Author: Neville

  • No-confidence motion seeks to capitalise on ALP-Greens rift

    No-confidence motion seeks to capitalise on ALP-Greens rift
    By chief political correspondent Simon Cullen

    Updated 29 minutes ago
    Penny Wong in Senate Question Time Photo: Penny Wong accused the Coalition of staging a stunt for the benefit of the media. (AAP: Alan Porritt)
    Related Story: Gillard stands firm in school funding row
    Related Story: PM stands firm despite Greens’ jobs package threat
    Related Story: Gillard ‘unsurprised’ at split with Greens
    Map: Australia

    The Coalition has sought to capitalise on the split between Labor and the Greens by moving a motion of no confidence in the Government’s handling of the mining tax.

    Liberal senator Eric Abetz has accused the Government of “economic illiteracy”, saying Australians were now paying the price for Labor’s “arrogance” in thinking it could outsmart the nation’s biggest mining companies.

    “Never before in the history of the Commonwealth have the Australian people endured such a dysfunctional and incompetent government,” he said in moving the motion.

    “Those of us who recall the debacle known as the Whitlam government are beginning to look on that short-term, yet devastating era with a degree of fondness as an example of sound administration and robust policy development in comparison to the past five years.”

    The mining tax raised just $126 million in its first six months of operation, despite revenue projections of $2 billion for the 2012-13 financial year.

    The revelations again exposed tensions between the Government and the Greens, resulting in the minor party effectively calling off its post-election deal with Labor citing the Government’s refusal to redesign the tax.

    “Today, the Greens have an opportunity to tell the Australian people whether they have confidence in the Government’s handling of the mining tax,” Senator Abetz taunted.

    The motion provoked an angry response from Finance Minister Penny Wong, who accused the Coalition of staging a “stunt” for the benefit of the media.

    “As we were all subjected to that 20-minute diatribe, did we all get an image of Eric in his bathroom practicing in front of the mirror… adjusting his tie, puffing his chest out, showing how outraged he was?” Senator Wong said, during a rowdy exchange across the chamber.

    “What a pathetic performance. Is that the best you can do?

    “All you want to do is continue the relentless negativity that you have become known for.”
    Capacity to pay

    Greens leader Christine Milne says she has already made clear that her party will not be supporting no-confidence motions against the Government.

    Instead, she has sought to amend the motion, so that it calls on the Government to redesign the tax to raise more revenue.

    “All this talk of about what promises are going to be made or not made in the election campaign… the people want to know where the money is going to come from in order to implement the Gonski review,” Senator Milne said.

    “We need a new funding model for education in Australia, and where are we going to get that money if we don’t raise it from those who have the capacity to pay?”

    The mining tax was renegotiated by Prime Minister Julia Gillard, along with Treasurer Wayne Swan, with the country’s three biggest miners soon after she took over the top job from Kevin Rudd.

    The Opposition says Ms Gillard and Mr Swan were out-negotiated by the chief executives of BHP Billiton, Rio Tinto and Xstrata.

    “I have known (Wayne Swan) since we were university students in the 1970s,” Liberal senator George Brandis said.

    “He had no brains then and his intellect hasn’t grown in the years since.”

    Labor senator Kim Carr hit back, accusing “Lord Brandis” of making an “arrogant, a contemptuous, a pompous” display in the Senate.

    Topics: federal-parliament, federal-government, greens, alp, tax, australia

    First posted 33 minutes ago

    Contact Simon Cullen

  • “belittled, humiliated and demeaned”

    From: Karen Skinner, Change.org
    Date: Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 12:30 PM
    Subject: Harassed, bullied, fired
    To: nevilleg729@gmail.com

    Change.org
    Former employees of a Queensland MP say he “belittled, humiliated and demeaned” them in a pattern of “sexist bullying”. David’s calling on Campbell Newman to dismiss him from the LNP immediately.
    Sign David’s Petition

    NEVILLE –

    They say he “belittled, humiliated and demeaned” his young female staff, forcing one to keep a record of her periods on an office calendar — then firing her when she tried to complain. But instead of being disciplined, Scott Driscoll is being held up as a role model: he’s Campbell Newman’s new MP for Redcliffe.

    David Browne, a local community worker says this type of “sexist and disgusting” behaviour is unacceptable — from anyone in society, let alone someone who is held up as representing the community. That’s why he’s started a petition calling on Campbell Newman to immediately dismiss Driscoll from the LNP.

    One in four women have been sexually harassed in the workplace. And the idea that the perpetrator can then be held up as the responsible, role model of society not only sends a terrible message, but can be incredibly damaging for the victims.

    This week, former employees have come forward and into the media spotlight — they’re determined not to let Driscoll get away with what they said was a pattern of “harassment, bullying and sexism” when Driscoll was President of the Queensland Retail and Shopkeepers Association. Yet despite his history, Driscoll’s been appointed a government representative on the Health and Community Services Committee — a role that reviews mental health and child protection policy.

    Pressure is building. The Courier Mail, Channel 10 News and other media are all reporting on the story. And after the resignation of the “scandal-ridden” Arts Minister last week — David says it’s clear Newman is eager to start turning around the LNP’s image in the electorate.

