Category: Uncategorized

  • The ‘Doomsday Clock’ stays at five minutes to midnight as scientists accuse world leaders of ignoring climate change

    The ‘Doomsday Clock’ stays at five minutes to midnight as scientists accuse world leaders of ignoring climate change

    • Clock symbolises the future of humanity – with midnight ending our time on the planet
    • Scientists say world leaders are ignoring climate change to focus on economic recovery

    By Mark Prigg

    PUBLISHED: 16:04 GMT, 15 January 2013 | UPDATED: 16:50 GMT, 15 January 2013

    The hands of the infamous ‘Doomsday Clock’ that shows the future of humanity will remain at five minutes to midnight, scientists said today.

    The clock, which has midnight as a symbol for human destruction, has not moved since last year, the influential group of scientists behind it decreed.

    However, they wrote an open letter to President Barack Obama, urging him to partner with other global leaders to act on climate change and accusing world leaders of ignoring the problem to focus on economic recovery.

    Former U.S. ambassador to the U.N., Thomas Pickering,in front of the Doomsday Clock - which scientists have kept at 11:55pm for 2013, claiming world leaders are ignoring climate change to focus on the economyFormer U.S. ambassador to the U.N., Thomas Pickering,in front of the Doomsday Clock – which scientists have kept at 11:55pm for 2013, claiming world leaders are ignoring climate change to focus on the economy

     

    THE DOOMSDAY CLOCK

    The Science and Security Board of the Chicago-based Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, in consultation with the Governing Board and the Board of Sponsors, which includes 18 Nobel Laureates, reviews the implications of recent events and trends for the future of humanity with input from other experts on nuclear weapons, nuclear energy, climate change, and emerging threats.

    image001.pngThe Clock hand has been moved 20 times over the past 65 years, since its appearance in 1947 on the first cover of the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists.

    ‘The politics of economic recovery have distracted world leaders from the long-term threats that face humanity, specifically the dangers presented by climate change and nuclear weapons,’ said the Science and Security Board of the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, who control the clock.

    ‘2012 was a year in which global problems pressed forward, but too many of its citizens stood back.’

    The clock has remained stationary since January 2012, when the Clock’s hand was moved forward one minute, from six to five minutes before midnight.

    In an unusual move, Board members directly addressed US President Barack Obama in an open letter published today.

    They acknowledge the steps the president took to ‘nudge the country along a more rational energy path,’ – but also warm of global warming’s effect on the US.

    ‘2012 was the hottest year on record in the contiguous United States, marked by devastating drought and brutal storms,’ the letter says.

    ‘These extreme events are exactly what climate models predict for an atmosphere laden with greenhouse gases. 2012 was a year of unrealized opportunity to reduce nuclear stockpiles, to lower the immediacy of destruction from weapons on alert, and to control the spread of fissile materials and keep nuclear terrorism at bay. 

    ‘2012 was a year in which — one year after the partial meltdown at the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station — the Japanese nation continued to be at the earliest stages of what will be a costly and long recovery.’

    The scientists sent an open letter to President Obama urging him to focus on climate change during his second termThe scientists sent an open letter to President Obama urging him to focus on climate change during his second term

     

     

    Robert Socolow, Chair of the Science and Security Board, said, ‘We have as much hope for Obama’s second term in office as we did in 2010, when we moved back the hand of the Clock after his first year in office.

    ‘This is the year for U.S. leadership in slowing climate change and setting a path toward a world without nuclear weapons.”

    Share or comment on this article

    From the

    Add your comments

    Comments (44)

    The comments below have not been moderated.

     View all

    Wether climate change is man made or not (jury is still out and will be for another 50 yrs plus) trying to control it is a useless waste of money because it will never work. As for the ‘self appointed ‘ climate experts they will always be stating that we are almost sure it is happening but we need more research (more money). As for the ludicrous prediction that the sea levels will rise by cm I wonder wether these scientists have ever been on the Pacific or the Atlantic oceans. As far as I can see melting all the ice on the planet would be like spitting in a reservoir.Still some people believe this rubbish.

