Author: Neville

  • Kepler Discovers a System of Tiny Planets

    Kepler Discovers a System of Tiny Planets

    Pin it

    Feb. 20, 2013: NASA’s Kepler mission scientists have discovered a new planetary system that is home to the smallest planet yet found around a star similar to our sun.
    Tiny Planets (moonlike, 200px)
    An artist’s concept of the new-found planet Kepler-37b. More

    The planets are located in a system called Kepler-37, about 210 light-years from Earth in the constellation Lyra. The smallest planet, Kepler-37b, is slightly larger than our moon, measuring about one-third the size of Earth. It is smaller than Mercury, which made its detection a challenge.

    The moon-size planet and its two companion planets were found by scientists with NASA’s Kepler mission to find Earth-sized planets in or near the “habitable zone,” the region in a planetary system where liquid water might exist on the surface of an orbiting planet. However, while the star in Kepler-37 may be similar to our sun, the system appears quite unlike the solar system in which we live.

    Astronomers think Kepler-37b does not have an atmosphere and cannot support life as we know it. The tiny planet almost certainly is rocky in composition. Kepler-37c, the closer neighboring planet, is slightly smaller than Venus, measuring almost three-quarters the size of Earth. Kepler-37d, the farther planet, is twice the size of Earth.

    The first exoplanets found to orbit a normal star were giants. As technologies have advanced, smaller and smaller planets have been found, and Kepler has shown even Earth-size exoplanets are common.
    Auroras Underfoot (signup)

    “Even Kepler can only detect such a tiny world around the brightest stars it observes,” said Jack Lissauer, a planetary scientist at NASA’s Ames Research Center in Moffett Field, Calif. “The fact we’ve discovered tiny Kepler-37b suggests such little planets are common, and more planetary wonders await as we continue to gather and analyze additional data.”

    Kepler-37’s host star belongs to the same class as our sun, although it is slightly cooler and smaller. All three planets orbit the star at less than the distance Mercury is to the sun, suggesting they are very hot, inhospitable worlds. Kepler-37b orbits every 13 days at less than one-third Mercury’s distance from the sun. The estimated surface temperature of this smoldering planet, at more than 800 degrees Fahrenheit (700 degrees Kelvin), would be hot enough to melt the zinc in a penny. Kepler-37c and Kepler-37d, orbit every 21 days and 40 days, respectively.

    “We uncovered a planet smaller than any in our solar system orbiting one of the few stars that is both bright and quiet, where signal detection was possible,” said Thomas Barclay, Kepler scientist at the Bay Area Environmental Research Institute in Sonoma, Calif., and lead author of the new study published in the journal Nature. “This discovery shows close-in planets can be smaller, as well as much larger, than planets orbiting our sun.”
    Tiny Planets (splash)
    This line up compares artist’s concepts of the planets in the Kepler-37 system to the Moon and planets in our own solar system. More

    The research team used data from NASA’s Kepler space telescope, which simultaneously and continuously measures the brightness of more than 150,000 stars every 30 minutes. When a planet candidate transits, or passes, in front of the star from the spacecraft’s vantage point, a percentage of light from the star is blocked. This causes a dip in the brightness of the starlight that reveals the transiting planet’s size relative to its star.

    The size of the star must be known in order to measure the planet’s size accurately. To learn more about the properties of the star Kepler-37, scientists examined sound waves generated by the boiling motion beneath the surface of the star. They probed the interior structure of Kepler-37’s star just as geologists use seismic waves generated by earthquakes to probe the interior structure of Earth. The science is called asteroseismology.

    The sound waves travel into the star and bring information back up to the surface. The waves cause oscillations that Kepler observes as a rapid flickering of the star’s brightness. Like bells in a steeple, small stars ring at high tones while larger stars boom in lower tones. The barely discernible, high-frequency oscillations in the brightness of small stars are the most difficult to measure. This is why most objects previously subjected to asteroseismic analysis are larger than the sun.

    With the very high precision of the Kepler instrument, astronomers have reached a new milestone. The star Kepler-37, with a radius just three-quarters of the sun, now is the smallest bell in the asteroseismology steeple. The radius of the star is known to 3 percent accuracy, which translates to exceptional accuracy in the planet’s size.

    For information about the Kepler Mission, click here

    Production editor: Dr. Tony Phillips | Credit: Science@NASA
    More Information

    Ames is responsible for Kepler’s ground system development, mission operations, and science data analysis. NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, Calif., managed Kepler mission development.

    Ball Aerospace & Technologies Corp. in Boulder, Colo., developed the Kepler flight system and supports mission operations with the Laboratory for Atmospheric and Space Physics at the University of Colorado in Boulder.

