Author: Neville

  • What is coastal erosion and how will it impact Australia?

    What is coastal erosion and how will it impact Australia?

    The Australian governments could be given the power to force people in coastal areas to move from their land due to climate change, a report released in late October said.

    FULL REPORT: Managing our Coastal Zone in a Changing Climate: the Time to Act is Now

    A report into the effects of climate change on the coastal regions was issued by the House of Representative’s Standing Committee on Climate Change, Water, Environment and the Arts.

    The 18 month inquiry said that rising sea levels, more frequent storms, cyclones and floods along the coastline are putting beach front properties at risk.

    As a result the inquiry has canvassed the option of forced retreats with the “the possibility of a government instrument that prohibits continued occupation of the land”.

    Queensland is noted as the most at risk as rising sea levels will potentially affect billions of dollars of beachfront housing.

    The report does not go into whether landholders would be fully compensated for the forced retreats and, if so, who would pay.

    Another option raised in the report is forcing coastal residents to pay a regular levy to compensate those amongst them who have to move due to climate change.

    It concluded that action to combat the effects of climate change on the coast was urgently needed, as was national leadership.

    It is estimated that 80 per cent Australians live near the coast.

    What is coastal erosion?

    Coastal erosion is the permanent loss of land along the shoreline.

    The coast is constantly adjusting to changes in wave and tide processes and sediment supply, so it is important to distinguish between short-term changes in the coast and long-term coastal erosion.

    Short-term shoreline change

    Short-term shoreline changes do not constitute coastal erosion.

    There changes occur over periods of days to several years. It is most obvious during storms when high wave energy actively removes sand from beaches.

    During storms waves reach a backshore area and erode sand from it. The important function of this backshore is to act as sand reservoir during storms. In the following months normal weather and wave patterns may cause sand to be replaced on beaches.

    Long-term coastal erosion

    Long-term coastal erosion occurs over years to decades. The varying coastline is observed to gradually move landward.

    This recession of the shoreline represents long-term erosion.

    For the past two decades sea level rise has been singled out as a likely cause of erosion throughout the Pacific, the Australian Bureau of Metereology says.

    But while rising sea level is one possible factor, climatic variability may also be a significant cause of coastal erosion.

    Currently interannual changes in weather patterns can alter the wind, wave and sea level patterns on islands throughout the Pacific.

    Natural causes of erosion 

    *Changes in wave climate such as an increase in wave height, change in the angle of wave approach or increased frequency of high magnitude waves.

    *Reduction in the amount of sediment delivered to the coast from reef.

    *Rising sea level.

    Human-induced causes of erosion

    *Sand extraction from beaches that reduces the sand volume of the coast.

    *Coral mining.

    *Insertion of structures such as seawalls which locally alter wave processes and change sediment transport patterns.

    *Removal of mangroves.

    • Follow us: 
    • Follow us on Facebook
    • Follow us on Twitter
    • Follow us on Youtube

     

  • Batteries included: New wind turbines and solar panels come with built-in storage

    Batteries included: New wind turbines and solar panels come with built-in storage

    By John Upton

    GE’s 2.5-120 wind turbine
    General Electric
    A new GE wind turbine comes with battery included.

    If you want to use solar power at night or wind power on calm days, you need batteries that can store energy after it’s produced. But why bother with two pieces of equipment when you could have one?

    Engineers are now beginning to build batteries directly into wind and solar systems.

    Combined renewable generation-storage systems are just starting to be deployed in the wind sector. From a report last month in Quartz:

    [W]hat if every wind turbine became a node in an energy internet, communicating with the grid and each other to adjust electricity production while storing and releasing electricity as needed? That’s the idea behind General Electric’s new “brilliant” turbine, the first three of which the company said … will be installed at a Texas wind farm operated by Invenergy.

    The 2.5-MW windmill is something of a technological leap in an industry where turbines have gotten bigger and bigger but not necessarily smarter. The turbine’s software captures tens of thousands of data points each second on wind and grid conditions and then adjusts production, storing electricity in an attached 50 kilowatt-hour sodium nickel chloride battery. If, say, a wind farm is generating too much electricity to [be] absorbed by the grid—not an uncommon occurrence in gusty west Texas—it can store the electricity in the battery. When the wind dies down, the electricity can be released from the battery and put back on the grid.

