Category: Uncategorized

  • Coastal Erosion problems at Bar Beach

    Valley has now added the Old Bar Beach foreshore to its list of issues.

    The foreshore is disappearing faster than my wages, with twenty metres of beach front lost in the past decade. This loss of sand has accelerated in the past couple years due to storms and other elements, with more than three metres of beach front lost in the past 18 months. Old Bar is part of an erosion problem facing many parts of the east coast- line from Sydney to Byron Bay. Coastal towns and villages are working with their Councils and other agencies to save these major assets.

    Old Bar is a seaside town near Taree. The town has already witnessed the demolition of two homes located at the southern end of Lewis Street due to erosion. These two homes were the subject of development applications to rebuild on the rear of their blocks; however, the development applications had to be fast tracked by Taree Council. The Council had to act quickly with demolition orders, as the rapid loss saw one of the homes with part of its structure hanging over the cliff face.

    Another two neighbouring homes appear certain to head the same way, as they also succumb to the rapid erosion. The problem is highlighted at the site of one the demolished homes, which was originally on land that was 5,500 square metres in size and purchased in 2001. This property has pristine views of the ocean, and the original residence was located a healthy 27 metres from the back fence. The fast moving erosion problem has seen this distance vanish.

    Lewis Street backs onto the eroding areas, and its residents are expressing major concerns. Experts predict the beach front street may have a five to ten year life span at the current rate of erosion.

    The crisis has caused Old Bar residents to form an action group: Old Bar Beach Sand Replenishment Group Inc. under the Presidency of Elaine Pearce. The group is urging immediate work to protect the foreshore and dunes, to eliminate any further loss.

    The group formed in late 2008 and has completed a Draft Management Plan, met local Federal Member Rob Oakeshott, Greater Taree City Council, and Worley Parsons, the consultants currently compiling a report on behalf of the Council as a Coastal Hazard Assessment.

    “We have covered a lot of ground since we formed,” said Elaine Parsons. “Currently we have compiled our own solution and are applying for a Federal grant to head towards a permanent solution.”

    The action group is advised by Tim Minty, a local geological engineer who has decades of experience studying and stopping erosion problems.

    “If something is not done now, then the beach will be gone, and there is a risk the sea will enter Racecourse Creek,” said Minty. “The shore-line is now eighty metres closer to the dune.”

    Minty has suggested a solution: building a series of groins (breakwalls) at right angles to the shore-line, which will capture the sand and severely slow the erosion. Minty believes that six to eight groins varying in length from 15 to 45 metres are necessary to overcome the problem. He has estimated the cost to be between $800,000-$900,000 – something, he says, that can easily be put into place.

    “The system can be either an Elcorock (bags) or Tetra pods (interlocking) – both will be effective.”

    Resident Mark Searles, a local surveyor, is also a major contributor to the solution plan. He has been surveying the shore-line regularly and reports that his records show five to six metres of the dunes/beach have been lost in the past two years. This is in contrast to the original predications in 1997 that a metre a year would be lost.

    The Greater Taree City Council’s coastal management plan developed in 1992 is now under review, with a new coastal management line to be established citing a minimum distance for future developments.

    With some affected residents heading to the legal fraternity to be advised about their rights of compensation, the disaster appears headed to the courts for a decision. Who is responsible? The Greater Taree City Council, or the various agencies of the Federal or New South Wales Governments for approving these developments?

    Residents claim all three agencies were aware of the future losses of coast-line as far back as the mid 1990s and are legally responsible – a situation denied by all three bodies. Residents whose homes are now under threat are alarmed and annoyed at having to bear the cost of reports, after receiving written advice from Council for engineering assessments on their properties.

    “We believe the Council should cover the costs of any reports,” said Elaine Parsons. “The owners of the affected properties see it as a dismissal of responsibilities by our bureaucrats.”

    It may sound alarmist, but if the current rate of erosion continues, in 20 years we will see the shore-line decrease and the elimination of the caravan park, amenities around the reserve, the entirety of Lewis Street, Pacific Parade, part of Rose Street and the Old Bar Public School.

    So it is evident that a solution has to be found soon.

    In the early 1990s the Council recognised there was a problem and successfully built a groin-wall to divert Racecourse Creek, which at the time was eroding the fore-dunes in front of the reserve and houses located in Lewis Street. The re-direction of the creek created a build-up of sand located in the south. Since that action – which worked well – conditions have changed, with the barrier now only visible during storms.