    The Space Telescope Science Institute in Baltimore archives, hosts and distributes Kepler science data. Kepler is NASA’s tenth Discovery Mission and was funded by NASA’s Science Mission Directorate at the agency’s headquarters in Washington.

  • BP to fight government’s ‘excessive’ demands over Deepwater oil spill

    BP to fight government’s ‘excessive’ demands over Deepwater oil spill

    Oil giant says it has failed to reach a settlement over fatal 2010 blowout and would rather go to court than continue negotiations
    Share217

    inShare.8
    Email

    Suzanne Goldenberg US environment correspondent

    The Guardian, Tuesday 19 February 2013 18.17 GMT

    Jump to comments (53)

    The trial, which will start in Monday in New Orleans, could potentially result in $21bn in civil damages for BP. Photograph: Getty Images

    BP has announced that it will square off against the federal government in court next week to fight “excessive” claims arising from the 2010 Gulf of Mexico oil disaster.

    In a combative statement, the oil giant said it had been open to a settlement in the civil trial, set to start on Monday in a federal court in New Orleans. But it had failed to reach a deal with federal government lawyers.

    The trial could potentially result in $21bn (£13.6bn) in civil damages for BP, but the company said on Tuesday it would rather take its chances in court than continue negotiations with federal government lawyers.

    “Faced with demands that are excessive and not based on reality or the merits of the case, we are going to trial,” said Rupert Bondy, the BP’s general counsel, said in a statement.

    The trial is the last major hurdle to BP’s efforts to move beyond the fatal blowout of the Deepwater Horizon oil rig, which killed 11 people and resulted in the biggest oil spill in US history.

    BP has already accepted criminal responsibility for the disaster, pleading guilty last November to manslaughter and lying to Congress and paying $4.5bn in fines. It reached a separate $7.8bn settlement earlier last year with thousands of local individuals that suffered economic damages because of the oil disaster.

    But Bondy indicated the company had become stuck trying to reach a deal on the big ticket item: up to $21bn in fines for environmental damage arising from the oil disaster.

    The fines, which would be levied under the Clean Water Act, would go directly for coastal restoration in Louisiana, Mississippi, and other Gulf states. More than 40 lawyers for federal and state governments are expected to be in court on Monday.

    At issue are BP’s efforts to stop the doomed Macondo well, which gushed for three months before it was finally sealed off by company engineers.

    The Justice Department has said it would set out to prove that BP was “grossly negligent” in its response to the spill – a designation that would increase the burden of fines on the oil company to $4,300 a barrel.

    BP disputes the allegation of gross negligence. It argues that the court should take into consideration the $23bn it has already spent on clean-up costs, and that it does not deserve to pay the maximum in fines under the Clean Water Act. “No company has done more, faster, to meet its commitment to economic and environmental restoration efforts in the wake of an industrial accident,” Bondy said in the statement.

    The trial before US district judge Carl Barbier is expected to unfold in two stages.

    The first phase, due to start next Monday, will try to determine the causes of the fatal blowout. It will also apportion blame between BP and its partners in the doomed Macondo well, Transocean and Halliburton.

    The second phase, due to get under way next September, will address the amount of oil that gushed into the Gulf of Mexico in the three months before BP engineers regained control of the runaway well.

    Federal government scientists have estimated that 4.9m barrels of oil were released before the well was finally capped. BP, in its statement on Tuesday, repeated its argument that estimate was too high – going so far as to accuse the federal government of exaggerating its findings.

    “The government’s public estimate is simply wrong, and [is] overstated by at least 20%,” Bondy said.

    BP has consistently argued that the government’s estimate is off by about 20% – and said that at most it should be liable for 3.1m barrels of spilled oil.

    The company also demanded the federal government subtract about 810,000 barrels of oil siphoned off directly from the well, without entering Gulf waters. That would shave another $3.4bn off the maximum $21bn penalty.

  • Now it’s the parents’ turn to scream about unruly kids sign

    Now it’s the parents’ turn to scream about unruly kids sign

    Charis Chang•
    Manly Daily •
    February 21, 201312:00AM
    62

    Increase Text Size
    Decrease Text Size
    Print
    Email

    Screaming children banned

    Watch

    Screaming children banned

    One shopping centre in the northern beaches of Sydney is causing a bit of stir, after it emerged it may ban noisy children

    .

    .

    .

    Play

    0:00 / 1:50

    Scrubber

    mute

    Share

    Fullscreen.

    Screaming children banned
    Gilce Oliveira

    The warning sign from the Dee Why Grand shopping centre banning screaming kids. Source: The Daily Telegraph

    UPSET parents want a Sydney shopping centre to shift a kids’ play area away from its food court after it threatened to not tolerate loud and unruly children.

    The Dee Why Grand was embroiled in a stoush yesterday after it introduced a controversial crackdown on “screaming” children, saying “mothers have to be more responsible”.

