Category: Uncategorized

  • Greenland Ice Stores Liquid Water

    Site » News stories

    News

    Greenland Ice Stores Liquid Water

    22.12.2013

    22.12.2013 21:57 Age: 8 min

    Liquid water found in the Greenland ice sheet could affect estimates of future sea level rise.

    Click to enlarge. This drill rig was used to extract firn cores from within the Greenland firn aquifer. One of the snowmobiles used in the 186 mile traverse of the ice sheet to reach the drill site. Clément Miège, University of Utah Ph.D. student and Terry Gacke, Ice Drilling Design and Operations. Courtesy: Evan Burgess

    Click to enlarge. Water from the Greenland perennial firm aquifer draining from a core extracted 40 feet below the surface of the ice sheet in April, prior to seasonal melt, with air temperatures 5 degrees F confirming water was retained at depth throughout the winter. Courtesy: Ludovic Brucker

    Researchers at the University of Utah have discovered a new aquifer in the Greenland Ice Sheet that holds liquid water all year long in the otherwise perpetually frozen winter landscape. The aquifer is extensive, covering 27,000 square miles.

     

    The reservoir is known as a “perennial firn aquifer” because water persists within the firn – layers of snow and ice that don’t melt for at least one season. Researchers believe it figures significantly in understanding the contribution of snowmelt and ice melt to rising sea levels.

     

    The study was published online Sunday, 22 December, in the journal Nature Geoscience.

     

    “Of the current sea level rise, the Greenland Ice Sheet is the largest contributor – and it is melting at record levels,” says Rick Forster, lead author and professor of geography at the University of Utah. “So understanding the aquifer’s capacity to store water from year to year is important because it fills a major gap in the overall equation of meltwater runoff and sea levels.”

     

    Forster’s team has been doing research in southeast Greenland since 2010 to measure snowfall accumulation and how it varies from year to year. The area they study covers 14 percent of southeast Greenland yet receives 32 percent of the entire ice sheet’s snowfall, but there has been little data gathered.

     

    In 2010, the team drilled core samples in three locations on the ice for analysis. Team members returned in 2011 to approximately the same area, but at lower elevation. Of the four core samples taken then, two came to the surface with liquid water pouring off the drill while the air temperatures were minus 4 degrees Fahrenheit. The water was found at about 33 feet below the surface at the first hole and at 82 feet in the second hole.

     

    “This discovery was a surprise,” Forster says. “Although water discharge from streams in winter had been previously reported, and snow temperature data implied small amounts of water, no one had yet reported observing water in the firn that had persisted through the winter.”

     

    The aquifer is extensive, covering 27,000 square miles — larger than the state of West Virginia. It is similar in form to a groundwater aquifer on land that can be used for drinking water. “Here instead of the water being stored in the air space between subsurface rock particles, the water is stored in the air space between the ice particles, like the juice in a snow cone,” Forster adds. “The surprising fact is the juice in this snow cone never freezes, even during the dark Greenland winter. Large amounts of snow fall on the surface late in the summer and quickly insulates the water from the subfreezing air temperatures above, allowing the water to persist all year long.”

     

    Why Studying Ice in Greenland is Important

    The Greenland Ice Sheet is vast, covering roughly the same area as the states of California, Nevada, Arizona, New Mexico, Colorado and Utah combined. The average thickness of the ice is 5,000 feet. In 2012, the ice sheet lost volume of 60 cubic miles – a record for melt and runoff.

     

    The consequences of losing the ice sheet could be catastrophic. If all the water retained in the ice sheet melted, it is estimated that the global sea level would rise about 21 feet, says Forster. Although no one is predicting a total meltoff all at once, keeping an eye on ice formation, runoff amounts and how the water is moving is critical to accurately predicting sea level changes.

     

    Until now, calculations of the ice sheet mass changes did not include a year-round storage mechanism for liquid water. Models predicted that water either flowed into rivers and lakes on the ice surface, into crevasses and subglacial streams that eventually run into the sea, or was refrozen within the ice sheet.

     

    Discovery of the perennial aquifer will help scientists predict the movement and temperature of water within the ice sheet with more precision.

     

    Forster says the reservoir’s exact role is unknown. “It might conserve meltwater flow and thus help slow down the effects of climate change. But it may also have the opposite effect, providing lubrication to moving glaciers and exacerbating ice velocity and calving increasing the mass of ice loss to the global ocean.”

     

    As for whether climate change caused the aquifer to form, Forster says that’s not clear, but simulations of the Greenland Ice Sheet going back to the early 1970s would suggest it has been around for some time.

     

    How the Study was Conducted

    The previously unknown storage mode was found in the southeast section of Greenland, where conditions combine to provide sufficient rain and snowmelt to fill the firn with water, as well as high levels of snow accumulation that insulate the water from freezing during the winter.

     

    The team used data collected by airborne and ground-penetrating radar to pinpoint the aquifer, and then took core samples on the ground.

     

    Airborne radar imagery was collected in the area by NASA Operation IceBridge, which is a program directed at collecting images of Earth’s polar ice in unprecedented detail to better understand the processes that connect polar regions with climate change. Ground-penetrating radar and a roving Global Positioning System navigation unit also were towed across the ice in the same area via snowmobile, collecting data every five seconds.

     

    Researchers found that the radar images from air and ground corresponded on both the depth of a bright horizon, indicating where there is a change in consistency of the ice, as well as the undulations of the horizon across distance of about 15 miles. This was confirmation that the airborne radar could map the aquifer just as well as the ground-based radar.

     

    Core samples were taken with a 4-inch-diameter drill. Two segments were extracted that were saturated with liquid water – one from a depth of about 33 feet and another the following day about a mile east and at a depth of more than 80 feet.

     

    Temperatures in the spring of 2011 were below average. Forster notes that, “because air temperatures were minus 4 degrees Fahrenheit during drilling and because surface melting in the area did not begin until June in 2011, there is no doubt that the water found in the firn had persisted through the winter.”

     

    This research is an international collaboration among researchers at the University of Utah, the Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland, Byrd Polar Research Center at the Ohio State University, Institute for Marine and Atmospheric Research Utrecht, Utrecht University, the NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, the Center for Remote Sensing of Ice Sheets at the University of Kansas, and the Desert Research Institute at the University of Nevada, Reno. Forster and the Utah team were supported by the National Science Foundation and NASA.

     

    Abstract

    Mass loss from the Greenland ice sheet contributes significantly to present sea level rise1. High meltwater runoff is responsible for half of Greenland’s mass loss2. Surface melt has been spreading and intensifying in Greenland, with the highest ever surface area melt and runoff recorded in 20123. However, how surface melt water reaches the ocean, and how fast it does so, is poorly understood. Firn—partially compacted snow from previous years—potentially has the capacity to store significant amounts of melt water in liquid or frozen form4, and thus delay its contribution to sea level. Here we present direct observations from ground and airborne radar, as well as ice cores, of liquid water within firn in the southern Greenland ice sheet. We find a substantial amount of water in this firn aquifer that persists throughout the winter, when snow accumulation and melt rates are high. This represents a previously unknown storage mode for water within the ice sheet. We estimate, using a regional climate model, aquifer area at about 70,000 km2 and the depth to the top of the water table as 5–50 m. The perennial firn aquifer could be important for estimates of ice sheet mass and energy budget.