    “This provides a path for lowering the cost of energy even more,” Keith Longtin, general manager of GE’s wind product line, told Quartz. “We think by being able to integrate the storage into the turbine and by being able to provide predictable power it’s going to minimize a lot of the balancing the grid has to do today.”

    And the solar industry is trying to catch up. A team of University of Wisconsin researchers describes a new invention in the journal Advanced Materials. From a press release:

    In a quest for a smaller, more self-sustaining solar power source, a UW-Madison electrical engineer has proposed a design for solar panels that can simultaneously generate power from sunlight and store power reserves for later, all within a single device. …

    The final design allows for a standard-size solar cell that can simultaneously power a device and store energy for later use, creating a closed-loop system for small-scale applications of solar energy. “We can have some energy set aside locally, right in the panel, so that when you need it, you can get it,” says [engineer Hongrui] Jiang. …

    Other such solar panels — referred to as photovoltaic self-charging cells — have been around for a while, but the ability to provide energy continuously, rain or shine, sets Jiang’s apart. …

    Since the design scales up easily, says Jiang, microgrids — small scale power grids used to balance renewable power sources in energy-efficient buildings — would be another ideal application, since self-contained solar panels would limit the need for battery management and would allow engineers to design buildings that rely on the outside power grid even less than current systems.

    And there are futuristic applications: picture lighting systems that can be installed in remote areas — without running expensive power lines. “You could have one solar panel installed that will store the energy the system might need through nights and cloudy days,” says Jiang.

  • Warm Ocean Drives Most Antarctic Ice Shelf Loss

    Warm Ocean Drives Most Antarctic Ice Shelf Loss

    June 13, 2013 — Ocean waters melting the undersides of Antarctic ice shelves, not icebergs calving into the sea, are responsible for most of the continent’s ice loss, a study by UC Irvine and others has found.


    Share This:

    The first comprehensive survey of all Antarctic ice shelves discovered that basal melt, or ice dissolving from underneath, accounted for 55 percent of shelf loss from 2003 to 2008 — a rate much higher than previously thought. Ice shelves, floating extensions of glaciers, fringe 75 percent of the vast, frozen continent.

    The findings, to be published in the June 14 issue of Science, will help scientists improve projections of how Antarctica, which holds about 60 percent of the planet’s fresh water locked in its massive ice sheet, will respond to a warming ocean and contribute to sea level rise.

    It turns out that the tug of seawaters just above the freezing point matters more than the breaking off of bergs.

    “We find that iceberg calving is not the dominant process of ice removal. In fact, ice shelves mostly melt from the bottom before they even form icebergs,” said lead author Eric Rignot, a UC Irvine professor who’s also a researcher with NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena. “This has profound implications for our understanding of interactions between Antarctica and climate change. It basically puts the Southern Ocean up front as the most significant control on the evolution of the polar ice sheet.”

    Ice shelves grow through a combination of land ice flowing to the sea and snow falling on their surfaces. The researchers combined a regional snow accumulation model and a new map of Antarctica’s bedrock with ice shelf thickness, elevation and velocity data captured by Operation IceBridge — an ongoing NASA aerial survey of Greenland and the South Pole. (Rignot will host a planning session of Operation IceBridge scientists at UC Irvine on June 17 and 18.)

    Ocean melting is distributed unevenly around the continent. The three giant ice shelves of Ross, Filchner and Ronne, which make up two-thirds of Antarctica’s ice shelves, accounted for only 15 percent of the melting. Meanwhile, less than a dozen small ice shelves floating on relatively warm waters produced half the total meltwater during the same period.

    The researchers also compared the rates at which the ice shelves are shedding ice with the speed at which the continent itself is losing mass and found that, on average, the shelves lost mass twice as fast as the Antarctic ice sheet did.

    “Ice shelf melt can be compensated by ice flow from the continent,” Rignot said. “But in a number of places around Antarctica, they are melting too fast, and as a consequence, glaciers and the entire continent are changing.”

    Other authors are Jeremie Mouginot and Bernd Scheuchl of UC Irvine and Stanley Jacobs of Columbia University. Funding was provided by NASA, the National Science Foundation, and the National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration.

