Category: General news

Managing director of Ebono Institute and major sponsor of The Generator, Geoff Ebbs, is running against Kevin Rudd in the seat of Griffith at the next Federal election. By the expression on their faces in this candid shot it looks like a pretty dull campaign. Read on

  • Let the sleeping giant lie

     

    Let the sleeping giant lie

    A changing climate isn’t just about floods, droughts and heatwaves. It brings erupting volcanoes and catastrophic earthquakes too

    • By Bill McGuire -Guardian News and Media Limited
    • Published: 00:00 March 23, 2012
    • Weekend Review

    • Image Credit: Reuters
    • Mount Etna in Sicily spews volcanic ash during an eruption on March 4

    The idea that a changing climate can persuade the ground to shake, volcanoes to rumble and tsunamis to crash on to unsuspecting coastlines seems, at first, to be bordering on the insane. How can what happens in the thin envelope of gas that shrouds and protects our world possibly influence the Earth-shattering processes that operate deep beneath the surface? The fact that it does reflects a failure of our imagination and a limited understanding of the manner in which the different physical components of our planet — the atmosphere, the oceans and the solid Earth, or geosphere — intertwine and interact.

    If we think about climate change at all, most of us do so in a very simplistic way: So the weather may get a bit warmer; floods and droughts may become more of a problem; and sea levels will slowly creep upwards. Evidence reveals, however, that our planet is an almost unimaginably complicated beast, which reacts to a dramatically changing climate in all manner of different ways; a few — such as the aforementioned — are straightforward and predictable; some surprising and others downright implausible. Into the latter category fall the responses of the geosphere.

    The world we inhabit has an outer rind that is extraordinarily sensitive to change. While the Earth’s crust may seem safe and secure, the geological calamities that happen with alarming regularity confirm that this is not the case. In the United Kingdom, we only have to go back to April 2010, when the word on everyone’s lips was Eyjafjallajökull — the ice-covered Icelandic volcano that brought the UK and European air traffic to a grinding halt. Less than a year ago, our planet’s ability to shock and awe headed the news once again as the east coast of Japan was bludgeoned by a cataclysmic combination of megaquake and tsunami, resulting — at a quarter of a trillion dollars or so — in the biggest natural-catastrophe bill ever.

    In the light of such events, it somehow seems appropriate to imagine the Earth beneath our feet as a slumbering giant that tosses and turns periodically in response to various pokes and prods. Mostly these are supplied by the stresses and strains associated with the eternal dance of a dozen or so rocky tectonic plates across the face of our world; a sedate waltz that proceeds at about the speed that fingernails grow. Changes in the environment, too, however, have a key role to play in waking the giant.

    Between 20,000 and 5,000 years ago, our planet underwent an astonishing climatic transformation. Over the course of this period, it flipped from the frigid wasteland of deepest and darkest ice age to the — broadly speaking — balmy, temperate world on which our civilisation has thrived. During this dynamic episode, as the immense ice sheets melted and colossal volumes of water were decanted back into the oceans, the pressures acting on the solid Earth also underwent massive change. In response, the crust bounced and bent, rocking our planet with a resurgence in volcanic activity, a proliferation of seismic shocks and burgeoning giant landslides.

    The most spectacular geological effects were reserved for high latitudes. Here, the crust across much of northern Europe and North America had been forced down by hundreds of metres and held at bay for tens of thousands of years beneath the weight of sheets of ice 20 times thicker than the height of the London Eye. As the ice dissipated in soaring temperatures, the crust popped back up like a coiled spring released, at the same time tearing open major faults and triggering great earthquakes in places where they are unheard of today. Even now, the crust underpinning those parts of Europe and North America formerly imprisoned beneath the great continental ice sheets continues to rise — albeit at a far more sedate rate.

    As last year’s events in Japan most ably demonstrated, when the ground shakes violently beneath the sea, a tsunami may not be far behind. These unstoppable walls of water are hardly a surprise when they happen within the so-called ring of fire that encompasses the Pacific basin, but in the more tectonically benign North Atlantic their manifestation could reasonably be regarded as a bit of a shock. Nonetheless, there is plenty of good, hard evidence that this was the case during post-glacial times. Trapped within the thick layers of peat that pass for soil on Shetland — the UK’s northernmost outpost — are intrusions of sand that testify to the inland penetration of three tsunamis in the past 10,000 years.

    Volcanic blasts too can be added to the portfolio of post-glacial geological pandemonium; the warming climate being greeted by an unprecedented fiery outburst that shook Iceland as its frozen carapace dwindled, and against which the recent ashy ejaculation from the island’s most unpronounceable volcano pales.

