Category: Uncategorized

  • GM crops suffer from super weeds

    How has this happened? Farmers over-relied on Monsanto’s revolutionary and controversial combination of a single “round up” herbicide and a high-tech seed with a built-in resistance to glyphosate, scientists say.

    Today, 100,000 acres in Georgia are severely infested with pigweed and 29 counties have now confirmed resistance to glyphosate, according to weed specialist Stanley Culpepper from the University of Georgia.

    “Farmers are taking this threat very seriously. It took us two years to make them understand how serious it was. But once they understood, they started taking a very aggressive approach to the weed,” Culpepper told FRANCE 24.

    “Just to illustrate how aggressive we are, last year we hand-weeded 45% of our severely infested fields,” said Culpepper, adding that the fight involved “spending a lot of money.”

    In 2007, 10,000 acres of land were abandoned in Macon country, the epicentre of the superweed explosion, North Carolina State University’s Alan York told local media.

     
    The perfect weed

    Had Monsanto wanted to design a deadlier weed, they probably could not have done better. Resistant pigweed is the most feared superweed, alongside horseweed, ragweed and waterhemp.

    “Palmer pigweed is the one pest you don’t want, it is so dominating,” says Culpepper. Pigweed can produce 10,000 seeds at a time, is drought-resistant, and has very diverse genetics. It can grow to three metres high and easily smother young cotton plants.

    Today, farmers are struggling to find an effective herbicide they can safely use over cotton plants.

    Controversial solutions

    In an interview with FRANCE 24, Monsanto’s technical development manager, Rick Cole, said he believed superweeds were manageable. “The problem of weeds that have developed a resistance to Roundup crops is real and [Monsanto] doesn’t deny that, however the problem is manageable,” he said.

    Cole encourages farmers to alternate crops and use different makes of herbicides.

    Indeed, according to Monsanto press releases, company sales representatives are encouraging farmers to mix glyphosate and older herbicides such as 2,4-D, a herbicide which was banned in Sweden, Denmark and Norway over its links to cancer, reproductive harm and mental impairment. 2,4-D is also well-known for being a component of Agent Orange, a toxic herbicide which was used in chemical warfare in Vietnam in the 1960s.

    FRANCE 24 report: French scientist Eric Seralini says research shows Roundup herbicide is highly toxic to human beings.   

    Questioned on the environmental impact and toxicity of such mixtures, Monsanto’s public affairs director, Janice Person, said that “they didn’t recommend any mixtures that were not approved by the EPA,” she said, referring to the US federal Environmental Protection Agency.

    According to the UK-based Soil Association, which campaigns for and certifies organic food, Monsanto was well aware of the risk of superweeds as early as 2001 and took out a patent on mixtures of glyphosate and herbicide targeting glyphosate-resistant weeds.

    “The patent will enable the company to profit from a problem that its products had created in the first place,” says a 2002 Soil Association report.

    Returning to conventional crops

    In the face of the weed explosion in cotton and soybean crops, some farmers are even considering moving back to non-GM seeds. “It’s good for us to go back, people have overdone the Roundup seeds,” Alan Rowland, a soybean seed producer based in Dudley, Missouri, told FRANCE 24. He used to sell 80% Monsanto “Roundup Ready” soybeans and now has gone back to traditional crops, in a market overwhelmingly dominated by Monsanto.

    According to a number of agricultural specialists, farmers are considering moving back to conventional crops. But it’s all down to economics, they say. GM crops are becoming expensive, growers say.

    While farmers and specialists are reluctant to blame Monsanto, Rowland says he’s started to “see people rebelling against the higher costs.”

  • James Lovelock

    Other articles on James Lovelock in the Generator.

    Background on James Lovelock

    James Lovelock is a scientist who invented a device in 1958 to detect minute concentrations of chemicals. It was used to show that pesticides like DDT accumulate in animals a long way from where they are used. He used it himself a decade later to show that ChloroFlouroCarbons (CFCs) were present in large concentrations in the Antarctic.

    Lovelock was hired by NASA to design instruments that could find life on Mars if it existed. Lovelock started designing very sensitive instruments. Then he realised that they would be unable to differentiate between the contamination brought to Mars on the space ship and any life already there on the red planet.

