Author: admin

  • Global shift to renewable energy: But will it be fast enough

    Consider Texas. Long the leading U.S. oil-producing state, it is now also the leading generator of electricity from wind, having overtaken California in 2006. Texas now has 9,700 megawatts of wind generating capacity online, 370 more in the construction stage, and a huge amount in the development stage. When all of these wind farms are completed, Texas will have 53,000 megawatts of wind generating capacity — the equivalent of 53 coal-fired power plants. This will more than satisfy the residential needs of the state’s 25 million people, enabling Texas to export electricity, just as it has long exported oil.

    Texas is not alone. In South Dakota, a wind-rich, sparsely populated state, development has begun on a vast 5,050-megawatt wind farm (1 megawatt of wind capacity supplies 300 U.S. homes) that when completed will produce nearly five times as much electricity as the 810,000 people living in the state need. Altogether, some 10 states in the United States, most of them in the Greatt Plains, and several Canadian provinces are planning to export wind energy.

    Across the Atlantic, the government of Scotland is negotiating with two sovereign wealth funds in the Middle East to invest $7 billion in a grid in the North Sea off its eastern coast. This grid will enable Scotland to develop nearly 60,000 megawatts of off-shore wind generating capacity, close to the 85,000 megawatts of current electrical generating capacity for the United Kingdom.

    We are witnessing an embrace of renewable energy on a scale we’ve never seen for fossil fuels or nuclear power. And not only in industrial countries. Algeria, which knows it will not be exporting oil forever, is planning to build 6,000 megawatts of solar thermal generating capacity for export to Europe via undersea cable. The Algerians note that they have enough harnessable solar energy in their vast desert to power the entire world economy. This is not a mathematical error. A similarly remarkable fact is that the sunlight striking the earth in just one hour is enough to power the world economy for one year.

    Turkey, which now has 41,000 megawatts of total electrical generating capacity, issued a request for proposals in 2007 to build wind farms. It received bids from both domestic and international wind development firms to build a staggering 78,000 megawatts of wind generating capacity. Having selected some 7,000 megawatts of the most promising proposals, the government is now issuing construction permits.

    In mid-2008, Indonesia — a country with 128 active volcanoes and therefore rich in geothermal energy — announced that it would develop 6,900 megawatts of geothermal generating capacity, with Pertamina, the state oil company, responsible for developing the lion’s share. Indonesia’s oil production has been declining for the last decade, and in each of the last five years the country has been an oil importer. As Pertamina shifts resources from oil into the development of geothermal energy, it could become the first oil company — state-owned or independent — to make the transition from oil to renewable energy.

    These are only a few of the visionary initiatives to tap the earth’s renewable energy. The resources are vast. In the United States, three states — North Dakota, Kansas, and Texas — have enough harnessable wind energy to run the entire economy. In China, wind will likely become the dominant power source. Indonesia could one day get all its power from geothermal energy alone. Europe will be powered largely by wind farms in the North Sea and solar thermal power plants in the North African desert.

    The goals for developing renewable sources of energy by 2020 that are laid out in my book, Plan B 4.0: Mobilizing to Save Civilization, are based not on what is conventionally believed to be politically feasible but on what I think is needed. This is not Plan A, business as usual. This is Plan B — a wartime mobilization, an all-out response that is designed to avoid destabilizing economic and political stresses that will come with unmanageable climate change.

    Implementing Plan B entails cutting net carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions 80 percent by 2020. This would keep atmospheric CO2 levels from exceeding 400 parts per million (ppm), up only modestly from 387 ppm in 2009, thus limiting the future rise in temperature. To make this ambitious cut, the first priority is to replace all coal- and oil-fired electricity generation with renewable sources. Whereas the twentieth century was marked by the globalization of the world energy economy as countries everywhere turned to oil, much of it coming from the Middle East, this century will see the localization of energy production as the world turns to wind, solar, and geothermal energy.

