Managing director of Ebono Institute and major sponsor of The Generator, Geoff Ebbs, is running against Kevin Rudd in the seat of Griffith at the next Federal election. By the expression on their faces in this candid shot it looks like a pretty dull campaign. Read on
Labor’s wipeout in Queensland is a lesson in electoral volatility, Victorian Labor leader Daniel Andrews says.
The annihilation of Queensland Labor in Saturday’s election to the Liberal National Party (LNP) comes a year after a similar devastating election result for Labor in NSW and losses of government in Victoria and Western Australia.
Mr Andrews says the Queensland election had been fought on state issues.
“The lesson for Victoria is there is a volatility in the Australian electorate that we perhaps have not seen before,” he told AAP on Sunday.
“People are more than willing to change governments and issue the harshest of verdicts if they believe politicians are not listening.”
He denied the loss indicted “doomsday” for the Labor brand saying exiting Labor premier Anna Bligh faced a tough election and powerful move for change.
“We don’t underestimate the challenge we face winning back the trust of ordinary Victorians,” he said.
Mr Andrews said Labor’s win in the Niddrie by-election showed voters resonated with the party’s focus on jobs and basic services.
Residents in the northwestern Melbourne seat were sent to the polls on Saturday after former deputy premier Rob Hulls quit politics due to illness.
Despite the coalition government electing not to run a candidate in the safe Labor seat, Mr Andrews said he was pleased at Labor’s three per cent increase in the primary vote.
“People who have not voted Labor, voted Labor yesterday,” he said.
“I can’t make the Liberal party find the courage to run. They chose a pretty cowardly act, not to run.”
Ports Minister Denis Napthine defended the decision not to run a candidate.
“We needed to concentrate on the main task of governing the state, fixing the problems of 11 years of (Labor) mismanagement,” he said.
It would be a disappointing if Labor had not captured less than 50 per cent of the vote in a “one-horse race,” he said.
Dr Napthine said the LNP win was a great result for Queensland.
“I wish them well as they face the challenging task of governing Queensland.”
Are climate changes in one part of the world felt half a world away? To understand the present, scientists look for ways to unlock information about past climate hidden in the fossil record. Scientists have now found a new key in the form of ikaite, a rare mineral that forms in cold waters.
Lucky dip … an emperor penguin rookery on the Weddell Sea. Photo: Getty Images
Surrounded by penguins and pack ice, Robert Upe hears tales of polar endurance in the Weddell Sea.
Almost a century ago, the polar explorer Ernest Shackleton made a voyage into Antarctica’s Weddell Sea, where his wooden sailing ship, Endurance, was trapped and crushed by ice.
I’m in the same sea now, surrounded by pack ice all the way to the horizon.
Advertisement: Story continues below
A leopard seal. Photo: Robert Upe
Shackleton and his men didn’t step on land for 497 days. Some of their ordeal was immortalised in the famous black-and-white photographs of Frank Hurley showing the gradual disintegration of the frozen ship and the makeshift camp where they lived miserably on the ice.
As the oak and fir planks of Endurance cracked, she broke into pieces and went to the bottom. The men boarded their lifeboats for a perilous 500-kilometre journey to barren Elephant Island. From there, Shackleton and a handful of others risked another 1300-kilometre lifeboat voyage to South Georgia Island to summon help. Heroic Shackleton eventually saved them all.
Another Antarctic adventurer, Sir Raymond Priestley, sums up Shackleton when he compares him with two other polar legends: Roald Amundsen (the first man to reach the South Pole) and Robert Scott (beaten to the pole by one month by Amundsen): “Give me Scott for scientific method, Amundsen for speed and efficiency but when disaster strikes and all hope is gone, get down on your knees and pray for Shackleton.”
Two bathers take the plunge at Whalers Bay. Photo: Robert Upe
Our former research ship, Plancius, meanwhile, is slicing into the white barrier with ease. The sea is calm and the big swells during our two-day crossing of the Drake Passage from our starting point of Ushuaia, at the southern tip of Argentina, have abated.
Many report favourably on this small town that is often dubbed the end of the world. However, I’m left cold. The hotel wants me out at 10am and the departure of the ship is many hours away. The shops are closed all day, it’s rainy and one of the few cafes that is open can’t serve coffee because the espresso machine is broken.
Many nautical miles south, I’m soothed in the lounge of the Plancius with a gin and tonic with 1000-year-old ice fished out of the water and chipped into glass-size chunks. It’s midnight yet light. As I sip, I wonder if this ice was floating here when Endurance came through.