    The huge environmental changes that accompanied the rapid post-glacial warming of our world were not confined to the top and bottom of the planet. All that meltwater had to go somewhere, and as the ice sheets dwindled, the oceans grew. An astounding 52 million cubic kilometres of water was sucked from the oceans to form the ice sheets, causing sea levels to plummet by about 130 metres — the height of the Wembley stadium arch. As the ice sheets melted, so this gigantic volume of water was returned, bending the crust around the margins of the ocean basins under the enormous added weight, and provoking volcanoes in the vicinity to erupt and faults to rupture, bringing geological mayhem to regions remote from the ice’s polar fastnesses.

    Our planet is once again in the throes of an extraordinary climatic transformation — this time brought about by human activities. Clearly, the Earth of the early 21st century bears little resemblance to the frozen world of 20,000 years ago. Today there are no great continental ice sheets to dispose of, while the ocean basins are already pretty much topped up. On the other hand, climate-change projections support the thesis that global average temperatures could rise as rapidly in the course of the next century or so as during post-glacial times, reaching levels at high latitudes capable of driving catastrophic break-up of polar ice sheets as thick as those that once covered much of Europe and North America. Could it be, then, that if we continue to allow greenhouse gas emissions to rise unchecked and fuel serious warming, our planet’s crust will begin to toss and turn once again?

    The signs are that this is already happening. In the detached state of Alaska in the United States, where climate change has propelled temperatures upwards by more than 3C in the past half-century, the glaciers are melting at a staggering rate, some losing up to 1 kilometre in thickness in the past 100 years. The reduction in weight on the crust beneath is allowing faults contained therein to slide more easily, promoting increased earthquake activity in recent decades. The permafrost that helps hold the state’s mountain peaks together is also thawing rapidly, leading to a rise in the number of giant rock and ice avalanches.

    Whether or not Alaska proves to be the “canary in the cage” depends upon the degree to which we are successful in reducing the ballooning greenhouse gas burden arising from our civilisation’s increasingly polluting activities, thereby keeping rising global temperatures to a couple of degrees centigrade at most. So far, there is little cause for optimism, emissions rocketing by almost 6 per cent in 2010, when the world economy continued to bump along the bottom. Furthermore, the failure to make any real progress on emissions control at last December’s Durban climate conference ensures that the outlook is bleak. Our response to accelerating climate change continues to be far below the level that science says is needed if we are to avoid the devastating consequences.

    So what can we look forward to if we continue to pump out greenhouse gases at the present rate? With resulting global average temperatures likely to be several degrees higher by this century’s end, we could almost certainly say an eventual goodbye to the Greenland ice sheet and probably that covering West Antarctica too, committing us to a 10-metre or more rise in sea levels.

    GPS measurements reveal that the crust beneath the Greenland ice sheet is already rebounding in response to melting, providing the potential for future earthquakes, as faults beneath the ice are relieved of their confining load. The possibility exists that these could trigger submarine landslides spawning tsunamis capable of threatening North Atlantic coastlines. Eastern Iceland is bouncing back too as its Vatnajökull ice cap fades away. When and if it vanishes entirely, research predicts a lively response from the volcanoes residing beneath. A dramatic elevation in landslide activity would be inevitable in the Andes, Himalayas, European Alps and elsewhere, as the ice and permafrost that sustains many mountain faces melts and thaws.

    Across the world, as sea levels climb remorselessly, the load-related bending of the crust around the margins of the ocean basins might act to sufficiently “unclamp” coastal faults, such as California’s San Andreas, allowing them to move more easily, at the same time acting to squeeze magma out of susceptible volcanoes that are primed and ready to blow.

    The bottom line is that we are loading the dice in favour of escalating geological havoc at a time when we can most do without it. Unless there is a dramatic turnaround in the way we manage ourselves and the planet, long-term prospects for our civilisation look increasingly grim. At a time when an additional 220,000 people are lining up at the global soup kitchen each and every night; when energy, water and food resources are coming under ever-growing pressure, and when the debilitating effects of anthropogenic climate change are insinuating themselves increasingly into every nook and cranny of our world and our lives, the last thing we need is for the dozing subterranean giant to awaken.

     

    Bill McGuire is professor of geophysical and climate hazards at University College London. Waking the Giant: How a Changing Climate Triggers Earthquakes, Tsunamis and Volcanoes is published by Oxford University Press.

