Author: admin

  • Coal crackdown will not reduce emissions

     

    But an analysis by Greenpeace shows that none of the 12 proposed coal plants would be forced into a redesign or be shelved due to the standards.

    The figures show just three of the proposed plants would emit more carbon per megawatt hour of electricity generated than would be allowed under Labor’s promised standards.

    The proposed Bluewaters 3 and Bluewaters 4 coal plants in Western Australia both have emissions intensity rates of 0.92, and the proposed Coolimba plant in WA will have a rate of 0.9 to 1.0. All three have state government approval and would be exempt from federal Labor’s standards.

    The emissions intensity for a new coal generator in South Australia – Altona Energy’s Arckaringa plant, which is in an early stage of development – remains unknown. Calls to Altona Energy’s Australian office went unanswered yesterday.

    A proposed brown coal plant in Victoria with emissions standards of between 0.78 and 0.87 was recently withdrawn for redesign to meet a tougher 0.8 standard set by the Victorian government as part of its climate change white paper.

    The other seven new plants all have estimated emissions intensity rates below Labor’s 0.86 standard. The lowest is the 0.18 at the Wandoan carbon capture project in Queensland.

  • Australian Greens, Labor commit to agreement for stable Government

    1 September 2010

    Australian Greens, Labor commit to agreement for stable Government

    The Australian Greens and the Labor Party have signed an agreement to
    ensure stability for Labor in Government. The Greens will ensure supply
    and oppose any motion of no confidence in the Government from other
    parties or MPs.

    Labor will work with the Greens to deliver improved transparency and
    integrity to Parliament and pursue policies that promote the national
    interest and address climate change.

    As part of the agreement there will be regular meetings between the
    Prime Minister and Australian Greens Leader Bob Brown and newly-elected
    Lower House MP Adam Bandt.

    “There will be a Climate Change Committee resourced as a Cabinet
    Committee, an investment in dental health care in the next budget and
    completion of a $20 million study into High Speed Rail by July 2011,”
    said Australian Greens Leader Bob Brown.

    “The agreement includes a wide range of measures. These include:
    * A Climate Change Committee
    * A full parliamentary debate on Afghanistan
    * A commitment to work with the Greens on dental health care
    investment
    * Completion of a $20 million High Speed Rail study by July 2011
    * Legislating for truth in political advertising
    * A Leaders’ Debate Commission
    * Establishing a Parliamentary Integrity Commissioner
    * Establishing a Parliamentary Budget Office
    * Restrictions on political donations
    * A move toward full three year governments
    * Specially allocated time for debate and voting on private
    members bills and a fixed and fair allocation of questions for
    Independent and minor party members in Question Time
    * Referenda for constitutional recognition of Indigenous
    Australians and Local Government
    * A commitment for reform to provide above the line voting in the
    Senate
    * Better processes for the release of documents in the public
    interest in both Houses of Parliament
    * Access to relevant departments, including Treasury and Finance &
    Deregulation for Greens election policies.

    Media contact: Erin Farley 0438 376 082
    www.greensmps.org.au

  • Solar Array Design: Parallel Wiring Opens new Doors

     

    Series: The Old Way

    Series-wired systems are governed by the principles of voltage. A solar array must provide a high enough voltage to enable its inverter to operate at an efficient level; this has traditionally required series wiring, so that panel voltages sum. Similarly it is important to make sure that the system can never go above the maximum voltage permitted by code, usually 600VDC in the U.S.

    However, the inverter is sensitive to operating voltage levels. It can suffer major swings in efficiency when the input voltage varies in relation to its fixed output voltage. The larger the variation, the harder it is for the inverter to operate at optimal efficiency. Currently inverter efficiency is shown at a single operating point when actual operating efficiency varies as system voltage changes, real operating efficiencies can be off several percentage points from the optimal operating efficiency.

    To accommodate these physical demands, all series-architected solar installations must abide by a set of design rules. The result of these rules is to define the minimum-sized building block (string) used for a given installation. Once this is defined, that exact footprint must be used for the entire array. This can lead to serious challenges, as designers are forced to manage the always-unique geometry of the proposed array location. In many cases, these challenges translate into increased cost of deployment, smaller system sizes or even a decision to forego the installation completely.

    The New Parallel Solar Universe

    The enabling technology for parallel solar deployment is a new generation of low-cost, high-efficiency electronic devices that allow a solar module to deliver a fixed DC voltage to a DC power bus. This DC power bus can be set to the single best point for the inverter or can float to whatever level the inverter requires, allowing the inverter to concentrate simply on optimizing its AC-to-DC conversion efficiency, as opposed to worrying about what compromises it might need to make to effectively harvest power from the solar modules. This mechanism provides an effective transport of power to a central inverter where AC conversion efficiencies can be optimized.

