Author: admin

  • Seismic survey at the Mariana trench will follow water dragged down into the Earth’s mantlle

    ScienceDaily: Oceanography News


    Seismic survey at the Mariana trench will follow water dragged down into the Earth’s mantle

    Posted: 22 Mar 2012 11:22 AM PDT

    Seismologists have just returned from a cruise in the Western Pacific to lay the instruments for a seismic survey that will follow the water chemically bound to or trapped in the down-diving Pacific Plate at the Mariana trench, the deep trench to which Avatar director James Cameron is poised to plunge.

    What is the monetary value of a healthy ocean?

    Posted: 22 Mar 2012 07:04 AM PDT

    Scientists have attempted to measure the ocean’s monetary value and to tally the costs and savings associated with human decisions affecting ocean health. The study estimates that if human impacts on the ocean continue unabated, declines in ocean health and services will cost the global economy $428 billion per year by 2050, and $1.979 trillion per year by 2100.
    You are subscribed to email updates from ScienceDaily: Oceanography News
    To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now.
    Email delivery powered by Google
    Google Inc., 20 West Kinzie, Chicago IL USA 60610
  • Climate Change News NY TIMES

    ADVERTISEMENT

    Alert Name: CLIMATE CHANGE NEWS
    March 23, 2012 Compiled: 1:05 AM

    By STEVEN LEE MYERS (NYT)

    A report released on Thursday indicated that problems with water could destabilize countries in North Africa, the Middle East and South Asia over the next decade.

    By JACKIE CALMES (NYT)

    President Obama said that he supported expedited construction of the southern half of the controversial Keystone pipeline.

    By A. O. SCOTT (NYT)

    “4:44 Last Day on Earth,” Abel Ferrara’s new film, offers an intimately scaled view of the destruction of the world.

    By CLIFFORD KRAUSS and ERIC LIPTON (NYT)

    Declining oil consumption and new energy production have brought the United States closer to a goal that has tantalized presidents since Richard Nixon.

  • O’farrell to pull Monorail down

    Sydney’s controversial monorail will be pulled down, says NSW Premier Barry O’Farrell.

    The state government has announced it has bought the company that owns the light rail and monorail to clear the way for the monorail’s removal.

    “The monorail is not integrated with Sydney’s wider public transport network and has never been truly embraced by the community,” Mr O’Farrell said on Friday.

    “The monorail is reaching the end of its economic life and the NSW government cannot justify costly upgrades like the purchase of new vehicles required to keep it running.”

    The state government has bought Metro Transport Sydney (MTS) for $19.8 million.

    Transport Minister Gladys Berejiklian said tearing down the monorail would remove any constraints on the proposed new convention centre development in Darling Harbour.

    It is expected to be completed by 2015-16.

    She said the monorail, which came into service in 1988, could be pulled down in two to three years but the government would not know for another 12 to 18 months the exact date of its removal.

    Buying out MTS gave the government greater flexibility when it came to planning future public transport, particularly proposed extensions to the light rail network, she said.

    “It means our options have increased in relation to light rail,” she told reporters in Sydney.

    “Our options have increased in relation to how we integrate the convention centre with other modes of public transport.

    “The monorail’s been around for 20 years, and many argue that its use-by date has arrived, and that is certainly the government’s position.”

    Mr O’Farrell said the monorail struggled right from the start, with patronage figures in its first two years half that predicted by the Unsworth Labor government.

    “The real problem with the monorail I think for most Sydneysiders is that it doesn’t actually go anywhere that you want to go,” he said.

    Opposition leader John Robertson accused the government of being more interested in tearing down public transport than in investing in new projects.

    Mr Robertson said the state government had broken its election promise to improve public transport options.

    “I think it’s a good indication that Barry O’Farrell is more interested in destroying public transport around Sydney than he is in actually doing something about it,” he told AAP at Gosford Hospital, on NSW’s central coast, on Friday.

    “What we see is someone who wants to pull something down but he is doing nothing about actually improving congestion, improving travel times for people right across Sydney and NSW.”

    Sydney Lord Mayor Clover Moore said removing the monorail to accommodate an extension to the light rail network was the sort of “big, bold transport project” the people of NSW had been waiting for.

    “I welcome the purchase of Metro Transport Sydney which will help fully integrate the current light rail system into the expanded network now being planned,” Ms Moore said in a statement.

    “Removal of the ugly and intrusive monorail is also the right next step.

    “Replacing it with efficient and effective light rail will improve transport access in central Sydney.”

    Infrastructure Partnerships Australia chief Brendan Lyon said few people would miss the monorail.

    “It is an analogue mode in a digital world and is in the way of a range of important projects like Sydney’s new convention centre,” Mr Lyon said in a statement.

    The Sydney Business Chamber praised the monorail’s removal, saying one of its “key restraints” was its isolation from the rest of the transport network.

    “Replacing the monorail with an integrated light rail network makes sense if we want to improve public transport options through the CBD and inner city,” Sydney Business Chamber executive director Patricia Forsythe said in a statement.

