Category: Uncategorized

  • Australia’s large casual workforce masking real unemployment rate

    Australia’s large casual workforce masking real unemployment rate

    By Simon Palan, ABC Updated June 12, 2013, 10:01 pm

    Economists are warning an increase of casual and part-time work means Australia’s unemployment rate is higher than we think.

    The unemployment rate is currently 5.5 per cent, but official figures show another 7 per cent of workers in casual or part-time roles are willing and able to work more hours.

    It is estimated that 35 per cent of Australia’s workforce is now employed on a casual or contract basis.

    AMP Capital economist Shane Oliver says that figure is too high.

    “To have this situation where you are locked into part-time work for a long period can be debilitating,” he said

    Unions have recently aired a television commercial outlining their concerns.

    Australian Council of Trade Unions president Ged Kearney says the trend is costing workers’ entitlements.

    “You lose sick leave and you lose annual leave,” Ms Kearney said. “You lose carers leave – you also lose things like superannuation and it becomes difficult to get a loan.”

    Philippa Barr is among those looking for more work.

    She has been searching for a full-time job since the start of the year, but all she can find are three casual positions.

    Ms Barr says the financial impact is high.

    “It’s meant that I’m in a very precarious situation at the moment,” Ms Barr said.

    “I’m not even renting a house, I’m house-sitting because I can’t afford to commit to paying rent from week to week.”

    Employment uncertainty is a growing issue. During the global financial crisis many employers replaced full-time jobs with part-time roles, and they are yet to change them back.

    Meanwhile, more older workers are also returning to the workforce part-time because their superannuation savings have taken a hit.

    Employers say casual and part-time contracts have advantages

    But employer groups say workplace flexibility is needed to achieve economic growth.

    They suggest there are also growing numbers of Australians who are choosing casual and part-time jobs.

    There are even job websites dedicated entirely to them.

    Recruitment specialist Don Robertson recently launched jobflex.com.au to tap into the demand.

    “What we’ve found is Generation Y job seekers are more inclined, are more interested to test a market if you will, in terms of potentially looking at different employment ideas before settling on one career,” Mr Robertson.

    But Mr Oliver believes the casualisation of Australia’s workforce is hurting the broader economy.

    “If we fully utilise the resources available to us in the labour market, then we could be having a higher level of economic activity and better living standards flowing from that.”

  • Coal dust is harming the health of Queenslanders

    Coal dust is harming the health of Queenslanders

    Qld-Coal-dust

    A Greens-initiated Senate Inquiry into the health impacts of air quality is holding a hearing in Brisbane to hear evidence from experts and local groups. The Australian Greens say that not enough is being done to protect the community from the health impacts of air pollution such as coal dust.

    “There is very clear evidence that coal dust is a very serious threat to the health of Queenslanders,” said Dr Richard Di Natale, Australian Greens health spokesperson.

    “The mining, transportation and combustion of coal all pollute the air with fine particles that can exacerbate diseases like asthma and lead to very serious conditions such as lung cancer.

    “Air pollution has been responsible for twice as many annual fatalities as the national road toll and it has been ignored by the old parties for too long.

    “Protecting the health of Australians should be of paramount importance to the parliament. We need to be looking at strengthening enforceable standards for air quality around the country and we also need to increase how much we monitor those standards.”

    Australian Greens lead Senate candidate for Queensland, Adam Stone, said that Queensland felt the impacts of air pollution very acutely.

    “Queensland residents are particularly at risk because there is a lot of coal mined, stockpiled and transported around the state every day and often basic precautions to protect public health are not taken, such as covering coal wagons,” said Mr Stone.

    “The Greens put this issue on the agenda because we care about protecting the health of the community.”

  • New York lays out $20 bn plan to adapt to climate change

    New York lays out $20 bn plan to adapt to climate change

    A USD 20 billion plan to prepare for rising sea levels and hotter summers expected as a result of climate change in the coming decades was announced on Tuesday by New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg.