    This century will also see the electrification of the economy. The transport sector will shift from gasoline-powered automobiles to plug-in gas-electric hybrids, all-electric cars, light rail transit, and high-speed intercity rail. And for long-distance freight, the shift will be from diesel-powered trucks to electrically powered rail freight systems. The movement of people and goods will be powered largely by electricity. In this new energy economy, buildings will rely on renewable electricity almost exclusively for heating, cooling, and lighting.

    Can we expand renewable energy use fast enough? I think so. Recent trends in the adoption of mobile phones and personal computers give a sense of how quickly new technologies can spread. Once cumulative mobile phone sales reached 1 million units in 1986, the stage was set for explosive growth, and the number of cell phone subscribers doubled in each of the next three years. Over the next 12 years the number doubled every two years. By 2001 there were 961 million cell phones — nearly a 1,000-fold increase in just 15 years. And now there are more than 4 billion cell phone subscribers worldwide.

    Sales of personal computers followed a similar trajectory. In 1980 roughly a million were sold, but by 2008 the figure was an estimated 270 million — a 270-fold jump in 28 years. We are now seeing similar growth figures for renewable energy technologies. Installations of solar cells are doubling every two years, and the annual growth in wind generating capacity is not far behind. Just as the communications and information economies have changed beyond recognition over the past two decades, so too will the energy economy over the next decade.

    There is one outstanding difference. Whereas the restructuring of the information economy was shaped only by advancing technology and market forces, the restructuring of the energy economy will be driven also by the realization that the fate of civilization may depend not only on doing so, but on doing it at wartime speed.

    Adapted from Chapter 5, “Stabilizing Climate: Shifting to Renewable Energy,” in Lester R. Brown, Plan B 4.0: Mobilizing to Save Civilization.

    Lester R. Brown is founder and president of Earth Policy Institute in Washington, D.C.

  • Declining trees spell gloom for planet

    August 25, 2010

    Graph

    LESS rainfall and rising global temperatures are damaging one of the world’s best guardians against climate change: trees.

    A global study, published in the journal Science, shows that the amount of carbon dioxide being soaked up by the world’s forests in the past decade has declined, reversing a 20-year trend.

    It diminishes hopes that global warming can be seriously slowed down by the mass planting of trees in carbon sinks. Although plants generally grow bigger as a result of absorbing carbon-enriched air, they need more water and nutrients to do so, and they have been getting less.

    A fierce drought that dried out vast areas of the Amazon Basin in 2005 is seen as a key to the global decline in carbon sinks in the past decade, but Australia is not immune.

    ”Australia is a significant contributor to the global pattern, and the findings are consistent to what we have seen here,” said a senior CSIRO researcher and director of the Global Carbon Project, Dr Josep Canadell.

    ”There has been a measurable decline in the leaf area of plants this decade, though we don’t have all the data for Australia yet. What we have seen is strongly consistent with projected patterns of climate change.”

    The Science study, Drought-induced Reduction in Global Terrestrial Net Primary Production from 2000 through 2009, used data from a NASA satellite that orbits Earth every 15 days to build up a global map of changing leaf density and forest cover. It estimated net primary production, a measurement of how much CO2 is taken in by plants and stored as part of their biomass.

    The study found that in some areas of the world, higher temperatures had driven more plant growth. But these gains have been cancelled out by drier conditions in rainforests, leading to the overall decline in total amount of CO2 the forests are soaking up.

    The findings reinforce work being done at the Australian Bureau of Rural Sciences, which is researching how much carbon can be stored on a long-term basis in the landscape.

    Scientists say that a sustained decline in the amount of carbon being stored in forests risks locking in a vicious cycle, in which trees absorb less carbon because the world is warmer and drier, while the rising carbon levels in the atmosphere continue to trap heat.

    ”There is no single silver bullet answer to this, but one of the partial solutions is the protection of old-growth forests, which store a lot of CO2, and the replanting of those that have been removed,” said Professor Andy Pitman, the co-director of the Climate Change Research Centre at the University of NSW.

