Category: News

Add your news
You can add news from your networks or groups through the website by becoming an author. Simply register as a member of the Generator, and then email Giovanni asking to become an author. He will then work with you to integrate your content into the site as effectively as possible.
Listen to the Generator News online

 
The Generator news service publishes articles on sustainable development, agriculture and energy as well as observations on current affairs. The news service is used on the weekly radio show, The Generator, as well as by a number of monthly and quarterly magazines. A podcast of the Generator news is also available.
As well as Giovanni’s articles it picks up the most pertinent articles from a range of other news services. You can publish the news feed on your website using RSS, free of charge.
 

Greens reaped rewards of emissions backflip: poll

admin /30 August, 2010

Greens reaped rewards of emissions backflip: poll

Updated 2 hours 49 minutes ago

An exit poll commissioned by the Climate Institute shows almost one third of Greens voters in key marginal seats would have voted Labor if the introduction of the emissions trading scheme had not been delayed.

The survey was conducted by Auspoll in 30 key marginal seats across Australia.

Thirty-two per cent of voters said they would have been prepared to vote Labor if it had retained the emissions trading scheme, but when that did not happen, they chose the Greens instead.

Unwritten conventions of government

admin /29 August, 2010

Unwritten conventions of government

By Antony Green

Posted Fri Aug 27, 2010 3:26pm AEST

Parliament House

The Constitution was deliberately written to be vague on the process of government formation. (ABC News: Damien Larkins)

Last weekend Australians thought they were voting on who would form government. If Labor or the Coalition had won a clear majority, this would have been a reasonable summary of what the election was about.

But with neither side having gained a majority in their own right, the murky world of government formation under our system of unwritten constitutional conventions has been exposed to the light.

The Australian Constitution provides a framework for government in Australia. However, that framework is bare of flesh on how to deal with the current impasse.

The Constitution was deliberately written to be vague on the process of government formation. The intent was for the written constitution to be a simple framework within which Australia could inherit the unwritten constitutional conventions that applied in the United Kingdom Parliament at Westminster.

The conventions of the ‘Westminster’ system evolved over several centuries. Where the French and the Americans engaged in revolutions and set down written constitutions, the United Kingdom muddled through with an unwritten constitution built on conventions as the society transformed itself from a feudal to a constitutional monarchy.

At its heart, our constitutional framework see voters elect a representative Parliament from which the ‘Crown’ in the form of the Governor-General appoints advisers. In the real world these advisers are the Prime Minister and Cabinet, but constitutionally these are advisers appointed by the Crown.

Whether governments are elected or appointed by the Crown hardly matters when either side of politics has a majority. But these conventions pre-date party politics, and in situations such as the current election result, these conventions matter.

So let me run through a few questions about what will happen in coming weeks and how the constitutional conventions apply.

John James Newsletter No. 10

JohnJames /29 August, 2010

The Pentagon’s Strategy is Full Spectrum Dominance, from Asia to Africa Mikhail Gorbachev, 2009: “Unless we prevent weaponization of outer space, all talk about a nuclear-weapon-free world will be inconsequential rhetoric.” I recommend a careful and full reading of the following. It will take no more than 5 minutes, but will change your perspective. http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article39516.htm Continue Reading →

Poison gas leak from Sydney nuclear reactor sparks cover up claims

admin /29 August, 2010

Poison gas leak from Sydney nuclear reactor spark cover up claims

Lucas Heights

The Lucas Heights nuclear reactor and government insists the release of the gas were no threat to public safety Source: Supplied

  • Gases spread from Sydney to Melbourne
  • Public not told for fear of spreading alarm
  • Reactor insists gas was not public threat
  • Join us over on Facebook | Twitter

POTENTIALLY dangerous radioactive gases have been secretly pumped into the atmosphere from Lucas Heights and have spread hundreds of kilometres from the nuclear reactor – but the public have never been told.

The release of the highly volatile radioxenon over several months last year was so concentrated that the plumes were detected in Melbourne up to two days later.

Other plumes were dragged out to sea by winds before drifting back over Sydney.

The Sunday Telegraph understands the Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation (ANSTO) decided against releasing a public statement at the time to avoid causing alarm.

Scientists at a nuclear testing station in Melbourne traced the source of the radioactive gases to Sydney after they picked up 10 specific events between November, 2008 and February last year.

The Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty Organisation International Monitoring System site in Melbourne contacted Lucas Heights after detecting the radioxenon isotope Xe-133.

Expert rubbishes splar storm claims

admin /27 August, 2010

Expert rubbishes solar storm claims

By Stuart Gary for ABC Science Online

Updated 1 hour 34 minutes ago

The upcoming solar maximum is 'nothing to lose sleep over', says one expert

The upcoming solar maximum is ‘nothing to lose sleep over’, says one expert (TRACE Team, NASA)

Australia’s leading body responsible for monitoring space weather has dismissed claims that a massive solar storm could wipe out the Earth’s entire power grid.

One report quotes an Australian astronomer as saying “the storm is likely to come sooner rather than later”.

But Dr Phil Wilkinson, the assistant director of the Bureau of Meteorology’s Ionospheric Prediction Service, says claims that this coming solar maximum will be the most violent in 100 years are not factual.

“All this talk about gloom and doom has selling power, but I’m certain it’s overstated,” he said.

“[It’s] going far beyond what’s realistic and could be worrying or concerning for people who don’t really understand the underlying science behind it all.

“The real message should be that the coming solar maximum period could be equally as hazardous as any other solar maximum.”

The smearing of an innocent man

admin /27 August, 2010

The Smearing of an Innocent man

The report we publish for the first time today proves that the serious charges made against Rajendra Pachauri are completely untrue.

 

By George Monbiot, published on the Guardian’s website, 26th August 2010

Has anyone been as badly maligned as Rajendra Pachauri, chairman of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)?

In December, the Sunday Telegraph carried a long and prominent feature written by Christopher Booker and Richard North, titled: Questions over business deals of UN climate change guru Dr Rajendra Pachauri.

The subtitle alleged that Pachauri has been “making a fortune from his links with ‘carbon trading’ companies”. The article maintained that the money made by Pachauri while working for other organisations “must run into millions of dollars”.

It described his outside interests as “highly lucrative commercial jobs”. It proposed that these payments caused a “conflict of interest” with his IPCC role. It also complained that we don’t know “how much we all pay him” as chairman of the IPCC.

The story (which has subsequently been removed from the Sunday Telegraph’s website) immediately travelled around the world. It was reproduced on hundreds of blogs. The allegations it contained were widely aired in the media and generally believed. For a while, no discussion of climate change or the IPCC appeared complete without reference to Pachauri’s “dodgy” business dealings and alleged conflicts of interest.

There was just one problem: the story was untrue.