    During the last decade, the dunes south of Racecourse Creek at Old Bar have slowly changed along with the natural coastal system, which is now a residential area.

    With the coastlines of New South Wales eroding, it is puzzling that there has been an absence of action from governments.

    Our beaches are one of the lifebloods of our tourist industry, and if the erosion is allowed to go unchecked we will have reduced revenue and a reduced amount of venues for our growing population to enjoy.

    Where does the responsibility stop? Does it rest with all levels of government, with owners of the properties or with the developers who applied and were granted permission to erect buildings?

    If history repeats itself, it is evident they will all blame each other; however, the bottom line is that we must protect our coast-line and the current residential areas from further erosion.

    Many blame climate change, while others say the change in currents and weather conditions are related to a cycle that happens every five decades. Whatever the reason, we simply cannot afford to procrastinate.

    Old Bar is not unique with its problems. Laurieton, near Port Macquarie, is becoming a victim, and recently the foreshore of Sydney had a block of units under threat after it lost an enormous amount of sand, exposing the units’ foundations.

    Protection of our coast-line has been on government agendas, as they have instigated many laws to protect marine life, vegetation etc. The Greater Taree City Council is awaiting a report on a Coastal Hazard Assessment from Worley Parsons – a group of consultants engaged to investigate and make recommendations about our coastline.

    Director of Planning and Building, Graham Gardiner says: “We are aware and concerned about the Old Bar situation. Whatever recommendations are made by the Worley Parsons report, Council will discuss what the next steps will be. Council has fast tracked the demolition orders and pending development application/s of the affected residents.

    “In the circumstances we have done everything possible and cannot do any more until we do an analysis of the Worley Parsons report due in March.”

    Residents are working hard to stop the pending demise of their beachside village, and as a tight community they are united to gain a positive outcome.

     

  • Climate report warns extreme weather events are now the norm

    Climate report warns extreme weather events are now the norm

    By North America correspondent Ben Knight, wires

    Updated 6 hours 42 minutes ago

    Climate scientists in the United States say extreme weather events and warming temperatures are the new norm.

    The American Meteorological Society has released its annual snapshot of the world’s climate, which concludes disastrous weather events like Hurricane Sandy in the US and droughts and floods in Australia, Africa and South America will become more frequent.

    The report lists a raft of indicators that show a continuously warming planet where ice sheets and glaciers will keep shrinking, and sea and land temperatures will keep rising to record levels.

    Last year was a record-breaking year for the world’s climate, with new extremes for sea levels, temperatures, snow coverage and ice melts.

    Arctic ice levels reached record lows in 2012, and the polar region is warming at twice the rate of the rest of the planet, however on a positive note at the other end of the world, Antarctica’s climate remained relatively stable and sea ice cover reached a record maximum.

    Key Points

    • Extreme weather to become the norm: hurricanes and floods
    • Ice sheets and glaciers to keep shrinking
    • Sea and land temperatures to keep rising to record levels
    • The world to become warmer
    • More droughts and unusual rains expected

     

    The report also stated the world’s highest levels of greenhouse gases were released by burning fossil fuels last year.

    Some 384 scientists from 54 countries contributed to the report, covering all aspects of the planet, from the depths of the oceans to the stratosphere.

    Last year was among the top 10 on record for global land and surface temperature since modern data collection began.

    ‘Planet as whole becoming warmer place’

    “The findings are striking,” Kathryn Sullivan, acting administrator of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) told AFP.

    “Our planet as a whole is becoming a warmer place.”

    Michael Mann, a leading US climatologist at Pennsylvania State University who was not involved in the research, added: “It’s hard to read the report and not be led to the conclusion that the task of reducing carbon emissions is now more urgent than ever.”

    Globally, 2012 ranked as the eighth or ninth warmest year since records began in the mid-to-late 1800s, according to four independent analysts cited by the study.

    “Surface temperatures in the Arctic are increasing at a rate about two times faster than the rest of the world,” Jackie Richter-Menge, research civil engineer with the US Army Corps of Engineers, said.

     

    Meanwhile, permafrost temperatures reached record highs in northern Alaska and 97 per cent of the Greenland ice sheet showed some form of melt, four times greater than the average melt for this time of year.