    Share this story on Facebook, Twitter, and Google:
  • The Critical Decade

    The Critical Decade

    Inbox
    x
    GetUp!
    8:43 PM (1 hour ago)

    to me
    Dear NEVILLE,

    Today, Australia’s top independent climate scientists released information guaranteed to have the mining lobby on the attack tomorrow: “we simply have to leave about 80 per cent of the world’s fossil fuel reserves in the ground. We cannot afford to burn them and still have a stable and safe climate.”1

    There’s more. New information in today’s report confirms what many of us already know: the climate science continues to strengthen, and we’re already seeing and feeling impacts of climate change all around the country – which pose substantial risks to our continued health, infrastructure, agriculture and prosperity.

    In a nutshell: we’re living in the critical decade for action on climate change, and everything, and everyone, will be affected.

    Know anyone who still needs convincing? Here’s something that might help: this video shows how Australia will be impacted by climate change if we continue to expand our fossil fuel industry investments and don’t reduce emissions.


    Click the image to watch the video

    The impact of climate change isn’t limited to any one part of Australia. If we don’t act now the effects of climate change will be felt nationwide, including:

    • Reduced rainfall in the Cotter and Googong catchments will threaten the ACT’s water supply.
    • A changing climate will see the cane toad spread further south along the northern coast region of NSW, posing a significant threat to biodiversity.
    • Increases in temperatures in the Northern Territory will affect beef production, due to heat stress in cattle.
    • Queensland will see tropical cyclones become more intense as a result of climate change.
    • South Australia’s wine regions, such as the Barossa Valley, will be affected by increasing temperatures that will negatively impact wine grape production and quality.

    This is certainly sobering information, but we still have a chance to change it. Amongst all the fact and figures surrounding climate change, the most important number to remember is the number of Australians continuing to demonstrate strong support for climate action.

    We can grow that number.

    We know that tomorrow will bring a barrage of anti-climate media from the mouths of the big polluter lobby and vested interests. But friends and family are still the number one trusted source of information for most Australians. As a massive movement of everyday Australians, we can counter tomorrow’s conservative spin by sharing this video far and wide:

    www.getup.org.au/the-critical-decade

    Thanks,
    the GetUp team

    PS. No matter who wins the next election, our movement will continue to be key in promoting climate action and driving investment in renewable energy. Just last week hundreds of GetUp members gathered around the country to speak with and learn from environmental pioneer Bill McKibben who ‘did the maths’ on what we’re facing if we continue to expand fossil fuel production in a warming world. Tomorrow, GetUp members will be rallying in Canberra to support renewable energy and tonight we can take the fight online and spread the facts in the hope that we’ll inspire others to wise-up before it’s too late: www.getup.org.au/the-critical-decade

    [1] Climate Commission says majority of global fossil fuel reserves must be kept in the ground, Professor Lesley Hughes on ABC radio, 17 June 2013


    GetUp is an independent, not-for-profit community campaigning group. We use new technology to empower Australians to have their say on important national issues. We receive no political party or government funding, and every campaign we run is entirely supported by voluntary donations. If you’d like to contribute to help fund GetUp’s work, please donate now! If you have trouble with any links in this email, please go directly to www.getup.org.au. To unsubscribe from GetUp, please click here. Authorised by Sam Mclean, Level 2, 104 Commonwealth Street, Surry Hills NSW 2010.

    Reply
    Forward
  • Cities worldwide struggle to cope with rising sea levels

    Cities worldwide struggle to cope with rising sea levels

    Posted:   06/17/2013 12:01:00 AM MDT

    The Associated PressAssociated Press

     

    Cars are parked on an overpass on a flooded street in Bangkok, Thailand. Projections on the rise of sea levels show Bangkok could be at risk of inundation in 100 years. (Associated Press file photos)

    From Bangkok to Miami, cities and coastal areas across the globe are already building or planning defenses to protect millions of people and key infrastructure from more powerful storm surges and other effects of global warming. • Some are planning cities that will simply adapt to more water. • But climate-proofing a city or coastline is expensive, as shown by New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg’s $20 billion plan to build floodwalls, levees and other defenses against rising seas. • The most vulnerable places are those with the fewest resources to build such defenses, secure their water supplies or move people to higher ground. How to pay for such measures is a burning issue in U.N. climate talks, which just wrapped up a

    FILE – In this Wednesday, March 28, 2012 file photo, amphibious homes float on the harbor in the IJburg neighborhood in Amsterdam. IJburg is a new district in the eastern part of town completely surrounded by water. The Netherlands, a third of which lies below sea level, has been managing water since the Middle Ages. (AP | Margriet Faber)

    session in the German city of Bonn. • A sampling of cities around the world and what they are doing to prepare for the climatic forces that scientists say are being unleashed by global warming:ROTTERDAM, Netherlands

    In a country where two-thirds of the population lives below sea level, the battle against the sea has been a matter of life and death for centuries.