     

    Citation

    “Extensive liquid meltwater storage in firn within the Greenland ice sheet” by

    Richard R. Forster, Jason E. Box, Michiel R. van den Broeke, Clément Miège, Evan W. Burgess, Jan H. van Angelen, Jan T. M. Lenaerts, Lora S. Koenig, John Paden, Cameron Lewis, S. Prasad Gogineni, Carl Leuschen & Joseph R. McConnell published by Nature Geoscience. doi:10.1038/ngeo2043

    Read the abstract and get the full paper here.

     

    Source

  • New study helps wind energy sector tackle turbine noise problem

    In this issue
    year that was…
    Judge blasts renewable energy regulator over secret email wrangle

    More than 40% of Scotland’s energy demand is now met by renewables

    Major offshore wind industrial project gets the go-ahead

    New study helps wind energy sector tackle turbine noise problem

    Statkraft signs double PPA deal with RES for Meikle Carewe and Tallentire Wind Farms

    Renewable energy is young generation’s top investment choice

    Mushroom farm installs AD plant to generate power and heat

    Pioneering renewable energy plant seals £50m investment deal

    Innovative smart grid technology roll-out helps save cash and carbon

    Greggs installs solar PV panels on its bakery roofs

    Plans brought forward to install waste-to-energy plant at former colliery site

    £3m boost for energy storage innovation
    REA calls for stronger domestic biofuels targets

    Second huge offshore wind farm axed in space of two weeks

    New study helps wind energy sector tackle turbine noise problem

    The wind industry trade association RenewableUK has published detailed new scientific research on wind energy acoustics.

    The study was carried out to investigate the causes of, and solutions to, the occurrence of an acoustic characteristic known as “Other Amplitude Modulation” (OAM).

    The report explains the differences between “Normal Amplitude Modulation” (NAM), which is the common swishing sound made by turbine blades as they pass through the air, and OAM, which is an infrequent and uncommon sound which typically lasts only for a few minutes. As a result of the research, acoustics professionals and the wind industry have a clear understanding of the characteristics of OAM, as well as how to address it if it should occur.

    RenewableUK’s Deputy Chief Executive Maf Smith said: “It’s right that the wind industry should take the lead in investigating issues like this when they arise. As a result of the in-depth research we’ve commissioned, we’ve identified the causes of OAM, and, most importantly, the industry has identified a way to deal with it effectively.

    “On the limited and infrequent occasions when OAM occurs, we can address it by using software to adjust the way turbines operate, changing the angle of the blades.

    “Beyond that, the industry has worked with members of the UK’s leading acoustics institute to develop a planning condition for local authorities to use, which we’re publishing today alongside this work. This states that if OAM occurs, it’s up to the wind industry to resolve it.

    “We’re proud to have commissioned this ground-breaking research as it pushes the boundaries of our knowledge of wind turbine acoustics considerably further forward. It’s a tangible example of the wind industry acting in a responsible manner, demonstrating that we’re continuing to be good neighbours to the communities who host wind farms in the UK.”

    OAM is caused by sudden variations in the direction and speed of the wind. These variations mean that the wind hits different parts of the turbine blade at different speeds, causing it to stall momentarily. This stalling action produces a “whooshing” sound.

    OAM is not louder than NAM; both are relatively quiet, typically no louder than 35 to 40 decibels at a distance of about 1 kilometre, but it is deeper in pitch. OAM is comparable to the sound of traffic noise heard at around 1 km from a single carriage A-road.

    The wind industry has identified solutions to the issue – software adjustments which change the angle of the turbine blades at certain times when OAM could occur. The industry has also worked with members of the Institute of Acoustics on the development of a planning condition which can be used by local authorities. This means that when wind farm developers apply to build projects, they will be required to resolve any instances of OAM in accordance with the planning permission.

  • Antony Green’s Election Blog

    « Comparative Rules on Registering Political Parties | Main

    December 21, 2013

    The Remarkable Path to Victory of Wayne Dropulich

    The most astonishing result of the 2013 Australian election was the extra-ordinary election of Wayne Dropulich of the Australian Sports Party in the Western Australia Senate.

    With a first preference vote for his party of just 0.23%, it took an astonshing sequence of exclusions and preference flows to allow Mr Dropulich to increase his vote more than fifty fold to reach the quota of 14.3%. He was elected to fill the fifth seat ahead of the Greens who had polled 9.5% of the first preference vote.

    At this stage whether Mr Dropulich will take his Senate seat depends on proceedings before the Court of Disputed Returns. The Australian Electoral Commission (AEC) has petitioned the Court to void the result and order a new election for the WA Senate.

    As will be outlined below, Mr Dropulich was initially defeated on the distribution of preferences performed after the initially tally of all first preferences. After the AEC permitted a re-count, Mr Dropulich was elected on the distribution of preferences that followed the completion of the second count.

    However, 1,370 ballot papers could not be located for the re-count and these were not included in the second count and distribution of preferences. If the tally of the missing votes from the first count were added to the second count, the result would change again, with a critical one vote difference at a crucial point in the count resulting in Mr Dropulich failing to be elected.

    Having been duly declared elected, Mr Dropulich is entitled to be sworn in as a Senator on 1 July if the Court has not decided the matter before then, or if the Court chooses to let the second count excluding the missing votes stand. If the Court orders a fresh election, Mr Dropulich would no longer be entitled to his Senate seat. If the Court does not issue orders for a fresh election until after 1 July, Mr Dropulich would be entitled to hold his seat until a judgment is given.

    What was remarkable about Mr Dropulich’s victory was how a party that finished 21st out of the 27 parties on the ballot paper managed to get elected. Of the 20 parties that contributed ticket votes to his quota for election, 15 polled more votes than the Australian Sports Party.

    The path by which Mr Dropulich passed those 15 parties and gained their preferences was perilous. At three points in the count Mr Dropulich was the second lowest polling candidate remaining, and on each occasion he picked up preferences from the excluded candidate that allowed him remain in the count by avoiding last place.

    At another critical juncture in the count Mr Dropulich was the third lowest polling candidate ahead of the Australian Christians and the Shooters and Fishers Party. Depending on the order in which the Australian Christians and Shooters and Fishers Party finished, Mr Dropulich either became the lowest polling candidate and was excluded, or he leap frogged other parties and went on to win the fifth vacancy.