  • Climate Change News NY TIMES

    ADVERTISEMENT

    Alert Name: CLIMATE CHANGE NEWS
    March 23, 2012 Compiled: 1:05 AM

    By STEVEN LEE MYERS (NYT)

    A report released on Thursday indicated that problems with water could destabilize countries in North Africa, the Middle East and South Asia over the next decade.

    By JACKIE CALMES (NYT)

    President Obama said that he supported expedited construction of the southern half of the controversial Keystone pipeline.

    By A. O. SCOTT (NYT)

    “4:44 Last Day on Earth,” Abel Ferrara’s new film, offers an intimately scaled view of the destruction of the world.

    By CLIFFORD KRAUSS and ERIC LIPTON (NYT)

    Declining oil consumption and new energy production have brought the United States closer to a goal that has tantalized presidents since Richard Nixon.

  • O’farrell to pull Monorail down

    Sydney’s controversial monorail will be pulled down, says NSW Premier Barry O’Farrell.

    The state government has announced it has bought the company that owns the light rail and monorail to clear the way for the monorail’s removal.

    “The monorail is not integrated with Sydney’s wider public transport network and has never been truly embraced by the community,” Mr O’Farrell said on Friday.

    “The monorail is reaching the end of its economic life and the NSW government cannot justify costly upgrades like the purchase of new vehicles required to keep it running.”

    The state government has bought Metro Transport Sydney (MTS) for $19.8 million.

    Transport Minister Gladys Berejiklian said tearing down the monorail would remove any constraints on the proposed new convention centre development in Darling Harbour.

    It is expected to be completed by 2015-16.

    She said the monorail, which came into service in 1988, could be pulled down in two to three years but the government would not know for another 12 to 18 months the exact date of its removal.

    Buying out MTS gave the government greater flexibility when it came to planning future public transport, particularly proposed extensions to the light rail network, she said.

    “It means our options have increased in relation to light rail,” she told reporters in Sydney.

    “Our options have increased in relation to how we integrate the convention centre with other modes of public transport.

    “The monorail’s been around for 20 years, and many argue that its use-by date has arrived, and that is certainly the government’s position.”

    Mr O’Farrell said the monorail struggled right from the start, with patronage figures in its first two years half that predicted by the Unsworth Labor government.

    “The real problem with the monorail I think for most Sydneysiders is that it doesn’t actually go anywhere that you want to go,” he said.

    Opposition leader John Robertson accused the government of being more interested in tearing down public transport than in investing in new projects.

    Mr Robertson said the state government had broken its election promise to improve public transport options.

    “I think it’s a good indication that Barry O’Farrell is more interested in destroying public transport around Sydney than he is in actually doing something about it,” he told AAP at Gosford Hospital, on NSW’s central coast, on Friday.

    “What we see is someone who wants to pull something down but he is doing nothing about actually improving congestion, improving travel times for people right across Sydney and NSW.”

    Sydney Lord Mayor Clover Moore said removing the monorail to accommodate an extension to the light rail network was the sort of “big, bold transport project” the people of NSW had been waiting for.

    “I welcome the purchase of Metro Transport Sydney which will help fully integrate the current light rail system into the expanded network now being planned,” Ms Moore said in a statement.

    “Removal of the ugly and intrusive monorail is also the right next step.

    “Replacing it with efficient and effective light rail will improve transport access in central Sydney.”

    Infrastructure Partnerships Australia chief Brendan Lyon said few people would miss the monorail.

    “It is an analogue mode in a digital world and is in the way of a range of important projects like Sydney’s new convention centre,” Mr Lyon said in a statement.

    The Sydney Business Chamber praised the monorail’s removal, saying one of its “key restraints” was its isolation from the rest of the transport network.

    “Replacing the monorail with an integrated light rail network makes sense if we want to improve public transport options through the CBD and inner city,” Sydney Business Chamber executive director Patricia Forsythe said in a statement.

    “The Sydney Business Chamber has been a strong advocate for the proposed new convention

  • Stop the mining murders (AVAAZ)

    Stop the mining murders

    Inbox
    x

    Emma Ruby-Sachs – Avaaz.org avaaz@avaaz.org
    Mar 16 (7 days ago)

    to me
    Dear friends,

    When security forces of a Canadian mining company brutally evicted Mayan families from their villages in Guatemala, eleven women were raped, a community leader was killed, and a young man paralyzed. Now villagers are standing up and suing HudBay Minerals, but they need our help to match the legal firepower of this huge corporation — donate now and help end the mining murders for good:

    When security forces of a Canadian mining company brutally evicted Mayan families from their villages in Guatemala, eleven women were raped, a community leader was killed, and a young man paralyzed. Now villagers are standing up and suing HudBay Minerals for these horrific crimes — but they need our help to match the corporate legal firepower and win their case!

