Category: Archive

Archived material from historical editions of The Generator

  • Parkinson linked to Pesticides

    The idea that pesticides may be to blame has now received a boost from the first large-scale, prospective study to examine this possible link. Alberto Ascherio of the Harvard School of Public Health in Boston, Massachusetts, US, and colleagues looked at data from roughly 143,000 people involved in a cancer and diet study, of whom 413 were diagnosed with Parkinson’s disease in the 1990s.

    Toxin exposure

    In 1982 these volunteers each completed an initial questionnaire, providing information about their occupation and levels of exposure to various toxins.

    Ascherio and colleagues found that those who reported exposure to pesticides had a 70% greater risk of developing Parkinson’s disease than those who said they had no such exposure. But exposure to other toxic compounds – such as asbestos and formaldehyde – did not increase their chances of acquiring the illness.

    Ascherio stresses that the absolute risk of developing Parkinson’s is low. So while about 2% of the population as a whole may be at risk of developing the disease, exposure to pesticides might increase this risk to little more than 3%.

    Of the 413 patients with Parkinson’s disease, 43 reported exposure to pesticides. But surprisingly the study found that farmers – many of whom presumably had high levels of exposure – and non-farmers shared a similarly increased risk. This contradicts a previous, smaller study reporting that risk rises with exposure levels (see Exposure to pesticides can cause Parkinson’s).

    Garden pesticides

    Ascherio suggests that non-farmers may have encountered pesticides while gardening. “Maybe the pesticides used in agriculture are not the most harmful,” he speculates. He regrets that the initial questionnaire did not include more details about the type, duration and intensity of pesticide exposure.

    Experts stress that many people unknowingly consume pesticides on a daily basis. “If you analyse the fruit and vegetables we eat, they’re full of chemicals,” says Serge Przedborski of Columbia University in New York, US. He adds that traces found in such foods can accumulate over a lifetime to potentially harmful levels.

    Przedborski describes the new study as “excellent” because researchers collected data about pesticide exposure years before participants developed Parkinson’s disease, ruling out potential bias. But he notes that it does not prove that pesticides are the main cause of Parkinson’s disease.

    Moreover, Przedborski explains that because the initial questionnaire did not ask about specific pesticides, we are no closer to knowing which particular chemicals are the culprits. “In reality, we have no idea,” he says.

    Journal reference: Annals of Neurology (DOI:10.1002/ana.20904)

  • India tops wind energy table

    Since changing course in 1994 Tanti has become Asia’s foremost wind man and one among India’s growing crop of new billionaires. Suzlon Energy makes wind turbines, industry jargon for modern windmills, to generate electricity. The 70 per cent stake that Tanti and his three brothers own in their Bombay Stock Exchange-listed company is worth $4.3 billion. The stock has risen 60 per cent since Suzlon’s first daily close last October, giving Tanti an entrée into the billionaire ranks.


    Now situated in Pune, a city known for its engineering skills, Suzlon is a prime example of India’s emerging story in manufacturing, less told than the technology- services tale. A fellow Pune billionaire, Baba Kalyani, has built Bharat Forge, which makes auto chassis, into a world beater. Tanti wants a similar status for Suzlon.

    The company already ranks as the world’s eighth-largest producer of wind energy in terms of installed capacity to date. Tanti is aiming high and wants to close the gap with Suzlon’s biggest European competitors, Denmark’s Vestas Wind Systems, Germany’s Enercon and Spain’s Gamesa. Suzlon’s surging revenues are only one-fifth those of Vestas, but the Indian outfit has been consistently profitable for six years. Vestas made losses in the last two years.

    At home, where it still makes 90 per cent of its sales, Suzlon has 35 per cent of the market. The country is among the top five wind power users, which collectively account for 70 per cent of global capacity. With its mission to provide "Power for all by 2012" India’s federal government has introduced legislation making it compulsory for electricity distributors to get a specified quantum from renewable energy sources.

    Slideshow:
    India’s Richest
    Newcomers to the India Rich List
    The World’s Billionaires

    There is a separate ministry for nonconventional energy, which has estimated the country’s capacity to generate wind power at 45,000 megawatts, more than ten times current installed capacity.