    ”This doesn’t actually get to the heart of the problem though, which is rising CO2 emissions from human activity.”

    Rainfall patterns in Australia are expected to alter significantly over the next few decades as average temperatures increase, with more rain likely to fall in the north and north-west and less precipitation likely in southern Australia. This means that many of Australia’s existing old-growth forests, which are located in NSW, Victoria and Tasmania, can be expected to become less efficient carbon sinks.

    Ads by Google

    Climate Change

    Latest News, Views & Expert Commentary on Climate Change.

    charteredaccountants.com.au/Carbon

    Bring the Bush Back

    Native trees create carbon credits and remediate the Aussie landscape.

    www.co2australia.com.au

  •  

     


     

     

  • Right and Wrong (Monbiot)

     

    Labor’s collapse began when the senate rejected Rudd’s emissions trading scheme. Faced with a choice between dissolving parliament and calling an election or dropping the scheme, he chickened out and lost the confidence of the party. Julia Gillard’s support began to slide when she proposed to defer climate change policy to a citizen’s assembly(1). Nearly 70% of the votes she lost went to the Greens(2).

    Turnbull, like Rudd, was ousted over the emissions trading scheme, but six months earlier. His support for the scheme split the Liberal party. Just before the first senate vote on the issue, in December last year, he was overthrown by Tony Abbott, who had told his supporters that climate change “is absolute crap”(3). If Abbott manages to form a government, he will reverse the outcome of the 2007 election, in which the Liberal Party was defeated partly because it wouldn’t act on climate change.

    It’s not difficult to see why this is a hot issue in Australia. The country has been hammered by drought and bushfires. It also has the highest carbon dioxide emissions per person of any major economy outside the Arabian peninsula. Australians pollute more than Americans, twice as much as people in the UK and four times more than the Chinese(4). Most Australians want to change this, but the coal industry keeps their politicians on a short leash. Like New Labour over here, Rudd and Gillard’s administration was a government of flinchers. It has been punished for appeasing industrial lobbyists and the rightwing press.

    Australian politics provides yet more evidence that climate science divides people along political lines. Abbott is no longer an outright denier, though he still insists, in the teeth of the facts, that the world has cooled since 1997(5). Some members of his party go further: Senator Nick Minchin, for example, maintains that “the whole climate change issue is a left-wing conspiracy to deindustrialise the western world”(6). (He has also insisted that cigarettes are not addictive and the link between passive smoking and illness cannot be demonstrated(7)). A recent poll suggests that 38% of politicians in Abbott’s coalition believe that man-made global warming is taking place, by comparison to 89% of Labor’s people(8).

    It’s the same story everywhere. At a senatorial hustings in New Hampshire last week, all six Republican candidates denied that man-made climate change is taking place(9). Judging by its recent antics in the Senate and by primary campaigns all over the country, the Republican party appears to be heading towards a unanimous rejection of the science. The ultra-neoliberal Czech president Vaclav Klaus asserts that “global warming is a false myth and every serious person and scientist says so.”(10) The hard-right UK Independence Party may soon be led by Lord Monckton(11), the craziest man in British politics, who claims that action on climate change is a conspiracy to create a communist world government(12). The further to the right you travel, the more likely you are to insist that man-made climate change isn’t happening. Denial has nothing to do with science and everything to do with politics.

    In the Telegraph recently, the Conservative Daniel Hannan tried to explain this association. “When presented with a new discovery, we automatically try to press it into our existing belief-system; if it doesn’t fit, we question the discovery before the belief-system.”(13) He’s right. We all do this, and it is also true that in some respects an antagonism to climate science is consistent with right-wing – and especially neoliberal – politics. The philosophy of the new right is summarised by this chilling statement from Vaclav Klaus. “Human wants are unlimited and should stay so.”(14)

    But right-wing denial also leads to perverse outcomes. In a desperate attempt to appease the deniers in his party, Malcolm Turnbull proposed handing £70bn to industry to soften the impacts of acting on climate change(15). Rudd’s trading scheme, by contrast, was more or less self-financing. Tony Abbott intends to lavish subsidies on polluting companies without demanding any corresponding obligations(16). State handouts? Rights without responsibilities? When did these become conservative policies?

