Category: Uncategorized

  • How population growth is affecting the residential property market

    How population growth is affecting the residential property market: Tracey Chandler

    By Tracey Chandler
    Thursday, 18 July 2013

    Australian population is on a merry ride with a growth of 1.8% last year. We have added roughly 0.4 million people to the kitty of Australian citizens in 2012.

    All good, but this brings forth a few pertinent questions. Such as: Is the housing sector good enough to keep abreast with the rising population?

    Population in Australia is getting a fillip due to two main reasons.

    The first is termed as ‘natural increase’ and is expressed as the difference between the number of births and deaths. With low mortality rate, the natural increase is only expected to aid the population graph further in coming years.

    The second factor is the ubiquitous overseas migration. It has brought in working class in ever so high numbers within the Australian shores. Net migration has doubled in the last 8 years and we have added nearly 240,000 to our population through net migration last year.

    Of course, few states find themselves steeply rising on the population curve while others lag behind. While there are many reasons for the trend, net interstate migration turns out to be a key factor.

    A few states drain people out while others siphon them in.

    Factors like a) brightness of opportunities available, b) the performance of the housing sector, and c) the number of growth-drivers (single-industry economy or multiple-industry economy), among others, determine how much will a state soak in or bleed out individuals.

    Tasmania and South Australia are finding out rather quickly that they are not providing enough reasons for people to stay (complete lack of depth in their markets). They have grown at a paltry rate of under 1%.Places like Queensland, NSW and Victoria are growing rapidly both in terms of “wealth factor” and population.

    Sydney has done rather well with New South Wales adding 90,400 people to its kitty last year. The good part is that the ratio of skill stream: family migration is loaded in favour of Sydney and a lot many skilled workers have been added to its tally lately.

    This skilled-class will be an apt replacement for the baby boomer generation even as it looks to create its own job opportunity.These people who are expected to generate their own wealth will look more and more towards living in the four main capital cities.

    This is one reason why Sydney should keep piling the inflow of migrants and keep benefiting from it too.The overseas migrants will fill us on their knowledge of overseas practices and business networks, will fuel demand in certain areas and also heighten investments.

    Another point worth noting: not only the settler arrivals but also the number of onshore grants is increasing.The latter is offered to student class who wish to settle permanently (have been living on a temporary visa till now).

    The rapid development of Australia is luring them to stay forever and these are the individuals who are bound to feel more loyal about our country, adding a lot to its near-future wealth factor.

    Population growth brings to the surface the crux question of housing supply.

    We are running short of nearly 170,000 dwellings at the moment.Oversupply in uninhabitable or lousy estate areas won’t help the cause.

    Development-ready land needs to increase manifold.

    Off-the-plan constructions need to honour time-frames, something which is not happening at large.

    We have to stand up to our ‘median’ housing commitments and also look into the micro lots more engagingly. After all, we have a First Home Buyer population to cater to.

    While the population growth is great news (we are not India or China where it can be perceived as a threat), our ability to turn it into a machine for growth is the main question at hand.

    Tracey Chandler is a buyer’s agent specialising in Sydney’s eastern suburbs. This article originally appeared at buyersagent-sydney.com.au.

  • Sea-level rise on the low-lying Narooma Flat

    Sea-level rise on the low-lying Narooma Flat

    By Stan Gorton

    July 17, 2013, 9:10 a.m.

    • INUNDATION: The footpath at the Narooma wharf is flooded during a recent king tide...INUNDATION: The footpath at the Narooma wharf is flooded during a recent king tide…

    THE Eurobodalla Shire Council has announced it is currently preparing a flood study for Wagonga Inlet that will consider the risk from current catchment-related flooding and ocean inundation events.

    This comes as an academic planner is urging local government to do more to plan for sea-level rise, warning that it is only a matter of time before the Narooma Flat goes under.

    At the same time, the Eurobodalla Shire is asking other local councils if they want to work together to set new sea-level rise benchmarks following the current State Government terminating the previous benchmarks set by the former Labor government.

    All this sea-level planning work comes as nearly 70 University of Canberra planning and science students are visiting the Far South Coast for a week to do some field work in the area.

    The students – 35 of which study coastal planning and 32 studying marine ecology — are based at Lake Tabourie until Sunday, July 21.