The steel hull of the former Royal Dutch Navy ship pushes forward with the force of diesel engines. It leaves traces of blue paint on the ice, which slowly opens ahead of us in long cracks that provide pathways Shackleton could only dream of. Our Russian captain, Evgeny Levakov, ensures there is always an exit during this small-group World Expeditions voyage.
Adelie penguins resting on the floes look at us like we’re space invaders and run and dive with Charlie Chaplin mannerisms into the sea. But belligerent and chubby Weddell seals, which have perhaps feasted on too many cod and krill, are dozy and not so eager to leave. These fatsos sleepily lift their heads and stare at us and sometimes the shadow of the ship is upon them before they decide to give way to our 3175 tonnes.
It’s among this pack ice that we see killer whales, also known as orcas, hunting for the plump seals. At one point, there are three pods close to the ship – so many it’s hard to know in which direction to point the camera.
At least the killer whales here are the target of our Japanese lenses, not harpoons, which are mainly aimed at Antarctica’s population of minke and fin whales.
Some inquisitive killer whales swim alongside the ship as you would expect dolphins to do, tilting their bodies sideways so they can look up to the crowded deck where the cameras are clicking. But mostly, we see them spy-hopping in the middle distance among the pack ice. This is a hunting behaviour that involves the whale surfacing and lifting its massive head out of the water to see if there are seals on the ice floes.
Heaven help any snoozing seals. The whales co-operate in a deadly pod like a wolf pack and will swim at the ice floe with all their might to create a wave to wash the seal into the sea. If that fails, they will also attempt to knock the floe to tilt the seal into the water, or simply rise up and grab it if it is close to the edge.
Antarctica’s curious and fearless leopard seal is another efficient polar hunter, second to killer whales in the food chain here. During a shore excursion, some of the passengers watch a leopard seal catch a penguin in the shallows. It’s a gruesome sight, with the seal violently shaking the victim and slapping it against the water until it’s a bloody mess with its skin coming off.
Following this real-life Attenborough-like scene, stories about leopard seals abound on the ship. They have rarely attacked humans but a scientist snorkelling in Antarctica was killed by one in 2003 when she was grabbed and dragged underwater. Conversely, there is a YouTube video that shows a leopard seal trying to give a diver a penguin that it has caught.
Life aboard the ship, with only 100 passengers, is cordial at first but experiences of puking seas in the Drake Passage, penguin and bird sightings, icebergs rolling over, dolphins on the bow and an on-deck barbecue bond the group further.
We gather in the lounge for drinks or hot cuppas and afternoon cakes and to listen to expert expedition staff talk about their passions.
Polar explorer and climber Bernice Notenboom speaks of her adventures, including her successful 2008 quest to become the first Dutch woman to ski to the South Pole. She reads an extract from her diary:
“Outside minus 31F and wind chill factor — who knows? Boots are frozen, lost sensation in toes, fingertips frigid, goggles iced up. Break down camp with cold fingers, then a pee, butt exposed again.”
With the wind howling across the sea, I think how pleased I am to have an en suite in my small-but-cosy two-person cabin.
Henryk Wolski, a Polish sailor and historian, lectures us about the explorers. In 2000 he was part of a four-man team that followed the tracks of Shackleton, using a replica of Shackleton’s lifeboat, James Caird. They sailed from the Antarctic continent via Elephant Island to South Georgia. Following the landing, Wolski and co. trekked across South Georgia, like Shackleton did in his desperate bid to find help.
There’s also James Cresswell, a geologist and specialist in climate change, and Mick Brown, a naturalist and bird expert, among others.
Outside, during our Zodiac landings, there is penguin entertainment. We step ashore at least once a day, deposited next to rookeries of thousands of nesting penguins as well as seals and sea birds such as skuas, storm petrels, albatross and terns.
The bird enthusiasts among the passengers are delighted at the lists they’re ticking off. The excitement of landing at Paulet Island, with a million pairs of Adelie penguins, is unbridled.
We see the eggs of the nesting penguins and opportunistic skuas hanging around to try to grab them. We see penguins bringing pebbles to their mates to fortify their nests. We see chicks that have just hatched.
During the voyage there are also sightings of macaroni, chinstrap, gentoo and king penguins among others but most adulation is reserved for the rare emperor penguin.