    Since way back. In the US the Republicans also favour green incentives for industry, without caps or regulation. Worldwide, subsidies for fossil fuels are twelve times greater than subsidies for renewable energy(17). Many of the most generous hand-outs are awarded by right-wing governments (think of the money lavished on the oil industry under George W Bush(18)).

    Yes, man-made climate change denial is about politics, but it’s more pragmatic than ideological. The politics have been shaped around the demands of industrial lobby groups, which happen, in many cases, to fund those who articulate them. Right-wingers are making monkeys of themselves over climate change not just because their beliefs take precedence over the evidence, but also because their interests take precedence over their beliefs.

    www.monbiot.com

  • NZ glacier sheds 50m tonnes of ice

    NZ glacier sheds 50m tonnes of ice

    By Philippa McDonald

    Posted 6 hours 32 minutes ago

    The Lake Tasman and the Tasman Glacier in New Zealand.

    The Lake Tasman and the Tasman Glacier in New Zealand. (wikipedia.org: James Shook)

    Up to 50 million tonnes of ice has fallen off New Zealand’s largest glacier.

    The Tasman glacier has changed from a U shape to an L after shedding the ice.

    Mount Cook Alpine Village general manager Denis Calleson says a trail of huge icebergs has been left behind.

    One is believed to be the largest in a fresh water lake outside Antarctica.

    The event was thought to have triggered a three-metre-high tsunami in a remote part of Mount Cook National Park.

    Tags: environment, human-interest, new-zealand

  • The greens are the breakthrough story of this election

    The Greens are the breakthrough story of this election. 

    I want to make sure you’re the first to understand how significant these results are—and that we couldn’t have achieved them without your support.

    Yesterday, the Greens won the balance of power in the Senate, as well as our first lower house seat at a general election in Melbourne. We’ve achieved so much together this election that it’s hard to quantify, but here are some numbers that tell part of the story: 

    • We won a Senate seat in every State, including our first ever Greens Senators in Queensland and Victoria. This gives us the power to shape the agenda of the new Government and achieve real outcomes on issues like climate change, a fair go for asylum seekers, same sex marriage, and improving public schools and hospitals; 
    • Our first ever lower house Greens Member of Parliament has been elected in a general election – congratulations to Adam Bandt who won the seat of Melbourne with a massive 13% swing to the Greens on primaries!
    • More than 4,500 of you signed up online to volunteer over the course of the campaign – knocking on doors, handing out how to votes, holding Greens stalls and events, and much more;
    • Together, we raised more than $300,000 from small online donations to run our fantastic, positive campaign advertising on TV, on billboards in capital cities, in major newspapers, and to build the biggest online advertising presence we’ve ever had; (with special thanks to the talented creative team at Make Believe for all their work on this campaign)
    • More than 20,000 people became Facebook fans of the Greens– and dozens of State and local Facebook groups sprung up to spread the Greens’ message online

    For me, as Campaign Manager, the last few months have been both exhilarating and exhausting. What’s kept me going is the knowledge that you – the people out there reading these emails – have been working tirelessly in your own communities. 

    You’ve shared the Greens’ positive vision for Australia with your neighbours, your colleagues and your families, and that’s what’s led to these stunning results. 

    You are the heart and soul of the Greens. 

    Having the balance of power in the Senate from July 2011 isn’t a magic wand, but it does mean we’ll be in a powerful position to make legislation better, introduce new ideas to the Parliament and push both sides of politics to deliver smarter, more constructive and progressive outcomes for our nation. The results of this election won’t be clear for another few days – or even weeks – and the Senators and I will be in touch with the latest developments.

    But for today, I just wanted to say thank you. 