    The melt is also contributing to rising sea levels.

    Average global sea level reached a record high in 2012, 3.5 centimetres above the 1993 to 2010 average.

    “Most recently, over the past seven years or so, it appears that the ice melt is contributing more than twice as much to the global sea level rise compared with warming waters,” Jessica Blunden, climatologist at NOAA’s National Climatic Data Center, said.

    Scientists say the data should be of concern to people living in coastal areas and that weather patterns from the past can no longer be used to predict the future.

    The peer-reviewed report did not go into the causes for the trends but experts said it should serve as a guide for policymakers as they prepare for the effects of rising seas and warming weather on communities and infrastructure.

    The amount of carbon dioxide emissions from burning fossil fuels also hit new highs, after a slight decline in recent years that followed the global financial crisis.

    For the first time, in Spring 2012, the atmospheric CO2 concentration exceeded 400 parts per million (ppm) at seven of the 13 Arctic observation sites, the report said.

    Global average carbon dioxide reached 392.6 ppm, a 2.1 ppm increase from 2011, it said.

    Droughts and unusual rains struck different parts of the globe last year and the the worst drought in the past three decades was noted in north-eastern Brazil.

    The Caribbean observed a very wet dry season and the Sahel had its wettest rainy season in 50 years, according to the report.

    Dr Sullivan said the findings “caution us, perhaps, to be looking at a likely future where extremes and intensity of some extremes are more frequent and more intense than what we have accounted for in the past.”

    ABC/AFP

    Topics: climate-change, environment, world-politics, united-states

    First posted Wed Aug 7, 2013 7:16am AEST

  • Rising Sea Levels Will Be Tough To Reverse

    Rising Sea Levels Will Be Tough To Reverse

    SustainableBusiness.com News

    Based on current emissions and global warming trends, the US already has “locked in” sea level increases of at least four feet above current levels before the next century, according to a Climate Central analysis.

    That’s enough to submerge more than half the population in 316 US coastal cities and towns when high tide rolls in. Those communities currently are home to about 3.6 million people.

    “By the end of this century, if global climate emissions continue to increase, that may lock in 23 feet of sea level rise, and threaten 1,429 municipalities that would be mostly submerged at high tide,” writes Ben Strauss, vice president for Climate Impacts and Director of the Program on Sea Level Rise at Climate Central. “Those cities have a total population of 18 million. But under a very low emissions scenario, our sea level rise commitment might be limited to about 7.5 feet, which would threaten 555 coastal municipalities: some 900 fewer communities than in the high-emissions scenario.”

    Right now, the water is encroaching on coastal developments in the US by about one inch per decade, but Climate Central anticipates increases of closer to one foot per decade in the near-term future.In its analysis, Climate Central considers a place to be “threatened” if at least half of the current population lives below the sea levels expected at high tide by 2100.

    Florida is particularly vulnerable, but Louisiana, New Jersey and North Carolina also are home to plenty of threatened communities under that definition.

    If current carbon pollution trends continue, Climate Central suggests that more than 100 cities and towns will be threatened in each of these states.

    Nationally, the biggest threatened cities include Miami, Virginia Beach, Va.; Sacramento, Calif.; and Jacksonville, Fla.

    The graphic below shows the areas that would be flooded at high tide in 2100, under the scenario described above. The threatened areas are represented in blue:

     

    If you use a lower threshold for giving communities a  threatened stats –- say, if 25% of the current population lives below the projected high-tide sea levels for 2100 — you can add major cities including Boston, Long Beach, Calif., and New York City to the list.

    The analysis doesn’t account for any solutions that cities may be putting into place for protection, such as the network of levees and flood barriers in New Orleans or a series of measures that have been proposed for New York City. It does suggest that areas such as South Florida will be especially difficult to protect, because of its geological makeup.

    The impact would be reduced significantly under a low-emissions scenario that calls for a halt to global emissions growth by 2020, followed by rapid reductions and clean-up actions. But that is extremely unlikely given the current political climate.

    The average rate of global sea level increases was about one half-foot per century during the 20th century, just half the current rate.

    Middle-of-the-road projections suggest average per-century increase of about 5 feet by 2100, notes Climate Central.