    The victims have filed a lawsuit in Canada, where HudBay’s headquarters are located. But HudBay is asking that the court turn over the lawsuit to Guatemala, where its weak courts are likely to let them go free. Experts say that the ruling could have massive reverberations beyond Canadian borders — a win for the plaintiffs could force HudBay and other multinationals to clean up their acts abroad.

    The court hearing is happening now and the plaintiffs need our help to cover the legal costs — if we raise enough funds to give these villagers the same legal firepower as HudBay’s corporate machine, we can achieve justice for the victims and continue campaigning to protect human rights over profits around the world. Click on the link below to chip in. If just 20,000 of us donate today, we could help end these mining murders for good by setting a key legal precedent:

    https://secure.avaaz.org/en/stop_the_mining_murders/?vl

    Multinational companies are responsible for some of the most terrible crimes all over the world but shockingly, corporate abuses often go unpunished. In mining alone, corporate giants like Rio Tinto and Barrick Gold are accused of a wide range of atrocities that include environmental destruction, brutal gang rapes, and even thousands of deaths — from Tanzania to Papua New Guinea. Winning this case could begin to put corporate wrongdoing in check.

    Companies like HudBay can often act with impunity because they think their home countries won’t police the crimes they commit overseas. Or they set up shell corporations designed to protect their headquarters from liability. If we win this case, it could set a precedent that can help stop rapes, save entire villages, and protect fragile ecosystems — no matter where these companies operate.

    These firms have millions of dollars and will do whatever it takes to win this and similar cases because they know it’s a game changer. Giving just a small amount will help in the fight to bring them to justice. Click here to help:

    https://secure.avaaz.org/en/stop_the_mining_murders/?vl

    Courts are supposed to be places where people go to get justice. But all too often, corporate interests have made them the bastions of the rich and powerful. We have taken on deep rooted corruption before and won. Now let’s stand with and empower these victims and help create a world where no one is above the law.

    With hope and determination,

    Emma, Jamie, Pascal, Ari, Ricken, Maria Paz, Diego and the whole Avaaz team

    Sources

    Widow files $12M suit against mining company (CBC)
    http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/story/2010/12/02/mining-lawsuit002.html

    Guatemalan lawsuits to continue against HudBay, says lawyer (Mining Weekly)
    http://www.miningweekly.com/article/lawsuits-against-hudbay-over-guatemalan-project-to-continue-says-lawyer-2011-08-10

    Lawsuits against Canadian company HudBay Minerals Inc. over human rights abuse in Guatemala (Klippensteins)
    http://www.chocversushudbay.com/

    Award Winning Mining Company Being Sued for Violent Death of Community Leader: Industry Out of Step with Canadian Values and Expectations (Mining Watch Canada)
    http://www.miningwatch.ca/fr/node/6609

    U.S. court revives human rights case against Rio Tinto (Financial Post)
    http://business.financialpost.com/2011/10/25/u-s-court-revives-human-rights-case-against-rio-tinto/

    Claims of sexual abuses in Tanzania blow to Barrick Gold (Globe and Mail)
    http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/world/africa-mideast/claims-of-sexual-abuses-in-tanzania-blow-to-barrick-gold/article2040735/



    Avaaz.org is a 13-million-person global campaign network
    that works to ensure that the views and values of the world’s people shape global decision-making. (“Avaaz” means “voice” or “song” in many languages.) Avaaz members live in every nation of the world; our team is spread across 13 countries on 4 continents and operates in 14 languages. Learn about some of Avaaz’s biggest campaigns here, or follow us on Facebook or Twitter.

    This message was sent to nevilleg729@gmail.com. To change your email address, language, or other information, contact us via this form. To unsubscribe, send an email to unsubscribe@avaaz.org or click here.

    To contact Avaaz, please do not reply to this email. Instead, write to us at www.avaaz.org/en/contact or call us at +1-888-922-8229 (US).

  • Forrest slams Swan over mining tax ‘war’

    Forrest slams Swan over mining tax ‘war’

    Updated March 23, 2012 09:26:57

    Fortescue Metals Group (FMG) chairman Andrew Forrest has hit back at Federal Treasurer Wayne Swan’s description of him as “greedy and irresponsible”.

    It is the first time Mr Forrest has publicly commented on the issue since Mr Swan’s article in The Monthly, which attacked him for his campaigns against the mining and carbon taxes.

