Author: Neville

  • When Will Earth Lose Its Oceans?

    Science News

    … from universities, journals, and other research organizations

    When Will Earth Lose Its Oceans?

    Dec. 16, 2013 — The natural increase in solar luminosity-a very slow process unrelated to current climate warming-will cause the Earth’s temperatures to rise over the next few hundred million years. This will result in the complete evaporation of the oceans. Devised by a team from the Laboratoire de Météorologie Dynamique[1] (CNRS / UPMC / ENS / École polytechnique), the first three-dimensional climate model able to simulate the phenomenon predicts that liquid water will disappear on Earth in approximately one billion years, extending previous estimates by several hundred million years. Published on December 12, 2013 in the journal Nature, the work not only improves our understanding of the evolution of our planet but also makes it possible to determine the necessary conditions for the presence of liquid water on other Earth-like planets.


    Share This:

    Like most stars, the Sun’s luminosity very slowly increases during the course of its existence[2]. It is therefore expected that, due to higher solar radiation, the Earth’s climate will become warmer over geological timescales (of the order of hundreds of millions of years), independently of human-induced climate warming, which takes place over decades. This is because the amount of water vapor in the atmosphere rises as the oceans become warmer (the water evaporates faster). However, water vapor is a greenhouse gas that contributes to the warming of the Earth’s surface. Scientists therefore predict that runaway climate warming will occur on Earth, causing the oceans to boil and liquid water to disappear from the surface. Another consequence is that the greenhouse effect will enter a runaway state and become unstable, making it impossible to maintain a mild mean temperature of 15 °C on Earth. This phenomenon may explain why Venus, which is a little nearer to the Sun than the Earth, turned into a furnace in the distant past. It also sheds light on the climate of exoplanets.

    When might this runaway state occur on Earth? Until now, this was difficult to estimate as the phenomenon had only been investigated using highly simplified astrophysical (one-dimensional) models, which considered the Earth to be uniform and failed to take into account key factors such as the seasons or clouds. Yet the climate models used to predict the climate over the coming decades are not suited to such high temperatures. According to some of these one-dimensional models, the Earth would start to lose all its water to space and turn into a new Venus within a mere 150 million years.

    A team from the Laboratoire de Météorologie Dynamique (CNRS / UPMC / ENS / École polytechnique) has now designed a three-dimensional model able to predict how the terrestrial environment would change under the effect of a significant increase in solar flux causing evaporation of liquid water into the atmosphere. According to this sophisticated model, the tipping point should occur when mean solar flux reaches approximately 375 W/m2, with a surface temperature of around 70 °C (present-day flux is 341 W/m2), i.e. in approximately one billion years. The oceans will then start to boil and the greenhouse effect will increase until it enters a runaway state. This result pushes back earlier predictions for the complete evaporation of the oceans by several hundred million years.

    This difference is due to atmospheric circulation: while transporting heat from the equator to the mid-latitudes, it dries these warm regions and reduces the greenhouse effect in the areas where it is most likely to enter a runaway state. Increased solar flux appears to intensify this atmospheric circulation, drying sub-tropical regions even more and stabilizing the climate for several hundred million years before it reaches the point of no return. In addition, this work shows that the parasol effect of clouds, in other words their ability to reflect solar radiation-which helps to cool the present-day climate-tends to decrease over millions of years compared to their greenhouse effect. The parasol effect is therefore likely to contribute to climate warming and destabilization.

    These findings can also be used to determine the extent of the habitable zone around the Sun. They show that a planet can be as close as 0.95 astronomical units[3] to a star similar to our Sun (i.e. 5% less than the distance from the Earth to the Sun) before losing all its liquid water. In addition, they demonstrate yet again that a planet does not need to be exactly like the Earth to have oceans. The researchers are now planning to apply this model to extrasolar planets in order to determine which environments could help them retain liquid water.