    Kenny70 , Solihull, United Kingdom, 16/1/2013 17:58

    Click to rate     Rating   4

    Report abuse

    Where do people get the idea that the planet has stopped warming? The ten warmist years ever recorded were in the last 15 years but now climate scientists tell us that the rate of increase has slowed by 20%. This does not mean global warming has stopped. If you have a burst pipe in your bathroom and you stem the flow by 20% your bathroom will still get flooded it will not stop. you my friend have fallen into the classic trap of “since records began” which seems like a big deal when printed in papers etc, in reality the records are only about 100 years old so far from being “the warmest year ever etc” its only the warmest year by 0.2 of a degree or so in the last 100 years hardly something to keep you awake at night, the world has existed for 100’s of millions of years and gone through many different phases of climate, some much greater than now so why is a tiny raise of fractions of a degree all suddenly man made and our fault?

    chugernought , derby, 16/1/2013 17:38

    Click to rate     Rating   7

    Report abuse

    The problem is we are all out of touch with what we consume and produce. The solution is local, local food, local waste, local employment, local energy. If your energy was produced at the end of your street what would you choose? Nuclear? Coal? Solar? If you had to dispose of all your own waste how many things would you buy in little plastic trays?

    Alastair , London, 16/1/2013 17:20

    Click to rate     Rating   4

    Report abuse

    Let me see: believe the majority of experts in the filed or believe some dumb DM punter?….errmmm – Andy HB , Hebden Bridge, 16/1/2013 10:38 – I don’t know how old you are Andy but I would guess pretty young. We are not all dumb, many have had a good education and have lived long enough to know not to listen to all you are told, particularly when the sums don’t add up. If history tells us anything its that when all say something is a certainty its not. Winston Churchill spent years in the wilderness telling us of the Nazi danger to be ignored. Here’s the lyrics from a song that I know that sums up “experts” perfectly. “I heard it on the radio too much of what they said wasn’t so and now we’ve got to do those things that they thought before were so wrong to be healthy and strong.” Think for yourself, many experts have an axe to grind.

    Eric Arthur Blair , Plymouth, United Kingdom, 16/1/2013 15:57

    Click to rate     Rating   19

    Report abuse

    They all went down the beach afterwards and did doughnuts on the beach in their SUVs.

    Jetty , London, United Kingdom, 16/1/2013 15:55

    Click to rate     Rating   4

    Report abuse

    Where do people get the idea that the planet has stopped warming? The ten warmist years ever recorded were in the last 15 years but now climate scientists tell us that the rate of increase has slowed by 20%. This does not mean global warming has stopped. If you have a burst pipe in your bathroom and you stem the flow by 20% your bathroom will still get flooded it will not stop.

    Working class hero , USSSR, 16/1/2013 15:49

    Click to rate     Rating   9

    Report abuse

    THE CLIMATE HAS *** A L W A Y S *** CHANGED – WHY DO WE NEED TO ‘SLOW’ IT DOWN? ABSOLUTE INSANITY AND WE ARE CALLING IT SCIENCE??????

    Bob , Earth, 16/1/2013 15:30

    Click to rate     Rating   4

    Report abuse

    Wish OUR leaders would ignore “climate change”, but that’s unlikely given the cart loads of cash they are making out of it! Will now go and start one of my v8’s to offset any “green” initiatives I have been forced to pay for by the government

    chuggernought , derby uk, 16/1/2013 14:24

    Click to rate     Rating   5

    Report abuse

    Eric Arthur ! Pity about the last name ! but you are correct regarding the religion you are talking about. It will take over, and that will be the end of all of us , unless steps are now taken to HALT its growth. It is THE most dangerous religion on this planet – C.M.Calvert , Poole, United Kingdom, 16/1/2013 10:32 It is but its self destructive and barbaric nature will ensure its demise,not ours.Churchill was right.While the rest of the planet reaps the fruits of perogress they’ll still be throwing stones.

    Keith , Crawley, United Kingdom, 16/1/2013 13:23

    Click to rate     Rating   8

    Report abuse

    Who cares really what a load of tosh

    Rob , Leeds, United Kingdom, 16/1/2013 13:06

    Click to rate     Rating   8

    Report abuse

    The views expressed in the contents above are those of our users and do not necessarily reflect the views of MailO

  • No mandate for carbon laws repeal, national poll finds Media Release

    No mandate for carbon laws repeal, national poll finds Media Release

    June 23, 2013 – 12:00am

     

    A national poll from early June reveals that there is no support for the claim that the Federal election is a referendum on the carbon laws. It also shows that more Australians oppose a double dissolution on the laws than support one, said The Climate Institute today.