    Wind power has its critics, one beef being the noise that neighbors of turbines have to endure. But densely populated India in fact has large tracts of open land, mostly in remote rural areas. About 15 to 20 acres are needed for a 1-megawatt installation.

    Suzlon has built Asia’s largest wind farm, with an installed capacity of 500 megawatts, near Kanyakumari, on India’s southernmost tip, where trade winds of 15mph are common. The ministry of nonconventional energy has created a "wind atlas" for picking the best sites.

    India itself could easily keep Suzlon busy in the years to come. But Tanti is keen to expand abroad. "This is a global business, and we want to also grow in the global market," he insists. Worldwide the wind energy industry is worth $11 billion, growing 27 per cent a year for the past five years. BTM Consult ApS, a renewable energy consultancy in Denmark, predicts that global installed capacity for wind power will more than double to 124,000 megawatts by 2009. Tanti is positioning Suzlon to get a fair chunk of that growth by being a low-cost producer and is collecting engineering talent so Suzlon can continually improve technology.

    "Tulsi is a tiger with a burning desire to play on the global stage. He wants Suzlon to be among the top three wind energy companies in the world," says Ashish Dhawan, senior managing director, ChrysCapital, a private equity firm in Mumbai that made a timely $11 million investment in Suzlon in 2004. (ChrysCapital bought shares at 27 rupees, selling part of its then 7 per cent stake just before the IPO for a slight discount to the 510-rupees-a-share IPO price. Dhawan remains on Suzlon’s all-Indian board.)

    Can a relative newcomer seriously challenge the Europeans, who have dominated the modern incarnation of the industry for 40 years? Until the IPO Suzlon was virtually unknown and had to hard sell its credentials. "Now we can tell our potential customers that we’re a $6 billion [market cap] company!" beams Tanti. In a marketing drive led by Tanti’s younger brother Girish, an electronics engineer, Suzlon has established a marketing outpost in Denmark to canvas for customers outside India. The company has made headway in the US and China and, more recently, in Australia.

    Suzlon started selling in the U.S. in 2003 when it landed a contract with DanMar & Associates, a Minnesota development firm, to supply 24 turbines in southwestern Minnesota. Suzlon clinched the deal not only because it could supply at prices 10 per cent cheaper than its European rivals.

    "Their design and technology was better suited for our wind resources in the US Midwest and 10 per cent more efficient than that of competing providers," says DanMar’s founder Dan Juhl, who has followed up with repeat orders. Turns out that Suzlon’s robust turbines could best withstand extreme weather conditions.

    Customers like John Deere Credit got sold on Suzlon’s willingness to execute even the smallest of projects. To serve its customers, Deere figured out that renewable energy was another "crop" that farmers could be harvesting. "We felt that Suzlon, which was learning to become a global supplier, was the best option for our small community-based projects," says David Drescher, vice president of the wind energy group at John Deere Credit.

    With orders worth $600 million in hand from US, Chinese and Australian customers, Suzlon has invested in a service support facility and a workshop in Pipestone, Minnesota to manufacture rotor blades. At 140 feet these are longer than the wing of a 747 plane, so they are too expensive to transport across continents. Building them closer to the customer location obviates the logistical issues of transporting them from India."We’re an Indian company that’s creating 300 jobs in the US," boasts Tanti.

    Expansion isn’t expected to require a dilutive follow-on equity offering anytime soon. Banks are now chasing such projects, so getting bank loans is no problem for Suzlon. Besides, it generates cash profits that are put back in the business.

    The same kind of venturesome spirit that drives Tanti now was what set the Suzlon train in motion. Spurning their father’s construction business in Gujarat, Tanti and his three siblings moved into textiles in the late 1980s. They started processing polyester yarn, then graduated to making furnishing fabrics.

    Slideshows:
    Notable Newcomers – The World’s Billionaires
    India’s Hottest Jobs
    The World’s Hottest Jobs

    The decision to shift again, into wind energy, was a brave one. The industry was in the dumps, as it had been given a bad name by unscrupulous companies that lured customers with the bait of tax breaks. But projects were ill conceived, often left incomplete with no maintenance or service support to speak of. Banks wised up and stopped lending for wind power projects.