    [1] The Laboratoire de Météorologie Dynamique is part of the Institut Pierre-Simon Laplace (IPSL). The project was granted an Ile-de-France Region post-doctoral research allowance. 2 It is estimated that at the origin of the Solar System 4.5 billion years ago, the Sun’s luminosity was 70% of today’s value, which implies an increase of around 7% every billion years. 3 1 astronomical unit (AU) = 150 million kilometers.

    Share this story on Facebook, Twitter, and Google:

    Other social bookmarking and sharing tools:

    |

    Story Source:

    The above story is based on materials provided by CNRS.

    Note: Materials may be edited for content and length. For further information, please contact the source cited above.


    Journal Reference:

    1. Jérémy Leconte, Francois Forget, Benjamin Charnay, Robin Wordsworth, Alizée Pottier. Increased insolation threshold for runaway greenhouse processes on Earth-like planets. Nature, 2013; 504 (7479): 268 DOI: 10.1038/nature12827

    APA

    MLA

    CNRS (2013, December 16). When will Earth lose its oceans?. ScienceDaily. Retrieved December 17, 2013, from http://www.sciencedaily.com­ /releases/2013/12/131216142310.htm?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+sciencedaily%2Fearth_climate%2Fearth_science+%28ScienceDaily%3A+Earth+%26+Climate+News+–+Earth+Science%29

    Note: If no author is given, the source is cited instead.

    Search ScienceDaily

    Number of stories in archives: 148,667

    Find with keyword(s):
    Enter a keyword or phrase to search ScienceDaily’s archives for related news topics,
    the latest news stories, reference articles, science videos, images, and books.

    Recommend ScienceDaily on Facebook, Twitter, and Google:

    Other social bookmarking and sharing services:

    |
    Interested in ad-free access? If you’d like to read ScienceDaily without ads, let us know!

    Social Networks


    Follow ScienceDaily on Facebook, Twitter,
    and Google:

    Recommend ScienceDaily on Facebook, Twitter, and Google +1:

    Other social bookmarking and sharing tools:

    |

    Breaking News

    … from NewsDaily.com

    In Other News …

    Science Video News


    Global Warming Equals Stronger Hurricanes

    Climate change experts studying hurricanes documented a 35-year warming trend in ocean surface temperature and linked it to larger hurricanes. The. …  > full story

    Strange Science News


    Free Subscriptions

    … from ScienceDaily

    Get the latest science news with our free email newsletters, updated daily and weekly. Or view hourly updated newsfeeds in your RSS reader:

    Feedback

    … we want to hear from you!

    Tell us what you think of ScienceDaily — we welcome both positive and negative comments. Have any problems using the site? Questions?

     

  • Global Warming: Four Degree Rise Will End Vegetation ‘Carbon Sink’, Research Suggests

    Global Warming: Four Degree Rise Will End Vegetation ‘Carbon Sink’, Research Suggests

    Dec. 16, 2013 — Latest climate and biosphere modelling suggests that the length of time carbon remains in vegetation during the global carbon cycle — known as ‘residence time’ — is the key “uncertainty” in predicting how Earth’s terrestrial plant life — and consequently almost all life — will respond to higher CO2 levels and global warming, say researchers.


    Share This:

    Carbon will spend increasingly less time in vegetation as the negative impacts of climate change take their toll through factors such as increased drought levels — with carbon rapidly released back into the atmosphere where it will continue to add to global warming.

    Researchers say that extensive modelling shows a four degree temperature rise will be the threshold beyond which CO2 will start to increase more rapidly, as natural carbon ‘sinks’ of global vegetation become “saturated” and unable to sequester any more CO2 from the Earth’s atmosphere.

    They call for a “change in research priorities” away from the broad-stroke production of plants and towards carbon ‘residence time’ — which is little understood — and the interaction of different kinds of vegetation in ecosystems such as carbon sinks.

    Carbon sinks are natural systems that drain and store CO2 from the atmosphere, with vegetation providing many of the key sinks that help chemically balance the world — such as the Amazon rainforest and the vast, circumpolar Boreal forest.