    Their visit will include some science experiments and dropping in at Eurobodalla council.

    Leading the group is Professor Barbara Norman, foundation chairperson of Urban and Regional Planning at the University of Canberra.

    It was Prof. Norman who also led the recent report “South East Coastal Adaptation (SECA): Coastal urban climate futures in SE Australia from Wollongong to Lakes Entrance” published by the National Climate Change Adaptation Research Facility (NCCARF).

    The report stated Eurobodalla Shire Council and other local governments are facing increasing pressure to develop coastal areas, while local environment plans were not doing enough to take into account rising waters.

    The report looked specifically at the Narooma Flats saying planning strategies in the Local Environmental Plan do not account for sea-level rise risk with the precinct designated for future growth.

    Read our previous coverage of the report:

    http://www.naroomanewsonline.com.au/story/1453750/report-warns-of-sea-level-rise-complacency/

    Prof. Norman told the Narooma News this week “the Narooma Flat is at risk of inundation of flooding and council should be doing more looking at the long-term impact of this flooding.”

    “It is a difficult issue and council needs to think carefully about what is appropriate development – it doesn’t need to be an empty area and there could be uses like playing fields and open space,” she said.

    Council however says the reality is that the Narooma Flat is a major area for employment and residential housing with the highway being the major transport route.

    Eurobodalla Shire Council’s coastal and flood management planner Norm Lenehan said council was currently preparing a flood study for Wagonga Inlet that will consider the risk from current catchment-related flooding and ocean inundation events.

    “The study will also examine anticipated changes to this risk under a range of projected scenarios for climate change,” Lenahan said.

    “The flood study commenced in 2012, but has been stalled until council can adopt a position on sea level rise planning benchmarks which are required to inform the consideration of longer-term risk management strategies.

    “Notwithstanding the delay, several key milestones from the project have been achieved including a community mail-out, public meeting and community survey.

    “Running in the background have been the technical milestones of the project associated with developing and calibrating the computer modelling, however as previously stated, the finalisation of the project is dependent upon the adoption of sea level rise planning benchmarks.”

    Lenehan said councillors on July 2 were given a number of options relating to the sea-level benchmarks, including adopting the old levels as some councils have or going it alone to set new benchmarks.

    Instead, he said the council decided to contact neighbouring councils to see if they wanted to collectively set new benchmarks, and discussions were just now starting.

    Anyone submitting a development application currently has to pay for their own coastal risk assessment or flood risk assessment, depending on the location.

    Lenehan said one benefit of having new standardised sea-level rise benchmarks was that development proponents would no longer have to do these assessments as council would already have the information.

  • Acidic oceans of the future show extinction

    Acidic oceans of the future show extinction

    Posted: 16 Jul 2013 09:56 AM PDT

    Ocean acidification may create an impact similar to extinction on marine ecosystems, according to a study published last Monday.

    The study, exploring naturally acidic waters near volcanic vents in the Mediterranean Ocean off Italy, suggests that ocean acidification as a result of human emissions can degrade entire ecosystems – not just individual species, as past studies have shown.

    The result, scientists say, is a homogenized marine community dominated by fewer plants and animals.

     

    The background, low-grade stress caused by ocean acidification can cause a whole shift in the ecosystem so that everything is dominated by the same plants, which tend to be turf algae,” said lead author Kristy Kroeker, a postdoctoral researcher at the Bodega Marine Laboratory at the University of California, Davis.

    The study was published in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

    Colorful patches

    The oceans have absorbed roughly 30 percent of the carbon humans have pumped into the atmosphere by burning fossil fuels, buffering the globe from the harm posed by greenhouse gases. But it comes with a price: seawater has become more acidic as it absorbed all that carbon.

    Today the ocean’s pH is lower than anything seen in the historical record in the past 800,000 years, scientists say. As the acidity increases, organisms such as corals, oysters, snails and urchins have trouble pulling minerals from the seawater to create protective shells.

    The study released Monday buttresses ecologists’ fears that such changes could ripple through entire ecosystems – and that ocean acidification could prove as consequential and catastrophic for the globe as any changes in air temperature associated with climate change.

    Most ecosystems have numerous, colorful patches of different plants and animals – algae, sponges, anemones, among others, Kroeker said in a statement. “With ocean acidification, you lose that patchiness…. Everything looks the same.”

