UN official claims “Legal and moral bankruptcy of the Howard Government’s defence, of ‘ignorance’
According to a Leader Editorial in The Age: Statements by the UN’s
chief customs officer under the Iraq oil-for-food program from 1999 to
2003, Felicity Johnston, are a reminder of the Government’s
responsibilities and have exposed the legal and moral bankruptcy of the
Howard Government’s defence of ignorance. As she told ABC’s Four
Corners, UN resolution 661 states “in black and white” that the
Government had an absolute responsibility under international law to
ensure funds did not go to Iraq”.
Fairy tales: Like Humpty Dumpty to Alice in Through the Looking
Glass, it seems the meaning Howard puts on words is “just what I choose
it to mean”. And Foreign Minister Alexander Downer still says: “I do
not and I never have admitted any failing by me or my department.” As a
matter of fact, they failed in their statutory duty”.
Just a “postbox” between AWB and the UN: “That leaves no room
for excuses such as departmental officials’ claims that they were just
a “postbox” between AWB and the UN. oward said on 10 April: “I don’t
accept the interpretation placed on the Government’s obligations by the
lady in question.”
UN resolution 661 As with commissioner Terence Cole’s
clarification of his terms of reference, it is hard to see how Mr
Howard can sustain a contrary interpretation of resolution 661. The
clear obligation it imposes on member states was enshrined in
Australian law in the Customs (Prohibited Export) Regulations.
Freshly squeezed orange juice on market demand; long-term returns should average about $1000/megalitre