    As the world continues to warm, consequent events such as Boreal forest fires and mid-latitude droughts will release increasing amounts of carbon into the atmosphere — pushing temperatures ever higher.

    Initially, higher atmospheric CO2 will encourage plant growth as more CO2 stimulates photosynthesis, say researchers. But the impact of a warmer world through drought will start to negate this natural balance until it reaches a saturation point.

    The modelling shows that global warming of four degrees will result in Earth’s vegetation becoming “dominated” by negative impacts — such as ‘moisture stress’, when plant cells have too little water — on a global scale.

    Carbon-filled vegetation ‘sinks’ will likely become saturated at this point, they say, flat-lining further absorption of atmospheric CO2. Without such major natural CO2 drains, atmospheric carbon will start to increase more rapidly — driving further climate change.

    The researchers say that, in light of the new evidence, scientific focus must shift away from productivity outputs — the generation of biological material — and towards the “mechanistic levels” of vegetation function, such as how plant populations interact and how different types of photosyntheses will react to temperature escalation.

    Particular attention needs to be paid to the varying rates of carbon ‘residence time’ across the spectrum of flora in major carbon sinks — and how this impacts the “carbon turnover,” they say.

    The Cambridge research, led by Dr Andrew Friend from the University’s Department of Geography, is part of the ‘Inter-Sectoral Impact Model Intercomparison Project’ (ISI-MIP) — a unique community-driven effort to bring research on climate change impacts to a new level, with the first wave of research published today in a special issue of the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

    “Global vegetation contains large carbon reserves that are vulnerable to climate change, and so will determine future atmospheric CO2,” said Friend, lead author of this paper. “The impacts of climate on vegetation will affect biodiversity and ecosystem status around the world.”

    “This work pulls together all the latest understanding of climate change and its impacts on global vegetation — it really captures our understanding at the global level.”

    The ISI-MIP team used seven global vegetation models, including Hybrid — the model that Friend has been honing for fifteen years — and the latest IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) modelling. These were run exhaustively using supercomputers — including Cambridge’s own Darwin computer, which can easily accomplish overnight what would take a PC months — to create simulations of future scenarios:

    “We use data to work out the mathematics of how the plant grows — how it photosynthesises, takes-up carbon and nitrogen, competes with other plants, and is affected by soil nutrients and water — and we do this for different vegetation types,” explained Friend.

    “The whole of the land surface is understood in 2,500 km2 portions. We then input real climate data up to the present and look at what might happen every 30 minutes right up until 2099.”

    While there are differences in the outcomes of some of the models, most concur that the amount of time carbon lingers in vegetation is the key issue, and that global warming of four degrees or more — currently predicted by the end of this century — marks the point at which carbon in vegetation reaches capacity.

    “In heatwaves, ecosystems can emit more CO2 than they absorb from the atmosphere,” said Friend. “We saw this in the 2003 European heatwave when temperatures rose six degrees above average — and the amount of CO2 produced was sufficient to reverse the effect of four years of net ecosystem carbon sequestration.”

    For Friend, this research should feed into policy: “To make policy you need to understand the impact of decisions.

    “The idea here is to understand at what point the increase in global temperature starts to have serious effects across all the sectors, so that policy makers can weigh up impacts of allowing emissions to go above a certain level, and what mitigation strategies are necessary.”

    Share this story on Facebook, Twitter, and Google:

    Other social bookmarking and sharing tools:

    |

    Story Source:

    The above story is based on materials provided by University of Cambridge, via EurekAlert!, a service of AAAS. The original story is licensed under a Creative Commons Licence.

    Note: Materials may be edited for content and length. For further information, please contact the source cited above.