    “The Sydney Business Chamber has been a strong advocate for the proposed new convention

  • Nuclear google alerts

    Google Alert – DANGER TO US NUCLEAR PLANTS

    Inbox
    x

    Google Alerts googlealerts-noreply@google.com
    11:19 AM (21 minutes ago)

    to me
    News 6 new results for DANGER TO US NUCLEAR PLANTS
    What the Fukushima and BP Disasters Remind Us About Our Failure to Communicate
    Huffington Post
    The recent headlines commanded by two disasters of historic proportions — the anniversary of the tsunami that flooded the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear reactors and the settlement of the BP Gulf of Mexico oil spill litigation — remind us not only of our
    See all stories on this topic »
    Obama to Pursue Nuclear Safety, Security, Nonproliferation at Summit
    Voice of America
    “The number-one threat to the national security of the United States is nuclear terrorism, a group getting a bomb or the material with which to build a bomb and detonating it in the United States – a “nuclear 9/11,” Cirincione said.
    See all stories on this topic »
    Missing Nukes Fuel Terror Concern as Seoul Meeting Draws Obama
    Bloomberg
    If saboteurs were to penetrate a reactor site and disable the power supply, creating a similar effect as when the tsunami struck the Fukushima Dai-Ichi plant in Japan last year, there would be a danger of the nuclear fuel rods melting and radioactive
    See all stories on this topic »
    MacArthur Awards $13.4 Million to Study and Support Enhanced Nuclear Security
    Sacramento Bee
    “MacArthur’s grantmaking aims to support the people and institutions that can provide us with the research and know-how needed to keep nuclear energy safe and fissile materials out of dangerous hands.” Harvard’s Belfer Center for Science and
    See all stories on this topic »
    Germany Unprepared for Major Nuclear Disaster
    Spiegel Online
    German nuclear plants, of course, are in no danger from tsunamis. But a thousand-year flood could knock out a reactor’s cooling system — a risk dismissed as just as unlikely in Germany as the danger of a massive tsunami was considered in Japan until
    See all stories on this topic »

    Spiegel Online
    The Seoul Nuclear Security Summit: Discovering An Agenda – Analysis
    Eurasia Review
    By PR Chari Over fifty nations are gathering in Seoul on 25-26 March to confer on nuclear security issues a second time. They had met in Washington two years back to discuss the catastrophic threat of nuclear terrorism and the consequent need to secure
    See all stories on this topic »


    Tip: Use quotes (“like this”) around a set of words in your query to match them exactly. Learn more.

    Delete this alert.
    Create another alert.
    Manage your alerts.

  • Stop the mining murders (AVAAZ)

    Stop the mining murders

    Inbox
    x

    Emma Ruby-Sachs – Avaaz.org avaaz@avaaz.org
    Mar 16 (7 days ago)

    to me
    Dear friends,

    When security forces of a Canadian mining company brutally evicted Mayan families from their villages in Guatemala, eleven women were raped, a community leader was killed, and a young man paralyzed. Now villagers are standing up and suing HudBay Minerals, but they need our help to match the legal firepower of this huge corporation — donate now and help end the mining murders for good:

    When security forces of a Canadian mining company brutally evicted Mayan families from their villages in Guatemala, eleven women were raped, a community leader was killed, and a young man paralyzed. Now villagers are standing up and suing HudBay Minerals for these horrific crimes — but they need our help to match the corporate legal firepower and win their case!

    The victims have filed a lawsuit in Canada, where HudBay’s headquarters are located. But HudBay is asking that the court turn over the lawsuit to Guatemala, where its weak courts are likely to let them go free. Experts say that the ruling could have massive reverberations beyond Canadian borders — a win for the plaintiffs could force HudBay and other multinationals to clean up their acts abroad.

    The court hearing is happening now and the plaintiffs need our help to cover the legal costs — if we raise enough funds to give these villagers the same legal firepower as HudBay’s corporate machine, we can achieve justice for the victims and continue campaigning to protect human rights over profits around the world. Click on the link below to chip in. If just 20,000 of us donate today, we could help end these mining murders for good by setting a key legal precedent:

    https://secure.avaaz.org/en/stop_the_mining_murders/?vl

    Multinational companies are responsible for some of the most terrible crimes all over the world but shockingly, corporate abuses often go unpunished. In mining alone, corporate giants like Rio Tinto and Barrick Gold are accused of a wide range of atrocities that include environmental destruction, brutal gang rapes, and even thousands of deaths — from Tanzania to Papua New Guinea. Winning this case could begin to put corporate wrongdoing in check.

    Companies like HudBay can often act with impunity because they think their home countries won’t police the crimes they commit overseas. Or they set up shell corporations designed to protect their headquarters from liability. If we win this case, it could set a precedent that can help stop rapes, save entire villages, and protect fragile ecosystems — no matter where these companies operate.