    Kroeker and colleagues studied waters surrounding Castello Aragonese, a 14th century castle off the coast of Italy where volcanic vents naturally release bubbles of carbon dioxide gas. The vents create different levels of acidity on the reef. These gradients gave the scientists a glimpse of what a future marked by increasingly acidic ocean waters could look like – and how the creatures and plants living in those environments may react to a disturbance.

    The researchers selected three reef zones: low, high and extremely high acidity, representing world ocean conditions for the present day, 2100 and 2500, respectively. Then they removed animals and vegetation from the rocks there. Every few months for three years, Kroeker dived to the study plots to photograph them and watch how plots in each zone recovered.

    Variety through time

    Kroeker found that acidic water reduced the number and variety of species. In the non-acidic plots, many different plants and animals, including turf algae, would colonize and grow. Sea urchins, snails and other so-called “calcareous species” would then eat them, allowing for variety through time.

    But in both the high and extremely high acidic plots, urchins and other grazers either never reappeared or did not graze, allowing fleshy turf algae to steadily increase and ultimately overtake the zones.

    Calcareous grazers play key roles in maintaining the balance within marine ecosystems. They are also considered among the most vulnerable species to ocean acidification, previous studies have found.

    “If the role of these grazers changes with ocean acidification, you might expect to see cascading effects of the whole ecosystem,” Kroeker said. “If the pattern holds for other calcareous grazers, this has implications for other ecosystems, as well.”

    Daily Climate, 10 July 2013. Article.

  • Stop the Great Barrier Reef Train Wreck (AVAAZ )

    Stop the Great Barrier Reef Train Wreck

    Inbox
    x
    Oliver MacColl – Avaaz.org
    2:17 PM (3 hours ago)

    to me
    Dear friends,


    Australia is about to build one of the biggest coal complexes in the world, damaging the Great Barrier Reef and threatening our climate. But the company planning the project is deep in debt, and if we can convince a crucial investor to walk away, the whole polluting plan will be derailed. Sign this urgent petition now and help Save the Great Barrier Reef:

    Sign the petition

    Australia is about to build some of the biggest coal mines in history, then destructively dredge the Great Barrier Reef to ship hundreds of millions of tonnes of coal to the world. But tomorrow there’s a major chance to stop the project in its tracks and take a stand for our climate!

    The emissions from new mines proposed in the Galilee Basin would be greater than the 2009 emissions of Canada or the UK! But the company planning the project is drowning in debt and desperate for a major investor to keep it afloat. Australian rail company Aurizon has expressed interest in a crucial coal rail-line, but after months of deliberation, they’re still on the fence — and a massive outcry could convince them to stay away from this environmentally disastrous and financially risky project.

    Tomorrow they’re holding a key meeting with stakeholders. Let’s hit the phone to let them know what we think about this disastrous project and what it’d do to their reputation. Click to call, and help save our climate and the Great Barrier Reef:

    https://secure.avaaz.org/en/stop_the_great_barrier_reef_train_wreck_oz_loc/?bhPqncb&v=27173

    Australia is already the #2 coal exporter in world — and there are enough new mines proposed in the Galilee Basin to roughly triple the amount they produce! If all the coal from the proposed mines were burned, it would be three times Australia’s current climate pollution. Let’s stall this new Australian coal rush before it sets us back years in the fight against climate change.

    Around the world the smart money is moving away from coal. Some of Australia’s biggest mining companies are even backing away from these projects, but the Indian company leading this project — GVK — is bucking the trend. They plan to build a massive port right in the heart of the Great Barrier Reef and dredge deep into the seafloor dumping the material at an unknown destination. It’s an ecological disaster that would damage the reef directly before killing it with climate change.

    The Australian rail company Aurizon has been in talks with GVK to invest in the crucial rail link from mines to the ports, but unlike GVK, Aurizon’s own investors don’t like risk — one even makes major donations to support climate activism! Even Macquarie Bank has come out saying the likelihood of returns is “extremely poor”. Their decision could come any day — a big, public reminder on the day their top investors meet in Brisbane could be just the thing to stop this plan. Sign this urgent petition and share it with everyone you know to stop the Great Barrier Reef Train Wreck:

    https://secure.avaaz.org/en/stop_the_great_barrier_reef_train_wreck_oz_loc/?bhPqncb&v=27173

    The Avaaz community has been fighting to save the unparalleled beauty of the reef for years. Last year, Avaaz members threatened a public US Bank when they were set to invest in Reef destruction. Hundreds of thousands of Avaaz members sent messages to the Australian Environment Minister to help win the largest marine reserve in the world. Let’s do it again and put the reef out of reach of these profiteering plunderers.

