Tony Abbott maintains that his own views don’t matter because his policy is to reduce Australia’s emissions. Putting aside that therefore Abbott appears to want to accelerate global cooling, his policy – that relies on the supernatural powers of “soil carbon”, which at this point is little more than the climate change equivalent of biodynamic farming — will oversee a substantial increase in our emissions and, better yet, spend billions of dollars of taxpayers’ money to achieve it.
Then again, at least Abbott is being honest – he is open about his willful refusal to accept basic scientific fact and prefer global conspiracy theories and rigid ideology. What is Julia Gillard’s excuse? The Prime Minister occupies an even worse position – she claims to believe in human-caused global warming, and accepts the need to address it, but proposes delay and half-baked measures drawn up to protect the interests of those responsible for pollution. Like Abbott, Gillard’s policies will oversee a rise in Australia’s emissions. Like Abbott, she’ll waste taxpayers’ money to achieve it.
The parties insist there are vast differences between them on climate change. The Liberals charge that Labor wants to introduce a big new tax. Labor charges that the Liberals don’t believe in climate change. The rhetoric hides a bipartisan policy of protecting the economic interests of polluters, which is why climate change has been almost entirely absent from the major parties’ campaigns.
Perhaps we should take the parties at their word and demand that the next debate should be held on climate change and the reform process of ending our addiction to carbon, not a debate about the economy that will merely provide the forum for repetition of the mantras of “risk to our $1.3 triliion economy” and “waste and mismanagement”.
When our kids and our grandkids demand to know why we did nothing while their planet cooked, even when we knew a relatively minor economic reform could have started the process of decarbonising our own economy and encouraged other, bigger polluters to do likewise, we can point to the 2010 election and say “because we let people like Tony Abbott and Julia Gillard run the country.”
Author: admin
-
The future is Green (Crikey)
Carers on the radio
This was sent to me by Terry Tremethick, Carers’ Alliance candidate for Macquarie.
From: Terry Tremethick <terry@tremethick.org>Date: 17 August 2010 10:05:41 AMSubject: Carers on the Radio – May be of interest to youHi there,This was on the radio yesterday and covers the the National Disability Insurance Scheme as well as a story in the Women’s Day. It does mention the Carers Alliance and will help you get your mind around the whole carers/loved ones issues.http://www.2gb.com/index2.php?option=com_newsmanager&task=view&id=6802
….2.4 Million voters and rising.
Other :
Labor set to lose key staffers after election
Start of sidebar. Skip to end of sidebar.
But informed sources say that Environment Minister Peter Garrett and Infrastructure Minister Anthony Albanese will also lose key staff.
“It won’t be as bad if we win government, but people are just exhausted and can’t wait for the campaign to be over,” one staffer told Capital Circle.
The brain drain follows an exodus from Kevin Rudd’s office when Ms Gillard took over, including advisers Sarah Adams, Matt Levey, Corri McKenzie and Kate Sieper (as Capital Circle has previously reported here and here).
The former prime minister was famed for demanding long hours and a punishing schedule from his political staff and the public service.
In May 2008, the former PM famously told public servants struggling with the long hours “I’ve simply got news for the public service – there’ll be more. The work ethic of this Government will not decrease, it will increase”. As recently as April this year he was unapologetic about making staff burn the midnight oil, saying a “dog year” in politics was worth seven working elsewhere