    The brothers saw the opportunity for a producer not only to build the wind turbine but to provide maintenance and service support–even operation–as well.

    The experience seems to have kept the brothers tight. "We have a common store, but our kitchens are separate," is how Tulsi Tanti puts it, though even today they host each other daily at their respective flats.

    Selling some family property, the Tantis put together $600,000 as seed capital to start Suzlon. They shopped around for technology in Europe, but no one was willing to give it without having an equity stake in the venture.

    Finally, Sudwind, a small German company agreed, provided Suzlon bought ten turbines. Tanti convinced IPCL, a petrochemicals company that had been supplying raw materials for his yarn business, to sign up as Suzlon’s first customer. Suzlon completed IPCL’s 3.5-megawatt project using Sudwind’s turbines within the three-month deadline. Tanti claims that ten years on, this first wind farm continues to run at 97 per cent efficiency.

    WIND POWER MARKET SHARE LEADERS

    Suzlon is growing fastest among the world’s biggest turbine makers.
    COMPANY/COUNTRY TOTAL INSTALLED MW % GROWTH 2004-2005 MW
    Vestas/Denmark 20,766 15%
    Enercon/Germany 8,550 18%
    Gamesa/Spain 7,912 23%
    GE Wind/US
    7,370 14%
    Siemens¹/Denmark 4,502 13%
    Nordex/Germany 2,704 7%
    Repower/Germany 1,522
    22%
    Suzlon/India 1,485 28%
    Mistubishi/Japan 1,252
    21%
    ¹Wind Unit. Source: BTM Consult ApS.


    But the brothers, all four engineers, wanted to prove their technical prowess by crafting their own turbine. Their research efforts got a boost when Sudwind went bust in 1997. They hired Sudwind’s engineers and created an R&D center in Germany. The subsequent acquisition of a manufacturer of rotor blades in the Netherlands gave them access to technology for a key component.

    Electricity-Generating Capacity by Type (2003)

    Fossil fuels remained dominant sources of power in the latest available year.

    MW (THOU)
    Combustible Fuels
    Coal and Coal Products 488
    Natural Gas 376
    Other Combustibles 710
    Hydro 421
    Nuclear 313
    Wind 35
    Geothermal 6
    Solar 1
    Other 1
    Source: International Energy Agency
    Note: Numbers are for OECD countries only. Emerging countries such as India, China not inlcuded.

    By 1999 Suzlon had introduced its partly homegrown turbine into the market. Today the company has three research sites, in Germany, the Netherlands and India, which are linked together. One important mission: to find ways of increasing output so cost per kilowatt of energy-generated decreases.

    At the same time, Tulsi Tanti is shrewdly consolidating his hold on component supplies, a critical success factor in this business. In March Suzlon acquired Hansen Transmissions Intl., a Belgian maker of wind turbine gearboxes, for $565 million, thereby securing supplies of another key component. (Suzlon now makes two-thirds of its turbines in India; the remaining third are imported.)

    Traditionally, wind power has depended on tax breaks to make it an attractive alternative to conventional energy. But Tanti insists that with the price of conventional power climbing, production costs today are almost the same. Suzlon’s technology innovations and ability to substitute for expensive imports with cheaper domestic components has reduced costs in the last ten years. "We don’t need government handouts to survive," he declares.

    However, Indian investors in wind power can claim an accelerated depreciation of 80 per cent starting from the first year. "Wind energy projects tend to be viewed as tax-saving devices, but they make business sense as firms can reduce their power costs," says Karthik Ranganathan, an investment manager at Baring Private Equity Partners.


    As often, the breaks create suspicion. Suzlon, along with other firms, is being investigated by the Indian income tax authorities for creating fictitious projects as a tax dodge.

    Tanti insists Suzlon is as clean as the power it generates. He’s also confident the run-up in oil prices is putting the wind at his back. "This is only the beginning," he promises.

    By the Numbers

    • 200,000 megawatts: Estimated production (installed capacity) of electricity in India by 2012, up by 60%. 0.69% The share of wind power in total global electricity generation.

      $10 trillion: Investments required to meet global electricity demand in 2030.

    Sources: Company reports; IEA.