    “The carbon laws themselves are not a dominant reason behind those supporting the Coalition, nor is there majority support for their repeal or a double dissolution,” said John Connor, CEO of The Climate Institute.
    “The claim that this election is a ‘referendum on the carbon tax’ is without foundation. Issues of economic management, trust and competence are much stronger influences behind the Coalition vote.”
    “The process of the carbon laws’ introduction is more a proxy for a question of trust than the policy itself and is more influential than the laws themselves. So people’s concern is really more about the process than the policy.”
    The findings come from a weighted JWS Research national online poll of 1,009 Australians, conducted 1-7 June 2013.

    Key findings include:

    • Only a third (37 per cent) of Australians believe that the Coalition should repeal carbon pricing if it is elected to government at the next Federal election. That is down from 48 per cent in an Ipsos poll of late May 2012, as reported last July in the Climate of the Nation 2012 report.
    • There is no mandate for a double dissolution if the Coalition fails to get the carbon laws abolished, with considerably more people against a double dissolution election (43 per cent) than for one (34 per cent).
    • For Coalition voters, the top concerns are about Labor’s economic mismanagement, its perceived broken lies and promises generally and Julia Gillard’s ‘carbon tax lie’. The carbon tax itself was further down a list of issues including waste of taxpayers’ money and dislike of policies generally.

     

    “There is perhaps a growing recognition that the cost of living impacts were not as severe as claimed by many and that the carbon price is beginning to work,” said Connor.

    New data from Westpac Economics shows that the carbon price added less than half a per cent to the Consumer Price Index — half of what was expected. At the same time emissions from energy fell by 7 per cent between March 2012 and March 2013, according to consultancy Pitt & Sherry.

    “Australians just want to move on and are much more concerned with the economy, jobs and general broken promises,” Connor said. “They don’t want to waste more time squabbling over carbon pricing, which they are starting to see at work, as Australia’s energy emissions have fallen and cost of living scares did not materialise.”

    Download a factsheet summarising the polling results below.

     

    For more information

    Kristina Stefanova | Communications Director, The Climate Institute | 02 8239 6299

    – See more at: http://www.climateinstitute.org.au/articles/media-releases/no-mandate-for-carbon-laws-repeal,-national-poll-finds.html#sthash.zPTEpdRf.dpuf

  • Synergistic effects of elevated carbon dioxide and sodium hypochlorite on survival and impairment of three phytoplankton species

    Synergistic effects of elevated carbon dioxide and sodium hypochlorite on survival and impairment of three phytoplankton species

    Published 21 June 2013 Science Leave a Comment
    Tags: , , , , , ,

    Sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) is widely used to disinfect seawater in power plant cooling systems in order to reduce biofouling, and in ballast water treatment systems to prevent transport of exotic marine species. While the toxicity of NaOCl is expected to increase by ongoing ocean acidification, and many experimental studies have shown how algal calcification, photosynthesis and growth respond to ocean acidification, no studies have investigated the relationship between NaOCl toxicity and increased CO2. Therefore, we investigated whether the impacts of NaOCl on survival, chlorophyll a (Chl-a), and effective quantum yield in three marine phytoplankton belonging to different taxonomic classes are increased under high CO2 levels. Our results show that all biological parameters of the three species decreased under increasing NaOCl concentration, but increasing CO2 concentration alone (from 450 to 715 μatm) had no effect on any of these parameters in the organisms. However, due to the synergistic effects between NaOCl and CO2, the survival and Chl-a content in two of the species, Thalassiosira eccentrica and Heterosigma akashiwo, were significantly reduced under high CO2 when NaOCl was also elevated. The results show that combined exposure to high CO2 and NaOCl results in increasing toxicity of NaOCl in some marine phytoplankton. Consequently, greater caution with use of NaOCl will be required, as its use is widespread in coastal waters.