    Journal Reference:

    1. Andrew D. Friend, Wolfgang Lucht, Tim T. Rademacher, Rozenn Keribin, Richard Betts, Patricia Cadule, Philippe Ciais, Douglas B. Clark, Rutger Dankers, Pete D. Falloon, Akihiko Ito, Ron Kahana, Axel Kleidon, Mark R. Lomas, Kazuya Nishina, Sebastian Ostberg, Ryan Pavlick, Philippe Peylin, Sibyll Schaphoff, Nicolas Vuichard, Lila Warszawski, Andy Wiltshire, and F. Ian Woodward. Carbon residence time dominates uncertainty in terrestrial vegetation responses to future climate and atmospheric CO2. PNAS, December 16, 2013 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1222477110

    APA

    MLA

    University of Cambridge (2013, December 16). Global warming: Four degree rise will end vegetation ‘carbon sink’, research suggests. ScienceDaily. Retrieved December 17, 2013, from http://www.sciencedaily.com­ /releases/2013/12/131216154851.htm?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+sciencedaily%2Fearth_climate%2Fearth_science+%28ScienceDaily%3A+Earth+%26+Climate+News+–+Earth+Science%29

    Note: If no author is given, the source is cited instead.

    Search ScienceDaily

    Number of stories in archives: 148,667

    Find with keyword(s):
    Enter a keyword or phrase to search ScienceDaily’s archives for related news topics,
    the latest news stories, reference articles, science videos, images, and books.

    Recommend ScienceDaily on Facebook, Twitter, and Google:

    Other social bookmarking and sharing services:

    |

     

    Interested in ad-free access? If you’d like to read ScienceDaily without ads, let us know!

    Social Networks


    Follow ScienceDaily on Facebook, Twitter,
    and Google:

    Recommend ScienceDaily on Facebook, Twitter, and Google +1:

    Other social bookmarking and sharing tools:

    |

    Breaking News

    … from NewsDaily.com

    In Other News …

    Science Video News


    Our Changing Climate

    Geographers have projected temperature increases due to greenhouse gas emissions to reach a not-so-chilling conclusion: climate zones will shift and. …  > full story

    Strange Science News


    Free Subscriptions

    … from ScienceDaily

    Get the latest science news with our free email newsletters, updated daily and weekly. Or view hourly updated newsfeeds in your RSS reader:

    Feedback

    … we want to hear from you!

    Tell us what you think of ScienceDaily — we welcome both positive and negative comments. Have any problems using the site? Questions?

     

  • Climate change puts 40 percent more people at risk of absolute water scarcity: Study

    Climate change puts 40 percent more people at risk of absolute water scarcity: Study

    Posted By News On December 16, 2013 – 8:31pm

    Water scarcity impacts people’s lives in many countries already today. Future population growth will increase the demand for freshwater even further. Yet in addition to this, on the supply side, water resources will be affected by projected changes in rainfall and evaporation. Climate change due to unabated greenhouse-gas emissions within our century is likely to put 40 percent more people at risk of absolute water scarcity than would be without climate change, a new study shows by using an unprecedented number of impact models. The analysis is to be published in a special issue of the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences that assembles first results of the Inter-Sectoral Impact Model Intercomparison Project (ISI-MIP), a unique community-driven effort to bring research on climate change impacts to a new level.

    “The steepest increase of global water scarcity might happen between 2 and 3 degrees global warming above pre-industrial levels, and this is something to be experienced within the next few decades unless emissions get cut soon,” says lead-author Jacob Schewe of the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research. “It is well-known that water scarcity increases, but our study is the first to quantify the relative share that climate change has in that, compared to – and adding to – the increase that is simply due to population growth.”

     

    From China to the US: Huge regional differences of future water availability

    Today, between one and two people out of a hundred live in countries with absolute water scarcity. Population growth and climate change combined would increase this to about ten in a hundred at roughly 3 degrees global warming. Absolute water scarcity is defined as less than 500 cubic meters available per year and person – a level requiring extremely efficient water use techniques and management in order to be sufficient, which in many countries are not in place. For a comparison, the global average water consumption per person and year is roughly 1200 cubic meters, and significantly more in many industrialized countries.