    “Such rates, if sustained, would realize the highest levels of sea level rise contemplated here in hundreds, not thousands of year — fast enough to apply continual pressure, as well as threaten the heritage, and very existence, of coastal communities everywhere,” writes Strauss.

    The Climate Central analysis was published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. Read the complete report:

    Website: http://assets.climatecentral.org/pdfs/Strauss-PNAS-2013-v2.pdf

  • Soil Carbon ‘Blowing in the Wind’

    Soil Carbon ‘Blowing in the Wind’

    Aug. 6, 2013 — Australian soils are losing about 1.6 million tonnes of carbon per year from wind erosion and dust storms affecting agricultural productivity, our economy and carbon accounts, according to new research.


    Share This:

    Top soil is rich in nutrients and carbon but is increasingly being blown away by events such as the ‘Red Dawn’ in Sydney in 2009.

    When wind lifts carbon dust into the atmosphere it changes the amount and location of soil carbon.

    Some carbon falls back to the ground while some leaves Australia or ends up in the ocean.

    CSIRO research scientist Dr Adrian Chappell and an international team of experts in wind erosion and dust emission recently calculated the extent of these carbon dust emissions.

    “Carbon stored in our soils helps sustain plant growth. Our modelling shows that millions of tonnes of dust and carbon are blowing away, and it is uncertain where all that ends up,” Dr Chappell said.

    “We need to understand the impact of this dust carbon cycle to develop more accurate national and global estimates of carbon balances and to be able to prepare for life in a changing climate.

    “Australia’s carbon accounts, and even global carbon accounts, have not yet taken wind or water erosion into consideration and when this happens it could have significant impacts on how we manage our landscapes. While soil organic carbon lost through dust is not a major contributor to Australia’s total emissions, it is a major factor in our deteriorating soil health.”

    Carbon is an essential ingredient for the healthy soils which underpin Australia’s capability to produce enough food to feed 60 million people.

    Understanding the movement of carbon through the landscape is a necessity if we are to improve the quality of our soils and support farmers and land managers to store carbon.

    This is not an issue for Australia alone. Other countries will also need to know the fate of their wind-blown carbon; countries like the USA and China with larger dust emissions will likely face similar challenges when including wind borne dust in their carbon accounting.

    With the frequency and intensity of dust storms likely to increase in Australia, the impact of wind erosion would also increase.

    This redistribution of carbon needs to be better understood so we can improve our land management practices to better protect our soils.

    Recent research estimated that the ‘Red Dawn’ dust storm that passed over the eastern coast of Australia on 23 September 2009 cost the economy of New South Wales A$300 million, mainly for household cleaning and associated activities.

    The research paper “Soil organic carbon dust emission: an omitted global source of atmospheric CO2” was published in the latest issue of the journal Global Change Biology.

    Share this story on Facebook, Twitter, and Google:
  • Senate report on extreme weather and climate warming paves way for rethink on emissions target

    Senate report on extreme weather and climate warming paves way for rethink on emissions target

    Your Friends’ Activity

    NEW! Discover news with your friends. Give it a try.
    To get going, simply connect with your favourite social network:

    Facebook
    • twitter
    • linkedin
    • google

    This feature allows you to discover news with your friends on Our Network.

    This means stories that are read and watched will be shared with your friends, and they’ll share things with you too.

    To try out Discover news with friends simply login with your favourite social network. You can login with Facebook, Twitter, Linkedin or Google+

    Give it a try! You can turn it off at any time.

    Emissions target must be lifted

    A strong global agreement is needed to tackle climate change. Source: AFP

    From the Homepage

    IBM defends role as state considers blacklist

    IBM defends role as state considers blacklistUPDATE: IBM has rejected key findings from the Queensland Health payroll inquiry, as state looks at sacking public servants adversely named in report.

    Serial offender in 430km chase drug user since 10

    Serial offender in 430km chase drug user since 10 WATCH THE EXTRAORDINARY VIDEO: A repeat offender who led police on a wild chase from Mount Gambier to Adelaide, terrifying numerous motorists, started taking drugs when he was 10.

    Meet Queensland’s most selfless man

    Meet Queensland's most selfless manCLIVE Berghofer has made the largest single donation in Australian history – yet he still uses shopper dockets for petrol. How he made his $320m fortune.

    Measles warning for Brisbane residents

    Measles warning for Brisbane residentsBRISBANE residents need to be on alert for measles symptoms after an infectious patient visited a busy shopping centre, authorities say.

