Author: admin

  • The future is Green (Crikey)

    Tony Abbott maintains that his own views don’t matter because his policy is to reduce Australia’s emissions. Putting aside that therefore Abbott appears to want to accelerate global cooling, his policy – that relies on the supernatural powers of “soil carbon”, which at this point is little more than the climate change equivalent of biodynamic farming — will oversee a substantial increase in our emissions and, better yet, spend billions of dollars of taxpayers’ money to achieve it.
    Then again, at least Abbott is being honest – he is open about his willful refusal to accept basic scientific fact and prefer global conspiracy theories and rigid ideology. What is Julia Gillard’s excuse? The Prime Minister occupies an even worse position – she claims to believe in human-caused global warming, and accepts the need to address it, but proposes delay and half-baked measures drawn up to protect the interests of those responsible for pollution. Like Abbott, Gillard’s policies will oversee a rise in Australia’s emissions. Like Abbott, she’ll waste taxpayers’ money to achieve it.
    The parties insist there are vast differences between them on climate change. The Liberals charge that Labor wants to introduce a big new tax. Labor charges that the Liberals don’t believe in climate change. The rhetoric hides a bipartisan policy of protecting the economic interests of polluters, which is why climate change has been almost entirely absent from the major parties’ campaigns.
    Perhaps we should take the parties at their word and demand that the next debate should be held on climate change and the reform process of ending our addiction to carbon, not a debate about the economy that will merely provide the forum for repetition of the mantras of “risk to our $1.3 triliion economy” and “waste and mismanagement”.
    When our kids and our grandkids demand to know why we did nothing while their planet cooked, even when we knew a relatively minor economic reform could have started the process of decarbonising our own economy and encouraged other, bigger polluters to do likewise, we can point to the 2010 election and say “because we let people like Tony Abbott and Julia Gillard run the country.”

  • Carers on the radio

     Fwd: Carers on the Radio – May be of interest to you

    This was sent to me by Terry Tremethick, Carers’ Alliance candidate for Macquarie.

    Begin forwarded message:


    From: Terry Tremethick <terry@tremethick.org>
    Date: 17 August 2010 10:05:41 AM
    Subject: Carers on the Radio – May be of interest to you
    Hi there,
    This was on the radio yesterday and covers the the National Disability Insurance Scheme as well as a story in the Women’s Day. It does mention the Carers Alliance and will help you get your mind around the whole carers/loved ones issues.
    National Disability Insurance Scheme – very detailed and informative.

    Thanks
    Terry Tremethick

  • Labor set to lose key staffers after election

    Start of sidebar. Skip to end of sidebar.

    But informed sources say that Environment Minister Peter Garrett and Infrastructure Minister Anthony Albanese will also lose key staff.

    “It won’t be as bad if we win government, but people are just exhausted and can’t wait for the campaign to be over,” one staffer told Capital Circle.

    The brain drain follows an exodus from Kevin Rudd’s office when Ms Gillard took over, including advisers Sarah Adams, Matt Levey, Corri McKenzie and Kate Sieper (as Capital Circle has previously reported here and here).

    The former prime minister was famed for demanding long hours and a punishing schedule from his political staff and the public service.

    In May 2008, the former PM famously told public servants struggling with the long hours “I’ve simply got news for the public service – there’ll be more. The work ethic of this Government will not decrease, it will increase”. As recently as April this year he was unapologetic about making staff burn the midnight oil, saying a “dog year” in politics was worth seven working elsewhere

  • Labor candidate against party’s own $300m project

     

    “The business community want that project, they know that project is vital for jobs in western Sydney, vital for taking trucks off the road, vital for reducing our greenhouse gas emissions. This is a very important project.”

    However there is concern about the development from Liverpool Council and some residents who argue it will see increased heavy truck traffic on local roads and more noise and air pollution.

    A rally opposing the project was held at the weekend. It was attended by both the Liberal candidate Craig Kelly and Labor’s candidate Brent Thomas.

    Mr Thomas has been letterboxing houses in the area to complain about the Moorebank Intermodal. He has also placed automated telephone calls to homes in the electorate about the issue.