    The focus in the 20th century was on a spectacular series of sea defenses, including massive steel and concrete barriers that can be quickly moved to protect against storm surges. But current techniques embrace a philosophy of “living with water.”

    Thousands of waterways are being connected so the country can act as a sponge and absorb influxes of water. Some areas have been designated as flood zones. Houses that can float have been a building sensation.

    VENICE, Italy

    Sea-level rise is a concern for this flood-prone city. It’s in the process of realizing an expensive and oft-delayed system of underwater barriers that would be raised in the event of flooding over 43 inches.

    Venice, a system of islands built into a shallow lagoon, is extremely vulnerable to rising seas because the sea floor is also sinking. Plans for the new

    FILE – A tourist sits outside a cafe in a flooded St. Mark square as high tides reached 1.05 meters above sea level, partly flooding the city of Venice, Italy on Monday, Oct. 15, 2012. The Lagoon City, a system of islands built into a river delta, is extremely vulnerable to rising sea levels. At the same time it is experiencing a lowering of the sea floor. The constant flooding puts the city’s considerable architectural treasures at risk. (AP | Luigi Costantini)

    so-called Moses barriers will cost more than 4 billion euro. The first of these have been moved into place in recent days. Many Venetians remain skeptical of the project due to the high costs and concerns over environmental risks.MIAMI

    Southern Florida is one of those places that show up as partially under water in many sea-level projections for this century. So it’s no surprise local leaders are seeking ways to adapt. Four counties of South Florida, including Miami-Dade, have collaborated on a plan to respond to climate change. Their overarching goal: keeping fresh water inland and saltwater away.

    Before writing the plan, the counties reviewed regional sea-level data and projected a rise of 9 to 24 inches in the next 50

    FILE – In this Saturday, Oct. 8, 2005 file photo, boats sail in Miami’s Biscayne Bay at the start of the annual Columbus Day Regatta. Southern Florida is one of the places that shows up as partially under water in many sea level projections for the 21st century. (AP | Lynne Sladky)

    years along a coastline that already has documented a rise of 9 inches over the past 100 years.BANGLADESH

    Bangladesh is one of Asia’s poorest countries and one that faces extreme risks from rising sea levels. Its capital, Dhaka, is at the top of a list of world cities deemed most vulnerable to climate change, according to risk analysis company Maplecroft.

    The World Bank says a sea-level rise of 5 inches would affect 20 million people along the 440-mile coast. Many of these people would be homeless.

    Bangladesh is implementing two major projects worth $470 million that involve growing forests on the coastal belt and building more multistory shelters to house people after cyclones and tidal surges.

    BANGKOK,

    FILE – In this Sunday, May 31, 2009 file photo, floodwaters flow to a lower area as villagers rebuild an embankment at Protap Nagar in Shatkhira, Bangladesh, about 176 kilometers (109 miles) southwest of Dhaka after Cyclone Aila. The low-lying delta nation of 153 million people is one of Asia’s poorest countries, and one that faces extreme risks from rising sea levels. (AP | Pavel Rahman)

    ThailandSea-level rise projections show Bangkok could be at risk of inundation in 100 years unless preventive measures are taken. But when the capital and its outskirts were affected in 2011 by the worst flooding in half a century, the immediate trigger was water runoff from the north, where dams failed to hold very heavy rains.

    The government recently announced winning bids totaling $9.38 million by Chinese, South Korean and Thai firms to run the flood and water management schemes, including the construction of reservoirs, floodways and barriers.

    Solutions to the problem of rising seas are still being studied.

    “Construction alone is not sustainable,” said Seree Supratid, director of a climate and disaster center at Rangsit University. “People have to adapt to nature.”