    Mr Swan criticised mining magnates Gina Rinehart, Clive Palmer and Mr Forrest, saying they were working against good public policy.

    Speaking at a Western Australian Chamber of Commerce and Industry dinner in Perth, the FMG boss criticised the amount the Government has spent promoting the mining tax, likening it to warfare.

    He maintained his opposition to the tax, saying it would see BHP, Rio Tinto and Xstrata paying very little, and queried Mr Swan’s abilities.

    “That is the theme of course which our venerable Treasurer has continued, where we seem to be at war with each other,” he said.

    “If you happen to disagree with the Treasurer then you’re un-Australian, un-democratic, probably Communist.

    “Oh for a Treasurer who can add up and subtract, as easily as he can deceive the Australian worker.

    “To add up that if you impose a tax, 23 per cent on so-called super profits, but then you subtract a huge deduction against that – like a company’s market value for its coal and iron ore assets – then you could probably see they’re not going to really pay a lot of that tax.

    “But you can rant and rave about how the MRRT is going to spread the boom for all Australians.”

    Mr Forrest did not confirm if FMG was definitely going ahead with a High Court challenge to the tax.

    This morning, Mr Swan responded to Mr Forrest’s attack.

    He says FMG last year admitted to having never paid a single cent of company tax, yet it will now try to prevent millions of small businesses getting a tax cut themselves.

    “I’ll go into bat for the Australian community any day of the week and twice on Sundays to ensure the community gets a fair go from the mining boom, while Mr Forrest goes into bat for his own self-interest,” he told the ABC.

    FMG has been looking at its legal options since the Minerals Resource Rent Tax passed the Senate this week.

    The tax will take effect from the middle of the year, but FMG says it has engaged senior counsel and will commence proceedings once legal opinion has been finalised.

    West Australian Premier Colin Barnett says his government will not initiate its own legal challenge to the tax but will join any challenge that is mounted.

    The Senate has called on the Federal Government to release a summary of its legal advice to deal with concerns that the tax is unconstitutional.

    Labor says it will respond to the request, but is confident in its legal position.

    Topics:mining-industry, industry, business-economics-and-finance, federal-government, government-and-politics, tax, perth-6000, wa, australia

    First posted March 23, 2012 07:20:47

  • Manufacturing decline spooks global investors

    Manufacturing decline spooks global investors

    Updated March 23, 2012 09:34:35

    Loading…

    Map DataMap data ©2012 Google, INEGI, MapLink, Tele AtlasTerms of Use
    Map Data
    Map data ©2012 Google, INEGI, MapLink, Tele Atlas
    Map data ©2012 Google, INEGI, MapLink, Tele Atlas
    Map
    Map
    Satellite

    Map: United States

    Global markets and the Australian dollar have slid sharply as weak manufacturing figures in both China and the eurozone raised fresh concerns about economic growth.

    The Dow Jones Industrial Average retreated 0.6 per cent to 13,046, the S&P 500 lost 0.7 per cent to 1,393 and the Nasdaq Composite Index gave up 0.4 per cent to 3,063.

    Sectors especially exposed to global growth such as energy, materials and industrials were the session’s major decliners.

    The losses came after the closely watched HSBC flash Purchasing Managers Index (PMI) showed Chinese manufacturing activity contracted for the fifth straight month in March.

    It remained below the key level of 50, which indicates expansion.

    A similar survey of the eurozone fell to a surprise three-month low – it had been expected to rise – and European share markets declined as a result.

    The CAC in France suffered the biggest fall, losing 1.6 per cent to 3,472, while London’s FTSE 100 ended 0.8 per cent lower at 5,846 and the DAX in Germany gave up 1.3 per cent to 6,981.

    Comments from the chief of the European Central Bank, Mario Draghi, that the worst of the debt crisis was over and Europe’s inflation, current account balance and budget deficits were in better shape than the United States did little to reassure markets.

    Oil prices fell sharply overnight following the release of the manufacturing figures, which signalled that fuel consumption may decline.

    At 9:30am (AEDT) West Texas Crude was down to $US105 a barrel and Tapis crude oil was at $US129.50 a barrel.

    Spot gold also was down to $US1,644.55 an ounce.

    The Australian dollar continued to struggle against most major currencies and was worth 103.9 US cents, 85.9 Japanese yen, 65.7 British pence, 78.8 euro cents and $NZ1.28.

    Topics:business-economics-and-finance, markets, stockmarket, currency, united-states, european-union

    First posted March 23, 2012 09:33:15