Arms Trade Treaty: Wrapping up in 2013?
Inbox
x
|
1:08 AM (8 hours ago)
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
||
|
||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Managing director of Ebono Institute and major sponsor of The Generator, Geoff Ebbs, is running against Kevin Rudd in the seat of Griffith at the next Federal election. By the expression on their faces in this candid shot it looks like a pretty dull campaign. Read on
|
Inbox
|
x |
|
1:08 AM (8 hours ago)
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
||
|
||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Australian Greens leader Christine Milne says sexism is behind accusations about Prime Minister Julia Gillard’s past work as a lawyer.
Senator Milne said there was a “group of older, white men in Australia” who did not like the idea that at last women were coming into their own.
“They’ve never accepted the legitimacy of a woman as a prime minister and they are kicking back in every which way they can,” she told reporters in Canberra on Tuesday.
She was commenting on the controversy surrounding the legal advice given by Ms Gillard to AWU officials, while she was a lawyer in the 1990s.
Ms Gillard on Monday held an extended press conference to tackle the allegations, stating the coalition was running a “sleaze and smear” campaign.
Senator Milne said parliament was “obsessing” over the issue because sections of the media “can’t accept the legitimacy of a woman as a prime minister and a minority government”.
“Well, get over it,” she said.
“We’ve got a minority government, we’ve got a woman as a prime minister.”
Shadow attorney-general George Brandis dismissed Senator Milne’s comments.
“I suppose Christine Milne would say that, wouldn’t she,” he told reporters.
The opposition was asking the most senior politician in the land to account for her conduct, Senator Brandis said.
“We are accusing her of doing the wrong thing,” he said.
“If we have come to the stage in this country where you can’t accuse a senior politician of doing the wrong thing merely because they are a woman without being accused of sexism, we have come to a pretty bad situation.”
THE owner of Coles supermarkets, Wesfarmers, is considering $1 bet limits on the poker machines it owns as the company explores options to distance itself from the pubs and gambling business.
GetUp! confirmed it had dropped Wesfarmers from the anti-poker machine campaign that it launched earlier this year against Australia’s supermarket giants after speaking with management and being encouraged by its commitment to tackle problem gambling issues.
”We were extremely pleased at the good faith they have shown over the past six months, but we’re looking for more concrete answers at this stage,” said GetUp! organiser Erin McCallum, who sent a letter last week requesting an update on the company’s progress.
It is understood that Wesfarmers has engaged corporate consultants, the Boston Consulting Group, to look at the economic impact of introducing reforms, like $1 betting limits, on its poker machines, which are believed to number around 1300.
Wesfarmers spokesman Alan Carpenter said the company would not comment on what might be happening with its pubs business.
GetUp! has indicated that if it is not happy with Wesfarmers’ progress it may still target Coles as part of its anti-pokies campaign this Christmas.
It is understood Wesfarmers is exploring alternatives to owning and operating its 92 pubs, and associated poker machines, as it does not see it as a natural fit with its other businesses. Betting limits are one of the options under consideration and not necessarily the most likely one to be adopted.
Implementation would be expensive and would only drive gamblers to nearby pubs and clubs if it was the only operator to implement them.
This argument was raised by Woolworths in opposition to GetUp!’s resolution to introduce $1 limits on its poker machines, along with other curbs.
Neither supermarket operator can afford to sell off its pubs if it compromises their liquor business, which have become a lucrative enterprise for both companies.
Wesfarmers and Woolworths are required to own pubs and hotels in Queensland as these are a prerequisite to operating bottle shops in the state, like Woolworths’ Dan Murphy’s brand. Most of Wesfarmers’ pubs are in Queensland.
Woolworths has said that, in practice, pub ownership was also required to underpin its liquor business in other states. Most of the hotels owned by Woolworths’ pub joint venture, ALH, are outside of Queensland.
The GetUp! campaign led to an extraordinary meeting of Woolworths shareholders last week to consider a resolution to introduce curbs on its poker machines.
The resolution was soundly defeated, with 95 per cent of investors voting against it. In his final meeting as Woolworths chairman, James Strong said the resolution was a ”radical proposal” that was being ”put forward for one company and not for everybody else in any other form of gambling within Australia. I think we’ve made that point and it remains valid no matter what the arguments are around accountability”
Posted
The Federal Government has released the details of its long-awaited proposed legislation to begin setting up the National Disability Insurance Scheme.
