparation for attaining government.

    So far, The Greens have snubbed their nose at the environmental activist groups that spawned them. It is now time to grow up and harness the energy of that Green Army rather than neurotically attempting to distance itself from it.

    The genius of the ALP a century ago was to establish a national conference that allowed the active and the political wings of the party to work together separately. So far, the Greens have failed to even recognise this problem let alone solve it. Thoughtful men on the periphery, like Ian Lowe and Clive Hamilton have attempted, unsuccessfully so far, to grapple with it, but without much success.

    With hundreds of councillors, decades of state parliamentarians and seven Federal parliamentarians, this Green coalition has enough clout now to actually nail this thing. The challenge is to maintain the vision through the long tedious process of winning the numbers. But that is the nature of politics.

    Ghandi and Mandela have acquired religious status because it is belief that informs that wait. It is the presence of greater knowledge that allows a little man in a loin cloth to cause armies to cower and a shackled man in pyjamas to cause his captors to snap to attention as he shuffles up the stone steps from his dungeon.

    The Liberals denial of preferences to the Greens in the Victorian elections this weekend just gone is more grist to that mythical mill. The Greens simply have to recognise it.

  • Coal Seam dangers clarified

    Environmental adviser to energy company Origin, Bartrim was highlighting the problem that the large amount of detail involved in regulating and approving the coal seam gas projects across Queensland and Northern NSW may cause the regulators to fail at their task and the industry itself to lose sight of its primary objective, extracting the gas with minimum damage to the environment.

     

    “This obsession with conformance leads people to focus on ticking the boxes and completing the paperwork and there is a danger we can lose sight of the real problem,” he said.

    He also noted that Coal Seam Gas companies will become major land holders in Queensland and the largest individual users of water. “The volumes of water are simply staggering,” he said. It is unkown wether the water extracted from the basic to hydraulically fracture the coal seam can, or should be, returned to the basin. If it is not, there is the danger that the basin will be permanently depleted.

    Bartrim’s presentation about the nature of coal seam gas extraction is extremely helpful to anyone trying to grapple with the rechnical aspects of the problem. The Generator will post a link to that presentation online if Bartrim is in a position to share it with the general public.

     

  • Julia’s deal shakes faith

     

    The House of Representatives website carries a guide to parliamentary practice, now in its fifth edition, which spells out the role of Speaker and alludes to the expectations attached to it.

    It states: “Traditionally, the Speaker in the House of Representatives has been a person of considerable parliamentary experience.”Oakeshott has been in federal parliament for two years. His record of non-attendance for votes is breathtaking (as is that of his Independent-Labor colleague Tony Windsor).

    Oakeshott pleads that he was a member of the NSW legislature for 12 years, but anyone who believes service in that pitiful slum of dem- ocracy is akin to experience in the federal sphere is seriously deluding themselves.

    The parliamentary guide continues: “One of the hallmarks of good Speakership is the requirement for a high degree of impartiality in the execution of the duties of the office.

    “This … has been developed over the last two centuries to a point where in the House of Commons, the Speaker abandons all party loyalties and is required to be impartial on all party issues both inside and outside the House.”

    Again, Oakeshott outstandingly fails this basic test. He has betrayed the trust of his former party, the Nationals, to which he once pledged his utmost loyalty, and he has spectacularly spat in the eyes of every conservative voter in his electorate – the overwhelming majority of those in Lyne – by supporting Labor and permitting it to form a government.

    According to the guide, quoting from May’s, the standard reference for practice in the House of Commons since 1844: “Confidence in the impartiality of the Speaker is an indispensable condition of the successful working of procedure, and many conventions exist which have as their object not only to ensure the impartiality of the Speaker but also to ensure that his impartiality is generally recognised.

    “He takes no part in debate either in the House or in committee. He votes only when the voices are equal, and then only in accordance with rules which preclude an expression of opinion on the merits of a question.”

    It’s clear Oakeshott doesn’t come within cooee of the notion of being a person in whom anyone could possibly express any confidence, no matter how many tickets he may have on himself.

    His whole political career has been one of dodgy premise and obfuscation of true principles. When it suits, he claims to be guided by this or that opinion – from another.

    He hides his own opinions because he doesn’t wish to be tied to any view that he may one day have to stand up and justify.

    Tomorrow, Oakeshott will meet Opposition Leader Tony Abbott to discuss, among other things, his hope of trousering an extra $100,000, gaining an office suite, a vast staff and the prestige of the Speaker’s job.

    He is already squealing about the agreement the Government has reached with the Opposition over pairing – the practice of governments and oppositions agreeing to match members who cannot (for sound reasons) be present during votes.

    His argument on this issue demonstrates exactly why he lacks the credentials to be Speaker. Under his proposal, his vote as Speaker would be paired on every division, meaning that on deciding which way he would vote, he would then ask the opposing side to pair with him.

    This arrangement would give Oakeshott even more power, as he would be able to deliver the necessary extra vote whenever needed.