    These firms have millions of dollars and will do whatever it takes to win this and similar cases because they know it’s a game changer. Giving just a small amount will help in the fight to bring them to justice. Click here to help:

    https://secure.avaaz.org/en/stop_the_mining_murders/?vl

    Courts are supposed to be places where people go to get justice. But all too often, corporate interests have made them the bastions of the rich and powerful. We have taken on deep rooted corruption before and won. Now let’s stand with and empower these victims and help create a world where no one is above the law.

    With hope and determination,

    Emma, Jamie, Pascal, Ari, Ricken, Maria Paz, Diego and the whole Avaaz team

    Sources

    Widow files $12M suit against mining company (CBC)
    http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/story/2010/12/02/mining-lawsuit002.html

    Guatemalan lawsuits to continue against HudBay, says lawyer (Mining Weekly)
    http://www.miningweekly.com/article/lawsuits-against-hudbay-over-guatemalan-project-to-continue-says-lawyer-2011-08-10

    Lawsuits against Canadian company HudBay Minerals Inc. over human rights abuse in Guatemala (Klippensteins)
    http://www.chocversushudbay.com/

    Award Winning Mining Company Being Sued for Violent Death of Community Leader: Industry Out of Step with Canadian Values and Expectations (Mining Watch Canada)
    http://www.miningwatch.ca/fr/node/6609

    U.S. court revives human rights case against Rio Tinto (Financial Post)
    http://business.financialpost.com/2011/10/25/u-s-court-revives-human-rights-case-against-rio-tinto/

    Claims of sexual abuses in Tanzania blow to Barrick Gold (Globe and Mail)
    http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/world/africa-mideast/claims-of-sexual-abuses-in-tanzania-blow-to-barrick-gold/article2040735/



    Avaaz.org is a 13-million-person global campaign network
    that works to ensure that the views and values of the world’s people shape global decision-making. (“Avaaz” means “voice” or “song” in many languages.) Avaaz members live in every nation of the world; our team is spread across 13 countries on 4 continents and operates in 14 languages. Learn about some of Avaaz’s biggest campaigns here, or follow us on Facebook or Twitter.

    This message was sent to nevilleg729@gmail.com. To change your email address, language, or other information, contact us via this form. To unsubscribe, send an email to unsubscribe@avaaz.org or click here.

    To contact Avaaz, please do not reply to this email. Instead, write to us at www.avaaz.org/en/contact or call us at +1-888-922-8229 (US).

  • Forrest slams Swan over mining tax ‘war’

    Forrest slams Swan over mining tax ‘war’

    Updated March 23, 2012 09:26:57

    Fortescue Metals Group (FMG) chairman Andrew Forrest has hit back at Federal Treasurer Wayne Swan’s description of him as “greedy and irresponsible”.

    It is the first time Mr Forrest has publicly commented on the issue since Mr Swan’s article in The Monthly, which attacked him for his campaigns against the mining and carbon taxes.

    Mr Swan criticised mining magnates Gina Rinehart, Clive Palmer and Mr Forrest, saying they were working against good public policy.

    Speaking at a Western Australian Chamber of Commerce and Industry dinner in Perth, the FMG boss criticised the amount the Government has spent promoting the mining tax, likening it to warfare.

    He maintained his opposition to the tax, saying it would see BHP, Rio Tinto and Xstrata paying very little, and queried Mr Swan’s abilities.

    “That is the theme of course which our venerable Treasurer has continued, where we seem to be at war with each other,” he said.

    “If you happen to disagree with the Treasurer then you’re un-Australian, un-democratic, probably Communist.

    “Oh for a Treasurer who can add up and subtract, as easily as he can deceive the Australian worker.

    “To add up that if you impose a tax, 23 per cent on so-called super profits, but then you subtract a huge deduction against that – like a company’s market value for its coal and iron ore assets – then you could probably see they’re not going to really pay a lot of that tax.

    “But you can rant and rave about how the MRRT is going to spread the boom for all Australians.”

    Mr Forrest did not confirm if FMG was definitely going ahead with a High Court challenge to the tax.

    This morning, Mr Swan responded to Mr Forrest’s attack.

    He says FMG last year admitted to having never paid a single cent of company tax, yet it will now try to prevent millions of small businesses getting a tax cut themselves.

    “I’ll go into bat for the Australian community any day of the week and twice on Sundays to ensure the community gets a fair go from the mining boom, while Mr Forrest goes into bat for his own self-interest,” he told the ABC.

    FMG has been looking at its legal options since the Minerals Resource Rent Tax passed the Senate this week.

    The tax will take effect from the middle of the year, but FMG says it has engaged senior counsel and will commence proceedings once legal opinion has been finalised.

    West Australian Premier Colin Barnett says his government will not initiate its own legal challenge to the tax but will join any challenge that is mounted.

    The Senate has called on the Federal Government to release a summary of its legal advice to deal with concerns that the tax is unconstitutional.

    Labor says it will respond to the request, but is confident in its legal position.

    Topics:mining-industry, industry, business-economics-and-finance, federal-government, government-and-politics, tax, perth-6000, wa, australia

    First posted March 23, 2012 07:20:47