Category: Archive

Archived material from historical editions of The Generator

  • Clarence to become the new Franklin?

    “Suggesting more dams and longer pipelines, is a very disappointing
    response to the nation’s water problems”, Mr Cohen said. “I’m
    devastated that he’s pushing last century’s water mentality. It’s
    not surprising that dam builders have proposed another dam, but we
    expected more creative solutions from the new minister.

    “The Clarence River supports a prime local tourism industry and
    unsurpassed recreational and commercial fishing resources – damming it
    would be an obscenity, and would simply prolong the profligate use of
    water in Queensland.”

    Citing the massive protests in Tasmania that finally put an end to the
    Franklin Dam scheme, Mr Cohen promises the federal government that a
    similar mobilisation of the mainland activist community would follow an
    announcement to build this dam.  Mr Cohen asks the Iemma government
    where is stands on the idea? “Will Morris Iemma acquiesce?”

    “Malcolm Turnbull has been touting water recycling schemes around the
    country. This announcement reveals how hollow his recycling commitment
    is. It now turns out that his real focus has been on developing plans to
    dam the mighty Clarence River and the equally environmentally
    destructive alternative to dam the Tweed River.” Mr Cohen said.

    “This project is more about allowing unfettered development in
    Queensland, than about managing the nation’s water resources. It’s a
    dinosaur engineering plan.”

    Further Information: Nic Clyde: 0417 742 754
    Ian Cohen: 0409 989 466

  • Conservation Council opposes Clarence plan

    Environmental groups are warning against the Federal Government’s proposal to pipe water from northern New South Wales to Queensland, saying it is a costly and destructive option.

    Prime Minister John Howard and Water Minister Malcolm Turnbull are pushing the plan to dam the Clarence River in northern NSW and divert the water to drought-stricken south-east Queensland.

    But the proposal has received a lukewarm response from both states.

    Cate Faehrmann is the executive director of the Nature Conservation Council of NSW, the peak umbrella organisation for NSW environmental groups.

    She says the pipeline idea has been around before, but has been dismissed as unworkable.

    "Dams are, of course, very environmentally damaging," she said.

    "This one, if it’s all about piping water up to Queensland, we need to think about the energy used in that.

    "We need to think about the Clarence estuary that potentially will be severely impacted by this."

    © 2007 Australian Broadcasting Corporation
    Copyright information: http://abc.net.au/common/copyrigh.htm
    Privacy information: http://abc.net.au/privacy.htm


  • Tropical forests will address climate change

    Forests affect climate in three different ways: they take up CO2 from the atmosphere and cool the planet; they evaporate water to the atmosphere and increase cloudiness, which also cools the planet; and they are dark and absorb a lot of sunlight, warming the Earth.

    The carbon offsetting programs that promote planting trees are taking only the first effect into account.

    When the changes to the surface properties are also taken into account, it is clear only tropical rainforests are strongly beneficial to slow down global warming. In the tropics, in addition to absorbing carbon dioxide, trees promote clouds which help to cool the planet.

    In other locations, specifically in the seasonally snow-covered high latitude area, the warming from the darkening of the surface either cancels or exceeds the net cooling from the other two effects.

    These new results have initiated a lively scientific discussion on the effectiveness of terrestrial carbon sequestration.

    Clearly, more studies will be needed to confirm these results and narrow the uncertainties that are inherent in any single modelling study. Climate policy on terrestrial sequestration should follow later.

    Based on the results from this new study, one may think that deforestation outside of the tropics could be an effective strategy to combat climate change.

    In dealing with our environment, a broader view should be taken and narrower criteria should be avoided to prevent environmentally harmful consequences. Apart from their role in climate, forests provide natural habitat to plants and animals, preserve the biodiversity, produce economically valuable timber and firewood, and protect watersheds.

    Dr Govindasamy Bala is an atmospheric scientist at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory in Livermore, California.

  • Gunns Woodship Deal Exposed

    Forestry Tasmania stonewalling attempts: Allston’s intervention followed several point-blank refusals by Forestry Tasmania to supply details of its deal with Gunns after an initial application by Greens native forests spokesman Tim Morris in July last year. Both Gunns and Forestry Tasmania "strongly objected" to the wood contract Memorandum of Understanding, signed in April 2004 between then-Forestry Tasmania chief Evan Rolley and Gunns chairman, John Gay, being made public. The two companies claimed the contract was commercial-in-confidence" and its publication would harm both companies’ competitive advantages.

    Ombudsman decision to open up debate: But the Ombudsman has now decided this is not sufficient grounds for keeping the entire deal top secret. But he agreed to continue to conceal the key price paid per tonne of timber and the timber volumes involved. However, the ruling is expected to reveal how Gunns has convinced Forestry Tasmania to give it cheaper access to the state’s native timber if the world pulp price falls below a certain level.

    Forestry Tasmania loses FoI exemption claim: Forestry Tasmania indicated it would supply the document immediately. Allston specificially pointed out in his finding that since July 2005, Forestry Tasmania had lost any special status exempting it from the state’s FoI laws.

    The Mercury, 13/4/2007, p.13

  • Citipower plans $72m upgrade for Melbourne CBD

    Citipower proposes $72m in new cables, substations, isolators for for Melbourne central business district

    CitiPower has proposed a project to enhance the security of the electricity supply to the Melbourne central business district (CBD). CitiPower’s current CBD network security planning standard, at the zone substation and sub transmission system level, was to deliver a network that is capable of withstanding a single contingency event at the 50th percentile of forecast demand without interruption (i.e. an N-1 security planning standard). These works were estimated to cost approximately $52 million ($2006). See citipower.com.au the final report can also be downloaded from NEMMCO’s website: http://www.nemmco.com.au/transmission_distribution/179-0402.htm
    The proposed major works include:

    • new 66kV 120MVA cable between Brunswick Terminal Station and Victoria market substation.

