admin /30 May, 2006
While the industry is happy for the house target to be increased, it says lifting the apartments target would push the price of units too high because it costs more to install energy-saving measures in flats, reported The Sydney Morning Herald (30/5/2006, p.3) .
High-rise development emits more greenhouse gases: Their argument is supported by a Department of Planning and EnergyAustralia study that indicates high-rise buildings emit more greenhouse gases than smaller blocks of flats, townhouses or detached homes.
10.4 tonnes CO2 emissions/year: High-rise apartment blocks emit 10.4 tonnes of carbon dioxide a year, compared with 9 tonnes for detached homes and 5.1 tonnes for townhouses.
Currently $15,000 per unit: The council’s state executive director, Ken Morrison, said it already cost about $15,000 a unit to meet the current target, and lifting it higher would make units unaffordable.
Greens say energy saving should take precedence: The director of the Total Environment Centre, Jeff Angel, said developers should spend less on an apartment’s aesthetic rather than scrimp on energy-saving measures.
Cogeneration an option: Angel encouraged the use of cogeneration plants in new apartment blocks, which work by taking the heat created by a power generator and using it for extra energy supply.
Incentives for building industry: The Property Council wants the Government to introduce incentives for builders to meet higher energy targets, such as guaranteed assessment times for development applications.
The Sydney Morning Herald, 30/5/2006, p. 3
Source: Erisk Net