    It is long-standing Westminster tradition – strenuously followed in the House of Commons and other Westminster-style parliaments around the world – for the Speaker not to be paired, not to have a deliberative vote, and, in the event of a tied vote, putting the casting vote effectively in support of the status quo. This tradition enshrines the true independence of the Speaker.

    In the tradition of the Greens, with whom he has much in common, Oakeshott appears to be attempting to claim to be principled while riding roughshod over sound practice.

    It wouldn’t surprise if he were to try to cling to power by proposing that the major parties endorse another House of Commons tradition: that Speakers not be challenged in their own seats by the majors (though this has not always been the case).

    Finally, the guide states: “The Speaker embodies the dignity of the nation’s representative assembly.

    “The office is above the individual and commands respect.
    The degree of respect depends to some extent on the occupant, but it is fair to say that the office … has [generally] been shown to be respected on both sides of the House. It is unquestionably of great importance that, as a contribution towards upholding the impartiality of the office, the House chooses a candidate [with] the qualities necessary for a good Speaker.”

    Oakeshott has lost any respect he may once have had. He’s not impartial and lacks all the necessary qualities for Speaker. He is not the candidate sound practice demands.

  • Promises may not be kept: PM

    Promises may not be kept: PM

    AAP September 18, 2010, 12:32 AM 

     

    Promises made by the government in the run-up to the federal election no longer necessarily apply because of the “new environment” created by a hung parliament, Prime Minister Julia Gillard says.

    “It’s not business as usual for measures that require substantial legislation,” Ms Gillard said in an interview with Fairfax Newspapers published on Saturday.

    This included “big picture reforms – and anything associated with climate change is obviously one where we’re in a new environment”, she said.

    Ms Gillard on Thursday said Labor remained committed to working towards a price on carbon but said there were complex policy questions that must first be addressed.

    With climate change policy now being shaped by a cross-party committee comprising politicians and outside experts, Ms Gillard said that what she said before the election no longer applied.

    “We laboured long and hard to develop a market-based mechanism,” she said of the government’s emissions trading scheme.

    “But I’m recognising the political reality.

    “I campaigned as prime minister in an election campaign with policies for the government.

    “We are in a new environment where in order for any action to happen in this parliament, you need more consensus than the views and policies of the government and this committee is the way of recognising that.”

     

  • EU nuclear waste disposal plans ‘not safe’ claim scientists.

    EU nuclear waste disposal plans ‘not safe’ claim scientists

    Emily Shelton

    16th September 2010

    Experts warn EU proposals for deep geological disposal of radioactive waste have ‘serious potential for something to go badly wrong’

    There are ‘serious flaws’ in the advice being given to EU ministers on disposing of nuclear waste deep underground, scientists have concluded.

    Geological disposal, where radioactive waste is buried in rock formations underground, is the preferred approach of a number of European countries, with potential sites having already been identified in Finland, Sweden and the UK, in Cumbria.

    However, scientists and environmentalists have revealed ‘serious flaws in the advice being given to the Commission’ and are calling for more research into alternative options.

    A major review of the science surrounding deep geological disposal, commissioned by Greenpeace, has highlighted numerous risks of failure which could result in highly radioactive waste being released into our groundwater or seas for centuries. Problems include: corrosion of containers; heat and gas formation leading to pressurisation and cracking of the storage chamber; unexpected chemical reactions; geological uncertainties; future ice ages, earthquakes and human interference.

    Report author Dr Helen Wallace says people need to ‘grasp the enormity of the challenge’.

    ‘We’re talking about trying to contain this waste for a greater amount of time than human beings have been living on the planet, so although [we] might be able to predict the consequences over a short time scale, that’s an enormous scientific challenge’.

    ‘This waste is extremely radioactive and very hot so it’s going to significantly change the water flow deep underground; the corrosion of materials and the repository will release large quantities of gas which have to escape somehow.’ She warned the waste will ‘remain dangerous for many generations’.

    Recent proposals from the EU’s Joint Research Centre (JRC) and the European ‘Implementing Geological Disposal’ Technology Platform (IGD-TP) claim there is a scientific consensus in support of deep geological disposal but Dr Wallace suggests this consensus is a ‘political rather than scientific one’.

    The EU Commission is expected to publish a draft nuclear waste plan this autumn with ambitions for the first geological disposal facilities for nuclear waste to be ready by 2025.

    Greenpeace is calling on EU leaders to look at alternatives, such as near surface or above ground storage or deep bore holes. Storing waste above ground was seen by Dr Wallace as the ‘least bad option’ because corrosion and leaking could be prevented.

    Useful links
    Greenpeace report ‘Rock Solid?’
    Vision Document of the European ‘Implementing Geological Disposal’ Technology Platform (IGD-TP)

  • Labor wins two-party preferred vote

    Labor wins two-party preferred vote

    Posted 4 hours 10 minutes ago

    The final count in the federal election campaign shows the Government has won the two-party preferred vote.

    The Australian Electoral Commission says after preferences Labor has 50.12 per cent of the vote compared to the Coalition’s 49.88 per cent.

    Labor has a lead of 30,490 votes.

    Tags: government-and-politics, elections, federal-government, federal-elections, australia