    The table below list the source of all votes that made up a part of Mr Dropulich’s total at the point where he was elected. The table has been derived from the detailed vote count data file released by the AEC. The first 20 entries in the table are total number of ticket votes that made up Mr Dropulich’s total on election. The final two entries are below the line first preferences for Mr Dropulich, and a total of all below the line votes received from multiple sources as preferences during the count. The total of votes from the Liberal Party is calculated by applying the transfer value following the election of the third Liberal Senator to the total of all Liberal ticket votes from the first count.

    The ‘% Vote’ column is the votes in the second column expressed as a percentage of the total formal vote. The ‘% of Quota’ is the votes as a percentage of the 191,219 votes held by Mr Dropulich at the point when he passed the quota. The ‘Preference number’ is the preference number for Dropulich on the group ticket vote of the party that sent the votes to Dropulich as preferences. The ‘Received at Count’ column is the stage of the count at which Mr Dropulich received each parcel of votes.

    2013 WA Senate Election – The Votes that Elected Wayne Dropulich
    Party Votes % Vote % of Quota Preference
    Number
    Received
    at Count
    Liberal Democrats 44,274 3.4 23.2 3 154
    Australian Christians 19,676 1.5 10.3 11 146
    Sex Party 17,830 1.4 9.3 11 150
    Liberal Party 16,495 1.3 8.6 15 162
    Help End Marijuana Prohibition 12,740 1.0 6.7 3 150
    Shooters and Fishers Party 12,586 1.0 6.6 3 142
    Animal Justice Party 9,004 0.7 4.7 13 150
    Family First Party 8,303 0.6 4.3 9 126
    Wikileaks Party 8,129 0.6 4.3 3 130
    Smokers Rights 8,081 0.6 4.2 5 154
    Australian Motoring Enthusiasts Party 7,334 0.6 3.8 5 118
    Australian Fishing and Lifestyle Party 5,511 0.4 2.9 17 146
    Australian Independents 3,687 0.3 1.9 13 142
    Rise Up Australia 3,473 0.3 1.8 7 98
    Australian Democrats 3,266 0.3 1.7 17 154
    Australian Sports Party 2,866 0.2 1.5 1 1
    Stop the Greens 2,074 0.2 1.1 5 154
    No Carbon Tax Climate Sceptics 1,389 0.1 0.7 5 146
    Australian Voice Party 1,082 0.1 0.6 5 94
    Stable Population Party 1,040 0.1 0.5 5 114
    Wayne Dropulich BTL first preferences 108 .. 0.1 1 1
    All other BTL votes received as preferences 2,271 0.2 1.2 .. ..
    Total votes on election 191,219 .. .. .. ..
    Total Formal Vote 1,310,278 .. .. .. ..

    On the first count the Australian Sports Party had 2,997 votes or 0.23%. These consisted of 2,866 ticket votes, 108 below the line first preferences for Wayne Dropulich, and 23 below the line votes for the second candidate Al Lackovic. Lackovic was excluded at count 12 and 13 of his 23 votes flowed as preferences to Dropulich.

    At the end of Count 89, only one candidate remained from each of 23 parties. During the distribution of below the line votes from the excluded candidates, Dropulich had gained 26 votes and had a total of 3,023 votes, 0.23% of the vote. At this stage he lay in 21st place of the 23 candidates on the ballot.

    At the end of Count 93, Mr Dropulich was ordered at 21st position out of 22 candidates with 3,027 votes to 2,598 for the last placed Adrian Byass of the No Carbon Tax Climate Sceptics. Byass was then excluded and his total included 1,082 ticket votes from the Australian Voice Party and these had next preference for Dropulich. This allowed Dropulich to escape last place to sit 18th of 21 remaining candidates.

    Last position now fell to Jane Foreman of Rise Up Australia. Her total of 3,950 votes included 3,266 ticket votes with next preference for Dropulich. This was the first of 15 bundles of votes from candidates with more votes than Dropulich. At the end of Foreman’s exclusion at Count 101, Dropulich now sat in 16th place of the 20 remaining candidate.

    By the end of Count 113 Dropulich had received no more ticket votes and had slipped back down the ranking to sit in 16th place of 17 remaining candidates. Dropulich trailed Richie Howlett of the Australian Motoring Enthusiasts Party by 193 votes, 7,843 to 7,649 from Dropulich. Count 114 saw salvation arrive for the second time at the last possible moment. The exclusion of the Australian Democrats released 1,040 ticket votes from the Stable Population Party with next preference for Dropulich. This put Dropulich ahead of the Australian Motorists Party for the first time and lifted Dropulich from the bottom of the pile and into second last place.

    Now salvation arrived for the third time. With the Australian Motoring Enthusiasts Party now in last place and excluded, 7,334 ticket votes from the Australian Motoring Enthusiasts Party flowed to Dropulich, preferences from a party that started the count with two and a half times as many votes as Dropulich. Dropulich was now lifted to tenth place of the sixteen remaining candidates.

    At Count 126 Dropulich received 8,303 Family First ticket votes and at count 130 received 8,129 ticket votes from the Wikileaks Party, two more parties that started out well ahead of Dropulich. These two bundles put Dropulich ahead of both the Australian Christians and the Shooters and Fishers Party for the first time. This was a critical result for what was to follow.

    At this point, the end of Count 141, Dropulich was in eighth place of the ten remaining candidates. The two parties behind him were the Australian Christians and the Shooters and Fishers Party. If the Shooters and Fishers were in last place and excluded, Dropulich received Shooters and Fishers preferences and stayed in eigth place and then gained Australian Christian preferences at the next count. If the Australian Christians were excluded first, their preferences went to the Shooters and Fishers Party putting them into eighth place, ahead of Dropulich, resulting in Dropulich being excluded.

    The count at this point was incredibly close, and the table below shows the order of the three lowest candidates and eventual outcome on the first and second counts, as well as the possible outcome if the first count of the 1,370 missing votes were included.

    2013 WA Senate Counts – Three Versions of the Crucial Exclusion
    First Count Second Count Including Missing Votes
    Dropulich (Sports Party) 32,829 (8th) 32,819 (8th) 32,819 (8th)
    Bow (Shooters and Fishers) 23,515 (9th) 23,514 (10th) 23,532 (9th)
    van Burgel (Christians) 23,501 (10th) 23,526 (9th) 23,531 (10th)
    Critical margin Shooters by 14 votes Christians by 12 votes Shooters by 1 vote
    Last two Senators elected Wang (Palmer United)
    Pratt (Labor)
    Dropulich (Sports Party)
    Ludlam (Green)
    Wang (Palmer United)
    Pratt (Labor)

    Having survived this critical count according to the accepted second count, at Count 142 Dropulich gains the ticket votes of the Australian Independents and Shooters and Fishers to pull ahead of the Australian Christians. At Count 146 he receives the Australian Christian, Fishing and Lifestyle Party and No Carbon Tax Climate Sceptics ticket votes, putting him into fourth place of the eight remaining candidates. At count 150 he receives more ticket votes from the Sex Party, Help End Marijuana Prohibition, staying in fourth place of seven remaining candidates.

