Author: Neville

  • Are there any Lessons from the Wanguri By-election Result? Antony Green

    February 17, 2013
    Are there any Lessons from the Wanguri By-election Result?

    On Saturday night the Northern Territory Country Liberal government took a pasting at a by-election in the northern Darwin seat of Wanguri.

    The by-election had been caused by the resignation of former Labor Chief Minister Paul Henderson.

    In the circumstances the electorate could have been annoyed at Paul Henderson and the Labor Party for causing the by-election. The electorate could have taken their choice of reasons to be annoyed at Julia Gillard and the Labor Party, either for the way she is running the country, or for her recent “captain’s pick” to annoint Nova Peris as the lead candidate for Labor’s NT Senate ticket.

    Instead, voters turned out and expressed their dislike of the actions in office of the six-month old Mills Country Liberal government.

    Voters have delivered a whopping 12.7% swing against the Country Liberals. Labor’s new candidate Nicole Manison received 69.7% of the two-party preferred vote, up near Paul Henderson’s winning margin at Labor’s landslide election victory in 2005.

    It is the worst swing against a first term government in two decades. The largest first term swing I can think of was 16% against the Greiner government in the NSW seat of Coffs Harbour at a 1990 by-election.

    As for swings against a government in its first year in office, I can think of only two similar situations to the Wanguri result.

    In 1994 the Brown Liberal government in South Australia lost the seat of Torrens at a by-election after a 9% swing, and in 1988 the new Greiner government in NSW suffered a 12.6% swing against it at a by-election in the Labor-held electorate of Port Stephens. Interestingly, both the Brown/Olsen government and the Greiner government failed to win majorities at the next state elections.

    Can we read anything into the Wanguri result concerning this year’s Federal election?

    In my view, not much. It might give you a hint that the local Federal seat of Solomon is no walkover for the Coalition, but past results indicates that local Territory results are not a good guide for who will win Solomon, let alone a useful guide for the nation as a whole.

    The Federal seat of Solomon covers all of the Darwin-Palmerston metropolitan area. The seat was first contested at the 2001 Federal election, and takes in 12 of the Territory’s Legislative Assembly electorates.

    The graph below plots Solomon results, including a retro-fit for 1998, against the total 2-party preferred results in the 12 Territory electorates within Solomon, for Territory elections from 1997 to 2012.

    DarwinPastPcts

    As the graph shows, at four of the five Federal elections since 1998, the Labor 2-party preferred vote in Solomon has been below Labor’s national 2-party preferred vote. The only time that Labor has polled above its national vote in Solomon was at the 2001 election, conducted just three months after Labor’s breakthrough Northern Territory election victory under Clare Martin.

    The only time Labor has won Solomon was on the election of the Rudd government in 2007, though Labor still polled below its national level.

    So there is a strong correlation between the result in Solomon and the national vote. However, as the graph shows, there is very little correlations between Territory election results and Solomon results.

    In the same period that Labor’s 2-party preferred result in Solomon has stayed in a narrow range from 47.2% to 50.2%, Labor’s results in Darwin at Territory elections have ranged from 40.7% in 1997 to 60.8% in 2005.

    In short, there is not a lot of evidence that Territory election results have much bearing on Federal election results.

    NT Chief Minister Terry Mills will certainly need to take note of the results. He will remember that when he was first elected to Parliament at the Blain by-election in July 1999, he suffered a 20.5% swing against him. Mills will also remember the 2005 election when he retained Blain, but found himself the only Country Liberal returned from north of the Berrimah line.

    Mills entered the NT Legislative Assembly on the same day as Labor’s Paul Henderson, who won the Wanguri by-election with a swing to Labor of 11.5%. In March 2000 the Country Liberals retained Port Darwin in a third by-election in the term, on the retirement of Shane Stone, and suffered a swing of 5.8%.

    In August 2001 the Country Liberals lost office, the three by-elections proving to have accurately reflected public opinion of an ageing Country Liberal government.

    What you can read into the Wanguri by-election is that voters in Darwin are not happy with the Mills government because of its increases in government prices, especially electricity, and because of its changes to the public service. A lot of voters view the changes as broken promises.