    As climate change is not uniform across the world, the regional differences of its impacts on water availability are huge. For example, the Mediterranean, Middle East, the southern USA, and southern China will very probably see a pronounced decrease of available water, according to the study. Southern India, western China and parts of Eastern Africa might see substantial increases.

     

    Food security depends on irrigation – farmers are main water users

    “Water scarcity is a major threat for human development, as for instance food security in many regions depends on irrigation – agriculture is the main water user worldwide,” says co-author Qiuhong Tang of the Chinese Academy of Sciences. “Still, an increase of precipitation is also challenging – the additional water may cause water logging, flooding, and malfunctioning or failure of water-related infrastructure. So the overall risks are growing.” Moreover, many industrial production processes require large amounts of water, so a lack thereof in some regions hampers economical development.

    This study is based on a comprehensive set of eleven global hydrological models, forced by five global climate models – a simulation ensemble of unprecedented size which was produced in collaboration by many research groups from around the world. Hence, the findings synthesize the current knowledge about climate change impacts on water availability. The cooperative ISI-MIP process systematically compares the results of the various computer simulations to see where they agree and where they don’t. The results quoted above represent the multi-model average. So some of the models indicated even greater increases of water scarcity.

     

    Unique multi-model assessment allows for risk-management perspective

    “The multi-model assessment is unique in that it gives us a good measure of uncertainties in future impacts of climate change – which in turn allows us to understand which findings are most robust,” says co-author Pavel Kabat of the International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA). “From a risk management perspective, it becomes very clear that, if human-made climate change continues, we are putting at risk the very basis of life for millions of people, even according to the more optimistic scenarios and models.”

    However, he added, the job is far from being done. “We need to do additional research on how the water requirement portfolio will develop in the future in different sectors like agriculture, industry, and energy – and how, in addition to reducing greenhouse-gas emissions, the technological developments in the water sector may help alleviating water scarcity.”

     

  • We won!

    Why this ad?
    Low Deposit Home Loanmortgagehouse.com.au – Borrow Up To 99% Of Your Home With A Mortgage House Home Loan

    We won!

    Inbox
    x
    Naomi Clarke via Change.org <mail@change.org>
    5:09 PM (15 minutes ago)

    to me
    Change.org

    Meeting the Premier. Please 'enable images' to see this photo
    “Today I caught up with Naomi Clarke and her husband Paul… I’m pleased to say that we’ve found a way to help meet Naomi’s unique needs, and she’ll be able to keep living at home.”
    — Premier Weatherill

    NEVILLE —

     

    Today we awake after yesterday being such an emotional day trying to convince the powers of my worth — and we have the grand news to share that Paul & I get to remain together at home.

    Yesterday morning we met the Premier Jay Weatherill in person. As friends, family and supporters joined us to deliver the petition to his office, he left a cabinet meeting to come out and accept our petition. And he actually listened, committing to funding the home care we need going forward.

    I would like to thank each of you, your family and friends for supporting and believing in love and life despite disability. Though we should not have to go to such measures, today we can breath and know that we can make a difference and that each and every one of us matter.

    To receive 62,000 signatures through our change.org petition goes beyond anything that Paul & I could have ever hoped. It’s all been a bit of a whirlwind and shock — especially with our success being covered by so much media. Last night we were on Channel 7, 9, 10, ABC News and radio, in The Advertiser and lots more.

    If, like me, you’d like to say thanks to the Premier for actually listening — you can leave a message on his Facebook page right here.

    Once again, thank you so very much for everything you’ve done for Paul and myself. We will never forget it. 

    Kindest regards,

    Naomi & Paul Clarke

    P.S. My interview with Channel 10’s The Project last night is up online now — you can watch it by clicking here — I’d love it if you can share it with friends and family who you asked to sign the

  • Sea Level, Risk Of Flooding Rising Rapidly In Mid-Atlantic

    Environment

    Sea Level, Risk Of Flooding Rising Rapidly In Mid-Atlantic

    Andrew Freedman, Climate Central Published: Dec 14, 2013, 10:20 AM EST weather.com

    • Share
    • Tweet
    Play Video

    Overlay

    The Future of Sea Level Rise

    Autoplay
    On
    Off

    During the 20th century, sea levels along the highly populated U.S. Mid-Atlantic coastline between New York and Virginia rose faster than in any other century during the past 4,300 years, according to a new study.