  • Hydrogen fuel not pie in the sky

    Hydrogen as a fuel is not pie in the sky, it is a known technology, reported New Scientist (24 June 2006, p.26). BMW and other German car makers have already made prototypes that run on hydrogen They are involved in constructing a net of filling stations and expect to see the start of the hydrogen economy within 10 years.

    CO2 not an essential by-product: The common and cheapest method of production is a process called steam reformation. This also produces CO2, but if electricity produced by renewables were used to split water, hydrogen could be produced without any CO2.

    Versatile: You can use hydrogen on-site to produce heat and power or you can send the gas down a pipeline (there is already one in the UK). You can cool it and store it as a liquid in caverns similar to those used for liquid petroleum gas, or you can adsorb it onto solid metal hydrides – this is still an expensive option, but improving, the article says.

    New Scientist, 24/6/2006, p. 26

    Source: Erisk Net

  • Greenland’s Glaciers in rapid meltdown


    JAKOBSHAVN GLACIER, Greenland — Gripping a bottle of Jack Daniel’s between his knees, Jay Zwally savored the warmth inside the tiny plane as it flew low across Greenland’s biggest and fastest-moving outlet glacier.

    Mile upon mile of the steep fjord was choked with icy rubble from the glacier’s disintegrated leading edge. More than six miles of the Jakobshavn had simply crumbled into open water.

    "My God!" Zwally shouted over the hornet whine of the engines.

    From satellite sensors and seasons in the field, Zwally, 67, knew the ice sheet below in a way that few could match. Even after a lifetime of study, the raffish NASA glaciologist with a silver dolphin in one pierced ear was dismayed by how quickly the breakup had occurred.

    Wedged between boxes of scientific instruments, tent bags, duffels and survival gear, Zwally had no room to turn inside the cramped passenger compartment of the twin-engine Otter. He passed the whiskey bottle over his shoulder to geophysicist Jose Rial from the University of North Carolina, squeezed on a jump seat between a surveyor and a sleeping climatologist.

    Homeward bound — windburned, bone-chilled and greasy after weeks on this immense ice cap tilted like a beret flopped across the top of the world — they all had been in a celebratory mood.

    Somber now, Zwally and Rial shared a drink in silence as the shadow of the plane slipped across azure meltwater lakes, rust-red tundra and silver tongues of ice.


    The Greenland ice sheet — two miles thick and broad enough to blanket an area the size of Mexico — shapes the world’s weather, matched in influence by only Antarctica in the Southern Hemisphere.

    It glows like milky mother-of-pearl. The sheen of ice blends with drifts of cloud as if snowbanks are taking flight.

    In its heartland, snow that fell a quarter of a million years ago is still preserved. Temperatures dip as low as 86 degrees below zero. Ground winds can top 200 mph. Along the ice edge, meltwater rivers thread into fraying brown ropes of glacial outwash, where migrating herds of caribou and musk ox graze.

    The ice is so massive that its weight presses the bedrock of Greenland below sea level, so all-concealing that not until recently did scientists discover that Greenland actually might be three islands.

    Should all of the ice sheet ever thaw, the meltwater could raise sea level 21 feet and swamp the world’s coastal cities, home to a billion people. It would cause higher tides, generate more powerful storm surges and, by altering ocean currents, drastically disrupt the global climate.

    Climate experts have started to worry that the ice cap is disappearing in ways that computer models had not predicted.

    By all accounts, the glaciers of Greenland are melting twice as fast as they were five years ago, even as the ice sheets of Antarctica — the world’s largest reservoir of fresh water — also are shrinking, researchers at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory and the University of Kansas reported in February.

    Zwally and other researchers have focused their attention on a delicate ribbon — the equilibrium line, which marks the fulcrum of frost and thaw in Greenland’s seasonal balance.

    The zone runs around the rim of the ice cap like a drawstring. Summer melting, on average, offsets the annual accumulation of snow.

    Across the ice cap, however, the area of seasonal melting was broader last year than in 27 years of record-keeping, University of Colorado climate scientists reported. In early May, temperatures on the ice cap some days were almost 20 degrees above normal, hovering just below freezing.