    In this parallel solar paradigm, the PV technology of the module no longer matters, as each module operates with complete independence from its neighbors. Because each module can produce the voltage level needed by the inverter, voltage summing with strings of modules is not needed. This means that a solar array can now be designed and installed just like a lighting system. Each module represents a current source and as long as the array’s wiring is sized appropriately and its branches are capable of handling the current produced, the system will work at optimum efficiency; no other design rules apply.

    What does this mean to the system designer? The biggest advantage is that systems can be built using variable-sized blocks of modules ranging from 200 watts to 31,000 watts. This enables designers to maintain installed cost targets while also taking complete advantage of all available space at an installation site. If the geometry or aesthetics of a project require multiple azimuth angles, different angles of tilt or shading, there is no longer a need to incur the costs or design limitations of multiple inverters. The solar power system can accommodate the architecture of the building, rather than requiring the building architecture to provide an ideal platform for the solar array. Different PV module technologies can even be applied to a single inverter (that is, thin film and crystalline).

    But this new technology also allows us to think a little further out of the box. We now have a new tool available for optimizing a system’s production capabilities in multiple environments. We are only scratching the surface of what we can achieve with this new capability. For example, rather than using a technology like a tracker, we might use different materials technologies to optimize production across multiple seasons and environmental conditions.

    Mathematics of Parallel Solar Power System Design

    Parallel solar design reduces the number of variables that need attention during solar power system design. Voltage is no longer a factor, so Voc overhead and temperature drift are no longer concerns. We are also freed from worry about the NEC 600V upper limit and its restrictions on the number of modules we can wire together. This simplifies the calculation of wiring loads.

    Three basic decisions must be made at the outset: size of the installation in kWh, modules to be used and inverter to be used. With these in mind, we can start to envision the system. As an example, let’s consider a 180 kW building block using 30 kW units with 230 watt solar modules operating at a Vmp of about 40 VDC. The math here is simple: we will need about 132 modules (30,000/230 ‚âà 132). We will assume that the inverter’s peak efficiency point is at about 330 VDC. From this, we can calculate that at maximum power output, we will have to deal with 92 Amps of current into our inverter (132 modules × 230W/330V = 92 amps (P/V=I)).

    Thinking about this as a lighting circuit, we can look at using six branches of 15 Amps each, a conservative level for #10AWG PV USE-2 or RHW-2 cable outside of conduit. Each branch would have an inline 20 Amp fuse connecting it to a #4 AWG PV backbone that runs directly into the inverter through a 125 Amp fused DC disconnect.

    We can also go a bit larger and design a parallel solar power system for 500kW production capacity: module power density, 230 W; voltage input to the inverter, 330 VDC; total power capacity of system, 550,000 W.

    This will tell us the number of modules we want to use: Total System Capacity/Module Power 500,000/230 = 2,174 modules.

    To figure the total current the system will need to manage we take the total power and divide it by the voltage. Modules×Module Power in Watts = System Power. System Power/Voltage to Inverter = Current. Thus, 2,174×230/330 = 1,516 Amps.

    From here it is a simple matter of working out the number of branches needed to manage the current flow. If we assume use of three of our 180 kW building block circuits (506 Amps each) to connect to our inverter, we can place their terminating points close to the array to minimize our use of conduit. If we want to minimize our terminations, we could use #4 AWG PV wire into our building block combiner units, with each handling 85 Amps.

    To minimize I2R losses we can take a conservative approach and use 20-Amp in-line fuses harnessed into the #4 AWG PV backbone, giving us six branches using #10 AWG PV. Each of our three combiners then will have 167kW of power concentrated into a single pair of conductors, handling a total run of 506 Amps into the central inverter. This array would need just six physical field terminations at the combiners, and six at the inverter. If the combiners are placed strategically at the edge of the array, the conduit runs would likewise be limited to three: one from each combiner to the inverter (see figure 1, below).

    The difference between parallel and series architecture for solar power system design is as simple as the difference between current and voltage. In a series system, the voltage of the module drives the design and therefore the economics of the installation. Parallel wiring lets the voltage be set as a constant, which allows the system to be driven by current.

    Current is a much easier variable to work with on several levels. First, it is a familiar, well-understood design variable for designers and installers; the same one used in all lighting system design. Second, the current variable is much easier to regulate and control with existing safety systems. Third, we can optimize the efficiency of the DC-to-AC conversion by regulating the operational voltage of the solar array to the voltage of the grid that the system is providing power to.