    Source: Reuters
    1
    3
    inShare
    Share on Tumblr
    Like this story, share it with millions of investors on M3
    New York lays out $20 bn plan to adapt to climate change
    A USD 20 billion plan to prepare for rising sea levels and hotter summers expected as a result of climate change in the coming decades was announced on Tuesday by New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg.
    Post your opinion here
     
    Like this story, share it with millions of investors on M3
    New York lays out $20 bn plan to adapt to climate change
    A USD 20 billion plan to prepare for rising sea levels and hotter summers expected as a result of climate change in the coming decades was announced on Tuesday by New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg.
    Post your opinion here
     

    Share  .  Email  .  Print  .  A+A-

    To download current article in Word format, click here.
    New York lays out $20 bn plan to adapt to climate change

    New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg on Tuesday announced a USD 20 billion plan to prepare for rising sea levels and hotter summers expected as a result of climate change in the coming decades.
    The ambitious proposal – which could become the benchmark for other cities dealing with climate change – could reshape Lower Manhattan’s waterfront, with the possible addition of a “Seaport City” out of the East Side.
    The more than 400-page plan, which follows widespread destruction wreaked by Superstorm Sandy last year, included about 250 recommendations ranging from new floodwalls and storm barriers to upgrades of power and telecommunications infrastructures.
    The plan also contained prosaic ideas, such as building up beaches and using sand dunes and plantings as natural buffers to storm surges flooding.
    Also read: Honolulu, Oslo most expensive cities for summer travel
    While some smaller provisions of the complex, long-term plan are already underway, others would require approval or action from the state or federal government.
    A report commissioned by the city and issued alongside the proposals found that over the next 40 years, the number of sweltering summer days could double or even triple, making New York City as hot by mid-century as Birmingham, Alabama, is now.
    By then, the sea level surrounding New York City could also rise by 2 feet (60 cm) or more.
    Bloomberg’s plan aims to ensure that the subway, transit, sewer and water, healthcare, energy and food distribution systems would continue to function for the city’s 8 million people well into the future.
    New York City could “do nothing and expose ourselves to an increasing frequency of Sandy-like storms that do more and more damage,” Bloomberg said in remarks at the Brooklyn Navy Yard.
    “Or we can make the investments necessary to build a stronger, more resilient New York – investments that will pay for themselves many times over in the years go to come” he said.
    New York City is surrounded by 520 miles (835 km) of coastline – more than Miami, Boston, Los Angeles and San Francisco combined – and even a small rise in sea level would endanger lower-lying homes and businesses.
    Sandy killed more than 100 people in New York, New Jersey and Connecticut, knocked out power to millions and cost New York City an estimated $19 billion in damages and lost economic activity. Bloomberg said a storm of Sandy’s strength would cost nearly five times that amount if it hit the city in the middle of this century because of rising sea levels.
    The implementation of the plan would be “an important step toward improved resilience for the City,” said Mark Way, head of Sustainability Americas Swiss Re, whose catastrophe model was the basis for the city’s analysis.
    FLOODWALLS, DUNES AND TIDAL BARRIERS
    In addition to new walls, dune systems and tidal barriers, the plan envisaged  USD 1.2 billion in loans and grants to help owners make buildings more resilient to floods and proposed changes to the building code.
    The plan also proposed the creation of new rules for how soon utility companies must restore power after a natural disaster. And the city would devise a plan to provide fuel when supplies are disrupted and to diversify energy sources.
    Some elements of the plan are likely to be implemented this year, but others would stretch out in to decades – well beyond the 200 days that Bloomberg will remain in office.
    “This is a call to the next administration and the next administration after that,” said Chris Ward, former executive director of the Port Authority of New York & New Jersey.
    To fund the plan the city would draw on money that has already been allocated for capital improvements and on post-Sandy federal relief funds approved by the US Congress.
    But the funds may fall at least USD 4.5 billion short, and the city will have to delay, scale back or eliminate some proposals if it can’t fill the gap, the plan’s authors said.
    Some thought the plan was more expensive than needed.
    Jeroen Aerts, a professor of environmental risk management at the VU University in Amsterdam and an adviser to New York City who last month co-authored a study on New York’s flood defense options, had expected the mayor to propose a plan estimated at $11.6 billion.
    “I think Bloomberg chose a more expensive solution because he wants to add value to the city. He wants to involve developers and private companies” Aerts said.

  • With Extreme Weather Events Expected to Worsen, NYC Prepares

    With Extreme Weather Events Expected to Worsen, NYC Prepares

    By Kristen Meriwether, | June 11, 2013

    Last Updated: June 11, 2013 7:16 am
    Give feedback
    Print Friendly
    1 of 2
    <
    >

    Large waves generated by Hurricane Sandy crash into Jeanette’s Pier in Nags Head, N.C. on Oct. 27, 2012. (Gerry Broome/AP Photo)

    NEW YORK—Superstorm Sandy, which flooded much of the New York City coastline, causing billions in damage, was a perfect storm: enormous size, a rare westward hook, and hitting at exactly high tide.

    It is impossible to know if the stars will align for New York City to see another perfect storm exactly like the first, but the Bloomberg Administration nonetheless believes a destructive weather pattern will continue due to climate change, and also that things are likely to get worse.

