Category: General news

Managing director of Ebono Institute and major sponsor of The Generator, Geoff Ebbs, is running against Kevin Rudd in the seat of Griffith at the next Federal election. By the expression on their faces in this candid shot it looks like a pretty dull campaign. Read on

  • Breaking: Madigan is voting NO

    Click here to enable desktop notifications for Gmail.   Learn more  Hide
    More

    1 of 3
    AdRetiring overseas is easywww.escapologist.com.au – Three English speaking countries where you can live well for less

    Breaking: Madigan is voting NO

    Inbox
    x

    Ged Kearney <info@actu.org.au>

    6:15 PM (1 hour ago)

    to me
    Neville —

    Two pieces of great news:

    1. Independent Senator John Madigan has just announced that he will vote against Tony Abbott’s new workplace laws that take away your rights at work!
    2. Parliament has finished for the week and Tony Abbott and the Liberals haven’t been able to bring their horrible new workplace laws on for debate in the Senate yet.

    This is all due to your hard work. By making your voices heard, and calling out these anti-worker laws, making a difference.

    Senator Madigan has been committed to workers rights for a long time and today is another strong demonstration of that commitment. In his statement Senator Madigan said Abbott’s laws were an attack on workers and would “leave those with the least with even less”. He also is urging his fellow Senators to support our campaign and vote against the Bill.

    The government thought that passing these new laws would be simple. They thought they could push them through whilst no one was looking. You changed that.

    If Tony Abbott thought he had the numbers to pass the Bill he would have put it to the vote by now. He hasn’t, and it’s thanks to your hard work. You are helping the Senators understand the serious impacts of this bill.

    It’s not over yet. Here is where we think things are up to:

    • Our best information is that two Senators–Bob Day and David Leyonhjelm–will almost definitely support this Bill and vote yes. David Leyonhjelm is a classical Libertarian and much of this Bill fits with to his deeply held beliefs about removing government regulation. Bob Day has been a senior figure in the extremist HR Nicholls society–one of the groups that conceived the idea of WorkChoices–and believes that workers should be stripped of most of their workplace rights and protections.
    • The remaining Senators Muir, Xenophon, Lazarus, Wang and Lambie haven’t committed but seem to still have open minds on this Bill.

    The Senate is back in session next week and there is a chance that the Bill will be debated then – otherwise the next time it can be looked at will be three weeks later. I know it often seems like the sands are shifting – that the laws keeping coming up for a vote and then get delayed. It’s frustrating. We don’t get a say in when Tony Abbott and his crew bring these votes on. The delay gives us more time to convince Senators to stand with us and with working people.
    Across the country people have worked hard to make sure all of the Senators hear the call to stand with workers and not be a part of Tony Abbott’s attack on living standards. Victorian union members delivered Senators Madigan and Muir thousands of handwritten letters. In South Australia union members have protested outside Senator Day’s office. 
    The calls that you’ve made and the emails–well over 20,000 of them–that you have sent are having a big impact. As I said before – if Tony Abbott thought he had the numbers he would have passed the Bill. Instead all the Government could muster this week was a whining speech by Eric Abetz complaining about your campaign.
    That’s because of you, and thousands of people like you around the country.
    Thank for everything that you have been doing —

    Ged

  • Global warming has irreversibly damaged coral reefs, Arctic ice: Report

    Global warming has irreversibly damaged coral reefs, Arctic ice: Report

    UN International Panel on Climate Change group has agreed to state irreversible effects on natural systems have accelerated.

     A UN report coming out Monday contains a consensus statement that the melting of Arctic sea ice is one of the irreversible consequences of global warming.

    National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration / The Associated Press

    A UN report coming out Monday contains a consensus statement that the melting of Arctic sea ice is one of the irreversible consequences of global warming.

    The international climate change panel currently meeting in Yokohama, Japan, has agreed to state in its upcoming report that global warming has inflicted irreversible damage coral reefs and Arctic sea ice.

    The agreement came at a plenary session of Working Group II of the UN International Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). The IPCC is meeting in Yokohama to assess the impact of ongoing warming of the planet.

    According to the IPCC, there will be serious effects on the natural environment when global average temperatures rise 1.6 C higher than average levels before the Industrial Revolution, and conditions will worsen further with a rise of 2.6 C.