During one Zodiac excursion among icebergs and pack ice, a lone emperor penguin is found on a floe. It turns into a paparazzi session and this bemused creature becomes the star of the voyage, probably more photographed than a Hollywood celebrity taking a walk down the red carpet.
As word of the sighting spreads on the radio, Zodiacs close in from all directions for a glimpse of the loner. As our expedition leader, Delphine Aures, points out, “Very few people ever get to see one of these supreme birds in the wild.”
Each Zodiac carries 10 passengers and when ferried ashore we dress in warm layers and waterproofs and regulation boots, which are hosed down, scrubbed and disinfected each time to avoid contamination of the environment. We keep an honourable distance from the wildlife, so even with the paparazzi frenzy the emperor penguin is not fazed.
One of the landings is at Argentina’s Esperanza Base. As I stumble ashore over chunks of ice and slippery rocks I meet some of the Argentinians who have voluntarily been posted here for the past year. There are soldiers, scientists, mothers and children who have endured months of darkness and the harshest weather. An Argentinian first lieutenant says at the height of winter they were lashed by winds of 240km/h and snap frozen by subzero temperatures with a wind chill so fierce it could freeze your nose off.
The thaw has begun (though we still need thermals, gloves and woollen hats) and the pack ice that has encased this outpost at Hope Bay is breaking up. We are the second ship in several months to get through the ice, the first visiting just days earlier. More tourist ships will arrive soon to relieve some of the tedium of living in a collection of red huts strewn across a jumble of ankle-twisting rocks, snow and ice. The huts are tethered by wires so they don’t blow away and the colonists are tethered by geography. They have a continent of open space at their feet but, somehow, claustrophobia lurks.
The welcoming Argentinians are in thrall of the fresh bananas we have; we are in thrall of this community of 60 people living alongside an off-limits rookery of 100,000 Adelie penguins.
As remote as it is, surprisingly there is mobile-phone reception and my line home to Australia is as clear as the ice that bobs in the water.
There is a small school here, a community mess hall where residents gather for meals, a chapel, a museum with Antarctic relics and a postal service from where I send a postcard home*, stamped November 27. As well, the Argentinians process our passports with an unofficial Antarctic stamp.
There is a stone shelter near the sea, marking the place where three Swedish explorers were stranded during the winter of 1903. Gunnar Andersson, Lieutenant S. A. Duse and Toralf Grunden were put ashore for a short-term exploration but their ship failed to return because, like Shackleton, it was crushed by ice and sank. The bedraggled trio trekked 200 kilometres the next summer to find rescue and were so black from soot that, at first, the rescuers thought they were indigenous habitants of Antarctica who had never been seen before.
There are still supplications inscribed by the men on the rocks in the shelter where they prayed and where they ate 700 penguins during their long and lonely winter.
Near their stone sanctuary is a small hand-painted Argentinian flag with the triband of light blue, white and light blue. It doesn’t flutter because it is cold steel but the patriotism of the base is unmistakable. This existence of the base, according to some seasoned expeditioners on our ship, is more to do with territorial claims than scientific research.
There is a “laboratorio biologia and geologia” in what looks like a shipping container but it appears so insignificant that the charge of territorial jostling seems to hold at least some credibility. As well, the first person to be born in Antarctica was Emilio Marcos Palma in 1978, whose Argentinian mother was sent to the base when she was seven months’ pregnant.
(Several countries have made territorial claims to Antarctica but no single country controls any part of the continent while it continues to be governed by the Antarctic Treaty.)
Esperanza Base is the only place we see others in Antarctica. We also anchor at desolate Deception Island, a horseshoe-shaped volcanic caldera that last erupted in 1969 and which has decaying signs of habitation.
Cruising into the caldera, fringed by glaciers and mountains, requires concentration by the captain. The entrance is just 230 metres wide and there is a large submerged rock that can rip open the hull. We land at Whalers Bay, where there are ruins to explore from an abandoned whaling station later used for scientific research.
There are rusty iron boilers, wooden buildings falling apart, graves and machinery and boat wrecks that have almost been covered by the volcanic debris. Sea water freezes at minus 2 degrees and we figure the water here is about minus 1. There is ice on the shore but two passengers take the plunge into the frigid sea to say they have swum in Antarctica, even if it is the most fleeting of dips.
There is no swimming when we land at Elephant Island, where Shackleton and his men stepped ashore after their 479 days on ice. The shore is full of sleeping elephant seals and the sea is heaving. Getting out of the Zodiacs needs precise timing. One passenger falls in but we have thermals and waterproofs and a heated ship anchored close by. It would have been far worse for Shackleton.
