admin /31 July, 2006
Sparks are flying in several Queensland Government departments over what exactly constitutes green power, reported The Courier-Mail (29/7/2006, p.1).
The controversy follows a deal last year to power state schools and electoral offices with green energy from state-owned Ergon Energy. It all sounded lovely on paper.
Ergon’s Kate Skilleter said it was the largest purchase of green energy in Queensland’s history. She said it would have the same impact on the environment as planting almost half a million trees or taking more than 26,000 cars off the road.
Several groups have now questioned the environmental benefits. The works department also bought suspect green electricity from Country Energy of NSW to power Queensland Parliament.
Under the National Greenpower Accreditation Program rules new green power rights cannot be sold independently of Renewable Energy Certificates (RECs). Works Minister Robert Schwarten conceded sales had taken place without the certificates.
Several definitions available: "Public Works did not buy new green power rights. It bought 100 per cent renewable energy," he said. He said there were different definitions of green power used throughout the industry. "The term fake is not appropriate," he said.
Deal deemed REC exempt: Schwarten said an independent review by accounting firm Deloitte confirmed Ergon complied with renewable energy criteria. Ergon’s James Gillard said the deal didn’t require renewable energy certificates, or RECs.
Renewable sales options: "RECs are not an accurate reflection of renewable energy products’ authenticity," he said. "There are a number of different but equally legitimate ways to validate and sell renewable energy.
Independent verification enough for Mickel: Energy Minister John Mickel agreed: "If there is any solid evidence that renewable energy certificates have not been traded in the correct manner, I would be happy to investigate. I am satisfied so long as the renewable energy is independently verified to ensure that it is indeed renewable. A REC is not the only mechanism to guarantee electricity is renewable."
Consumer confidence at stake: Professor lan Lowe of the Australian Conservation Council said he feared consumers would lose faith in the idea of green energy "if the waters are muddied by the sale of products that aren’t completely green". Emily Firth from the National Greenpower Accreditation Program agreed and said she was aware of complaints.
Unanswered questions persist: However, questions remain, according to The Courier-Mail. Exactly where did Ergon get the power from? Is Parliament House powered by legitimate green energy? Does rival retailer Energex provide legitimate green power? And how does Queensland remain a member of the accreditation committee while flouting its guidelines?
The Courier Mail, 29/7/2006, p. 1
Source: Erisk Net