    • 2 66kV 120MVA cables from Queensbury substation to Victoria Market substation;

    •  Replacement of 9 66kV isolators with 19 GIS CBs and isolators at Victoria Market substation;

    •  Replacement of 7: 66kV isolators with 7 GIS CBS and isolators at Waratah Place switching station; and

    • 2 66kV 120 MVA cables running from Queensbury substation to Waratah Place switching station.

    Erisk Net, 12/4/2007

  • Rise Up to End War

    Massive arms buildup

    In 2007 Australia is undergoing a massive military buildup – ALL of which is designed to complement U.S. forces and work under U.S. command, fighting wars in third countries.  The land warfare component of Talisman Sabre involves a city built around a walled square.  Mecca maybe?

    We’ve also made significant accommodation to U.S. needs with bombing ranges, exercise areas, and rest & recreation for U.S. troops.

    Since 2002 and the adoption of "the Bush Doctrine", U.S. military policy has been to attack any country in which a security "threat" "might" be forming.  Iraq was the first war to arise out of the Bush Doctrine.  There are others waiting in the wings (Iran, Syria, North Korea).  U.S. military spending is way out of control.

    The new US/Aus satellite base on Navy land outside Geraldton, West Australia, will facilitate capacities such as the "Warfighter Information Network Tactical (WIN-T)" which will enable units in the field to access a real-time picture of battle fields and "enemy" units from satellite transmissions. This high-tech warfare is, like Pine Gap, a one way ticket to automatic complicity in any act of aggressive war launched by the USA anywhere in the world – whether we like it or not.  (I don’t like it)!

    It’s clear the corrupt lying Howard government is not going to end, or even limit Australian collusion in U.S. warmongering.  It’s clear the corrupt lying Labor opposition will reduce participation in Iraq in a symbolic way, but will not limit the operation of the U.S. "alliance" and will continue to meet the U.S. demand for bases, and for routine participation in future wars.

    What to do?

    In our Pine Gap trial, the Commonwealth is working hard to prevent us from discovering documents, or mentioning anything related to the function of the Pine Gap Terrorist Base.  They challenge and oppose our every attempt to discover documents and question key witnesses about the policies or operations of Pine Gap as a "defence" base.

    The prosecution’s aim is to argue that what the terror base does is irrelevant, and all that matters is our physical presence on a specific piece of land at a particular time established by the Commonwealth Police present.  Nothing else has relevance.

    On 21 March, at a pre-trial hearing on our application for discovery of Defence Department documents, there were six lawyers, including a QC and more junior Counsel) for the prosecution (the Crown) and the government (the Commonwealth).  We are up against it.

    We need to "prove" that our beliefs about what Pine Gap does are "reasonable".  

    Their line is that we defendants don’t really "know" anything about Pine Gap – because it’s secret.  The Commonwealth asserts that we can’t even use Parliamentary reports to show our sources of knowledge (Parliamentary Reports, they say, are privileged).  Thus everything we say is mere "rumour", and can’t be used in evidence.

    Our immediate and major goal on 29 May is to get information before the jury, and before the various publics) that sets out the nature and function of Pine Gap as an instrument of illegal aggressive war.  Our task is to expose truth and let people make their own decisions.

    As Christians we believe in miracles and God’s grace.  We’ll need them.

    The grass-roots resistance

    Nevertheless our action is proving effective so far in engaging public attention and creating resistance to Pine Gap.  The heavy legal penalties which are likely to be imposed against us will, we hope, amplify our action’s effect.

    We know there’s significant attention in nonviolence circles about our action, mainly in Australia, but in places around the world.  This is the most fertile field for alliance development and mutual support in waging resistance.

    We also intend to reach out beyond the nonviolent committed and bring new people to calm, purposeful and effective nonviolence.  Various communities and congregations of faith have been responsive and productive.

    And, of course, we have a program of media stories and coverage which we hope will extend well beyond Alice Springs and generate some national and international attention.  The amorphous "public" is, of course the least likely source of new revolutionaries – but then again everyone has to start somewhere.  Converts to the cause are worth their weight in broadband.

    So in Alice Springs in May/June this year we’re running a parallel political program of information, protest and direct action outside the Court.

    For those who come to Alice Springs, the nonviolence training will focus on foundation work for the formation and operation of small, autonomous affinity groups which undertake interventionary work against the U.S. war-fighting system.

    Intervention contains an element of physical disruption to the war machine.  In December 2005 we forced Pine Gap to "lock down" for four hours.  In later months the government was forced to conduct a security assessment of Pine Gap and improve their security at a cost of millions (so they say – we’ll find out).  We have driven up costs and made operations more difficult.  

    We are few in number and small in resources, and we constitute an efficient and effective means of addressing war and the emerging security/terrorist state.

    To promote further actions of this nature we’ll be working hard at diversity, mutual respect, cooperation, fun, spirit, miracles, and a relaxed but determined revolutionary zeal to manifest Peace on Earth in the ways that are available.

    Around the world

    As we do this work, we take comfort and strength from the many thousands of people around the world who, just like us, are building resistance to war.  The Pit Stop Plowshares and the Derry 9 in Ireland, Lt Ehren Watada in Seattle, and Father John Dear in Albuquerque  – and so it goes.

    Come along and join in the fun.