    Click here to join David’s petition calling on Campbell Newman to dismiss Driscoll, and urge him to resign from parliament.

    As hundreds of people join David’s campaign, he says Campbell Newman must immediately dismiss Driscoll — otherwise it’ll send a dangerous message: that sexual harassment is OK if you’re in a position of power.

    Thanks for being a part of this,

    Karen and the Change.org team

    P.S. Sign David’s petition now — and forward this email to all your friends in Queensland.

    This email was sent by Change.org to nevilleg729@gmail.com | Start a petition
    Unsubscribe. Edit your email notification settings.

    Click here to Reply, Reply to all, or Forward

    Lumosity.com – Get smarter, think faster
    Train your brain with Lumosity, the personal trainer designed by scientists. Try a free workout!
    Why this ad?Ads –
    0% full
    Using 0 GB of your 10.1 GB
    ©2013 Google – Terms & Privacy
    Last account activity: 2.5 hours ago
    Details

    People (4)
    Karen Skinner, Change.org
    mail@change.org
    Show details
    Ads – Why these ads?
    Lumosity.com
    Get smarter, think faster
    Train your brain with Lumosity, the personal trainer designed by scientists. Try a free workout!
    More Promotions (1)
    TAFE Courses Online
    Study from home at your own pace. 20% off fees. Limited time offer!
    www.opencolleges.edu.au

  • The Earth continues to warm strongly.

    The Climate Commission has today released a briefing paper that corrects the confusion and confirms that the Earth continues to warm at an alarming rate.

    Key points:

    The Earth continues to warm strongly. Scientists assess this based on long term observations of the heat content of the ocean, the air temperature (an indicator of the heat content of the atmosphere), and the amount of heat absorbed by the land, glaciers, ice sheets and sea ice.
    Understanding changes in climate requires data over long time periods, at least 30 years and preferably much longer.
    The best measure of global warming is ocean heat content as it absorbs nearly 90% of additional heat trapped by greenhouse gases. Global ocean heat content has increased substantially over the last 40 years, and the strongly upward trend has continued through the most recent decade up to the present.
    Singling out short term trends in air temperature to imply that global warming is not occurring is incorrect and misleading.

    Author: Climate Commission
    Tags: climate change, temperature, warming, Will Steffen

    « Back to Reports
    What we’re doing
    Upcoming events

    Watch here for what we’re doing soon

    Recent events

    5 December 2012 – Adelaide community forum
    25 September 2012 – Brisbane forum

    Latest report

    The Earth continues to warm

    Subscribe to our newsletter
    RSS
    Did you know?
    Australia is the 15th largest emitter of greenhouse gas emissions in the world.
    Videos
    What clean energy inventions can we look forward to?

  • Western Sydney could experience flooding

    Western Sydney could experience flooding

    AAPFebruary 25, 2013, 9:27 am

    tweet1

    Email
    Print

    AAP © Enlarge photo

    Western Sydney could be in for minor flooding after Warragamba Dam spilled over following a weekend of heavy rain.

    A State Emergency Service (SES) spokeswoman says the spillover occurred about 3.30am (AEDT) and could cause flooding in local areas.

    “Penrith could be affected and the Richmond areas today on the Hawkesbury Nepean River,” she said.

    Minor flooding could disrupt local ferry services and close low roads and bridges.

    As swollen creeks and rivers start to recede across the state, the SES says 26,000 people remain stranded by floodwaters in the north but the focus now is shifting to recovery and resupply.

    Crews from the SES, NSW Rural Fire Service and Fire and Rescue NSW are concentrating on the Sydney suburbs of Malabar and Narellan, and Kiama on the south coast, which were worst-affected by storm damage over the weekend.

    In Kiama, three houses were destroyed and seven others badly damaged, while St Andrew’s Primary school at Malabar will be closed on Monday for safety checks.

    Meanwhile Ausgrid crews are working to restore power to about 500 homes and businesses on the Central Coast, about 100 in Sydney and more than 500 around Kiama and Bowral.
    At its peak over the weekend, more than 6000 homes and businesses on the Central Coast were without power as trees and debris hit powerlines.

  • Keystone XL decision will define Barack Obama’s legacy on climate change

    Keystone XL decision will define Barack Obama’s legacy on climate change

    Does the president have courage to say ‘no’ to a project that will lock us into decades of dependency on this dirty energy?
    Share138

    inShare.4
    Email

    Barack Obama is being urged by green groups to throw out Keystone XL oil sands pipeline project. Photograph: Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

    Very few of us have the opportunity in life to look forward to our legacy. However, sometimes events occur that we just know will shape how history will judge us.

    One of those events is about to happen to President Barack Obama. This year, his administration is expected to make a decision on whether to allow the construction of a massive pipeline that would be used to export tar sands from Alberta, Canada. The so-called Keystone XL pipeline would essentially bisect the United States to bring the tar substance (bitumen) to refineries on the Gulf of Mexico. From there, it could be exported around the world.