    At City Hall on Monday, June 10, Seth Pinsky, director of the Special Initiative for Rebuilding and Resiliency, described what would have happened if the storm had hit nine hours earlier. The northern part of Queens, especially LaGuardia Airport and Willets Point, as well as Hunts Point in the Bronx, would have taken on six to 12 feet of water.

    Hunts Point houses the largest food distribution center in the world, and La Guardia Airport saw just over 25 million passengers in 2011, the last year data was available.

    “If it had hit nine hours earlier, we would have been dealing with a much more significant disruption to the food supply that serves 60 percent of the restaurants in New York City,” said Deputy Mayor Cas Holloway.

    The storm didn’t hit Hunts Point, and instead the city saw severe flooding in the southern boroughs, but it was a lesson for Holloway and Pinsky. The men are tasked with devising a plan to protect the city from future storms.

    “Our focus should not be on preparing for the next Sandy, preparing for a storm that will do precisely the same thing in precisely the same places, in precisely the same way,” said Holloway. “In fact, there are all kinds of different [variables] that could impact much different areas of the city.”

    Article Continues after the discussion. Vote and comment

    Related discussion:Is global warming natural or man-made? 

    As the world around us changes, the city plans to be more prepared. City data estimates the 100-year floodplain will encompass 801,000 residents by 2050. During Superstorm Sandy, which used FEMA maps from 1983, only 218,000 residents were in the 100-year flood plain—and much of the flooding in Brooklyn far exceeded that mark.

    Heavy Rains

    With little green space to absorb heavy rains, spring downpours already present problems for the city. As effects from climate change take place, the Bloomberg administration said they will have to prepare for more consistent heavy rains.

    Dr. Radley Horton, Climate Scientist at Columbia Earth Institute, said the Northeast has seen a 75 percent increase in heavy rainfall events since 1958.

    “That positive trend is consistent with what we expect as the planet warms,” Dr. Horton said. “A warmer planet can hold more moisture. That moisture tends to fall out in very heavy events.”

    Even if the heavy rain falls out of the city, as it did with hurricanes Irene and Lee, it could present problems for New York City’s drinking water. Heavy rain causes sediment to fall into the reservoirs, an event called turbidity.

    “Once your water is cloudy, you can’t use that part of the supply until the sediment settles and the water is clear,” Holloway said. “We had portions of the water supply that were offline for months [following Irene].”

    Holloway said the more often extreme weather events occur, the more challenging it will be for the city to deal with.

    New York City prides itself on not treating its water, something that may change with the effects of climate change.

    Heat Wave

    Much of the focus in the climate change debate has been on the rising seas, but rising temperatures are expected to present another problem for the city.

    Heatwaves, characterized by three or more days of 90 degree-plus weather, are not uncommon in the city, but the frequency is expected to intensify. City data shows a recent average of 18 days of 90-degree-plus weather, but by 2050, that total is expected to jump to 57, the current level for Birmingham, Alabama.

    Dr. Horton says while the jumps may not look like much, tiny changes add up.

    “A small shift in average conditions, whether it is sea level or temperature, can have profound impact on the frequency of extreme events,” Dr. Horton said. “So a small amount of sea level rise is enough to mean a much greater frequency of coastal flooding events because you are elevating the baseline, even if storms don’t get any stronger.”

    Mayor Bloomberg will present his suggestions for how the city will address climate change issues on Tuesday.

  • Send an email to the Premier to show your support for a Special Commission of Inquiry into coal dust in the Hunter

    Send an email to the Premier to show your support for a Special Commission of Inquiry into coal dust in the Hunter

    Inbox
    x
    Coal Terminal Action Group via email.nationbuilder.com
    11:45 AM (4 hours ago)

    to me

    Dear Nevile,

    You may have heard that, on the 30th May, the Australian Rail Track Corporation (ARTC) released a report concluding that:

    “Loaded coal trains were not associated with a statistically significant difference in PM10 and PM2.5 concentrations when compared with the concentrations recorded when no train was passing the monitoring station.”

    The Hunter Community Environment Centre has received a leaked copy of the report, dated just six days before the version that was released to the public, which reached quite different conclusions. The leaked report states that:

    “Loaded coal trains and unloaded coal trains were associated with a statistically significant elevation in particulate matter concentrations when compared with the concentrations recorded when no train was passing the monitoring station.”

    Many other conclusions have been altered and data apparently reclassified between the two versions of the report. The effect of these alterations is to mislead the Government and the people of NSW into believing that coal trains do not cause coal dust emissions, when the opposite is true.