    Perhaps most importantly, parallel solar wiring allows different PV technologies to feed a single inverter. This promises to open new vistas for architects and system designers as they search for better ways to integrate solar technology into our everyday lives. It will allow PV manufacturers to optimize products for very specific environmental conditions without having to carry the load of an entire system’s production capacity. It may also make new materials more feasible by isolating each module from the rest of the system, allowing it to work at whatever native voltage is most efficient for that particular technology. All of these new possibilities open the door for innovation in the solar market.

  • Not carbon offsets, but carbon upsets

     

    As with the existing offset approach, financial benefits could be shared in the case of legal and political activities that are “sponsored” by an international partner. Imagine a world in which global financial giants like Goldman Sachs devote themselves not to the exploitation of dubious arbitrage opportunities like HFC-23 capture, but to the identification and promotion of critical political interventions by disempowered voices for sustainability. In that world, the landmark deal recently brokered by the UN development programme to preserve Ecuador’s Yasuni national park would become a model of climate capitalism.

    The carbon upset approach does not directly promote transformative clean-energy technologies. Instead, it aims to disrupt the political and economic inertia of the status quo. But that’s precisely the disruption we need. Conventional policies such as carbon offsets and allowance giveaways have the perverse effect of further subsidising already massively subsidised and politically dominant industries. Moving to a carbon upset system would open space for more dramatic transformations by empowering groups that stand opposed to the interests of business-as-usual beneficiaries. With the playing field tilted this way, who knows what might be possible?

  • UN report damns Australia’s failure to end discrimination

    NB It should not be forgotten that they are the original inhabitants.

         We are the intruders.

    31 August, 2010

    UN report damns Australia’s failure to end discrimination

    The UN Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination (CERD) has
    delivered a damning report on Australia’s failure to meet international
    commitments on eliminating discrimination.

    Greens Senator Rachel Siewert, Spokesperson for Aboriginal and Torres
    Strait Islander Affairs says the report lends its voice to international
    calls for Australia to negotiate a treaty with Aboriginal and Torres
    Strait Islander people.

    “It is not surprising that the UN is disappointed with Australia’s
    failure to deliver on its human rights commitments, especially those
    concerning Indigenous Australians,” Senator Rachel Siewert said today.

    “Racial discrimination is embedded in the Australian Constitution and
    continues to be enacted in the laws and policies of our states and
    territories.

    “Both Tony Abbott and Julia Gillard made election commitments to pursue
    the constitutional recognition of Australia’s First Nations and so it is
    now the perfect time to move on constitutional reform.

    “The UN committee also urged Australia to ‘…ensure the Racial
    Discrimination Act prevails over all other legislation which may be
    discriminatory’ and ‘…adopt comprehensive legislation providing
    entrenched protection against racial discrimination’.

    “Recent amendments to the Northern Territory Emergency Response Bills by
    the Gillard Government are a clear example of our failure to fully
    restore the RDA and wilfully misinterpret ‘special measures’ as a means
    of continuing discriminatory practices.

    “The continued backing of the discriminatory NT Intervention laws by
    both the ALP and Coalition led to the unprecedented swings in polling
    booths in central Australia against the sitting member and Minister for
    Aboriginal Health Warren Snowdon – with some booths showing swings of
    upward of 50-60% against him and 30-40% to Greens candidate and NTER
    critic Barbara Shaw,” said Senator Siewert.

    The Greens say the UN CERD report also calls for measures to improve the
    accessibility of justice and legal services and greater roles for
    Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people in policy development.

    “Our high rate of indigenous incarceration continues to be a serious
    concern, making the adoption of a Justice Reinvestment Strategy and
    increased funding for Aboriginal legal aid services is an absolute
    priority,” Senator Siewert said.

    “Improved mechanisms to ensure proper consultation with Indigenous
    communities in policy development and implementation remain essential if
    we are to deliver on our commitments to end inequality in this country,”
    concluded Senator Siewert.

    _______________________________________________
    GreensMPs Media mailing list

  • One in 10 would vote differently in election

     

    Voters in NSW and Queensland, the states which recorded the biggest swings against the Labor government, were also more inclined than those in other states to vote differently the second time around.

    The four independents mulling over who to support in a minority government have not ruled out walking away from the whole process and making the country have another election should they be unsatisfied with the intent of the negotiations.

    The Opposition Leader, Tony Abbott, has been accused by the Greens leader, Bob Brown, of spoiling for another election. Mr Abbott has publicly rejected this.

    The poll did not indicate which party would benefit should there be another election. Labor suffered the most from changed voter behaviour on August 21 with a large swag of votes going directly to the Greens. It suffered a 5 percentage point swing against it on the primary vote, of which 3.6 per cent went to the Greens and 0.6 per cent went to the Liberals.