    He started to focus on ways to tell from the outside if life existed. He reached the remarkable conclusion that there is a very simple indicator of life and that is activity, or more accurately, instability.

    Life consumes nutrients, extracts what it needs and exhales what it does not. It reorganises the world around it. There is one very significant thing about that reorganisation. It is more complex as a result of life than it would be without it. Plants consume sunlight, dirt and water and create forests. Animals eat plants and drink water and create societies.

    When you look at a living thing from the outside you see change happening that cannot be explained by simple chemical processes. We see the seething compost and we know the worms are well.

    Lovelock reported to NASA that he had completed his experiments and had proven that there was no life on Mars. They sacked him and insisted that he did not report his findings.

    He went one step further. He founded a movement, named after the Greek goddess of the Earth, Gaia, based on the principle that the planet is alive. It is not just covered in life, it is, itself, a living organism.

    There is no doubt in my mind that it is a very useful way to understand the systems which operate on a global scale.

    When we describe the rainforest as the lungs of the planet we are using exactly such an analogy. When we look at the ocean currents and their interaction with the life that depends on them, it is a circulatory system we describe. David Suzuki reports that the Nitrogen in the temperate rainforests that blanket the west coast of the USA and Canada has all come from the sea in the bodies of salmon. On a planetary scale, I see small, salmon-shaped cells carrying nutrients through that circulatory system to an organ that helps the planet breathe.

    This is not a far-fetched notion, it is a practical tool.

    James Lovelock in the news

    He’s opposed to renewable energy, and recently opposed the construction of windfarms in the UK http://www.thisiswesternmorningnews.co.uk/news/Expert-launches-tirade-wind-farm-fascism/article-869981-detail/article.html

    He’s been called the ultimate pessimist http://www.huffingtonpost.com/sanjay-khanna/pessimists-die-quickly-gu_b_177808.html

    He’s a biochar enthusiast! But he does not support the planting of trees for the sole purpose of creating biochar.

    In a January interview James Lovelock, originator of the Gaia theory, stated “There is one way we could save ourselves and that is through the massive burial of charcoal. It would mean farmers turning all their agricultural waste… into non-biodegradable charcoal, and burying it in the soil.” http://english.ohmynews.com/articleview/article_view.asp?at_code=436833&no=385028&rel_no=1

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2009/mar/24/biochar-earth-c02

    He’s accused of being extreme in his beliefs. e.g.

    He believes the hotter new world we are bringing into being could support, at best, a billion people. That would require 84 percent of the world’s population to die off.” http://www.alternet.org/environment/135201/why_the_london_protesters_are_on_the_right_side_of_history/

    Probably the most controversial thing about Lovelock is that he goes against the tide of green sentiment by proclaiming only nuclear power can halt global warming

    http://www.independent.co.uk/environment/only-nuclear-power-can-now-halt-global-warming-564519.html

  • The Honorable Minister for the Environment, Peter Robert Garrett

    New Matilda CartoonHis statements on US bases, nuclear mining, forestry and desalination have disappointed many environmentalists. With Foreign Minister, Steven Smith, Peter Garrett refused permission for Captain Paul Watson to have the bullet proof vest that saved his life in 2007 on board the ship if it was to land in Australian waters. “We do not condone, indeed we condemn, dangerous or violent activities, including any activity that may jeopardise safety at sea or could lead to injury or loss of life,” a joint statement by the two ministers said.

    So, does that make Garrett a boof head or a hero? Use the Poll at the left to let us know what you think. While you’re thinking about it, you can listen to this little sound piece that we put together in 2007.

     

    This sound piece contrasts his view over time set to Midnight Oil music. Hear the former head of the Nuclear Disarmament Party’s voice crack as he avoids reporter’s questions. Hear him do a 180 degree turn on US bases over his eighties hit, ‘Short memory’. Weep as you realise the incredible power of the lyrics which he can no longer sing.

    Listen to a great man turn into a worm. 

    Warning: Recordings of members of parliament behaving badly may offend non-cynical listeners.