    From cores of ancient Greenland ice extracted by the National Science Foundation, researchers have identified at least 20 sudden climate changes in the last 110,000 years, in which average temperatures fluctuated as much as 15 degrees in a single decade.

    The increasingly erratic behavior of the Greenland ice has scientists wondering whether the climate, after thousands of years of relative stability, may again start oscillating.

    The Theory at Work

    Huddled inside a red cook tent atop 3,900 feet of ice, Zwally shoveled snow into a pot simmering on a two-ring propane camp stove.

    He had to melt enough to boil lobster tails for dinner. Zwally, who works at NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Md., had purchased them at Costco and lugged them to Greenland.

    The beating wings of a 30-mph wind slapped against the tent fabric. Every 15 minutes, a gust sucked open the door and frosted the room.

    The tent — buried in drifts and entered by a ladder through a hatch in the roof — was part of Swiss Camp, located 155 miles north of the Arctic Circle.

    For those assessing the effect of global warming, there may be no more perfect place than this warren of red tents on the Northern Hemisphere’s largest ice cap. Here, the theoretical effects seen in computerized climate models take tangible form.

    University of Colorado climatologist Konrad Steffen set up Swiss Camp in 1990 to study the weather along the equilibrium line. As a precaution, Steffen, 54, built the camp on a plywood platform to keep it afloat when the ice turns into summer slush and open lakes before refreezing in the fall.

    Even so, Steffen and Zwally often spent days chiseling out tables and chairs had frozen in floodwater into a single block of ice.

    Zwally joined his colleagues there on May 8 in the regular spring migration of scientists to the Arctic.

    He has been coming to Swiss Camp every year since 1994 and has been studying the polar regions since 1972, monitoring the polar ice through satellite sensors.

    Eventually he realized he had to study the ice firsthand.

    The ice sheet seemed such a stolid reservoir of cold that many experts had been confident of it taking centuries for higher temperatures to work their way thousands of feet down to the base of the ice cap and undermine its stability.

    By and large, computer models supported that view, predicting that as winter temperatures rose, more snow would fall across the dome of the ice cap. Thus, by the seasonal bookkeeping of the ice sheet, Greenland would neatly balance its losses through new snow.

    Indeed, Zwally and his colleagues in March released an analysis of data from two European remote-sensing satellites showing the amount of water locked up in the ice sheet had risen slightly between 1992 and 2002.

    Then the ice sheet began to confound computer-generated predictions.

    By 2005, Greenland was beginning to lose more ice volume than anyone expected — an annual loss of up to 52 cubic miles a year — according to more recent satellite gravity measurements released by JPL.

    The amount of freshwater ice dumped into the Atlantic Ocean has almost tripled in a decade.

    "We are clearly seeing the effects of climate change starting to kick in," Zwally said.

    Since Steffen started monitoring the weather at Swiss Camp in 1991, the average winter temperature has risen almost 10 degrees. Last year, the annual melt zone reached farther inland and up to higher elevations than ever before.

    There was even a period of melting in December.

    "We have never seen that," Steffen said, combing the ice crystals from his beard. "It is significantly warmer now, and it happened quite suddenly. This year, the temperatures were warmer than I have ever experienced."

    At this time of year, the sun never sets, and at Swiss Camp, the pace of field work slackens only for dinner.

    Layered in fleece, the field researchers gathered around a makeshift plywood table littered with heels of whole grain bread, pots of raspberry jam and crumbs of granola. A ridge of ice 6 inches high encased an electrical cable running between their feet.

    Their cheeks were coarse with stubble. Their hair rose in waxy spikes. Their eyes had reddened from insomnia and too much midnight sun.

    While one researcher spooned out the first course — pasta in a sauce of sun-dried tomatoes — another opened the last bottle of the 2003 Cotes du Rhone.

    Zwally tended the pot on the stove.

    The Greenland ice sheet was in the same predicament as his frozen lobsters, steaming in meltwater.

    Getting Into the Ice

    The pilot refused to land. There were too many crevasses.

    Steffen waved him on to fly farther inland. He checked their position by satellite every few hundred yards.

    After 34 years in the Arctic, Steffen was attuned to its subtleties. Where a novice could only see a monochromatic plain stretching to the horizon, Steffen could discern the undulating outlines left by seasonal lakes and riverbeds.