*Still waiting for it.
Robert Upe travelled courtesy of LAN Airlines and World Expeditions.
Plagued by indecision … Premier Barry O’Farrell / Pic: Brad Hunter Source: The Daily Telegraph
IF something needs to be done in Barry O’Farrell’s NSW, be prepared to wait for an inquiry.
Our 43rd premier is set to celebrate a year in office on Monday, but so many of his policy decisions have been subject to inquiries or reviews (at least 30 major inquiries and counting) that it’s got some in government wondering whether the Premier can make a decision without one.
And the big remaining decision on whether the government builds the M4 East or M5 duplication requires, no surprise, an inquiry, too. That comes down in August or September – when the Infrastructure NSW team presents the Premier with a five-year plan and 20-year strategy.
The Premier’s insistence on waiting on that, as he has waited on inquiries over so many big decisions, has got people joking that if Infrastructure NSW were to come up with the unlikely scenario that the F6 was the next road to be built, the Premier would just go with it.
Even more confusingly, the infrastructure plan will merge with the government’s Transport Masterplan due out in November.
Speaking in an interview to mark his first year in office, O’Farrell basically says he’ll do whatever Infrastructure NSW tells him to. It’s a fascinating insight. The man with the largest parliamentary majority in Australian history has taken all the power he has earned in a thumping election mandate and given it to others to make the decisions.
Asked if he was likely to adopt the Infrastructure NSW recommendations, the Premier says: “Not having seen the recommendations, absolutely.”
I put to him that perhaps he might want to overrule Infrastructure NSW. They, after all, are expected to recommend proceeding with the cheaper M5 duplication before the M4 East and he says: “Their report is made public and any variation from us has to be made public and presumably attract whatever political odium there is.
“Infrastructure NSW was specifically … about ensuring politicians didn’t put … scarce and critical infrastructure dollars into policies which suited them, and not the public.”
So is he saying he can’t be trusted as a politician to deliver the right outcome? “What I’ve said before the election was every government comes to power with a focus on the public interest, but the longer they stay in office, the more the politics takes over.”
And that would include you? “Absolutely.”
O’Farrell commissioned, as much as agreed to, a series of one-year anniversary interviews this week. His suspended communications director Peter Grimshaw contacted The Daily Telegraph, a day before his own scandal broke, suggesting the interview.
Things went pretty pear-shaped for Grimshaw after that. Leaked texts and emails from The Star casino work phone of his girlfriend, a former human resources manager at the casino, showed Grimshaw had enough spare time in the Premier’s office to conduct a vendetta against his ex-employer, The Star.
While many in government suggest Grimshaw should be permanently shown the door, his future rests on – you guessed it – an inquiry. Actually, three. One from the Director-General of Premier and Cabinet, one from the Liquor and Gaming Authority and one from ICAC.
Asked if Grimshaw will come back into his office, O’Farrell says: “That goes to how the various reports and reviews come out.”
He defends his handling of the issue by saying whatever Grimshaw’s views were they did not get the casino’s licence removed in a review by Gail Furness SC.
Considering the vendetta Grimshaw had against the casino for demoting him, is O’Farrell concerned the man known as “Grimmo” might “dish the dirt” on O’Farrell if he sacked him? “Good luck, my life is an open book, so the answer is no,” O’Farrell says.
Longevity
It’s the standard question to a premier about how long Barry might want to stay in the job that elicits the most surprise from me. Before this interview, I had thought O’Farrell, who loves political history, would be all about staying in government – maybe even for three terms – to beat Bob Carr and Neville Wran’s records of 10 years in the job. But the Premier gives every indication he could pull the pin after six years.
“Well, we have an election in three years and one week’s time, all things being equal I expect to contest that election and presumably in that term I’ll then consider at some stage what happens in the next election,” he says.
“I’m not in the business of setting records, I’ll leave that to the Bob Carrs of this world. Nor do I want to be foreign minister, I hasten to add.”
When it comes to backing a successor, it’s his favourite, Transport Minister Gladys Berejiklian, who gets the frontrunning when most pundits think the clear and obvious choice is Treasurer Mike Baird.
This seems yet another snub to Baird, born of Barry having worked as chief of staff to Baird’s father Bruce during the Greiner years. Barry started his term by taking half of Mike’s job off him and giving it to Finance Minister Greg Pearce, as well as putting Baird number 11 on the cabinet list.