    Related:

    Its agreed-upon report, which will be released Monday, will affect ongoing international negotiations over global warming countermeasures, the main aim of which is to keep temperature rises within 2 C.

    At the beginning of the agreement, the working group acknowledges that “observed impacts of climate change are widespread and substantial” and “in recent decades changes in climate have caused impacts on natural and human systems on all continents and across the oceans.”

    These acknowledgments are more serious than those in its 2007 report, which said: “Observational evidence from all countries and most oceans shows that many natural systems are being affected by regional climate changes, particularly temperature increases.”

    Later in the agreement, the working group touches on the effect that temperature increases have had on the environment. The current world average temperature has risen by 0.6 C since the start of the Industrial Revolution. It warns that an increase of 1.6 C from that time will have a wider impact on fragile natural systems that are not capable of adjusting to global warming.

    As examples of such fragile natural environments, the group lists Arctic sea ice and coral reefs.

    In the Arctic Ocean, sea ice has been melting for several years. Large swathes of coral reefs, including one south of Japan, have been turning white as a result of sea temperature increases.

    The IPCC specifically stresses that irreversible effects on natural systems have accelerated.

    Meanwhile, the working group forecasts that with a 1.6 C rise will increase the risk of death from heat stroke and heat exhaustion, mainly in metropolitan areas.

    With a 2.6 C increase, drought and unreliable rainfall will cause a decline in crop production and shortages of drinking and irrigation water, according to the group’s forecasts.

    The target to keep average temperatures within 2 C of the pre-Industrial Revolution level was set at a summit held five years ago. However, some have said it is hard to achieve this target and that the goal should be eased.

    The IPCC’s report will provide the basis for international negotiations on greenhouse gas mitigation to be held in 2020 and after.

  • Can energy utilities keep their customers, or will they flee the grid? Giles Parkinson

    1 of 1
    AdSolar Panel Installationwww.bradfordsolar.com.au – Solar Panel Installation Company Backed By CSR. Get Your Free Quote.

    Daily update: Can energy utilities keep their customers, or will they flee the grid?

    Inbox
    x

    RenewEconomy editor@reneweconomy.com.au via mail140.us4.mcsv.net Unsubscribe

    2:34 PM (10 minutes ago)

    to me
    Research says one-third of electricity customers will change suppliers or quit the grid – what will the utilities do? Plus: A heartfelt solar plea to Abbott; BHP’s climate concession; 1000s set to attend Friday rallies for RET; why the future energy giants will not be the usual suspects; federal MP’s rant against environmentalists taps into terror; UN climate summit special briefing; how gas is ruining it for renewables; the truth about the Arctic ice melt; and more big solar moves from SolarCity.
    Is this email not displaying correctly?
    View it in your browser.
    RenewEconomy Daily News
    The Parkinson Report
    Energy utilities have decided to take solar and storage seriously after all, as new research says one third of customers will take their energy supply elsewhere, or even leave the grid, as solar, batteries and electric vehicles provide new options.
    A 2MW solar plant Conergy Australia is building in New Caledonia will be heart-shaped: a message to the Abbott government to ‘start loving solar.’
    BHP Billiton says it is factoring climate into all its investments, unlike the Australian government. The statement comes as Ian Dunlop says he will run again for the board.
    Thousands of renewables workers and supporters set to picket government offices across Australia to demand support for the 41,000GWh by 2020 RET.
    Australia could be a big winner in global race towards an energy-efficient, renewable energy future. But it would mean cannibalising existing energy industries, a challenge ducked by Kodak.
    Federal MP George Christensen equates environmental activism with terrorism, says ‘gutless green germs’ are attacking Australian livelihoods.
    A summary of the major announcements on climate pledges, climate finance and forestry, and whether they are new.
    New study suggests  push toward natural gas is not only a distraction from “decarbonizing” the U.S., it could also make climate change worse.
    According to polar scientist Dr Dirk Notz, the question isn’t why is Arctic sea ice melting so fast, it’s how come we have any left at all?
    SolarCity strikes a deal with New York for solar manufacturing plant. The projected economic boost is good news today. Will it continue into the future?
  • This year’s Arctic sea ice minimum is sixth lowest on record

    Blog

    This year’s Arctic sea ice minimum is sixth lowest on record

    • 22 Sep 2014, 17:39
    • Robert McSweeney

    The eight lowest measurements of Arctic summer sea-ice extent occurred in the last eight years, scientists confirmed today.