    “I have taken the strong and difficult decision to stand up against my party and say the project is wrong for our area and I am going to be speaking out publicly and privately against the project at every opportunity,” he said.

    “Minister Albanese and I have spoken on a number of occasions,” he said. “He is aware that if I am elected as the member for Hughes on Saturday we do have a big issue ahead of us that we are going to have to resolve.”

    The Liberal Party’s candidate Craig Kelly says he has secured a commitment from the Liberal Leader Tony Abbott to put the Moorebank Intermodal on hold.

    Mr Albanese’s office has issued a statement saying it will take on board complaints about the project.

    “We understand that the local community is concerned, and we have heard the very firm views put to the Government by Labor’s candidate for Hughes, Brent Thomas,” the statement read.

    “Over the next two years, the Moorebank Project Office will undertake extensive consultations with the local community, giving them a proper chance to have their say.”

    Construction of the terminal is due to begin in 2013 and it is expected to be operational by early 2016.

    Tags: community-and-society, urban-development-and-planning, government-and-politics, elections, federal-state-issues, political-parties, labor-party, federal-elections, australia, nsw, moorebank-2170

  • Labor rail pledge didn’t get cabinet approval

     

    “Obviously we are in an election campaign and … we don’t have formal Cabinet meetings during election campaigns, we’re in caretaker,” she said.

    “Obviously things work differently than when Cabinets can formally meet … when executive government is in full operation, we are in caretaker.

    “Obviously [Transport] Minister Albanese consulted and worked through this project. It’s ready to go, it’s a great project for Sydney.”

    Ms Gillard also would not be drawn on when the NSW Government was told about the project.

    “There have been discussions between Minister Albanese and the NSW Government,” she said.

    “Obviously Minister Albanese provides me with advice, I relied on it on this project and I think it’s a good project for Sydney, a good project for two economic hubs and a good project because it’s ready to go.”

    The Carr government promised to build the line in 1998. It was delayed in 2001, then scrapped entirely.

    But Ms Gillard guarantees the rail link will actually be built.

    “I understand that in New South Wales, there have been a number of announcements in the past,” she said.

    “I understand there would be people in western Sydney who shrug their shoulders a bit and say, ‘Gee, I’ve heard all this before.’

    “What I say to those voters is I will get this done. Work will start happening next year, we will have an intergovernmental agreement that requires the New South Wales Government to stay up to the mark and we will pay on milestones as they are delivered.”

    Construction of the rail link will start in 2014 and will take three years to complete.

    Tags: government-and-politics, elections, federal-government, political-parties, federal-elections, australia, nsw, epping-2121, parramatta-2150

    First posted 53 minutes ago

  • Gunns takes hit in annual profits

    Gunns takes hit in annual profits

    Updated: 10:31, Monday August 16, 2010

    Gunns takes hit in annual profits

    Gunns Ltd says it will post a 50 per cent drop in annual net profit due to impairments.

    The woodchipper said on Monday it had completed a review of the carrying value of some of its assets, and it expects to book a $98.1 million impairment charge for the year to June 30.

    It will also post an annual net profit of $28 million, according to preliminary and unaudited figures.

    That is down from $56.24 million in the 2008/09 financial year.

    Underlying earnings before interest and tax will be $52.2 million, within Gunns’ guidance.

    The full details of the impairments will be released on Wednesday with the final annual financial results, Gunns said.

    ‘They principally relate to the write down of non-core assets and businesses that have been or are being prepared for sale or closure and the adoption of policy decisions in relation to the carrying value of deferred lease and management receivables in relation to various MIS (managed investment scheme) schemes,’ Gunns said in a statement.

    Meanwhile, Gunns’ Tamar Ridge wine business will be sold to Brown Brothers Milawa Vineyards for $32.5 million, subject to completion adjustments.

    The transaction is expected to be completed by August 31, and involves the sale of all of Gunns wine interests including vineyard management of winegrape MIS projects.

    ‘The sale to Brown Brothers continues the process of focusing Gunns on its core plantation and processing-based operations, while at the same time providing a growth path for the wine business,’ Gunns chief executive Greg L’Estrange said in a statement.

    ‘We are confident the development of the Tamar Ridge wine business will continue under Brown Brothers ownership, providing further opportunities for its employees