“I think I’ve got a cabinet full of successors,” he says.
“There’s Gladys, there’s Mike, there’s Pru (Goward), there’s Greg (Smith) … there is no shortage of talent in the team and that’s a good thing.”
He says he didn’t mention Mike first because: “I’m an old-fashioned gentleman – I still open doors for women and still let women go through doors first.
“The good news is, in our party it’s ultimately not the leader who gets to choose who’s the leader – it’s the party room.”
And O’Farrell adds for good measure, the moment a leader goes all their power dissolves.
Poll driven
A former Liberal Party state director, O’Farrell views politics often through poll results. And they have been unquestionably good. But after 16 years of Labor scandal and inaction, and an opposition leader who seems more a caretaker than a serious contender in John Robertson, that hardly seems surprising.
If there’s one time you could argue you don’t have to worry about polls so much, it would appear to be now.
But it is the recent poll results which still show the Coalition ahead 64-36 which O’Farrell points to when he says appointing Nick Greiner as Infrastructure NSW boss was not a mistake.
In some respects, Greiner was a more effective opposition leader than Robertson last year.
The former Liberal premier caused O’Farrell much grief, urging him to abandon his caution and sell the $10-15 billion electricity poles and wires to pay for infrastructure – something O’Farrell failed to do because the Tamberlin inquiry he commissioned sat on the fence.
“I don’t think he created any political damage; that’s evidenced last week by (the) Newspoll,” O’Farrell says.
The business community has hoped until now that O’Farrell will change his mind and promise to sell off the asset at the 2015 election but there is none of that.
“I haven’t even thought about the next election, I’m too busy,” O’Farrell says.
Equally this week when The Daily Telegraph flagged a plan by Roads Minister Duncan Gay to charge tolls on the existing motorways to pay for the M4 East and M5 duplication, the Premier’s office encouraged Gay to step back from his comments.
The minister said in reaction to the story that any such changes would have to be taken to the 2015 election.
The Premier points to achievements with the planning work on the North West Rail Link, South West Rail Link, setting up the Public Service Commission, Infrastructure NSW, donations reform, disability reform, the planning review, and devolution of schools as highlights of his first year.
And his biggest mistake? An attempt to retrospectively cut the solar bonus from 60c per kilowatt hour to 40c, a decision he overturned.
One area where O’Farrell didn’t show his trademark caution was backing James Packer immediately over a plan to take over Grimshaw’s former employer The Star and set up a second casino.
The Premier explains: “On the less than handful of occasions I’ve seen James Packer in the past … he never made any secret of the fact that he’d like to extend his gaming operations into Sydney.
“Any premier who refuses to entertain or meet with people who suggest they are going to invest somewhere between $750 million and $1 billion dollars in the state shouldn’t be in the job.”
He predicts a tough budget in June but fails to promise more than the current public service job cuts target of 5000 over four years.
He says he has made real progress in western Sydney, in terms of upgrading local roads and other initiatives, but concedes there is more to do.
“We were never going to, and we never pretended we could, fix in one year or overnight what it had taken 16 years to bugger up in the state,” he concedes.
And then I try just one more time – which would he personally prefer; the M4 East or M5 duplication?
“I prefer to do what we said we’d do in opposition, which was to ask Infrastructure NSW for a 20-year infrastructure strategy based on what’s best for the state.”
And with that statement the cautious leader, with the political opportunity of a lifetime, cedes the power again to someone else’s hands.
Scientists get to the bottom of what wiped out Australia’s ancient gentle giants
Deborah Smith, SCIENCE EDITOR
March 23, 2012
HUMAN hunters were mainly responsible for wiping out Australia’s megafauna, a study has concluded.
The reasons behind the demise of the giant animals that once roamed the continent – such as rhinoceros-sized diprotodons, towering kangaroos, marsupial lions and birds twice the size of emus – have long been hotly debated, with hunting, the human use of fire, and climate change blamed.
Chris Johnson, of the University of Tasmania, said his team had solved the extinction mystery by studying fungi that thrive in the dung of large herbivores.
Advertisement: Story continues below
The team examined two cores of sediment from Lynch’s Crater, a swamp in north-east Queensland, dating back 130,000 years.
They counted the spores of these fungi and looked for pollen and charcoal in the sediments as indicators of vegetation change and fire.
Professor Johnson said the research showed megafauna numbers were stable until about 40,000 years ago, despite several periods of drying.
