NEWSPAPERS in 45 countries have united to implore world leaders to take decisive action at the Copenhagen climate change talks, warning failure would bring calamity, the London-based Guardian said.
Fifty-six newspapers, including Le Monde in France, the Miami Herald in the US and the Gulf Times in Qatar, will publish the same editorial warning climate change will “ravage our planet” unless action is agreed, it said.
“We call on the representatives of the 192 countries gathered in Copenhagen not to hesitate, not to fall into dispute, not to blame each other but to seize opportunity from the greatest failure of modern politics,” it said.
Many of the newspapers will take the unusual step of publishing the editorial on the front page of today’s editions, the Guardian said, featuring the piece on its website.
The editorial, to be published in 20 languages including Chinese, Russian and Arabic, has been thrashed out by newspaper editors for more than a month ahead of the UN crunch talks starting today, the paper said.
The facts behind climate change are clear, despite a recent row over leaked emails from a key climate research unit in Britain, the editorial said.
The leaks sparked claims scientists were trying to suppress data which did not support the view that temperatures were rising.
“In scientific journals the question is no longer whether humans are to blame, but how little time we have left to limit the damage.
“Yet so far the world’s response has been feeble and half-hearted.”
Leaders must agree to take action to limit temperature rises to 2C, warning that commitments so far would see temperatures hit an unacceptable level of 3.5C, it said.
admin /6 December, 2009
The truth about climate: Copenhagen isn’t enough
- Editorial
- The Observer, Sunday 6 December 2009
- Article history
Politicians are rarely accused of focusing too much on the long term. Tomorrow’s headlines are always in view. In that context there is already something to celebrate from this week’s global summit in Copenhagen.
Not long ago a gathering to discuss carbon emissions would be attended by junior environment ministers with limited clout inside their own governments. No longer. This week climate change commands the attention of world leaders.
That is where the good news starts to run out. With so much diplomatic pressure on the negotiations, a commitment to fairly substantial cuts in carbon emissions is inevitable. But a deal is unlikely to match the recommendations of the UN inter-governmental panel on climate change (IPCC), and it will not be a binding treaty. Arguably even the framework for negotiations is flawed, since it embraces the old Kyoto treaty model of pricing carbon with tradable permits. That system is too complex and builds in perverse incentives and opportunities for financial fraud. A simpler and more effective tool would be a carbon levy that increases the cost of pollution for all.