    The decision divided opinions over the right to eat in peace and whether the centre management was too harsh.

    Dee Why mother Gilce Oliveira, 35, said she did not understand why management created a play area if they didn’t want kids there.

    “Kids can’t control themselves, they are there to have fun, otherwise there is no reason to have a playground there,” Ms Oliveira, who has a three-week-old son, said.

    WHAT DO YOU THINK? COMMENT BELOW

    “If the general public is not happy, they should put it in an area that is not so close to the coffee shops or food court.”

    Start of sidebar. Skip to end of sidebar.

    Recommended Coverage

    Crackdown on screaming children

    NOISY children banned from a Sydney shopping centre in a move that one parenting expert says reflects society’s growing intolerance.

    Screaming children banned

    End of sidebar. Return to start of sidebar.

    Grandmother Marilyn House, who has taken her granddaughter Ruby, 3, to the play area about once or twice a week for the past seven months, said she had never noticed any particularly noisy children in the food court.

    “But kids can’t be quiet all the time, especially when you have been shopping for a long time, that’s why this area is nice, it breaks it up for them,” she said.

    Another man sitting in the food court said he had never noticed “screaming” children but supported the centre.

    “There is a line between a child being a child, and being out of control,” he said.

    A sign in the centre near the children’s play area asks parents to be considerate of others. “Screaming children will not be tolerated in the centre,” it read.

  • Ian Macdonald vows to fight on – I’m no rotten apple, he says

    Ian Macdonald vows to fight on – I’m no rotten apple, he says

    EXCLUSIVE by Bruce McDougall
    The Daily Telegraph
    February 21, 201312:00AM

    Increase Text Size
    Decrease Text Size
    Print
    Email
    Share

    2

    Ian Macdonald on his farm outside Orange, NSW / Pic: Brad Hunter Source: The Daily Telegraph

    EMBATTLED former minister Ian Macdonald has strongly denied he is planning to flee Australia, declaring yesterday: “We are not hiding.”

    Speaking for the first time since his torrid grilling at the Independent Commission Against Corruption, the former Labor heavyweight revealed he had sold his two farms outside Orange in the state’s central west and planned to buy a “modest” home in Sydney.

    Mr Macdonald, 63, said rumours he owned an apartment in Hong Kong and planned to move there were false and he had not been to Hong Kong since a brief holiday about 16 months ago.

    “I have not left the country since early November 2011, and I have never stayed in Hong Kong for longer than a week,” he told The Daily Telegraph.

    Mr Macdonald also fiercely denied claims he was a wealthy man, saying his family’s combined assets could be measured in “hundreds of thousands” of dollars rather than millions.

    Recommended Coverage

    .

    Millionaire contests coal rort claim»

    MILLIONAIRE mining magnate Travers Duncan denies misleading a pair of millionaires who invested in the controversial coal company Cascade Coal.
    .

    .

    High cost of an expensive lifestyle»

    HOW much was enough?
    .

    .

    The cash kept rolling in for Macca»

    IAN Macdonald received $450K to keep him “rolling along” until a million-dollar windfall from a coal deal came through, ICAC heard.
    .

    .

    ICAC set to sink teeth into ex-MP»

    FOR Ian Michael Macdonald, 22 years in public life as an MP and seven years as a minister could be about to end in disgrace.
    .

    .

    Rumours Macdonald making his move»

    HE will be ICAC’s star witness Monday, but Ian Macdonald appears to be cutting his ties with Australia after listing his country retreat for sale.
    .

    .

    Macdonald linked to coal mine»

    DISGRACED former mineral minister Ian Macdonald signed off on an exploration licence renewal for proposed coal mine, documents show.
    ..

    “If I had millions in the bank then they (ICAC) would have put it all on the table,” he said.

    Between gruelling sessions of cross-examination in the ICAC corruption inquiry Mr Macdonald and wife Anita have been tending their orchard of apples, pears and cherries on the family farm at Orange.

    Set amid rolling hills and tree-lined fields in fruit and wine country, the farm’s calm is in stark contrast to the turbulence Mr Macdonald faced at ICAC. At the property named AndoyaSkye, which he has owned since 2006, the silence and tranquillity is broken only by a flock of galahs taking flight or by the odd passing car.

    The former minerals and primary industries minister, who once commanded a salary of $250,000, is “downsizing” and moving to Sydney to be closer to his daughters.

    Ian Macdonald’s farm

    Source: The Daily Telegraph

    “When we were both working we could afford a place in Sydney and the farm,” he said.

    Mr Macdonald has spent his time between ICAC hearings repairing water troughs for his breeding cattle, looking after the orchard and helping his wife in a shop selling fruit and organic preserves in Orange.