“This rules out climate change as a cause of extinction,” he said.
The giant herbivore population crashed soon after humans arrived, with the number of spores in the sediment virtually disappearing. “So it seems that people did it.”
The study, published in the journal Science, showed that after the demise of the megafauna, the vegetation changed and fire activity increased, with rainforest species disappearing and grassy eucalypt-dominated forests expanding.
But Judith Field, of the University of NSW, challenged the conclusions of the study. She said it was merely assumption that the ancient spores reflected the abundance of the giant animals.
“The only evidence we have from Queensland for megafauna indicates that they were gone before humans arrived.”
There was also little archaeological evidence from any site in Australia to show humans co-existed with megafauna, and none to show they hunted them.
“The results of this paper are interesting. The interpretations drawn from it are unsubstantiated and can be explained by other mechanisms,” Dr Field said.
But John Alroy, of Macquarie University, described the data as “superb and decisive”.
The debate had dragged on for almost 50 years because people thought it “incredible” that stone-age hunters could have had such a big impact as to wipe out the megafauna.
Gavin Prideaux, of Flinders University, said the study was an important contribution and supported mounting evidence that climate change was not to blame.
“To test the inferences from this paper we might look at similar lake records from other regions of Australia and seek fossil deposits in the north-east that preserve bones of the giant animals themselves,” Dr Prideaux said.
THE Sydney CBD’s controversial network of bike paths has hit a major road block – Premier Barry O’Farrell.
Declaring war on Lord Mayor Moore, Mr O’Farrell will today announce new laws that will take away Ms Moore’s transport and traffic planning powers.
Under the changes, a joint state government-City of Sydney committee will manage the city’s transport issues.
The move comes after it was revealed yesterday Ms Moore was planning to make on-street parking as expensive as commercial carparks and hoped to turn dozens of parking bays into bike racks.
“There will be no extension of bike lanes, no change to traffic routes unless it goes through this committee on which the government has four nominees,” the Premier said.
THE number of train journeys made every day in Sydney will jump by more than 40 per cent by 2036, increasing at a much faster rate than the population, forecasts show.
“The Sydney CBD is too important to be held hostage to the political constituency of Clover Moore. It’s very clear Clover Moore’s pitch for re-election is built around more bike lanes and making the CBD as unfriendly to cars as possible. That is why we have decided to act in the best interests of wider Sydney.”
The committee will have four representatives from the government, including the transport ministry director-general, as well as three representatives from council.
Asked what he would do if Ms Moore did not fill the council spots, the Premier said the committee would operate with only the government’s nominees.
Mr O’Farrell said the government was taking action on behalf of CBD workers, businesses, residents and visitors to “ensure major transport decisions are properly co-ordinated between the NSW government and City of Sydney Council”.
The Premier said the government was in disagreement with the council on speed limits and car access to the CBD, the provision of layover space for buses, the extension of the network of bikeways and the extension of low-speed shared zones.
“The lord mayor’s vision of the CBD is at odds with Sydney’s position as a global city,” Mr O’Farrell said.
The Central Sydney Traffic and Transport Committee would be responsible for “co-ordinating plans and policies for public transport and traffic within central Sydney and making decisions on major transport issues”.
“Sydney is Australia’s only global city and the CBD deserves a first rate and properly functioning roads and transport system,” Mr O’Farrell said. “Transport issues in the Sydney CBD have a far broader impact on the state’s economic activity. We need to ensure both levels of government working together to deliver the best results for the state’s economy.
“I’ve come to the conclusion that the only way to ensure this is to establish a legal framework that requires coordination between the state and the council, modelled on the successful Central Sydney Planning Committee.”
Mr O’Farrell said the committee would “for the first time, bring all traffic and transport decision-making under the one umbrella”.
Ms Moore warned today that the transport authority could become just another layer of bureaucracy for Sydney.
In a statement she said she was interested to see how the new system would differ from current arrangements.
“The city has limited powers and the NSW government already has to approve all of the city’s transport projects – including all bike routes,” she said.
She added the council already worked closely with NSW transport agencies.
“The city has neither stopped anything the state has sought to improve transport, nor has the city done anything without state approval,” she said.
“So unless this new panel has any authority or funding to take action, it will be in danger of becoming just another level of bureaucracy.”
Both the council and the government shared the same objective in wanting to see 80 per cent of city commuters using public transport and 10 per cent of all trips made by cycling, she said.
5 comments on this story