     

    Kim K., Kim K. Y., Kim J.-H., Kang E. J., Jeong H. J. & Lee K., 2013. Synergistic effects of elevated carbon dioxide and sodium hypochlorite on survival and impairment of three phytoplankton species. ALGAE 28(2): 173-183. Article.

    div { margin-top: 1em; }
    –>

    Rate this:

  • Morphology of the crustose coralline alga Pseudolithophyllum muricatum (Corallinales, Rhodophyta) responds to 30 years of ocean acidification in the Northeast Pacific

    Morphology of the crustose coralline alga Pseudolithophyllum muricatum (Corallinales, Rhodophyta) responds to 30 years of ocean acidification in the Northeast Pacific

    Published 21 June 2013 Science Leave a Comment
    Tags: , , , ,

    As the process of ocean acidification alters seawater carbon chemistry, physiological processes such as skeletal accretion are expected to become more difficult for calcifying organisms. The crustose coralline red algae (Corallinales, Rhodophyta) form an important guild of calcifying primary producers in the temperate Northeast Pacific. The morphology of important ecological traits, namely skeletal density and thallus thickness near the growing edge, were evaluated in Pseudolithophyllum muricatum (Foslie) Steneck & R.T. Paine, the competitively dominant alga within this guild. Pseudolithophyllum muricatum shows a morphological response to increased ocean acidification in the temperate Northeast Pacific. Comparing historical (1981-1997) and modern (2012) samples from the field, crust thickness near the growing edge was approximately half as thick in modern samples compared with historical samples, while crust calcite density showed no significant change between the two sample groups. Morphological changes at the growing edge have important consequences for mediating competitive interactions within this guild of algae, and may affect the role of crustose coralline algal beds as hosts to infaunal communities and facilitators of recruitment in many invertebrate and macroalgal species.

     

    McCoy S. J., in press. Morphology of the crustose coralline alga Pseudolithophyllum muricatum (Corallinales, Rhodophyta) responds to 30 years of ocean acidification in the Northeast Pacific. Journal of Phycology. Article (subscription required).

  • Julia Gillard Parole State of Origin Defence Force Climate change like atom bomb:

    Climate change like atom bomb: scientists

    Neda Vanovac, AAP June 22, 2013, 5:18 pm

    The planet has been building up temperatures at the rate of four Hiroshima bombs of heat every second, and it’s all our fault, say climate scientists.

    Hurricane Katrina and superstorm Sandy are just two examples of how extreme weather will intensify, Australia’s Climate Action Summit has heard.

    Humans are emitting more carbon dioxide into the atmosphere than any other time in history, says John Cook, Climate Communication Fellow from the Global Change Institute at the University of Queensland.

    “All these heat-trapping greenhouse gases in our atmosphere mean … our planet has been building up heat at the rate of about four Hiroshima bombs every second – consider that going continuously for several decades.”

    In a speech on extreme weather in Sydney on Saturday, Mr Cook said about 90 per cent of global warming was going into the oceans, which act like a natural thermometer along with changes in land, ice, and animal species.

    Distributions of trees are shifting towards cooler areas such as the poles or mountains, and animal species are responding to global warming by mating earlier in the year.

    “This isn’t because animals are getting randier, it’s because the seasons themselves are shifting,” Mr Cook said.

    120 climate records were broken in Australia this January, including the hottest month and the hottest day.

    New colours had to be added to temperature maps to denote highs of over 50 and 54 degrees celsius.

    Warmer air holds more water, so Australia will experience heavier rainfall in wetter areas, while dry regions are becoming drier.

    There will be more category four and five tropical cyclones, and a “catastrophic” rating has already been added to fire gauges.

    Mr Cook said studies have tried to put a number on how much of global warming is caused by humans, “and the rough answer is, all of it”.

    He said for the past two decades, 97 per cent of scientists have been in agreement human activity is causing warmer temperatures.

    B

  • Climate Change Promises Tough Times for Asia and Africa – Report

    Home News World Climate Change Promises Tough Times for Asia and Africa – Report

    Climate Change Promises Tough Times for Asia and Africa – Report

    Friday, 21 June 2013 02:24 Stephen Leahy
    E-mail Print PDF

    Africa-asia-america-to-scal

    UXBRIDGE, Canada, Jun 20 2013 (IPS) – Extreme heat, flooding and water and food shortages will rock South Asia and Africa by 2030 and render large sections of cities inhabitable, if the world continues to burn huge amounts of coal, oil and gas, the World Bank is warning.