    The by-election tells a lot about how the Mills government is currently placed in Northern Territory politics.

    However, trying to read Federal implications into a by-election involving around four thousand voters in the far northern suburbs of a far northern city is just a soothsay too far. It’s an interesting result, can create some speculation about Solomon, but that is about as far as you take the result.

    Posted by Antony Green on February 17, 2013 at 06:02 PM in By-election, Federal Politics and Governments, Northern Territory Elections | Permalink

  • Tesla electric car row goes up a gear as New York Times journalist hits back

    Tesla electric car row goes up a gear as New York Times journalist hits back

    John M Broder has responded to claims he deliberately let the electric car run out of power before testdriving the vehicle
    Share51

    inShare.1
    Email

    Adam Vaughan

    guardian.co.uk, Friday 15 February 2013 13.00 GMT

    Jump to comments (132)

    The journalist John M Broder drove the Tesla Model S car from Washington DC New England for a review published last week in the New York Times. Photograph: Robyn Beck/AFP/Getty Images

    The New York Times journalist involved in a war of words with US electric car company Tesla Motors over how far its new $101,000 luxury car can go between charges range has hit back over claims he deliberately let the car run out of power.

    The journalist John M Broder drove the Model S car from Washington DC to New England for a review published last week, in which he recounted having to have the car taken away on a flatbed truck because the car’s battery had run flat, despite a network of fast-charging points designed to make the trip viable. The review sparked a furious response from Tesla’s chief executive, Elon Musk, who subsequently published data logs from the car which he said showed the car “never had a chance with John Broder”.

    John M Broder has responded to claims he deliberately let the electric car run out of power before testdriving the vehicle
    Share51

    inShare.1
    Email

    Adam Vaughan

    guardian.co.uk, Friday 15 February 2013 13.00 GMT

    Jump to comments (132)

    The journalist John M Broder drove the Tesla Model S car from Washington DC New England for a review published last week in the New York Times. Photograph: Robyn Beck/AFP/Getty Images

    The New York Times journalist involved in a war of words with US electric car company Tesla Motors over how far its new $101,000 luxury car can go between charges range has hit back over claims he deliberately let the car run out of power.

    The journalist John M Broder drove the Model S car from Washington DC to New England for a review published last week, in which he recounted having to have the car taken away on a flatbed truck because the car’s battery had run flat, despite a network of fast-charging points designed to make the trip viable. The review sparked a furious response from Tesla’s chief executive, Elon Musk, who subsequently published data logs from the car which he said showed the car “never had a chance with John Broder”.

  • Labor triumphs in Wanguri by-election

    Labor triumphs in Wanguri by-election

    ABCFebruary 17, 2013, 12:50 pm

    tweet1

    Email
    Print

    Labor’s Nicole Manison has vowed to hit the ground running after an overwhelming win the by-election for the Northern Territory seat of Wanguri.

    Ms Manison will replace Paul Henderson, who retired from politics last month after leading his party to a crushing defeat at the Territory election in August.

    She took more than 65 per cent of the primary vote in yesterday’s by-election.

    Country Liberals candidate Rhianna Harker received 28 per cent and independent Peter Rudge took 6 per cent.

    Ms Manison, a former Labor media adviser and sportswoman, says she is astounded with the result.

    “You never take anything for granted,” she said.

    “I was hoping first and foremost to win, but to have such a huge, huge win, it’s overwhelming.

    “I’m just so delighted that people put their faith in me.”

    Ms Manison has vowed to work hard for her electorate, which she says has sent a message about power and water price hikes.

    “They are not happy with Terry Mills and the CLP Government,” she said.

    “The people of Wanguri have reflected the sentiment of the rest of the Territory that people do not like having promises broken.

    “People do not like unfairly having their cost of living dramatically increased.”

    Mr Mills, the Territory’s Chief Minister, is not surprised by the result.

    “I understand that people are finding it difficult with the decisions this Government has taken,” he said.

    But he has ruled out a cabinet reshuffle.
    “Our cabinet, our Government is focused on the real business. That means getting the Territory’s debt crisis under control,” he said.