    Clear of the hazard, the Otter touched down and glided on its skis to a halt on an inviting featherbed of snow.

    Steffen and his crew unloaded crates of equipment and began drilling into the ice. Zwally, stripping wires with bare fingers in the biting wind, hooked up a satellite receiver.

    Within the hour, they erected a tall mast festooned with monitoring instruments.

    They continued to hopscotch by air across the ice sheet, planting sensors at every stop.

    As spring comes earlier each year, alpine glaciers recede, hurricanes gather power and other signs of climate change accrue, the research team tries to understand how the Greenland ice sheet can respond so quickly to rising temperatures.

    "How does climate change get into the ice?" Zwally asked.

    Most of the computer models on which climate predictions are based did not take the dynamics of the glaciers into account.

    Contrary to appearances, the monolith of ice is constantly on the move, just as Southern California, driven by plate tectonics, inches every year toward Alaska.

    In that sense, the Swiss Camp is a measure of shifting property values.

    The camp has been rafting on the ice stream toward the sea, on average, at about 1 foot every day. Since Steffen pitched the main tents, the camp has moved about a mile downhill.

    When Zwally started tracking the velocity of the ice with Global Positioning System sensors in 1996, the ice flow maintained a steady pace all year.

    But he soon discovered that the ice around Swiss Camp had abruptly shifted gears in the summer, moving faster when the surface ice started to melt. By 1999, the ice stream had almost tripled its speed to about 3 feet a day.

    In an influential paper published in Science, Zwally surmised that the ice sheets had accelerated in response to warmer temperatures, as summer meltwater lubricated the base of the ice sheet and allowed it to slide faster toward the sea.

    In a way no one had detected, the warm water made its way through thousands of feet of ice to the bedrock — in weeks, not decades or centuries.

    So much water streamed beneath the ice that in high summer the entire ice sheet near Swiss Camp briefly bulged 2 feet higher, like the crest of a subterranean wave.

    "This meltwater acceleration is new," Zwally said. "The significance of this is that it is a mechanism for climate change to get into the ice."

    To better track the seasonal movements, Zwally and Steffen set up two new GPS stations around Swiss Camp, while a team led by University of Vermont geophysicist Tom Neumann erected an additional 10 GPS sensors to map the changing velocity of the local ice.

    At the same time, University of Texas physicist Ginny Catania pulled an ice-penetrating radar in a search pattern around the camp, seeking evidence of any melt holes or drainage crevices that could so quickly channel the hot water of global warming deep into the ice.

    To her surprise, she detected a maze of tunnels, natural pipes and cracks beneath the unblemished surface.

    "I have never seen anything like it, except in an area where people have been drilling bore holes," Catania said.

    No one knows how much of the ice sheet is affected.

    Since 2002, Greenland’s three largest outlet glaciers have started moving faster, satellite data show.

    On the eastern edge of Greenland, the Kangerlussuaq Glacier, like the Jakobshavn, has surged, doubling its pace. To the west, the Helheim Glacier now appears to be moving about half a football field every day.

    In all, 12 major outlet glaciers drain the ice sheet the way rivers drain a watershed, setting the pace of its release to the ocean.

    If they all slide too quickly, there is a possibility that, perhaps decades from now, they could collapse suddenly and release the entire ice sheet into the ocean.

    "They are like the buttresses of the high cathedral," said Rial, the North Carolina geophysicist. "If you remove the buttress, the cathedral will collapse."

    The accelerating ice flow has been accompanied by a dramatic increase in seismic activity, as the three immense streams of ice shake the Earth in their wake.

    The lurching ice has generated swarms of earthquakes up to magnitude 5.0, researchers at Harvard University and the Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory at Columbia University reported in March.

    Last year alone, the Harvard and Columbia researchers detected as many ice quakes as the total recorded from 1993 through 1996, with five times as many in the summer as in the winter months.

    "Instability is the key," Rial said.

    In the Swiss Camp laboratory tent, Rial moved his finger along the jagged seismic trace displayed on his iBook screen.

    The signal had been detected by the 10 sensors he had placed around the camp six days before.

    The ice sheet was trembling.