    Turn Down the Heat: Climate Extremes, Regional Impacts and the Case for Resilience“, a new report commissioned by the World Bank and released Wednesday, analysed the expected effects on South Asia and Africa if global temperatures increase by two and four degrees Celsius.

    The report showed that a global temperature rise of two degrees Celsius will have a wide range of dangerous effects, including a loss of 40 to 80 percent of cropland in Africa and rising sea levels that will destroy significant parts of many coastal cities in South Asia.

    “If the world warms by two degrees Celsius – warming which may be reached in 20 to 30 years – that will cause widespread food shortages, unprecedented heat waves, and more intense cyclones,” said World Bank President Jim Yong Kim.

    He pointed out that such change could “greatly harm the lives and the hopes of individuals and families who have had little hand in raising the earth’s temperature”.

    The burning of carbon-based fuels has increased the amount of carbon dioxide (CO2) in the atmosphere by 40 percent. CO2 and water vapour in the atmosphere are crucial in retaining some of the sun’s heat energy; without them, the earth’s atmosphere would be more like the moon’s: 100 degrees Celsius in the daytime and -150 degrees at night.

    Adding 40 percent more CO2, however, has increased the amount of heat energy the Earth absorbs, with more than 93 percent of it warming the oceans.

    Bleak findings

    One of the shocking findings in the new study is the enormous impact a two-degree rise will have on the urban poor, said Rachel Kyte, the vice president for sustainable development at the World Bank.

    Urbanisation is increasing rapidly, especially in the developing world, with many more people living in slums and informal settlements, Kyte told IPS from London.

    The report painted a bleak picture for many cities.

    As climate change disrupts rainfall patterns and generates more extreme weather in the coming decades, leading to poor crop yields, rural populations will flood cities. Escalating numbers of urban poor will suffer, with temperatures magnified by the “heat island effect” of the constructed urban environments.

    Safe drinking water will also be harder to find, especially after floods, contributing to greater water-borne diseases such as cholera and diarrhoea.

    Coastal regions like Bangladesh and India’s two largest coastal cities, Kolkata and Mumbai, will face extreme river floods, more intense tropical cyclones, rising sea levels and very high temperatures.

    “Huge numbers of urban poor will be exposed in many coastal cities,” Kyte said.

    Meanwhile, a sea level rise of 30 centimetres, possible by 2040, will result in massive flooding in cities and inundate low-lying cropland with saltwater, which is corrosive to crops. Vietnam’s Mekong Delta, a global rice producer, is particularly vulnerable to sea level rise, and a 30-centimetre rise there could result in the loss of about 11 percent of crop production, the report found.

    “We face a huge challenge over the next 20 years to…redesign our cities to protect them from climate change,” Kyte predicted, even as cities already face a huge infrastructure investment gap.

    One trillion dollars a year needed to be invested every year by 2020 by some estimates, Kyte said, adding that “to build climate resilience into cities will take another 300 to 500 million dollars a year”.

    A lack of water will be a problem in other regions. The projected loss of snowmelt from the Himalayas will reduce the flow of water into the Indus, Ganges and Brahmaputra river basins, which altogether threaten to leave hundreds of millions of people without enough water, food or access to reliable energy, the report said.

    In Sub-Saharan Africa, by the decades of 2030 or 2040, drought mixed with destructive flooding will contribute to farmers’ losing 40 to 80 percent of cropland used for growing maize, millet and sorghum.

    And while carbon emissions have already increased oceans’ acidity by 30 percent, by 2040, oceans will be too acidic for many coral reefs to survive. The death of coral reefs results in major loss of fish habitats as well as protection against storms.

    “That will have significant consequences for ocean fish catches, which are already in decline today,” said Bill Hare of Climate Analytics and who was the lead author of the study.

    Policy recommendations

    The report is a science-based guide for the World Bank and governments for what these regions will face over the next 20 to 30 years, said Hare.

    “Much of this can be avoided, and it will cost far less with urgent action to reduce carbon emissions,” Hare told IPS.

    In a speech at Berlin’s Brandenburg Gate Wednesday, U.S. President Barack Obama called climate change the “global threat of our time” and promised the United States would do far more to reduce emissions. A detailed announcement is expected next week.

    Last week, the United States and China agreed to reduce phase out HFCs, a greenhouse gas used in air conditioners. China has also created a series of carbon trading regions to cut emissions.