  • Xenophon detained at Malaysian airport

    Xenophon detained at Malaysian airport

    Updated Sun Feb 17, 2013 2:04am AEDT

    Video: Nick Xenophon talks to ABC News 24 from Malaysia (ABC News)

    Related Story: Xenophon caught up in Malaysia protest

    Related Story: Anwar Ibrahim cleared of sodomy charges

    Map: Malaysia
    Federal independent Senator Nick Xenophon has been detained by Malaysian authorities after being told he was a security risk.

    He was taken into custody on his arrival at Kuala Lumpur airport about 10:00am (AEDT) on Saturday.

    Senator Xenophon, who is outspoken on human rights issues in Malaysia, is under escort and is expected to be put on a flight to Melbourne early on Sunday morning.

    The South Australian senator had been about to join a delegation which had meetings planned with Malaysian opposition members and officials from the electoral commission ahead of this year’s national election.

    Nationals Senator John Williams, Labor MP Steve Georganas, and Liberal MP Mal Washer were also part of the delegation, but have now pulled out.

    Foreign Minister Bob Carr said it appeared that Senator Xenophon was detained under Malaysia’s national security laws.

    Senator Carr said he would be seeking an explanation from the Malaysian government.

    “We’re expressing our disappointment, we’re seeking a full explanation of this,” he said.

    “We think for a friendly country to do this is quite a sad thing.”

    In a statement, the Malaysia’s immigration department said Senator Xenophon had been denied entry for breaking the law on a previous visit.

    He was invited to Malaysia last year by opposition leader Anwar Ibrahim and observed a major street rally for electoral reform in April that ended in violence.

    He later criticised the government’s handling of the rally and what he described as biased coverage by state media.

    In a statement, Malaysia’s director-general of immigration, Alias Ahmad, said “Malaysia is a free and democratic country, but no-one is above the law”.

    Senator Xenophon told ABC News 24 that there should be more scrutiny on Malaysia’s upcoming elections.

    “Malaysia is due to have elections here very soon. I think the Australian Government has been incredibly silent about some of the abuses that have been occurring here in terms of the way the democratic system runs or doesn’t run,” he said.

    “And what we were trying to ascertain with members of both the Coalition and the Government was to how free and fair the elections are likely to be.

    “But at this stage I’ve been told that I’m not allowed entry and I have to be on the next flight back home.”

    ‘Orders from above’

    Senator Xenophon said immigration officials had been “incredibly polite” but told him they had “orders from above” to detain him.

    He said he had not expected to be detained.

    “I just find it extraordinary. I’ve been here before [and] I’ve made statements about the state of Malaysian democracy previously,” he said.

    “But on this occasion clearly someone high up in the Malaysian government doesn’t want me here.”

    Senator Xenophon was in Malaysia last year to observe the trial of opposition leader Ibrahim, who was acquitted of sodomy charges.

    “I became involved in this cause when the opposition leader [Anwar] Ibrahim came to Australia in 2010,” Senator Xenophon said.

    “He met with a number of MPs [and] I undertook to keep an eye on the trial he was facing, which he was subsequently acquitted of.”

    Senator Xenophon was also a part of an observer group that published a report on the Malaysian electoral system last April.

    He is currently pursuing a defamation case against government-backed media in Malaysia that misattributed a speech he gave on Scientology to the word of Islam.

    Senator Williams told ABC News 24 it was important for Australian politicians to build relationships with their Malaysian counterparts.

    He said a formal protest to Malaysia risked “pouring petrol on the fire”, and the delegation may look at travelling to Malaysia in the coming weeks.

    “I don’t think it is a big issue. They have their reasons why they stopped him at the airport,” he said.

    “I am sure these can be talked through in time and I don’t see any reason why we would want to add fuel to the fire on this issue.

    “It will settle in a few weeks’ time and we will look at whether we can make a visit then.”

    ABC/Reuters

  • Parents cry for help from charities

    Parents cry for help from charities

    LINDA SILMALIS
    The Sunday Telegraph
    February 17, 201312:00AM

    Increase Text Size
    Decrease Text Size
    Print
    Email
    Share

    0

    ONE of Australia’s leading charities has reported a 30 per cent increase in calls for help, which it has attributed to the changes in the single parenting payment scheme.