    Count 154 saw the exclusion of the Liberal Democrats, a party that polled more than 12 times the number of votes recorded by Dropulich. He now received the ticket votes of the Liberal Democrats, Smokers Rights, Australian Democrats and Stop the Greens to move into first place of the six remaining candidates.

    Counts 158-161 exclude the National Party, putting the third and only remaining Liberal candidate over the quota. Count 162 then distributed the surplus vote of the Liberal candidate, delivering the final 16,495 ticket votes that elected Dropulich to the fifth vacancy.

    This result was entirely determined by ticket votes and the chance order of exclusion in the critical race for 9th between the Australian Christians and the Shooters and Fishers Party. Of Dropulich’s votes, 98.7% were ticket votes, entirely under the control of pre-arranged preference deals.

    The oddity of the system is revealed if you consider what happened to the votes of anyone who voted the Australian Motoring Enthusiasts Party. Depending on the contest between the Christians and Shooters, votes for the Motoring Enthusiasts Party elected either Dropulich or Wang of the Palmer United Party. Yet those Motoring Enthusiasts Party preference played no part in determine the result, they were merely directed one way or the other depending entirely on the contest between the Christians and Shooters.

    It is always a possibility that preferential voting can produce odd outcomes because of the order in which candidates are excluded. However, that possibility is made much more likely in the Senate because of ticket voting. Under non-ticket voting systems, this problem would only occur in the exclusion order of high polling candidates, not candidates at the bottom of the pile.

    In systems where voters fill in their own preferences, the order that low polling candidates are excluded rarely matters, as a party with low votes tends to have more random preferences.

    However, under ticket voting, a low polling candidate still has strong preference flows. In the case of WA, the contest between the Christians and Shooters produced preference flows that were tangential rather than random. The contest between two candidates with 1.75% of the vote each determined the last two seats in the contest, and both parties were already long excluded by the point in the count where the final two seats were decided.

    The WA Senate count is an example of what is wrong with the current Senate electoral system. Ticket voting, which means that more than 95% of preferences are pre-determined at each exclusion, makes the order of exclusion much more important than it should be. The count becomes unstable, and whether you want to fall back on the analogy of ‘butterfly wings’ or ‘black swans’, the almost random event of the order low polling candidates finish, can have an impact that is magnified through the count.

    A change to the system that required voters to enter their own preferences under an optional preferential system would give much more weight to candidates with a significant tally of first preference votes. Candidates that struggle to attract more than  a tiny fraction of the vote would struggle just as much to attract more than a fraction of the preferences.

     

    Posted by on December 21, 2013 at 08:11 PM in Electoral Systems,

  • Finally, some good news for the Reef

    1 of 45
    Why this ad?
    RedBalloonExperience Gifts 40% Off – Up to 40% off a range of Experience Gifts from RedBalloon. V8 Drives, Skydives, Getaways and more.

    Finally, some good news for the Reef

    Inbox
    x
    GetUp!
    2:44 PM (35 minutes ago)

    to me
    Finally - some good news for the Reef!

    NEVILLE,

    Finally, some good news for the Great Barrier Reef! The decision on whether to allow 3 million cubic metres of toxic dredge spoil to be dumped in Reef waters has been delayed.

    After an incredible campaigning effort from GetUp members and many others, the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority has refused to issue a permit for the dumping of 3 million cubic metres of toxic dredge spoil inside the Reef’s World Heritage Area. Instead, they have given themselves more time to assess the damage the project may cause. The delay is a sure sign that decision-makers are feeling the pressure from the community to do the right thing for our Reef.

    Now, we have until January 31st to convince the Reef Authority to stand up to the mining industry and save our Reef from industrialisation.

    Click here to thank the Reef Authority for delaying the decision, and urge them to reject the proposal for good:

    http://www.getup.org.au/safe-for-the-moment

    More than 280,000 GetUp members like you have worked together to make the campaign to protect the Great Barrier Reef incredible. Together, we’ve grown a massive petition, helped fund TV ads, billboards and strategic postering campaigns. We’ve filled out thousands of postcards and marched together through the streets of Brisbane at Rally for the Reef.

    Just this week, 2,710 GetUp members chipped in to fund a last minute full-page ad in the Courier Mail urging the authority to reject the dumping, alongside another 9,601 who emailed or called them directly. The effort has been extraordinary.

    This means our Reef is safe for the moment, and gives us another 40 days to deliver some of our best campaigning yet.

    The Reef Authority’s fundamental role is to protect the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park and World Heritage Area, and this delay is a great sign that they’re giving adequate time to assess the dangerous proposal .

    Click here to thank the Reef Authority, and let them know we’re watching:

    http://www.getup.org.au/safe-for-the-moment

    We’ll be in touch soon with the next phase of the campaign. In the meantime, congratulations on being a part of this important development, and get ready to take the fight to a new level in the new year!

    Thanks for everything –

    the GetUp team.

    PS – After Environment Minister Greg Hunt approved the dredging project at Abbot Point, GetUp members in his electorate of Flinders decided to personally deliver him a special Christmas gift. Here they are, led by Lauren, just after meeting Minister Hunt to discuss protecting the Reef, and delivering him what he wants most for Christmas – stockings full of coal:


    GetUp is an independent, not-for-profit community campaigning group. We use new technology to empower Australians to have their say on important national issues. We receive no political party or government funding, and every campaign we run is entirely supported by voluntary donations. If you’d like to contribute to help fund GetUp’s work, please donate now! If you have trouble with any links in this email, please go directly to www.getup.org.au. GetUp has recently updated our Privacy Policy, to read the policy go to: www.getup.org.au/about/privacy-policy. To unsubscribe from GetUp, please click here.

  • American Holocaust, Millions Of Untimely American Deaths And $40 Trillion Cost Of Israel To Americans

    American Holocaust, Millions Of Untimely American Deaths And $40 Trillion Cost Of Israel To Americans

    By Dr Gideon Polya

    27 August, 2013
    Countercurrents.org

    The horrendous financial cost of Israel to Americans has now reached a gigantic $40 trillion in today’s dollars. However the human cost involves the preventable deaths of millions of Americans – passive mass murder of Americans  in an American Holocaust inflicted by the fiscal perversion of traitorous Neocon American and Zionist Imperialist One Percenters committing $8-10 trillion to ethnic cleansing and active and passive mass murder of Muslims abroad in support of Apartheid Israel instead of keeping Americans  alive at home.    Zionist-subverted American Government support for Apartheid Israel in circa 2008 dollars totals about $40 trillion, the breakdown being  (1) $3 trillion (1948-2003), (2) $4-6 trillion (Zionist-promoted Iraq and Afghan Wars), (3) $0.7 trillion (Value of a Statistical Life- or VSL-based cost of  88,000 US veteran suicides since September 2001) and (4) about $30 trillion (one quarter of the VSL-based cost of 15.6 million preventable American deaths since September 2001). This is an under-estimate because it does not consider the millions of preventable American deaths before 9-11 linked to Zionist subversion and perversion of America .