    Denyer: ‘I can’t watch Sunrise’

    Denyer: 'I can't watch Sunrise'GRANT Denyer says watching Sunrise “is like watching someone else having a turn of your wife”.

    What not to do at auctions

    What not to do at auctions THINK you can outwit an auctioneer and play by your own rules to win that dream home? Think again as it usually doesn’t end well.

    Ultimate man cave: Yours for $3m

    Ultimate man cave: Yours for $3mWHATEVER your idea of the perfect man cave is, this hole in the ground will surpass it. Wine? 4000 bottles. Location? Waterfront. Spacious? Nine storeys so bring your mates. Come and take a look inside.

    ‘I’m black, on drugs, don’t steal my kids’

    'I'm black, on drugs, don't steal my kids'CELIA is an Aboriginal woman. She uses drugs. She’s got hep C. And she’s angry. She wants an end to the new generation of “stolen” black children.

    CLIMATE politics may have been back in the headlines recently, but have we forgotten why we cared so much about cutting carbon pollution in the first place?

    Today sees the long awaited completion of the Senate’s inquiry into the impact of extreme weather and our preparedness to deal with a warming climate.

    Australians are all too familiar with the devastation and heartache that extreme weather events can cause, from properties lost to floods and bushfires, to cyclones damaging crops and driving up food prices.

    A hot world is a hungry world, with rising temperatures and shifting rainfall patterns reducing yields in regions already stricken by food shortages. Extreme weather events can wipe out entire harvests in a stroke.

    The picture could not be clearer – without stronger action to reduce emissions and increase the resilience of vulnerable communities around the world, we could lose almost all the recent hard-won gains in the fight against poverty.

    Our neighbours in the Pacific remain among the most acutely vulnerable in a changing climate, despite having contributed almost nothing to the world’s carbon emissions.

    Every major economy has initiatives to tackle climate change. Thirty-five countries have national emissions trading schemes.

    China and the US, who together produce 37 per cent of global emissions, are on track to meet their current targets and have signalled they will be strengthening efforts. In April, they struck an agreement to tackle climate change together.

    But it’s a strong global agreement we really need if we are to avoid the worst impacts of climate change. As we approach the pointy end of international negotiations, aimed at finalising a fair and ambitious new climate agreement in 2015, Australia will be judged on whether it’s putting in a fair share of the global effort to keep warming to no more than two degrees celsius above pre-industrial levels.

    We have the highest per capita emissions of any advanced economy, yet the current bipartisan emissions target of 5 per cent below 2000 levels by 2020 is absurdly short of what a country with our historic responsibility and economic capability should be delivering.

    Were all developed countries to set their sights so low, we would be condemning the world to greater hunger, poverty and instability.

    Climate change is not a future threat. It is a real and present challenge, with profound implications for Australia and the rest of the world.

    This is the conversation we need to have – not whether tinkering with current policies may help strengthen support from one sector of the community or another.

    Within weeks of taking office, the next Government will be confronted by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s latest assessment of the scale of the climate challenge.

    And next year, whoever is running the country will need to defend Australia’s emissions reduction target at a special summit of world leaders convened by the UN Secretary General, to lift global ambition ahead of the signing of a new agreement in 2015.

    As president of the G20 next year, Australia will be in a special position to help drive international progress. But our current target decreases our credibility. It’s time to lift our game.

    Dr Helen Szoke, Chief Executive of Oxfam Australia.

    ###

  • Extreme weather likely to increase and intensify, report finds

    Extreme weather likely to increase and intensify, report finds

    WeatherTemperatures are rising, with both maximums and minimums increasing. Photo: Kirk Gilmour

    The extreme weather events that have hit Australia in recent years are likely to increase in frequency and potentially intensify in the future as a result of climate change, a Senate inquiry has found.

    The inquiry, Recent trends in and preparedness for extreme weather events, recommended increased co-ordination across governments and many sectors of society to prepare for and limit the impact of such events.

    The Senate committee report also called for “credible and reliable flood mapping” to assist landowners of potential risks and to better inform land-use planning laws.

    WeatherFloods have been Australia’s most costly extreme weather events in recent years. Photo: Glenn Hunt

    The report will likely be welcomed by the insurance industry in particular, which had been calling for many of the changes it recommends. These include toughening building codes to “account for foreseeable risks”, and removing disincentives for taking up insurance, such as state taxes.