Labor has announced $1 billion to establish the scheme, but long-term funding still remains unclear.
The draft bill sets out the framework and eligibility criteria for the scheme, which gives people with a disability care based on need, and greater control over their support.
Disability Minister Jenny Macklin says the bill will be introduced to Parliament this week and will probably be referred to a committee for further consultation.
She says discussions are continuing over future funding, but she expects the legislation to go through Parliament early next year.
“There’ll also be a whole range of additional rules that we will be putting in place following the legislation,” she said.
“We’ll discuss those with people with a disability and of course their carers, with the states and territories and they too will enable further flexibility with the legislation.”
The federal government has reassured people with disabilities that a planned national insurance scheme will be flexible to adapt to their needs.
Disability Reform Minister Jenny Macklin on Monday released draft legislation for the National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS) while visiting a centre for deaf and hearing-impaired children in Canberra.
She will introduce the bill to parliament this week.
Several state governments have expressed concerns the scheme will be too prescriptive and bureaucratic, resulting in a Centrelink-type approach that would rob people of choice and control over their care.
Ms Macklin said there had been an “enormous” amount of consultation so far and that would continue in the coming months through a parliamentary committee.
“We’ve had not only consultations with the states and territories but extensive consultations with so many people who have a disability (at) many, many public forums,” she told reporters.
“Consultation on these detailed rules will occur with people with disability, their families, carers, service providers and advocates in the coming months.”
The scheme will give people with disabilities the flexibility to choose the type of care and support they receive.
The NDIS is expected to cost about $15 billion a year when fully implemented in 2018/19.
The government has set aside $1 billion to fund five launch sites around the nation from mid-2013, but future funding commitments fall outside the four-year budget estimates period.
The draft legislation sets up the framework for the scheme, including eligibility criteria, age requirements and what constitutes reasonable and necessary support.
The legislation will establish a launch transition agency as an independent body.

Fewer trains ran on time in the first year of the O’Farrell government than for the three previous years under Labor. Source: AAP
FEWER trains ran on time in the first year of the O’Farrell government than for the three previous years under Labor.
While in Opposition, Transport Minister Gladys Berejiklian was obsessed with the concept of “on-time running” and even backed changing the the criteria for deciding whether a train was on time from within five minutes to within a minute.
But last week Ms Berejiklian changed her tune, saying she wanted the government to focus on more than on-time running and appears to have abandoned changing the criteria.
Trains recorded the worst peak hour figures for four years. Six of the 16 lines operated below the 92 per cent acceptable level for train arrivals, with the worst the crowded Western Line, East Hills (Campbelltown) line and the Southern Highlands line.
Overall, the result for 2011-12 was 93.4 per cent, compared to 94.6 per cent the year before and 95.9 per cent in 2009-10. It was the worst result since 2007-08, when trains ran at 92.7 per cent.
In the first four months of this year the figure is 94.5 per cent. On the Western Line, the 2011-12 figure was 90.6 per cent, down from 92.4 per cent in 2010-11 and 93.8 per cent in 2009-10.
On the Northern Line via Strathfield, it was 91.6 per cent in 2011-12 (down from 93.9 and 95.3) and the Inner West was 94.3 per cent, compared to 95.3 and 96.4. On the East Hills line, it was 90.8 in 2011-12, 92.4 per cent in 2010-11 and 94.6 per cent in 2009-10.
But by far the worst was the Southern Highlands line which had on-time running of just 82.6 per cent compared to 90.8 per cent last year.
Ms Berejiklian is facing another battle, with the minister to take to cabinet for a third time a plan to have light rail run down George St.
She has been rejected twice by Premier Barry O’Farrell and Treasurer Mike Baird for failing to show how she would pay for the $2 billion project.
One senior minister said Ms Berejiklian should go away and work out a solution with Nick Greiner’s Infrastructure NSW, which wants light rail to run from Central to Randwick instead of through George St, rather than press ahead in such a “gung-ho” fashion.
The minister has told cabinet she can fund the project through the transport budget.
Ms Berejiklian defended the government’s on-time running. “In addition to on-time trains, customers want faster travel, a better experience and more timely information.”