    1. $3 trillion cost of Israel to America, 1948-2003.

    In 2003 Dr. Thomas R. Stauffer (1935-2005; a respected energy analyst, author, educator, consultant, and graduate of 144-Nobel-Laureate Harvard University’s Center for Middle Eastern Studies (CMES)), estimated that the 1948-2003 cost of Israel to the US was over $3 trillion in 2002 dollars: “Conflicts in the Middle East have been very costly to the U.S., as well as to the rest of the world. An estimate of the total cost to the U.S. alone of instability and conflict in the region—which emanates from the core, Israeli-Palestinian conflict—amounts to close to $3 trillion, measured in 2002 dollars. This is an amount almost four times greater than the cost of the Vietnam war, also reckoned in 2002 dollars… Total identifiable costs come to almost $3 trillion. About 60 percent, well over half, of those costs—about $1.7 trillion—arose from the U.S. defense of Israel , where most of that amount has been incurred since 1973.” [2].

    2. $4-6 trillion cost to America of the Zionist-promoted Iraq and Afghan Wars.

    The Zionist-promoted  illegal invasion of Iraq ,  the Iraq War, and the  Afghan War have been associated with a huge ongoing cost commitment of $4-6 trillion.  Thus Professor Joseph Stiglitz (professor of economics at 98-Nobel-Laureate Columbia University, chairman of President Bill Clinton’s Council of Economic Advisers and winner of the Nobel Prize in economics in 2001) and Dr. Linda J. Bilmes ( Daniel Patrick Moynihan senior lecturer in public policy at 144-Nobel-Laureate Harvard University) estimated a long-term cost of the Iraq war at $3 trillion in their 2008 book “The Three Trillion Dollar War: The True Cost of the Iraq Conflict” [3].

    However in 2010 Professors Stiglitz and Bilmes revised this estimate upwards: “Writing in these pages in early 2008, we put the total cost to the United States of the Iraq war at $3 trillion. This price tag dwarfed previous estimates, including the Bush administration’s 2003 projections of a $50 billion to $60 billion war. But today, as the United States ends combat in Iraq , it appears that our $3 trillion estimate (which accounted for both government expenses and the war’s broader impact on the U.S. economy) was, if anything, too low… There is no question that the Iraq war added substantially to the federal debt. This was the first time in American history that the government cut taxes as it went to war. The result: a war completely funded by borrowing. U.S. debt soared from $6.4 trillion in March 2003 to $10 trillion in 2008 (before the financial crisis); at least a quarter of that increase is directly attributable to the war. And that doesn’t include future health care and disability payments for veterans, which will add another half-trillion dollars to the debt.” [4].

    Professor Michael Intriligator ( a senior fellow at the US Milken Institute and professor emeritus of economics, political science and public policy at the 13-Nobel-Laureate University of California at Los Angeles , UCLA ) has indicated a long-term cost of $1.5 to 2.0 trillion for the war in Afghanistan [5].

    Dr Linda Bilmes (2013): “The Iraq and Afghanistan conflicts, taken together, will be the most expensive wars in US history – totaling somewhere between $4 to $6 trillion. This includes long-term medical care and disability compensation for service members, veterans and families, military replenishment and social and economic costs. The largest portion of that bill is yet to be paid. Since 2001, the US has expanded the quality, quantity, availability and eligibility of benefits for military personnel and veterans. This has led to unprecedented growth in the Department of Veterans Affairs and the Department of Defense budgets. These benefits will increase further over the next 40 years. Additional funds are committed to replacing large quantities of basic equipment used in the wars and to support ongoing diplomatic presence and military assistance in the Iraq and Afghanistan region. The large sums borrowed to finance operations in Iraq and Afghanistan will also impose substantial long-term debt servicing costs. As a consequence of these wartime spending choices, the United States will face constraints in funding investments in personnel and diplomacy, research and development and new military initiatives. The legacy of decisions taken during the Iraq and Afghanistan wars will dominate future federal budgets for decades to come.” [6].

    Pamela Olsen ( a President’s Scholar at 54-Nobel-Laureate Stanford University 1998-2002 with a major in Physics, a minor in Political Science, lived and worked in the Palestinian West Bank, worked as a researcher in Moscow, Siberia, and China ,  research analyst at the Institute for Defense Analysis, and the author of “ Fast Times in Palestine” ) has recently commented critically on the huge cost of Israel to the US (2013): “Israel’s cost to American taxpayers has remained high since Stauffer’s 2003 study. The US currently gives Israel an average of $3 billion a year in military aid, under an agreement signed by the Bush administration to transfer $30 billion to Israel over ten years, starting in 2009… And if, as many experts believe, the US would not have invaded Iraq without intense and sustained pressure from Washington insiders who advocate actively on behalf of Israel, this adds yet another dimension of staggering cost to the equation… The Israel lobby and partisans are currently gunning for a war with Iran with the same zeal they showed in the run-up to the 2003 invasion of Iraq . By all estimates, the costs of a war with Iran will be much higher than the Iraq war. In addition to the loss of life, analysts predict, for example, that if Iran ‘s oil production were taken out of the world market, gas prices would rise 25-70 percent… So now we are back to the question of why America continues to pour money into a state that commits daily human rights violations, defies US strategic interests, provokes rage and resentment among billions of people, competes with and crowds out US interests using technology subsidized by US taxpayers, and sells America ‘s military secrets to its enemies. The answer is simple and summed up well by professors Stephen Walt and John Mearsheimer in their ground-breaking article in the London Review of Books , “The Israel Lobby” and their book “The Israel Lobby and US Foreign Policy”… AIPAC, the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, is consistently ranked in the top two most powerful lobbies in Washington . And it is only one arm of the much larger, multi-faceted, and well-financed Israel lobby” [7].

    3.  $0.7 trillion VSL-based costing of 88,000 US veteran suicides since September 11, 2001 in the era of the Zionist-promoted War on Terror.

    There is growing concern over the high rate of US veteran suicides that constitute about 20% of the 30,000 annual suicides in the US [8].  Over the last dozen years, there have been roughly 20 US veteran suicides every day .i.e. 365.25 x 20 = 7,305 per year and about 88,000 since the start of the Zionist-promoted War on Terror in September  2001 [9]. This horrendous death toll of 88,000 dead US veterans linked to traitorous and racist Zionist-promoted  wars for the benefit of Apartheid Israel is about 3,000 times greater than the 34 US servicemen deliberately  murdered by Apartheid Israel in its1967 attack on the USS Liberty [7, 10].