    With hope and determination,

    Oliver, David, Emily, Luca, Rewan, Vilde, Will and the whole Avaaz team

    PS – Many Avaaz campaigns are started by members of our community. It’s easy to get started – click to start yours now and win on any issue – local, national or global: http://www.avaaz.org/en/petition/start_a_petition/?bgMYedb&v=23917

    SOURCES:

    GVK’s Australia coal project ‘a quagmire, not an investment’ says report (The Times of India)
    http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/business/india-business/GVKs-Australia-coal-project-a-quagmire-not-an-investment-says-report/articleshow/20651363.cms

    Report- Stranded: Alpha Coal Project in Australia’s Galilee Basin (IEEFA)
    http://www.ieefa.org/report-stranded-alpha-coal-project-in-australias-galilee-basin/

    GVK rejects claim Alpha is ‘stranded’ (The Age)
    http://www.theage.com.au/business/carbon-economy/gvk-rejects-claim-alpha-is-stranded-20130619-2oj96.html

    Cooking the Climate, Wrecking the Reef Report (Greenpeace)
    http://www.greenpeace.org/australia/en/what-we-do/climate/resources/reports/Cooking-the-climate-Wrecking-the-reef/

    Support the Avaaz Community!
    We’re entirely funded by donations and receive no money from governments or corporations. Our dedicated team ensures even the smallest contributions go a long way. Donate to Avaaz


    Avaaz.org is a 24-million-person global campaign network
    that works to ensure that the views and values of the world’s people shape global decision-making. (“Avaaz” means “voice” or “song” in many languages.) Avaaz members live in every nation of the world; our team is spread across 18 countries on 6 continents and operates in 17 languages. Learn about some of Avaaz’s biggest campaigns here, or follow us on Facebook or Twitter.

    You are getting this message because you signed “Save our dying planet!” on 2011-12-08 using the email address nevilleg729@gmail.com.
    To ensure that Avaaz messages reach your inbox, please add avaaz@avaaz.org to your address book. To change your email address, language settings, or other personal information, contact us, or simply go here to unsubscribe.

    To contact Avaaz, please do not reply to this email. Instead, write to us at www.avaaz.org/en/contact or call us at +1-888-922-8229 (US).

  • This is truly a people-powered win.

    -People power again wins ths the day.

     

    ——— Forwarded message ———-
    From: Karen Skinner, Change.org <mail@change.org>
    Date: Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 5:32 PM
    Subject: Victory! Fiordland saved
    To: nevilleg729@gmail.com

    Change.org
    NEVILLE — together, change.org users like you today saved this:

     

    This is truly a people-powered win. The plan to drill a tunnel through the centre of the pristine Fiordland National Park in New Zealand looked all but guaranteed to go ahead. Then a local resident Patricia Ko started her change.org petition.

    More than 31,000 people signed it, getting support from stars like Sam Neill and Peter Jackson, igniting a media storm that ranged from the NZ Herald to the UK’s Daily Mail. And today the Conservation Minister stepped in to reject the proposal.

    Read on below for more about Patricia Ko’s petition to stop the Fiordland tunnel proposal and her big win today. And remember, if there’s an issue that you care about — big or small — you can quickly get a petition started on change.org by clicking here.

    Karen and the Change.org team.

    —- a message from petition starter Patricia Ko —-

    We just won! The Conservation Minister has just rejected the plan to put a tunnel through Fiordland National Park. 
    We’ve just heard Nick Smith announce that the Fiordland tunnel would “permanently damage the natural and landscape values” and will be declined approval.

    The decision today is the result of countless hours of campaigning and hard work. And importantly, the support of you and 31,000 others who signed my petition on change.org. Thank you. 

    The tunnel would have been hugely damaging to not only our communities but also to one of the most beautiful, pristine national parks in the world — there’s literally nothing else like it anywhere.