    And as those sea levels continue to increase as a result of global warming and local land elevation changes, the risks of coastal flooding will dramatically escalate.

    The study, by geoscientists at Rutgers and Tufts Universities and published in the new journal “Earth’s Future,” took a comprehensive look at the history of sea level in the Mid-Atlantic, combining sediment records of prehistoric sea level with modern data, which includes readings from tide gauges and satellite instruments.

    The result is one of the most in-depth examinations of past, present, and future sea level rise of any region in the U.S.

    The study warns that regional planners will need to factor local rates of sea level rise when making decisions on building any long-lasting infrastructure, from water treatment facilities to Manhattan skyscrapers and Atlantic City casinos.

    For example, the study estimated that the New Jersey shore will likely see a sea level rise of about 1.5 feet by 2050, and about 3.5 feet by 2100, at least a foot higher than the average global sea level rise over the rest of the century.

    Master Sgt. Mark C. Olsen, New Jersey Air National Guard

    The amusement pier in Seaside Heights, N.J., was heavily damaged by Hurricane Sandy last October.

    Using a middle-range scenario for future sea level rise, the study found that by 2050, flooding caused by a 10-year storm, which has a 10 percent probability of occurring each year, would exceed all historic storms in Atlantic City.

    According to the study, relative sea levels in the Mid-Atlantic region rose at about 0.10 inches per year during the 19th century, and that rate accelerated to 0.15 inches per year during the 20th century. That may not sound like much, but it is already enough to make a major difference when storms strike.

    The impact from Hurricane Sandy clearly illustrates that. The study found that a 7.87-inch global sea level rise during the 20th century, which was largely driven by manmade global warming, caused Hurricane Sandy to flood an additional 27 square miles compared to what it would have if the storm had struck in 1880 when sea levels were lower.

    Using figures from Climate Central’s sea level rise database, the researchers (who were not affiliated with Climate Central) found that sea level rise exposed an additional 83,000 people to coastal flooding, with about 45,000 in New York City and the rest in New Jersey.

    While two factors largely control global average sea level — temperature and variations in the volume of the Earth’s ice sheets and mountain glaciers — local rates of relative sea level rise are more complicated.

    While the U.N. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) projected that global mean sea level rise for 2081-2100 will likely be between 10-to-32 inches, those numbers mean little to local policymakers, who must make decisions based on local sea level rise rates that often differ from the global average.

    Master Sgt. Mark C. Olsen, New Jersey Air National Guard

    Aerial views of the damage caused by Hurricane Sandy to the New Jersey coast taken during a search and rescue mission by 1-150 Assault Helicopter Battalion.

    Those differences are the result of several factors, including ocean currents that can cause faster or slower rates of sea level rise in some areas, groundwater depletion, which can result in sinking land, and gradual post-ice age adjustments of the land.

    In the Mid-Atlantic region, it turns out, all three of these factors are conspiring to accelerate sea level rise. Every part of the region saw the level rise at a faster rate than the global trend, the study found. In fact, that rate since the early 1900s was nearly double the global average.

    Locations that sit atop a coastal plain, such as the Jersey Shore, are seeing the fastest rates of sea level rise compared to those Mid-Atlantic coastal locations that are built on top of bedrock, such as New York City, since the geology of the coastal plain features more settling of the land from groundwater depletion and long-term sediment compaction.

    Other studies have also identified the Mid-Atlantic as a so-called “hot spot” of sea level rise, but the new research provides more statistical proof that modern sea level rise in this region is outpacing even periods from several thousand years ago.