    The pipeline is essential for the expansion of tar-sand production. It is estimated that if the pipeline were approved, the rate of bitumen extraction would increase by 36%. What various industry voices have been trying to tell us is that the tar sands are necessary for friendly US-Canada relations, for jobs, and for energy security. What those industry voices have not told us is that approval of the pipeline would be a nail in the coffin of climate change.

    Tar-sand oil is very hard to remove from the ground; it requires enormous amounts of water and energy just to get it to the surface. As a result, it releases more greenhouse gases than conventional fossil fuels. It really is the dirtiest of the dirty. Approval of the Keystone pipeline will lock us in to decades of dependency on this dirty energy at a time when we need to develop clean sources of energy.

    But do the tar sands really matter that much? The answer is clearly yes. Alberta has 1.8tn barrels of oil contained within the tar sands. Extracting and burning all of that tar will cause a global temperature increase of about 0.4oC (0.7oF). That is about half of the warming that humans have already caused. For perspective, according to a recent study, the amount of oil-in-place in the Alberta tar sands is approximately seven times that of Saudi Arabia’s proven reserves.

    But wait, it gets worse. One of the byproducts of tar-sand extraction is a substance that is like coal … only dirtier. That byproduct, petroleum coke (affectionately called Petcoke), emits more carbon dioxide than even coal.

    It should be no surprise that the companies pushing for this pipeline disagree with the science. In fact, Alex Pourbaix of TransCanada said this week that oil sands would be “immaterial to greenhouse gas emissions”. It will be interesting to see who Obama believes, the real climate scientists or tar-sand executives.

    After a year of incredible climate-related disasters in the US, including approximately $70bn (£46bn) from superstorm Sandy and another $35bn from the 2012 drought, it seems like an easy decision for the administration. Should they approve a pipeline to export Canada’s dirty oil and be responsible for the continued environmental costs, or should they finally send a signal to the world that the US is willing to work with other nations to deal with the climate problem.

    President Obama has recently made very strong statements on climate change, but now is the time for action. If his administration cannot say “no” to Keystone – the dirtiest of the dirty – can it say no to anything? This decision will cement Obama’s climate legacy.

    We in the US know that we cannot expect any meaningful action on climate change from the conservative parties. For Republicans, being anti-science and anti-environment is a litmus test to viability. It is almost a badge of honoor among some conservatives to see who can out-dirty the other.

    The hope is, with this president, at this time, and with this dirty fuel, there is a chance. Either he will be remembered as the last best chance that we had to stop climate change; or his legacy will be the president who presided over the first major climate action from the US.

    • John Abraham is associate professor in the school of engineering at the University of St Thomas in Minnesota

  • Sea Level rising 3 to 4 times faster on US Atlantic coast

    Sea Level rising 3 to 4 times faster on US Atlantic coast
    One of the impacts of the Greenland Ice sheet melt is the increase in cold fresh water impacting on the themohaline circulation, the great ocean conveyor belt. There are signs the Gulf Stream has slowed down by a third due to this influx of melt water. The Gulf Stream acts to drag water away from the coast of North America, so a slowing current will add to greater sea level rise along the east coast of north America: increasing sea level rise by up to 4 times the global average.

    Scientists from the US Geological Survey (USGS) identified that since about 1990, sea-level rise in the 1,000-km (600 mile) stretch of coastal zone from Cape Hatteras, North Carolina, to north of Boston, Massachusetts is a sea level rise hotspot. This is based on tide gauge data and concurs with sea level rise modelling.

    Caption: Differences in rates of sea-level rise from tide-gauge records across North America over a 60-year period (1950-2009). Circles are color coded to reflect computed differences; no color fill indicates differences in rates of sea-level rise that are not statistically different from zero. Cool colors indicate decreasing rates of sea-level rise over the 60-year period; warm colors indicate increasing rates of sea-level rise over the 60-year period. Note “hotspot” between Cape Hatteras and Cape Cod. After figure 2 in “Hotspot of Accelerated Sea-Level Rise on the Atlantic Coast of North America.”

    “Cities in the hotspot, such as Norfolk, New York, and Boston, already experience damaging floods during relatively low intensity storms,” said Abby Sallenger, USGS oceanographer and project lead for a 2012 study. “Ongoing accelerated sea-level rise in the hotspot will make coastal cities and surrounding areas increasingly vulnerable to flooding by adding to the height that storm surge and breaking waves reach on the coast.”

    So United States east coast cities like New York and Boston are going to need to prepare expensive coastal defences. The Boston Harbor Association has just released the Preparing for the Rising Tide Report which identifies flood risks and estimates some of the costs of adaptation. The major impacts will occur with coastal flooding with storm surges associated with storms like ex-tropical hurricane Sandy riding upon higher sea levels.

    Sources:

    Melanie Glade, US Geological Survey (USGS) Soundwaves newsletter Sept/Oct 2012 – Sea-Level Rise Accelerating on U.S. Atlantic Coast

    Asbury H. Sallenger Jr et al (2012) Nature Climate Change 2, 884-888 (2012) doi:10.1038/nclimate1597 Hotspot of accelerated sea-level rise on the Atlantic coast of North America (abstract)

    Posted by Takver Takvera at 10:28 AM