    It is impossible to value a life but one crude approach is through the Value of a Statistical Life (VSL) which can be defined as the value placed on changes to the likelihood of death [11].   The US Environment  Protection Authority  (EPA) has recently estimated the Value of a Statistical Life (VSL) at $8 million, this indicating the average social investment in hospitals, security, workplace safety  etc to keep a person safe. The VSL can be seen, for example,  as an accounting estimate of  the cost of life-saving government regulations i.e. a risk-avoidance-based cost of preserving a human life in a given group [12]. On this measure the assumed war-related suicide of 88,000 US veterans obviates a social expenditure of $8 million per person x 0.088 million persons  = $0.7 trillion.

    4. A $125 trillion cost associated with 15.6 million preventable American deaths since September 2001, of which about $30 trillion can be attributed  to US fiscal perversion supporting Apartheid Israel .

    About 1.3 million Americans die preventably each year, the breakdown being as follows: 15,000 Americans are violently murdered annually;  21,000 avoidable under-5 year old US infant deaths annually; 21,000 US opiate drug-related deaths annually from US restoration and protection of the Taliban-destroyed Afghan opium industry; 30,000 Americans suicide annually, with 1 in 5 being US veterans; 31,000 gun-related US deaths annually; 33,000Americans killed by motor vehicles each year; 45,000 US deaths annually  from lack of medical insurance; 70,000 Americans die annually from air pollution (e.g. from coal burning, vehicle exhaust, carbon burning in general);  75,000 American alcohol-related deaths annually; 225,000 deaths per year in the US from iatrogenic (medical personnel-related) causes ; 300,000 Americans die from obesity-related causes; and 443,000 Americans die from smoking-related causes (roughly 1 in 5 of all deaths and 49,000 or about 10% from passive smoking) [13, 14].  Some qualifications can be offered e.g. it should be noted that some of these areas overlap e.g. homicides and suicides overlap with gun-related deaths, and smoking-related deaths would take a long time  to stop after nationally legislated cessation of smoking.

    This huge carnage of 15.6 million preventable American deaths since September 2001 must be seen in the context of a fiscal perversion outlined in section #1-3 above in which $8-10 trillion in roughly today’s dollars has been committed in this period by the Neocon American and Zionist Imperialist One Percenter American Establishment to the strategic interests of nuclear terrorist, democracy-by-genocide Apartheid Israel. The World Health Organization (WHO) informs us that in 2011 the total US health expenditure was 17.9% of the GDP [15] and the US GDP in 2011 was $14.4 trillion [16] i.e. the 2011 annual total health expenditure of the US was 0.179 x $14.4 trillion = $2.6 trillion. Thus the upper estimate of a $10 trillion cost of Apartheid Israel to America is equivalent to about 4 years of the post- September 2001 total health expenditure of America. Alternatively, this $10 trillion fiscal perversion could have otherwise been used to increase the total American  health expenditure  since September  2001 from about $30 trillion to $40 trillion.

    The estimate of 1.3 million preventable American deaths  per year means 12 x 1.3 million = 15.6 million preventable deaths since September  2001. Applying a VSL of $8 million person yields a notional cost of 15.6 million x $8 million = $125 trillion. If we accept the estimate that 25% of these preventable deaths can be attributed to 25% less US health funding (i.e.  the total American  health expenditure  being $30 trillion since September  2001 rather than  $40 trillion due to the pro-Zionist, pro-Apartheid Israel fiscal perversion) then we can add a further $125/4 or  about $30 trillion to the cost of  Apartheid Israel to America .

    Conclusions

    Zionist-subverted American Government support for Apartheid Israel in circa 2008 dollars totals about $40 trillion, the breakdown being  (1) $3 trillion (1948-2003), (2) $4-6 trillion (Zionist-promoted Iraq and Afghan Wars), (3) $0.7 trillion (the VSL-based cost of  88,000 US veteran suicides since September 2001) and (4) about $30 trillion (one quarter of the VSL-based cost of 15.6 million preventable American deaths since September 2001).

    Like the other Western democracies,  the United States is a Murdochcracy, Lobbyocracy and Corporatocracy in which Big Money buys people, politicians, policies, parties, public perception of reality, votes and political power. Lying Mainstream media simply won’t report the 2 million Palestinian deaths since 1936 in the  Palestinian Genocide from violence (0.1 million) and violently-imposed derivation (1.9 million) [17], the 12 million Muslims who have been killed through violence (3.5 million ) or war-imposed deprivation (8.9 million) in the post-1990, Zionist-promoted US War on Muslims  [18] , or the 10 million  Muslims who have died  from violence (3 million)  or from war-imposed deprivation (7 million) since the US Government (with likely Zionist and Israeli involvement) almost certainly committed the 9-11 atrocity against the American people (see “Experts: US did 9-11”, [19])  – indeed the larger the crime, the more assiduous the Mainstream media censorship and Mainstream media lying [20-27].

    The US has invaded 70 countries since 1776 [28] and is now evidently getting ready to war criminally invade and devastate Syria after several years of supplying one side of the civil war. However US hegemony over the world has come at a huge price. Thus each year about 18 million people die avoidably from deprivation on Spaceship Earth with the US in charge of the flight deck. Indeed it is estimated that 1.3 billion people have died from deprivation since 1950, this including  1.2 billion non-Europeans and 0.6 billion Muslims,  the latter Muslim Holocaust being 100 times greater in death toll  than in the WW2 Jewish Holocaust (5-6 million killed, 1 in 6 dying from deprivation) or the “forgotten” WW2 Bengal Holocaust in which the British with Australian complicity deliberately starved 6-7 million Indians to death for strategic reasons [29-31].

    The horrendous human cost to America of support for Apartheid Israel by the Neocon American and Zionist Imperialist  One Percenters can be quantified in terms of a $40 trillion committed financial cost  in circa 2008 dollars since 1948 and some 4 million preventable American deaths in this century alone – a Zionist-imposed  American  Holocaust that goes unreported because of  Neocon American and Zionist Imperialist-perverted Mainstream media, politicians and academics. 99% of Congress are pro-Zionists and 20% are Jewish Zionists  (although the Jewish population  of America is only about 2% of the total). In contrast, about 80% of African American males in Chicago (a city with a Jewish Zionist  mayor, the son of an Irgun Zionist terrorist involved in the ethnic cleansing of Palestine)  [32]  and 27.4 % of African Americans live and die in poverty [33].

    What can decent people do? Decent people are obliged to speak out against all  human rights abuse and the horrendous, genocidal  crimes of Apartheid Israel and its US Alliance supporters in particular (see “Jews Against Racist Zionism” [34], “Non-Jews Against Racist Zionism” [35] and “Boycott Apartheid Israel” [36]).  Decent, patriotic Americans, and indeed all decent people who care for ordinary  Americans and their fellow human beings in general, should inform everyone they can about the Zionist-imposed American Holocaust  and Zionist perversion of an America in which 1.3 million Americans die preventably each year linked to the Neocon American and Zionist Imperialist One Percenter fiscal perversion of committing trillions of dollars to killing Muslims abroad rather than saving American lives at home. Americans must wake up to the deadly perversion of their society by the traitorous and genocidally racist  Zionists and their neocon supporters. The traitorous, genocidally racist Zionists and their neoconservative  supporters should be exposed and sidelined from public life as have been like racists such as the Nazis, neo-Nazis, Apartheiders and KKK. Please tell everyone you can.