    The new rules, which took effect in January, were expected to affect 80,000 women who would move from the parenting payment to the much lower Newstart allowance.

    Frontline workers for The Smith Family in NSW, Queensland, WA and the ACT told The Sunday Telegraph the change had resulted in a dramatic rise in calls for assistance from predominantly single mothers struggling to with back-to-school costs.

    The Smith Family chief executive officer, Dr Lisa O’Brien, said the rise in calls amounted to a 30 per cent increase compared with the same period last year. She said the charity had been finding it challenging already in helping needy families post-GFC.

    The cuts to payments had coincided with single parents having to pay upfront costs for school books, uniforms and fees, resulting in a rise in calls for financial help, she said.

    “Our community workers are experiencing a 30 per cent increase in calls from families needing support for the essentials,” she said. “A lot of the families we help are single-parent households.”

    The Smith Family has gradually shifted its focus from a broad-based charity to one that is focused on the education needs of children.

    The charity strongly believes the education of children is the best means of families breaking the cycle of poverty. It has secured sponsors to help pay for the education needs of 34,360 children, but needs another 1200 to meet the demand.

    The charity fears the welfare cuts will see the demand grow again this year.

    The federal government expects to save around $728 million over the next four years by moving single parents from the parenting payment scheme to the Newstart unemployment benefit. But critics of the revised scheme claim some are about $120 worse off per fortnight.

  • Labor’s secret hit-list reveals NSW hot seats

    Labor’s secret hit-list reveals NSW hot seats

    SAMANTHA MAIDEN NATIONAL POLITICAL EDITOR
    The Sunday Telegraph
    February 17, 201312:00AM

    Increase Text Size
    Decrease Text Size
    Print
    Email

    Related Coverage

    .

    Labor’s hot seats
    .

    A LEAKED election battle plan has revealed Labor’s list of target seats across NSW for the 2013 poll and sparked accusations Julia Gillard is sugar-coating an electoral bloodbath.

    Obtained by The Sunday Telegraph, the ALP’s list reveals the seats Labor will try to win from the Opposition or hold for Labor by throwing cash and manpower their way. Nationally, there are 25 ALP and Liberal seats regarded as the most marginal, must-hold or vulnerable to attack.

    It confirms the Labor Party’s battle is holding the line in NSW, Victoria and Tasmania, with not a single Liberal-held seat on Labor’s target-seats list deemed as vulnerable to attack.

    But Labor is hopeful of picking up Liberal-held seats in Queensland and Western Australia to balance the expected bloodbath in NSW, Victoria and Tasmania.

    The target-seats list confirms Craig Thomson’s seat of Dobell is regarded as high risk after the ongoing Health Services Union dramas despite a 5 per cent margin, with Greenway held by Michelle Rowland, Lindsay held by Labor frontbencher David Bradbury and the electorate of Banks held by Daryl Melham in the danger zone. In western Sydney, Labor MP John Murphy’s seat of Reid is regarded as high risk, as is Deb O’Neill’s seat of Robertson, Janelle Saffin’s electorate of Page and Mike Kelly’s Eden Monaro.

    The Greens’ seat of Melbourne, held by Adam Bandt, is also in the ALP’s sights, despite the fact that his support was crucial to Ms Gillard forming government. But independents Andrew Wilkie, Rob Oakeshott and Tony Windsor’s electorates are not on the target-seats list.

    Some Labor strategists are despondent the target-seats list is more concerned with protecting the PM’s leadership, amid fears up to 20 Labor MPs could be thrown out of office.

    “It’s all wrapped up in the leadership. They can’t have a frank discussion about what seats are at risk further up the pendulum,” a Labor strategist said. “They’re trapped. I understand why they’ve got the list they’ve got.”

    Another senior strategist predicted a “reconciliation” would happen closer to the September 14 poll that reflected seats on much bigger margins that were clearly in play.

    “The electorate is volatile and what’s in play is not the standard electoral pendulum,” the strategist said.