    In light of this, an independent Special Commission of Inquiry should be established to investigate the issue of coal dust in the Hunter and to get to the bottom of this issue. In addition, the planning process for any infrastructure projects that may contribute to elevated airborne dust levels in the Hunter should be suspended, pending the recommendations of the Special Commission of Inquiry. This includes the proposed fourth coal terminal, which would increase coal train movements by 107 per day, resulting in a significant increase in particle pollution.

    For this issue to be resolved, we urgently need your help.

    Please send an email to the Premier today to show your support for a Special Commission of Inquiry into this issue.

    Thank you very much for your continued involvement and support!

    Best wishes,

    Annika Dean

    President, Hunter Community Environment Centre
    On behalf of the Coal Terminal Action Group

    For more information, including a table comparing the findings of the two reports, please click here.

    -=-=-
    coalterminalactiongroup · Australia
    This email was sent to nevilleg729@gmail.com. To stop receiving emails, click here.
    You can also keep up with Coal Terminal Action Group on Facebook.
    -=-=-

    Created with NationBuilder, the essential toolkit for leaders.

  • Did you know our national parks don’t have adequate national protection? GET_UP

    GetUp!
    9:03 AM (1 hour ago)

    to me
    Our New National Parks

    Dear NEVILLE,

    Did you know our national parks don’t have adequate national protection?

    Recently, State Premiers have moved to allow logging, mining, cattle grazing and amateur shooters in our parks, and things are only getting worse.

    If you saw Four Corners on Monday, you’ll know the Shooters and Fishers Party, who have the balance of power in the NSW Senate, are trying to water down gun laws and expand shooting in national parks.

    Federal Ministers have tried to step in, but often lack the legal authority to do so. That could change, but we have to act quickly. There are eight more sitting days in Parliament before the pre-election break. Realistically, the Government has to act immediately to introduce federal protection for our national parks.

    Sign the petition and we’ll call on Environment Minister Tony Burke to introduce legislation before Parliament breaks.

    http://www.getup.org.au/protect-our-parks

    Smart Federal protections would give our parks an extra line of defence. It would stop irresponsible State Premiers putting short-term profits ahead of the preservation of our parks.

    Without Federal protection, here are some of the dangers our national parks face:

    Recently, in Victoria:

    • the Victorian Government made changes to effectively sell off its national parks; a proposal that will see chunks of national park land offered in 99 year leases. [1]

    In Queensland:

      • Campbell Newman opened 440,000 hectares of parks and reserves for cattle grazing – a practice proven to pollute waterways, trample delicate wetlands, cause soil erosion and spread weeds. [2]
    • Deputy Premier Jeff Seeney called for industry to fight green groups that are lobbying against new coal ports and dredging channels in our Great Barrier Reef. [3]

    In New South Wales:

      • the Upper House parliamentary committee proposed logging be allowed in national parks [4]
    • Barry O’Farrell intends to move forward with his deal with the Shooters and Fishers Party that will allow hunting in NSW parks despite a review saying it will pose a significant risk to human life [5]
    • NSW rolled back protection laws allowing fishing to occur in marine parks. [6]

    In South Australia:

    • Premier Jay Weatherill let shooters loose in national parks, leading to a young man being wounded by stray gunfire. [7]

    All of this shows us that state governments alone cannot be trusted with our world renowned and cherished natural areas.

    Let’s do something meaningful to ensure our parks are still around for our children to enjoy.

    Sign the petition calling for Federal protection of our national parks.

    http://www.getup.org.au/protect-our-parks

    Thanks,
    the GetUp team

    [1] Private leases plan for national parks, The Age, May 30, 2013
    [2] Tony Burke unable to stop cattle in national parks, The Age, May 22, 2013
    [3] Fight against green groups: Seeney, Brisbane Times, May 29, 2013
    [4] Logging looms in national parks, Sydney Morning Herald, May 13, 2013
    [5] Premier O’Farrell to allow hunting in NSW national parks, ABC. net.au, 31 May, 2012
    [6] Recreational fishing allowed in NSW marine parks, ABC. net.au, March 12, 2013
    [7] Shooting accident reignites call for hunting ban, ABC. net.au, May 19, 2013


    GetUp is an independent, not-for-profit community campaigning group. We use new technology to empower Australians to have their say on important national issues. We receive no political party or government funding, and every campaign we run is entirely supported by voluntary donations. If you’d like to contribute to help fund GetUp’s work, please donate now! If you have trouble with any links in this email, please go directly to www.getup.org.au. To unsubscribe from GetUp, please click here. Authorised by Sam Mclean, Level 2, 104 Commonwealth Street, Surry Hills NSW 2010.

    Reply
    Forward