    “The study highlights the importance of geological data when making predictions for coastal inundation during the 21st century and that it is important to take a regional approach,” Simon Engelhardt, a professor at the University of Rhode Island who was not involved in the new study, said in an email.

    To put recent rates of sea level rise into historical perspective, the study found there is at least a 95 percent probability that the rate of sea level rise in the Mid-Atlantic during the 20th century was faster than any century in the past 4,300 years, and a 67 percent probability that it was faster than any century in more than 6,600 years.

    “The sea level rise that we’re seeing now is very significant,” including in a “prehistoric context,” said study co-author Ben Horton of Rutgers University, in an interview.

    Miller et al. 2013

    Comparison of tide gauges along the coast with the Battery in Manhattan, showing sea levels are rising slightly faster along the coastal plain than in Manhattan. (The tide-gauge records are referenced to a synthetic 1900–1920 datum.)

    The study projects that lower Manhattan will see about 8.6 inches of sea level rise by 2030, 15.7 inches by 2050, and 38 inches, or just more than 3 feet, by 2100. The 15.7 inches of sea level rise by 2050 would be sufficient to transform what would be considered a moderate 10-year storm today to reach the same flood level as a 100-year storm would.

    The higher-end scenario considered in the study would bring 5.5 feet of sea level rise to Lower Manhattan by 2100. That would cause a 10-year storm event to bring flooding comparable to Hurricane Sandy, which brought the highest storm tide on record to Lower Manhattan.

    Every subway tunnel connecting Manhattan with Brooklyn and Queens flooded, along with transit stations in adjacent areas of New Jersey and all three of the city’s major airport hubs.

    A separate study published in 2012 found that similar increases in storm surge risk would occur at many other coastal locations in the U.S.

    Assuming continued groundwater extraction rates at coastal plain locations, those areas would see a greater amount of sea level rise, the study found. The study projected that those areas could be in for a rise of 9.8 inches by 2030, 1.5 feet by 2050, and about 3.5 feet, by 2100.

    While the study shows that the main component of future sea level rise will be from global sea level rise, local land elevation changes should be factored into development decisions, since they will influence the rate and extent of relative sea level rise at the local level.

    The study noted that there are currently limited tools for policymakers to use to factor in sea level rise to the planning process.

    Even the Federal Emergency Management Agency’s newest flood elevation data, released this year and used to help determine federal flood insurance requirements, failed to include sea level rise projections. “They are accordingly relevant to insuring against current risks but do not provide appropriate guidance for long-term planning,” the study said.

    Related Content from Climate Central

    MORE: Repeat Photography of Alaskan Glaciers Reveal Rapid Changes

    1 / 47

    Muir Glacier and Inlet (1895)

    Muir Glacier and Inlet (1895)

    In the photo above, the west shoreline of Muir Inlet in Alaska’s Glacier Bay National Park & Preserve is shown as it appeared in 1895. Notice the lack of vegetation on the slopes of the mountains, and the glacier that stands more than 300 feet high. See the glacier as it looked in

    • Northwestern Glacier (2005)
    • Northwestern Glacier (1909)
    • Northwestern Glacier (2004)

  • Update: ABC campaign

    Why this ad?
    UWS Agriculture courseswww.uws.edu.au/agriculture – $5,000 scholarships available to new Agriculture students at UWS.

    Update: ABC campaign

    Inbox
    x
    Benita from Play School
    5:19 PM (0 minutes ago)

    to me

    “I don’t want to imagine an Australia without the ABC.” -Benita Collings

    Benita

    From the GetUp team: Exciting news! More than 217,000 Australians have signed the GetUp “Save the ABC” petition and more than 6,000 GetUp ABC champions have already chipped in enough to run at least one high impact billboard in Tony Abbott’s electorate. It will run over the holiday period, turning up the public pressure to protect the ABC from cuts ahead of next year’s budget decisions. Read below for a message from Play School’s own Benita Collings ~

    Hi NEVILLE,

    Thanks for all that you’re doing to spread the word and protect the ABC.

