Author: admin

Computer manufacturers have three opportunities to earn their
environmental stripes: during a machine’s manufacture, use, and
disposal. From what I’ve read, the worst environmental legacy of
computers will be toxic waste, rather than energy consumption. (Not to
sneer at energy consumption issues, natch.) What we want to be able to start looking for in our computer choices is responsible manufacture
and responsible end-of-life stewardship. We don’t quite seem to be
there yet, but take heart: think about the time lag between onset of
chemical agriculture and onset of the organics label.

See Umbra’s column at Grist 

CHILDREN frequently exposed to household
insecticides used on plants, lawns and in head lice shampoos appear to
run double the risk of developing childhood leukaemia, research
suggests.

A study by French doctors, published today in the journal Occupational and Environmental Medicine,
supports concerns raised in recent years about the use of toxic
insecticides around the home and garden — including plant sprays,
medication shampoos and mosquito repellents — and a possible
correlation with increased rates of acute leukaemia in children.

See The Times Online  

Cheap, green electrical devices: The ultimate goal of his group,
the Soft Condensed Matter Physics Group, is to understand more about
the physics and chemistry of this biological material and build low
cost, environmentally friendly electrical devices from it. Dr
Meredith’s group has already built a prototype sensor with melanin that
measures water content but it is also building an organic chemical
sensor and transistor.

The Courier Mail, 21/9/2005, p. 31

Source: Erisk – www.erisk.net 

Volatile temperatures only slightly above average: Lacy said
although temperatures had been volatile, the average at Griffith from
October 15 to the end of December at 20 degrees had been only slightly
above the long-term average of 19.7.

Local irrigation approaches channel capacity, evaporation rates range from 10 to 16 mm per day:
Murray Irrigation general manager George Warne said hot weather and
high evaporation has caused local irrigation demand to approach channel
capacity for the first time in four years. He said there had been three
days with temperatures above 40 degrees in the week and evaporation
rates at the Tullakool and Finley weather stations had ranged between
10 and 16mm a day for the past fortnight.

Cattle feedlots unaffected by heat: Australian Lot Feeders
Association president Malcolm Foster said he had not heard of any
problem in cattle feedlots because of the heat.

The Land, 5/1/2006, p. 8

Source: Erisk – www.erisk.net

What a amazing world we live in. I sure hope you can make some sense of
the above cause I sure can’t. You would think our Australian
politicians lived on another planet. I’m sure Canberra’s decision had
nothing to do with the AP6 Climate Conference where Australia opened
it’s door to selling nuclear fuels to who ever can pay.

As we
need another 40 TW or so of generating capacity by the end of this
century, we only need to build say 40,000 1GW nuclear plants to do the
job. Lots of Australian mined nuclear fuel to be sure. And it will be
so secure that no nuclear terrorist will ever get their hands on the
fuel rods. Well, maybe just one or two missing rods is an acceptable
loss. Wonder what the
terrorists will do with them??

Lets have a vote for your view of the future:

1) 2 or 3 nuclear reactors in EVERY major city or so. Say every 100 km2 or
so. Easy to visit cause they are so close to where you live.

2) Solar on you roof receiving energy from the Sun hanging in the sky.

Either way, yes it’s nuclear energy. I know which I feel safer about.
What about your vote?

All the best,
Greg Watson
Green and Gold Energy
Adelaide, South Australia
+61 408 843 089
http://www.greenandgoldenergy.com.au
Online SunBall discussion group
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/sunball
 

SAN FRANCISCO – Hoping to make California a world leader in solar power,
state energy regulators Thursday approved some $3 billion in customer
rebates over the next decade to encourage people to install solar panels on
their roofs.

The goal is to get Californians to install equipment capable of producing
3,000 megawatts of solar electricity on 1 million homes, businesses and
public buildings over the next 10 years. That is enough energy to power 2.3
million homes.

“The California Solar Initiative is the largest solar program in the
country, and I hope it will be a model for other states,” said Dian
Grueneich, a member of the state Public Utility Commission. “The program
will be a major source of dependable and environmentally friendly
electricity.”

The PUC voted 3-1 to provide $2.9 billion in rebates for solar panels
between 2007 and 2016. Last month, the five-member commission approved $300
million in rebates for 2006.

Solar advocates said the program will make solar energy more affordable,
create jobs, reduce air pollution and cut emissions of heat-trapping gases
blamed for global warming.

The project incorporates many of the same provisions in a plan advanced by
Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger. That plan had bipartisan support but died in the
Legislature last year because of disputes over its labor provisions.

“When I ran for office, I promised the people of California an affordable,
reliable and more environmentally friendly energy
supply,” Schwarzenegger said in a statement. “Today is a big step toward
that goal.”

Only about 100 megawatts, about 0.3 percent of California’s electricity
capacity, now comes from rooftop solar panels, installed on about 15,000
homes and businesses, according to Environment California.

Thursday’s initiative includes $2.5 billion in rebates for existing homes,
businesses and public buildings that install solar panels. An additional
$350 million in rebates will be offered for solar installations on new
homes.

The initiative rewards people who act fast. Home or business owners who
install panels this year will be eligible for a $2.80 rebate for each watt
of capacity installed; the rebate drops to 25 cents per watt by 2016.

The rebates will be funded by a surcharge on gas and electricity bills. Most
residential customers will pay an extra $12 a year.
Critics questioned whether ratepayers should subsidize the most expensive
form of renewable energy, and whether the program will drive down the costs
of solar energy, as backers claim.

“We need rates to go down, but this goes in the other direction,” said
Joseph Lyons, a lobbyist for the California Manufacturers and Technology
Association.

Solar advocates said they expect the state spending will lead to more solar
energy ventures.

“We anticipate that there are going to be a lot of companies getting into
this space and thriving in this space,” said Matthew Cheney, chief executive
of San Francisco-based Renewable Ventures, which provides financing for
renewable energy projects
========================================

I now understand why the AGO will not answer my requests for the SunBall to
be registered for rebates. The SunBall will put coal, gas and nuclear power
plants out of business and thus reduce Australian sales of gas, coal and
uranium. That is something which is clearly not in the “Nuclear is
Greenhouse Friendly” interest of Australia.

Ok so there will be no rebates for the SunBall and SunCube. So be it but now
it is time to turn up the heat a bit and create a new solar PV market
segment which doesn’t need rebates to survive or governmental interference
to make sure a growing solar PV industry it doesn’t upset the fossil and
nuclear fuel supply industry nor the electricity generation, transmission,
distribution and retail industry.

SunBall and SunCube (smaller DIY version) prices have now dropped 25% (down
to wholesale pricing) and will be selling direct over the internet.
Electrical installation can be quickly done by any qualified electrician.

I don’t need the AGO’s rebates and through them their ability to control the
solar PV industry. Its time for the industry to grow up, throw off rebates
and make our way in the world, free of government strings and industry
controls geared through the on again off again solar rebates.

I’m really pissed off if you can’t
tell………………………………..

All the best,
Greg Watson
Green and Gold Energy
Adelaide, South Australia
+61 408 843 089
http://www.greenandgoldenergy.com.au
Online SunBall discussion group
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/sunball