    Read more: Cities worldwide struggle to cope with rising sea levels – The Denver Post http://www.denverpost.com/nationworld/ci_23474640/cities-worldwide-struggle-cope-rising-sea-levels#ixzz2WTPg3GRa
    Read The Denver Post’s Terms of Use of its content: http://www.denverpost.com/termsofuse
    Follow us: @Denverpost on Twitter | Denverpost on Facebook

  • Leave coal in ground, scientists urge government

    Leave coal in ground, scientists urge government

    Date
    June 17, 2013
    • 9 reading now
    Dr Lesley Hughes Taking action: Professor Lesley Hughes. Photo: Peter Morris

    Most of Australia’s coal reserves will have to be left unburned if the world is to avoid catastrophic global warming, according to a major new report from the federal government’s Climate Commission.

    The report puts the key science advisory body on a collision course with some of the nation’s biggest export industries, and marks the first time a government agency has endorsed calls for fossil fuel industries to be phased out because of their contribution to climate change.

    Its findings mean that most of Australia’s known coal, oil and gas reserves – many of which are already subject to minerals production licences held by companies such as BHP Billiton and Rio Tinto – must somehow be left alone if the world is to avoid dangerous climate change.

    Climate Change Minister Greg Combet says coal use has already decreased by 7%.Climate Change Minister Greg Combet says coal use has already decreased by 7%. Photo: Louie Douvis

    The Climate Commission acknowledged its conclusions were “sobering” and that the potential for economic disruption could be serious, but said there was no alternative if the world was to avoid dangerous climate change.

    Advertisement

    “How people react to this is up to the policymakers and governments, as well as investors,” said Professor Lesley Hughes, co-author of the report The Critical Decade 2013 – Climate change science, risks and responses, to be released on Monday.

    “It isn’t our job to reconcile the politics of this with the science,” she said. “We are simply presenting the facts as best we know them. Just because the facts may be unpalatable to some people doesn’t make them any less important.”

    Australia’s fossil fuel resources are the equivalent of about 51 billion tonnes of greenhouse gases, about one twelfth of the world’s entire “carbon budget” of about 600 billion tonnes – the amount of carbon that scientists estimate can be burned by 2050 if the world is to stop temperatures rising more than two degrees.

    If that carbon budget is exceeded, the build-up of heat-trapping gases in the atmosphere is likely to trigger dangerous global warming of up to five degrees this century, the report said.

    And the world is still eating into its budget far too fast, with average global emissions still rising at about 3 per cent a year, the report said.

    “If emissions could somehow peak in 2015, just two years away, the maximum rate of emission reductions thereafter would be 5.3 per cent, a very daunting task,” it said.

    “However, if we allow emissions to continue to rise through the rest of this decade and don’t reach the peaking year until 2020, the maximum rate of emission reductions thereafter is 9 per cent, a virtually impossible task unless economies around the world prioritise emission reductions above all other economic and technological goals.”

    Climate Change Minister Greg Combet said the government’s carbon price had already driven coal use down 7 per cent, and most countries that bought Australian fossil fuels would soon have similar carbon prices.

    Countries are responsible for the carbon emissions generated within their borders, a spokesman for Mr Combet said.

    “When it comes to exports, the majority of Australia’s coal exports go to Japan, South Korea, China and the European Union,” he said.

    “All these countries have introduced, or plan to introduce, a price on carbon through emissions trading schemes or carbon taxes that will apply to coal consumption.”

    A spokeswoman for opposition climate spokesman Greg Hunt said he would “consider the report carefully but we do not support shutting down Australia’s major export industry”.

    If elected to government at the September poll, the opposition has pledged to abolish the Climate Commission.

    “The Coalition has been consistent in arguing that the role of the Climate Commission on providing advice on addressing climate change is best undertaken by a merged department of environment and climate change,” Mr Hunt’s spokeswoman said. “There needs to be a continued focus on reducing emissions as is outlined in this report.”

    The opposition plans to abolish the carbon price and replace it with a suite of measures it calls “direct action”, involving paying industries to reduce their emissions.

    Both of the main parties have committed to reducing Australia’s emissions to 5 per cent below their 2000 levels by the year 2020 – a target that now looks achievable, but which falls well short of the much deeper cuts outlined in the Climate Commission’s report.

    “To stay within the two degrees limit, the trend of increasing global emissions must be slowed and halted in the next few years and emissions must be trending downwards by 2020 at the latest,” the report said. “Investments in and installations of renewable energy must therefore increase rapidly. And, critically, most of the known fossil fuel reserves must remain in the ground.”