    When I started the petition I had no idea what to expect. The odds were stacked against us — we were only a small community trying to face down multi-million dollar developers. But as we signed and shared the petition, and our community rallied together, we put the issue in the national spotlight.

    The Minister was forced to respond to hundreds of media stories — in New Zealand Herald, Campbell Live, international media like the UK’s Daily Mail and so many more. Mayors, business owners, celebrities like Peter Jackson, Sam Neil and Jane Campion all added their support. And the government was forced to listen. 

    Today we’ve been a part of what is probably one of the biggest environmental wins in this country for decades. And it means so much to all of us locals in Glenorchy and the Fiordland region that you stood with us. Thanks so much.

    Patricia

    P.S. Come celebrate and share the news we’ve just posted up here on our Facebook page: http://on.fb.me/10Zpqiw — and find the full statement from Nick Smith to all petition signers here.

    This email was sent by Change.org to nevilleg729@gmail.com. You can edit your email preferences or unsubscribe from Change.org emails. Start a petition on Change.org.

    Mailing address: Change.org · 216 W 104th St., #130, New York, NY 10025 USA

  • Acidic oceans of the future show extinction

    idic oceans of the future show extinction

    Published 16 July 2013 Media coverage Leave a Comment

    Ocean acidification may create an impact similar to extinction on marine ecosystems, according to a study published last Monday.

    The study, exploring naturally acidic waters near volcanic vents in the Mediterranean Ocean off Italy, suggests that ocean acidification as a result of human emissions can degrade entire ecosystems – not just individual species, as past studies have shown.

    The result, scientists say, is a homogenized marine community dominated by fewer plants and animals.

     

    The background, low-grade stress caused by ocean acidification can cause a whole shift in the ecosystem so that everything is dominated by the same plants, which tend to be turf algae,” said lead author Kristy Kroeker, a postdoctoral researcher at the Bodega Marine Laboratory at the University of California, Davis.

    The study was published in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

    Colorful patches

    The oceans have absorbed roughly 30 percent of the carbon humans have pumped into the atmosphere by burning fossil fuels, buffering the globe from the harm posed by greenhouse gases. But it comes with a price: seawater has become more acidic as it absorbed all that carbon.

    Today the ocean’s pH is lower than anything seen in the historical record in the past 800,000 years, scientists say. As the acidity increases, organisms such as corals, oysters, snails and urchins have trouble pulling minerals from the seawater to create protective shells.

    The study released Monday buttresses ecologists’ fears that such changes could ripple through entire ecosystems – and that ocean acidification could prove as consequential and catastrophic for the globe as any changes in air temperature associated with climate change.

    Most ecosystems have numerous, colorful patches of different plants and animals – algae, sponges, anemones, among others, Kroeker said in a statement. “With ocean acidification, you lose that patchiness…. Everything looks the same.”

    Kroeker and colleagues studied waters surrounding Castello Aragonese, a 14th century castle off the coast of Italy where volcanic vents naturally release bubbles of carbon dioxide gas. The vents create different levels of acidity on the reef. These gradients gave the scientists a glimpse of what a future marked by increasingly acidic ocean waters could look like – and how the creatures and plants living in those environments may react to a disturbance.

    The researchers selected three reef zones: low, high and extremely high acidity, representing world ocean conditions for the present day, 2100 and 2500, respectively. Then they removed animals and vegetation from the rocks there. Every few months for three years, Kroeker dived to the study plots to photograph them and watch how plots in each zone recovered.

    Variety through time

    Kroeker found that acidic water reduced the number and variety of species. In the non-acidic plots, many different plants and animals, including turf algae, would colonize and grow. Sea urchins, snails and other so-called “calcareous species” would then eat them, allowing for variety through time.

    But in both the high and extremely high acidic plots, urchins and other grazers either never reappeared or did not graze, allowing fleshy turf algae to steadily increase and ultimately overtake the zones.

    Calcareous grazers play key roles in maintaining the balance within marine ecosystems. They are also considered among the most vulnerable species to ocean acidification, previous studies have found.

    “If the role of these grazers changes with ocean acidification, you might expect to see cascading effects of the whole ecosystem,” Kroeker said. “If the pattern holds