    The findings were presented by Professor Julienne Stroeve from the National Snow & Ice Data Centre (NSIDC) at a Royal Society conference on Arctic sea ice reduction.

    On the 17th September satellites recorded the Arctic summer minimum extent at 5.01 million square kilometers (sq km). Stroeve confirmed that this year’s summer sea-ice extent is the sixth lowest on record, in a series of satellite measurments stretching back over thirty years.

    Sea-ice minimum

    Mid to late September marks the end of the Arctic summer, and the point when Arctic ice is at it’s smallest extent, before it freezes up again as temperatures fall in the autumn.

    Measurements of sea ice taken over the past decades suggest the rate of sea-ice loss is accelerating.

    Between 1979 and 1996 Arctic sea ice declined at around 36,000 sq km a year, on average. Since 1997, the rate of loss has accelerated to dramatically, to 130,000 sq km per year.

    The two trends are statistically different from each other, which means there is less than five per cent chance the change has happened by chance. “We can argue that in the last several years there is an accelerated rate of decline,” Stroeve says.

    She also says there’s a clear link to rising temperatures. While sea ice conditions vary a lot from one year to the next, the summers with the warmest summer temperatures have seen the lowest sea ice extents:

    “If you look at the last two minimum [Arctic sea-ice] low years – 2007 and 2012 – especially 2007 it was very warm… 2007 is the warmest summer we’ve had.”

    Arctic sea ice - conditions in context.

    Thick ice

    Scientists have also found that the amount of older, thicker ice is diminishing. Stroeve’s research finds a reduction in the amount of ice at least five years old.

    Usually around 90 per cent of old ice persists through the summer melt season and into the winter. In recent years this has dropped to around 70 percent, she says.

    This is important because old ice will be replaced by new, thinner ice as the sea refreezes in winter. Thin ice is more susceptible to being broken up by storms and will melt more easily the following year, say scientists. Only around 30 per cent of first-year ice survives the average summer.

    During the 1980s or 1990s, in an average year, around 54 to 58 per cent of ice in the Arctic would be first-year ice. Last year it was 77 per cent.

    Melt season

    Another important factor in monitoring changes in the Arctic is the length of the melt season. Ice melt is starting earlier and lasting longer, says Stroeve.

    In particular, scientists have found a delay in when the sea-ice starts to freeze again after the summer. For example, in some areas of the Beaufort Sea north of Canada and Alaska, the sea isn’t freezing again until almost two months later than usual.

    Stroeve points to warmer sea surface temperatures as the likely cause. While this might not come as a surprise, this could suggest a link between the sea surface temperature at an earlier point in the year and the length of the meltwater season.

    This could allow scientists to predict when the melt season is going to end and when the ice would start to freeze again.

    A later session at the conference examined the current state of Antarctic sea ice, that we’ll be covering tomorrow.

  • Daily update: Australia’s economic and political strategy – deny climate change

    1 of 1
    AdGovernment finance helpenvironment.nsw.gov.au/busprogram – New energy finance, energy training on conservation of electricity

    Daily update: Australia’s economic and political strategy – deny climate change

    Inbox
    x

    RenewEconomy editor@reneweconomy.com.au via mail6.wdc01.mcdlv.net 

    2:57 PM (14 minutes ago)