    He is listed as a director and Anita as an individual secretary of a Hong Kong-registered company Resource Image Pty Ltd but he said the business – set up in early 2011 to trade with China in coal, sugar and milk powder – was not operating because of his commitments to the ICAC inquiry.

    The company was registered in Hong Kong, he said, to take advantage of currency issues and had been investigated by ICAC, with no concerns raised.

    Mr Macdonald, constrained by lawyers in what he can say while ICAC is conducting hearings, said he planned to “have my say” after the inquiry.

    Although he believes he has been “named and shamed” by much circumstantial and unchallenged evidence, Mr Macdonald said he was not worrying about anything.

    It is understood ICAC investigators have combed forensically through 14 bank accounts he held but he was confident nothing irregular was found. Mr Macdonald said he had received support from former political colleagues – but he did not name them.

    While he lamented the disasters that hurt the former NSW Labor government’s final years in power, he looked back fondly on his own career: “Up to 2010 I was the No.1 minister for positive publicity.”

    When The Daily Telegraph visited the Macdonald farm yesterday he was happily trimming apple trees after earlier driving his Volvo SUV to the garage for an “adjustment”.

  • Labor flying into trouble on airport

    Labor flying into trouble on airport

    The Daily Telegraph
    February 21, 201312:00AM

    Increase Text Size
    Decrease Text Size
    Print
    Email
    Share

    0

    BESIDES being a passionate advocate of the Labor cause, Anthony Albanese has proved himself a very competent minister in the transport portfolio. It’s when transport becomes airborne that Albanese runs into a few problems.

    As the member for Grayndler in Sydney’s inner west, Albanese is obviously conflicted when it comes to the city’s much-needed second airport. The minister must know, as Labor politicians since Paul Keating have known, that the best possible option for a second Sydney airport is in Badgerys Creek. Yet Albanese dare not declare his hand due to the perceived electoral danger of such a move. The anti-airport lobby has effectively silenced several generations of politicians on this vital issue.

    But as The Daily Telegraph reports, modern jets are quickly becoming even quieter than a politician in a marginal seat. Aircraft noise is fading and so in turn is the previously reflexive rejection of a second airport.

    As polls have shown, the public is now far more welcoming to the concept of a second airport than ever before. Instead of running from the issue, it might be politically timely for Labor’s western Sydney representatives to actually get behind it.

    Sell the second airport as a genuine employment opportunity for the area, which it undoubtedly will be. Sell it as a chance for western Sydney to show its full potential. Sell it as an exercise in nation-building.

    Albanese is in a difficult position. He’s bound to a party policy that precludes him from advocating Badgerys Creek as the best option for our second airport, even though he must know that to be the case.

    The upcoming election might provide Labor and its transport minister with a chance to change some outdated views.

  • Labor stalwart warns Greens will ‘walk away’

    Labor stalwart warns Greens will ‘walk away’

    ABCUpdated February 21, 2013, 9:40 am

    tweet

    Email
    Print

    ABC © Enlarge photo

    A senior Federal Labor MP warns the Greens will walk away from Tasmania’s minority government and blame Labor for its demise.

    Federal Labor MPs and the Greens have been trading blows since the, announced on Tuesday her party’s relationship with the Government was effectively over.

    Tasmania’s Premier, Lara Giddings and acting Tasmanian Greens leader Tim Morris say the federal rift will not destabilise the Tasmanian power-sharing arrangement with Labor.

    But long-serving MP Dick Adams says the State Government needs to be careful in its dealings with the Greens.

    “The state Labor Party here will want to be very careful because I should imagine the Greens will do exactly the same as what they’re doing to Federal Labor,” he said.

    “We’ve just seen what they’ve done here, they’ve walked away from other agreements in the past, this seems to be their tactic.”

    “State Labor ought to be very conscience of that.”

    In ending the federal Greens deal, Senator Milne cited a string of Government decisions, including its refusal to redesign the mining tax and nominate Tasmania’s Tarkine region for national heritage listing.

    But Premier Lara Giddings says her agreement with the Greens is solid.

    She told the National Press Club on Wednesday it was difficult to draw comparisons with the federal arrangement.

    “Julia Gillard didn’t just have the Greens to form a relationship with; she had Andrew Wilkie, of course, and Rob Oakshott and other individuals in the Parliament,” Ms Giddings said.

    “So it’s not as easy to make a direct parallel between what we have done and what she has done.”

    The Premier says Tasmanian Labor’s alliance with the minority party differs from Federal Labor’s.

    “We have two Green ministers in our Cabinet, they hold the responsibility and power of Government, they have to conduct themselves appropriately and responsibly as Cabinet ministers.

    “They also know the power of stability and we’re determined to show that minority government can be stable.”

    But state Opposition Leader Will Hodgman is not expecting a political divorce anytime soon.
    “They’re joined at the hip, they are very much a coalition.”