     References.

    [1]. Dr John Gault, “Dr. Thomas R. Stauffer, 1935-2005: some personal reflections”, Harvard University Center for Middle Eastern Studies, 16 February 2006: http://cmes.hmdc.harvard.edu/ecmes/alumni/stauffer .

    [2]. Thomas R. Stauffer, “The costs to the American taxpayers id the Israeli-Palestinian conflict: $3 trillion”, Washington Report on Middle East Affairs, June 2003, pages 20-23 : http://www.wrmea.org/wrmea-archives/251-washington-report-archives-2000-2005/june-2003/4641-the-costs-to-american-taxpayers-of-the-israeli-palestinian-conflict-3-trillion.ht m l .

    [3]. Joseph Stiglitz and Linda Bilmes, “The Three Trillion Dollar War: The True Cost of the Iraq Conflict” (W.W. Norton, 2008).

    [4]. Joseph Stiglitz and Linda Bilmes, “The true cost of the Iraq war: $3 trillion and beyond”, Washington Post, 5 September 2010: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/09/03/AR2010090302200.html .

    [5]. Eli Clifton, “Bill for Afghan War could run into trillions”, Information Clearing House, 18 May 2010 : http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article25479.h t m .

    [6].  Linda Bilmes, “The Financial Legacy of Iraq and Afghanistan : How Wartime Spending Decisions Will Constrain Future National Security Budgets”,  Harvard John F. Kennedy School of Government Faculty Research Working Paper Series RWP13-006, March 2013: https://research.hks.harvard.edu/publications/workingpapers/citation.aspx?PubId=8956&type=WPN .

    [7]. Pamela Olsen, “The staggering cost of Israel to Americans”, Information Clearing House, 2 April 2013: http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article34485.htm .

    [8]. Rob Hotakainen, “Concern grows over “epidemic” veteran suicide rate”, The Tribune, 26 May 2011: http://www.thenewstribune.com/2011/05/26/1680716/concern-grows-over-epidemic-veteran.html .

    [9]. Dr Janet Kemp and Dr Robert Bossarte, “Suicide data report, 2012”, Department of Veterans Affairs, Mental Health Services, Suicide Prevention Program, especially Figure 3: http://www.va.gov/opa/docs/Suicide-Data-Report-2012-final.pdf .

    [10]. “USS Liberty incident”, Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Liberty_incident .

    [11]. “Value of Life”, Wikipedia” http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Value_of_life .

    [12]. Gabriel Nelson, “EPA plans to visit a touchy topic – the value of saved lives”, New York Times, 18 January 2011: http://www.nytimes.com/gwire/2011/01/18/18greenwire-epa-plans-to-revisit-a-touchy-topic-the-value-75301.html?pagewanted=all .

    [13]. Gideon Polya, “ One Million Americans Die Preventably Annually In USA ”, Countercurrents, 18 February 2012: http://www.countercurrents.org/polya180212.htm .

    [14]. Barbara Starfield, “Medical errors – a leading cause of death”, Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA), vol. 284, no. 4, 26 July 2000: http://www.cancure.org/medical_errors.htm .

    [15]. “World Health Organization”, USA data: http://www.who.int/countries/usa/en/ .

    [16]. US GDP: http://www.tradingeconomics.com/united-states/gdp .

    [17]. “Palestinian Genocide”: https://sites.google.com/site/palestiniangenocide/ .

    [18]. “Muslim Holocaust Muslim Genocide”: https://sites.google.com/site/muslimholocaustmuslimgenocide/ .

    [19]. “Experts: US did 9-11”: https://sites.google.com/site/expertsusdid911/ .

    [20]. “Boycott Murdoch media”: https://sites.google.com/site/boycottmurdochmedia/  .

    [21]. “Censorship by The Conversation”: https://sites.google.com/site/mainstreammediacensorship/censorship-by .

    [22]. “Mainstream media censorship”: https://sites.google.com/site/mainstreammediacensorship/home  .

    [23]. “Mainstream media lying”: https://sites.google.com/site/mainstreammedialying/  .

    [24]. “Censorship by The Age”: https://sites.google.com/site/mainstreammediacensorship/censorship-by-the-age .

    [25]. “Censorship by ABC Late Night Live”: https://sites.google.com/site/censorshipbyabclatenightlive/  .

    [26].   “Censorship by ABC Saturday Extra”: https://sites.google.com/site/censorshipbyabclatenightlive/censorship-by-abc-sat .

    [27].  “Censorship by the BBC”: https://sites.google.com/site/censorshipbythebbc/ .

    [28]. Gideon Polya, “US has invaded 70 nations. Make 4 July Independence from America Day”, MWC News, 5 July 2013: http://mwcnews.net/focus/politics/28254-us-has-invaded-70-nations.html .

    [29]. Gideon Polya, “Body Count. Global avoidable mortality since 1950”, now available for free perusal on the web: http://globalbodycount.blogspot.com/  .

    [30]. Gideon Polya, “Jane Austen and the Black Hole of British History”, now available for free perusal on the web: http://janeaustenand.blogspot.com/  .

    [31]. Gideon Polya, “ Bengal Famine. How Australia & UK killed 6-7 million Indians in WW2”, MWC News, 27 September 2011: http://mwcnews.net/focus/editorial/13742-bengal-famine.html .

    [32]. Michelle Alexander, “The New Jim Crow.  Mass incarceration in an age of color blindness”.

    [33]. Trymaine Lee, “Number of Americans living in poverty hits 52-year high, 27.4 percent of Blacks under the poverty line”, Huffington Post, Black Voices: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/09/13/number-of-americans-livin_n_960345.html .

    [34]. “Jews Against Racist Zionism”: https://sites.google.com/site/jewsagainstracistzionism/ .

    [35]. “Non-Jews Against Racist Zionism”: https://sites.google.com/site/nonjewsagainstracistzionism/ .

    [36]. “Boycott Apartheid Israel ”: https://sites.google.com/site/boycottapartheidisrael/ .