    It’s so important that as many people as possible support the campaign now, before budget decisions (and potentially cuts) are made.

    The ABC is a treasured feature of the Australian mediascape for many reasons. It is the only station that is obligated by law to provide independent, balanced reporting, it’s free for all, it hosts uniquely Australian content and it provides kids with ad-free, educational programming.

    I don’t want to imagine an Australia without the ABC and it’s clear from the polling and the momentum of this campaign that the majority of Australians feel the same.

    If enough of us speak up now, we can demonstrate to our leaders that the ABC is here to stay.

    https://www.getup.org.au/protect-our-abc

    Let’s keep it going,

    Benita Collings, formerly of Play School

    —– Orignal email below —–

    Since it’s nearly Christmas, everyone who chips in $5 or more will receive the exclusive “Protect Our ABC” bumper sticker delivered to them: https://www.getup.org.au/protect-our-abc

    Dear NEVILLE,

    It’s gone bananas.

    In just 72 hours, the GetUp petition in response to the attack on the ABC was signed by nearly 215,000 Australians, and it’s still growing by the hour.

    That’s incredible. And the campaign is just getting started.

    Next move? Let’s put our message where it will have maximum impact.

    Right now, we’re on the phones with media buyers to secure prominent, high traffic, attention-getting billboards inside the electorates of Prime Minister Tony Abbott and Communications Minister Malcolm Turnbull. We’ll place them smack-bang on the roads where they, and the voters they answer to, live and work. Our message is clear: Australians want our ABC to remain free of ads, free from cuts, free to remain fair and balanced. They’ve secured some great last minute rates for us and are just waiting for the green light.

    Will you chip in to make it happen? Click here to see where your billboard will run: https://www.getup.org.au/protect-our-abc

    The recent government tirade against our ABC from inside the Coalition party room is not an isolated incident. Nor are the near daily slurs against the ABC published in hysterical columns of the Murdoch-owned press; or the motion passed just two weeks ago by the Victorian Liberal Party conference to sell off our nation’s public broadcaster. These attacks are simply the latest in the right wing’s long history of interference with the only broadcaster in our country that operates in the interest of the public, not profits.

    Why? Conservative forces both inside and outside our government – which have Mr Abbott’s ear – are sowing the seeds for funding cuts, or worse, well ahead of budget decisions early next year. They want to see how the public reacts, gauge how much it’d cost them politically.

    Let’s give them a taste. Will you donate to put up targeted billboards, run ads and facilitate a community visibility campaign over the Christmas break and months leading up to budget?

    https://www.getup.org.au/protect-our-abc

    Think this would never happen to such a widely popular public service? Think again.

    When Liberal Senator Cory Bernardi called our ABC a “taxpayer-funded behemoth” and suggested that “we could perhaps cut the ABC budget and allow the commercial media operators to compete” – he was only picking up where many in the Howard Government left off. Howard famously stacked the board with right-wing cronies and climate deniers, and starved the broadcaster of funds until GetUp members rallied with one of our first big campaigns ever, back in 2006.

    Now is the time to head-off the attack. As Mike Carlton wrote in Saturday’s Sydney Morning Herald:

    “The next move is bleedin’ obvious. In due course, Abbott will instigate an ‘inquiry’ into the ABC, with a suitable stooge to run it and the result predetermined. It will recommend a reworking of the ABC charter to bring the place to heel and, most important of all, to kybosh any activities attracting audiences that Rupert sees as rightfully his. Then they’ll slash the funding. Bring on the Murdochracy.”

    Not if we can help it.

    We know the Australian public deeply values our ABC, and we’re prepared to remind any politician who forgets that they answer to us. Will you help turn up the pressure?

    https://www.getup.org.au/protect-our-abc

    For a free and fair independent media,

    Sam Mclean, for the GetUp team

    PS. Want to help take the message to the streets? Or your local shop window, car, computer or bike? We’re sending out awesome ABC bumper stickers now to every person who donates $5 or more to this campaign. Will you help B1