    Advertisement

    The cost of so-called catastrophe claims from floods, cyclones, bush fires and other such events was $8.8 billion in the three years to March 2013, according to a spokesman for the Insurance Council of Australia. The sum included $5.4 billion in 2011 alone.

    “These events are becoming more expensive,” the spokesman said. “The driver of this is that more and bigger homes are being built in disaster-prone areas, such as flood plains.”

    weatherGlobally, glaciers are shrinking in one signal of a warming planet. Photo: Andrew Bain

    “Much of (the cost) could have been avoided if the damaged properties had been built to be resilient to the risks,” the spokesman said. 

    Hot times

    Some of the report’s submissions coincided with the country’s hottest period of record. January, for instance, broke records for the hottest average national maximum temperature and for the hottest single month on record in what would be Australia’s hottest summer.

    weatherThe bushfire season is getting longer and the fire danger index is on the rise. Photo: Kirk Gilmour

    The report’s release also comes as the US released its State of the Climate report for 2012, which found last year to be the eighth or ninth hottest in data series going back to 1850. It noted many other signals of a warming planet including record low Arctic ice cover and the 22nd consecutive year of shrinking glacier mass.

    The Greens jumped on the Senate committee’s findings, saying it was time Labor and the Coalition acknowledged Australia “is unprepared for a significant increase in natural disasters as a result of climate change”.

    “The inquiry found the frequency and intensity of extreme weather events will increase in coming decades, costing Australia billions of dollars,” Greens Leader Senator Christine Milne said. “In the past six years alone, natural disasters have affected hundreds of thousands of Australians and cost the economy more than $10 billion.”

    WeatherThe atmosphere can hold roughly 6% more moisture for every degree of warming. Photo: Reuters

    “We will obviously consider an extensive report carefully,” said Greg Hunt, the Coalition’s spokesman for climate change.

    Mr Hunt singled out the inquiry’s recommendations that the government work closely with the CSIRO and the Bureau of Meteorology to step up research into early warning of extreme events and also the links between weather events and climate trends.

    “I have a deep respect for and belief in the work of both the Bureau of Meteorology and CSIRO,” Mr Hunt said. “We therefore strongly support continued and extended research by both into climatic trends, weather events and climate change.”

    Fairfax Media has sought a response from Mark Butler, the Minister for Climate Change. 

    Insurer support

    The report found that Australia’s exposure to extreme events is increasing not just from climate change but also because of the spread of population and investments into vulnerable areas.

    The attention to those threats has been welcomed by insurers.

    “Today’s report is another voice that strongly says we need a comprehensive and more sustainable approach to managing natural disasters in Australia to keep people safe,” said Mike Wilkins, chief executive of IAG, one of Australia’s biggest insurers.

    “Every Australian is impacted by natural disasters and extreme weather,” Mr Wilkins said.

    “Whether it be through personal devastation in losing loved ones or property, whether it be through billions of their taxpayer dollars spent on recovery, the creation of special flood levies, or through higher insurance premiums, we all pay the price when we fail to make where we live as safe as possible.”

    Beyond science

    Mark Stafford Smith, from CSIRO’s Climate Adaptation Flagship, said the strongest signals of climate change affecting Australia included hotter temperatures and rising sea levels.

    Heat records, for instance, were falling at three times the rate for those involving cold temperatures over the past decade or so.

    “If nothing was happening, you’d expect them to be roughly equal,” Dr Stafford Smith said.

    Rising temperatures were also contributing to ‘‘a significant increase’’ in bushfire danger, he said.

    While other signals were less clear, such as the frequency of heavy rainfall events, ‘‘responsible managers’’, including governments, would be looking to reduce risks and improve the resilience of infrastructure, he said.

    Political leaders and the wider community would have to make a call on the right balance, a tough challenge given that some of the science of climate change will remain uncertain.

    “How much do we want to invest today for future generations as opposed to putting it into our own well-being?” Dr Stafford Smith said. ‘‘That’s a genuine societal value trade-off that no science can answer.’’

    Read more: http://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/environment/climate-change/extreme-weather-likely-to-increase-and-intensify-report-finds-20130807-2rggq.html#ixzz2bGmXgifN