    Dr Gideon Polya has been teaching science students at a major Australian university for 4 decades. He published some 130 works in a 5 decade scientific career, most recently a huge pharmacological reference text “Biochemical Targets of Plant Bioactive Compounds” (CRC Press/Taylor & Francis, New York & London , 2003). He has published “Body Count. Global avoidable mortality since 1950” (G.M. Polya, Melbourne, 2007: http://globalbodycount.blogspot.com/ ); see also his contributions “Australian complicity in Iraq mass mortality” in “Lies, Deep Fries & Statistics” (edited by Robyn Williams, ABC Books, Sydney, 2007: http://www.abc.net.au/rn/science/ockham/stories/s1445960.htm ) and “Ongoing Palestinian Genocide” in “The Plight of the Palestinians (edited by William Cook, Palgrave Macmillan, London, 2010: http://mwcnews.net/focus/analysis/4047-the-plight-of-the-palestinians.html ). He has published a revised and updated 2008 version of his 1998 book “Jane Austen and the Black Hole of British History” (see: http://janeaustenand.blogspot.com/ ) as biofuel-, globalization- and climate-driven global food price increases threaten a greater famine catastrophe than the man-made famine in British-ruled India that killed 6-7 million Indians in the “forgotten” World War 2 Bengal Famine (see recent BBC broadcast involving Dr Polya, Economics Nobel Laureate Professor Amartya Sen and others: http://www.open.edu/openlearn/history-the-arts/history/social-economic-history/listen-the-bengal-famine ). When words fail one can say it in pictures – for images of Gideon Polya’s huge paintings for the Planet, Peace, Mother and Child see: http://sites.google.com/site/artforpeaceplanetmotherchild/ and http://www.flickr.com/photos/gideonpolya/ .

  • What is the Coalition’s direct action climate change policy?

    What is the Coalition’s direct action climate change policy?

    Updated 38 minutes ago

    Environment Minister Greg Hunt has released the Government’s Green Paper for its direct action climate change policy.

    The paper released today is open for consultation until February, after which time a White Paper will be developed.

    The Government wants to replace Labor’s carbon tax with its direct action plan, which would provide financial incentives for polluters to reduce emissions.

    The Green Paper details how the Coalition’s Emissions Reduction Fund will operate.

    The scheme is budgeted to cost $300 million, $500 million and $750 million over three years, starting on July 1, 2014.

     

    Mr Hunt says new figures show Australia needs to to reduce its emissions by less than thought to achieve the targetted cut of 5 per cent by 2020.

    “It’s going to be easier to achieve that figure now because of changes in Australian manufacturing,” he said.

    “That’s not a desirable cause, but it’s a reality.

    “We’ve seen a number of coal mines and a number of manufacturing businesses either not proceed or close down.”

    Take a look at our explainer below on how the Coalition’s climate change policy works.

    Direct action policy explained

    The Coalition Government’s big policy plank has been to remove carbon pricing legislation and replace it with its own “direct action” package.

    While both Labor and the Coalition agree on reducing emissions to 5 per cent below 2000 levels by 2020, they disagree on the mechanism.

    Under Labor’s carbon pricing, the country’s biggest polluters pay for the amount of pollution they produce, giving them an incentive to reduce emissions.

    Compensation is paid to taxpayers to help mitigate any price increases, such as the cost of electricity, that have been passed on.

    Coalition policy key points

    • Keep the 5 per cent emission reduction target
    • Keep the 20 per cent renewable energy target
    • Scrap the price on carbon and associated corporations
    • Establish a $3 billion fund to pay businesses for emission reduction projects
    • Create a 15,000 strong Green Army to conduct conservation work

     

    But under the Coalition, businesses will compete to win tenders and be paid to undertake emission reduction projects.

    The Government argues that this is the cheapest method to reduce emissions and is better for the economy than a nationwide “electricity tax”.

    There are four key pillars that the Government has outlined as part of its environment policy:

    • Clean air – Emissions Reduction Fund
    • Clean land – Green Army, Landcare reform and simplified environmental assessments and approvals
    • Clean water – Commitment to long-term planning for new dams and support for the Murray-Darling Basin Plan
    • Heritage protection – New programs focusing on community and heritage landmarks

    How does the Emissions Reduction Fund work?

    The main feature of the direct action policy is the creation of an Emissions Reduction Fund, which will cost $3 billion over four years.

    The fund will call for businesses to submit tenders for projects that will either lower emissions or offset them.

    It will operate as a reverse auction, where businesses compete and undercut each other to win a contract and with it, the Government’s money.

    The Government says the scheme will ensure a reduction of emissions for the best possible price.

    The reverse auction method mirrors the existing National Water Market, which conducts water buybacks to increase river flows.

    Emission reductions will be achieved through a range of projects, such as cleaning up power stations, capturing landfill gas, reforesting marginal lands or improving soil carbon.

    A project needs to meet two criteria to win a contract from the fund:

    • The emission reductions must be additional measures and not just business-as-usual
    • The reduction estimates must be credible and verified

    Measures that are already required to be carried out by businesses under government regulations cannot be used as projects for the fund.

    Only the projects with the lowest cost per amount of abatement will be taken on by the reduction fund.

    The fund is capped and Prime Minster Tony Abbott has previously indicated it will not be increased if the 2020 emission reduction target is not being reached.

    Green Army

    The Coalition aims to build an environmental workforce made up of 15,000 young people to undertake conservation projects.

    The “Green Army” will carry out projects such as re-vegetating sand dunes, cleaning up riverbanks, weed control and regenerating local parks.

    The workforce will work with and complement local groups such as Landcare, catchment authorities and councils.

    Projects will be tailored to local environmental priorities.

    Participants in the Green Army (initially only 17-24 year olds) will be paid a training allowance and the Government expects young people to gain valuable work skills from the group.

    The training received will count towards the requirements for a Certificate 1 or 2 in land management, park management, landscaping or horticulture.

    Full-time projects will run for up to 26 weeks in groups of 10 – nine participants and a supervisor.

    Teams will be given money to pay for equipment and materials needed to undertake a project.

    The program will begin in 2014-15 with 250 projects, which will be scaled up to 1,500 projects and a 15,000 strong workforce in 2018-19.

    It is expected to cost $50 million in its first year and then $300 million over a four-year period.

    What is the emission reduction target?

    The Government is committed to reducing greenhouse gas emissions to 5 per cent below 2000 levels by 2020.

    Environment Minister Greg Hunt said in December 2013 that the carbon dioxide abatement needed to reach the target by 2020 is 431 million tonnes.

    There is some debate over whether the target is ambitious enough to keep up with action by other countries.

    In October 2013, the Labor-initiated independent climate policy advisor, the Climate Change Authority, said the target was inadequate.

    The authority, which is to be scrapped under the Coalition Government, said in a report that a higher target would mean Australia would not need to drastically catch up later to fulfil its fair international role.

    It recommended either a 15 or 25 per cent reduction by 2020.

    But the Government says its target will not be modified until it sees the outcome of the 2015 Climate Summit in Paris.

    What is the Renewable Energy Target?

    The Coalition supports the Renewable Energy Target (RET) of 20 per cent by 2020, which is required by legislation to be reviewed every two years.

    The target is also supported by Labor.

    However, the Coalition has committed to axing the $10 billion green loans bank, the Clean Energy Finance Corporation, which invests in clean energy projects by co-financing with the private sector.

    Solar panel rebates will be given to low-income households under the Coalition, with a cap on 100,000 rebates a year.