     

  • Emissions free car from WA Uni

    The Rev project website says REV hopes to “revolutionise personal transport”, by building vehicles that produce no pollution, powered by electricity from any plug point and viable to both the performance and commercial markets.

    Additionally it provides a unique opportunity for undergraduates to learn and develop multi-disciplinary teamwork plus innovative, design, leadership, management, marketing, finance and practical skills.

    We are currently building our first car: a four-wheel, five-seater commuter vehicle, designed for sustained performance over typical commute distances. Alongside we have begun the design and development of our performance model which we will demonstrate by the end of this year.

    The UWA Renewable Energy Vehicle (REV) Project is tackling the problems created by rising fuel prices and vehicle pollution head-on. We’re building two cars from the ground up that produces no pollution and is powered by electricity from the power point. Our team is a group of students from the University of Western Australia, acting on our own initiative and fuelled by a passion for a sustainable future.

    About REV

    The vehicles that clutter our freeways today are completely dependent on fossil fuels, which create major pollution issues and are fast running out. In recent years, the price of those fuels has also risen sharply. Hence the development of renewable energy technologies — that is, ways of powering a car without relying on petrol or diesel — has become crucial.

    The vehicle that we’re developing is specifically designed to be low in weight and highly aerodynamic. This will make it highly efficient in its use of energy, without sacrificing convenience, performance or style. It will even be road registered, meaning it can be driven using a standard driver’s licence!

    Unlike other ‘concept’ electric cars that never amount to more than prototypes, our car will be ready to drive and will look much like any other car you might find on the road. To prove this we are using an existing production car and converting it to use electricity as its sole source of propulsion.

  • Interviews on the Generator

    Interviews on the Generator

    Since November 2005, The Generator has interviewed some of the most important figures in the sustainability movement as well as mainstream figures, such as Dick Smith, who have made significant contributions to the area. Here below, is a smattering of those interviews. The SNIPs are generally 30 second snippets lifted from the interview, ususally because of some news value at the time.

    Richard Heinberg speaks

    The Interview

    Heinberg in the news

    Richard Heinberg is the author of eight books including The Party’s Over: Oil, War and the Fate of Industrial Societies (New Society, 2003, 2005), Powerdown: Options and Actions for a Post-Carbon World (New Society, 2004), The Oil Depletion Protocol (New Society, 2006), and Peak Everything (New Society, 2007). He is a Senior Fellow of Post Carbon Institute and is widely regarded as one of the world’s foremost Peak Oil educators.

    Richard Heinberg

    Dick Smith speaks

    Interview part 1

    Dick Smith is a famous Australian businessman with a passion for the Australian bush and aircraft. In 1968 he started a electronics business that was later called “Dick Smith Electronics.” He sold this in 1982 to publish the quarterly magazine, “Australia Geographic”. As well as a number of world breaking solo flights, Dick Smith started a food company to buy and sell Australian Made Food. He spoke to Giovanni Ebono about the sustainability of that venture.
    Dick Smith
  • 2 – Shop on foot

    Just briefly

    There is an architectural movement called New Urbanism that sets out to design cities and suburbs as walkable spaces that encourage community.

    If you are buying a new house, you might consider taking some of these principles into account. I lived in the inner city of Sydney for twenty years, where most of the shops are in old fashioned strip shopping areas.

    Five years ago, I stopped shopping at the mall and started using local stores.

    That was one of the biggest lifestyle changes I have made and it was instrumental in learning to live in a way that does not harm the planet.

    Inner city locations are often more energy efficient than suburban areas where everyone drives everywhere to do everything.

     Benefits

    Costs

     

    • Save oil
    • Build community
    • Get fitter

    Ten minutes to half an hour each trip.

    Downside

    You might have to plan your shopping trip a little more.

    Places to go

    slowmovement.com

    Hard Facts

    One quarter of car trips are to do shopping and last an average of 13 minutes.

    Search terms

    Gruen factor shopping stroll

    woonerf

    new urbanism

    greener shopping centres

    Related tips

    Shop locally

    Bake your own food.

    Share a car

    Spend nothing for a day