    You’ve believed all along that we can make tremendous change to Australian politics, and yesterday, your votes created a powerful change in the Parliament. It is truly an historic achievement for the Greens and it has been my absolute pleasure and privilege to be a part of it. 

    Thank you,

    Ebony Bennett
    National Campaign Coordinator
    Australian Greens

    P.S. If you aren’t already, now is the perfect time to become a member of the Greens. You can join online here and become formally part of Australia’s third biggest political party. Thanks for your support!
     
    Please Donate Now!

     

    * Donations over $2 and up to $1500 per annum are tax deductible.

    Authorised by Derek Schild, 8-10 Hobart Place. Canberra
    www.greens.org.au

     

    If you received this from a friend and want to sign up to campaign emails from the Australian Greens click here.

  • Governor General’s job to choose new leader

    This places the GG in a very awkward position. The number of seats, not the number of votes either party receives
    will influence the GG’S decision. There is a need for clear guide lines for the GG to follow. The Constitution may
    need to be altered to provide for this contingency. The GG will incur the wrath of many Australian voters whichever
    choice she makes.Perhaps there is a case for a First past the Post System to be introduced.
    The constitutional Experts will no doubt examine this closely. Unwritten Rules as referred to in this article do not
    suffice and place too much onus on the GG.
     
    Neville Gillmore.
     
    Governor-General’s job to choose next leader

     

    For the first time since 1975 the Governor-General will be pivotal in a national political crisis but there is no road map for Quentin Bryce.

    Voters appear to have elected the first hung parliament in 70 years – so Ms Bryce’s vice-regal role has switched suddenly from ceremonial to serious.

    As Julia Gillard and Tony Abbott woo independent and Greens MPs for their support to control the 76 seats needed to govern, it will be the task of the Governor-General to decide which leader is most likely to form a stable minority government.

    Constitutionally, the percentage of votes gained by each party is irrelevant: it all comes down to seats.

    “The real question is a political one: which side has got the 76 seats?” University of NSW constitutional law professor George Williams said yesterday.

    He said the unwritten rule would be for Ms Bryce to wait until the return of writs – October 27 at the latest – to invite Ms Gillard, as caretaker Prime Minister, to form government.

    Ms Gillard would then need to survive a vote of no confidence on the floor of parliament.

    Should she lose, Ms Bryce would turn to Mr Abbott and invite him to form government.

    Should that government also collapse, Ms Bryce would be able to dissolve parliament and order a new election – a reserve power last invoked in 1975 when John Kerr dismissed Labor leader Gough Whitlam.

    Professor Williams said the Constitution did not spell out the Governor-General’s protocols, “which go back centuries to the UK”.

    “They are all unwritten conventions,” he said.

    Ms Bryce, appointed by the Rudd Labor government in 2008 and the mother-in-law of Labor MP Bill Shorten, can take advice from constitutional experts – including the Solicitor-General, academics and even the chief justice of the High Court.

    She might also wish to consult Tasmanian Governor Peter Underwood, who faced a similar dilemma in April when Labor and the Liberals each won 10 seats in the 25-member house, with five Greens holding the balance of power.

    Caretaker Premier David Bartlett told Mr Underwood to ask the leader of the opposition to form a government as the Liberals had the greatest overall vote.

    But the Governor refused and ordered Mr Bartlett to recall parliament and test his support, on the basis he was the caretaker leader.

    Mr Bartlett subsequently won the Greens’ support to govern.

    Mr Underwood, a former chief justice, later stated: “The total number of votes received by the elected members of a political party is constitutionally irrelevant to the issue of who should be commissioned to form a government.”

    Australian National University law professor Don Rothwell said Ms Gillard was under no legal obligation to step down as prime minister, despite the close result.

    “The Prime Minister is not under any real obligation to move on the matter until after declarations are issued for the ballots,” he said.

    A spokeswoman for Government House said yesterday neither side had contacted the Governor-General to arrange a meeting.