    to me
    Australia’s economic and political strategy is to pretend climate change isn’t happening. Plus: Did the NY Climate Summit deliver?; Four stunning graphs to show how renewables compete with fossil fuels; ARENA boosts coffers with Geodynamics funding cut; What 100% renewables looks like globally; Obama’s climate speech; transitive energy; are EVs cheaper than petrol cars yet?; and How Malmö Sweden is leading on sustainability.
    Is this email not displaying correctly?
    View it in your browser.
    RenewEconomy Daily News
    The Parkinson Report
    Australia’s energy blueprint, and its international politicking, is based on the hope that fossil fuels continue to rule. Given the momentum of international investors, it’s a hopelessly misguided strategy.
    …Depends who you ask. A summary of the practical outcomes of the UN Climate Summit in New York shows there was some level of success.
    Graphs from Lazard underline how wind and solar is competing with fossil fuels, offering low cost abatement, and pushing out gas peakers.
    ASX-listed geothermal outfit Geodynamics agrees to $30m reduction to ARENA grant, as Agency recoups funds from scrapped projects.
    Whichever you cut a zero emissions energy scenario for Australia, solar accounts for more than half of energy demand.
    World Future Council produces handbook which covers all energy, not just electricity & with a focus on cities and communities in various parts of the world.
    Obama says U.S. is committed to climate action and that it wants to cooperate with other countries in finalizing a meaningful global climate treaty.
    Debating how to treat solar vs. non-solar customers is mostly focused on what are the costs and benefits associated with serving the former.
    Are EVs finally cheaper to buy than the traditional petrol car? Analysis shows they are, particularly with solar.
    From A Decaying Industrial Area to an Eco-Friendly City: Malmö, Sweden is Leading the Way
  • Disasters could cost world $421B by 2030: Report

    GO

    Disasters could cost world $421B by 2030: Report

    21 Hours Ago

    5

    COMMENTSJoin the Discussion

    The increasing frequency and severity of extreme weather events could cost the world 328 billion euros ($421 billion) per year by 2030, the Red Cross and the European Commission warned on Monday.

    “Disasters take lives and ruin prospects, often making the situation of already impoverished people even worse,” said European Union Commissioner for International Cooperation, Humanitarian Aid and Crisis Response Kristalina Georgieva in a news release from the Red Cross on Monday.

    Peter Macdiarmid | Getty Images

    The warning came as the Red Cross—a global humanitarian aid charity—and the European Commission—the executive body of the European Union—launched a joint communications campaign on the importance of preparing for disasters.

    In the last 20 years, the impact of extreme weather has affected 4.4 billion people worldwide, killing 1.3 million people and causing 1.5 trillion euros in economic losses, according to the Red Cross. It calculates that every 0.77 euros spent on disaster risk reduction saves 11.47 euros in return.

    This year, several European countries have suffered severe flooding. In May, floods hit entire regions of Bosnia and Herzegovina and Serbia, resulting in several dozens of casualties in both countries. Damages and economic losses amount to around 2 billion euros in Bosnia and 1.5 billion euros in Serbia.

    Read MoreSerbia comes in from the cold with EU ambitions

    Earlier in the year, heavy storms flooded around 6,000 homes in the U.K. The country experienced the wettest January on record and widespread flooding continued into February.

    The Red Cross/European Commission warning came one day ahead of the United Nations’ Climate Summit in New York.

    Although the Red Cross drew no direct link between extreme weather events and climate change in its news release, it forecast that around 375 million people would be hit by climate-related disasters each year by 2015.

    10 economies hit hard by climate change

    Mohamed Nureldin Abdallah, Reuters

    Last week, a report by the Global Commission on the Economy and Climate concluded that action against climate change need not sacrifice economic growth—despite widely held views to the contrary.

    “The low-carbon growth path can lead to as much prosperity as the high-carbon one, especially when account is taken of its multiple other benefits: from greater energy security to cleaner air and improved health,” concluded the 70-page Better Growth Better Climate report, which was published last Tuesday.

    Read MoreIs climate change key to the spread of Ebola?

    World energy demand will grow by a third by 2030, according to Felipe Calderon, the former president of Mexico who chairs the global; climate commission. During that time, some $90 trillion is seen being invested in infrastructure affecting the world’s cities, land use and energy systems.

    For climate change activists like Calderon, this represents an opportunity to move away from reliance on high-carbon pollutants.

    At present, carbon usage varies widely across developed world cities. According to Calderon, carbon emissions per person from public and private transportation in Atlanta, Georgia, are 10 times higher than in Barcelona, Spain. The U.S. city is marked by urban sprawl and spotty public transport, while Spain’s second-biggest city is more compact and has invested heavily in mass transit.

    These states are at the biggest risk of disaster

    Source: CoreLogic2014

    “We are not suggesting decoupling economic growth from energy demands; but decoupling from carbon emissions,” said Calderon.

    “Although many jobs will be created, and there will be larger markets and profits for many businesses, some jobs will also be lost, particularly in high-carbon sectors,” said the authors of the report.