Wator vapour caused one-third of global warming in 1990s, study shows
Water vapour caused one-third of global warming in 1990s, study reveals
Experts say their research does not undermine the scientific consensus on man-made climate change, but call for ‘closer examination’ of the way computer models consider water vapoor
- The Guardian, Friday 29 January 2010
- Article history
A 10% drop in water vapour, 10 miles up has had an effect on global warming over the last 10 years, scientists say. Photograph: Getty
Scientists have underestimated the role that water vapour plays in determining global temperature changes, according to a new study that could fuel further attacks on the science of climate change.
The research, led by one of the world’s top climate scientists, suggests that almost one-third of the global warming recorded during the 1990s was due to an increase in water vapour in the high atmosphere, not human emissions of greenhouse gases. A subsequent decline in water vapour after 2000 could explain a recent slowdown in global temperature rise, the scientists add.
The game has changed and so should the PM
The game has changed and so should the PM
- From: The Australian
- January 29, 2010
KEVIN Rudd’s emissions trading scheme is dead but he can’t let it go. Politically he should shift ground to alternative action on climate change, blame Tony Abbott for the failure of a scheme previously favoured by Liberal leaders, and use the global failure to agree on a concerted plan as a reprieve before the election.
The Prime Minister can still campaign on taking steps against climate change and adopt the high moral ground on the environment, but he doesn’t have to cling to an ETS that no longer fulfils his stated aims of leading the world on climate change, cutting greenhouse gas emissions and providing “business certainty” – and which is vulnerable to the Coalition’s “great big tax” claims.
US sets 17% carbon emission reduction target
US sets 17pc carbon emissions reduction target
- From: AFP
- January 29, 2010
THE United States today officially stated a goal to cut carbon emissions by 17 per cent by 2020 off 2005 levels, in a submission to the United Nations as part of last month’s Copenhagen meeting.
The United States said it expected to cut emissions blamed for global warming “in the range of 17 per cent” and “anticipated” that Congress would approve legislation to meet the target.
On Wednesday, Climate Change Minister Penny Wong revealed that Australia’s target for greenhouse gas emissions cuts by 2020 under the Copenhagen Accord would be an unconditional, minimum of 5 per cent and a possible maximum of 25 per cent.
Gunns 20 Case Goes to Trial
gunns 20
28 Jan 2010
Gunns 20 Case Goes To Trial
By Liesel Rickarby
Should a corporate bully be allowed to silence criticism using the courts? Next week’s Gunns 20 trial should be watched closely by anyone who cares about free speech, writes Liesel Rickarby
After more than five years, the Gunns 20 case finally goes to trial next week. It will be the biggest case of its type in Australian history and is an excellent example of a SLAPP suit, or Strategic Litigation Against Public Participation.
In December 2004, Tasmanian logging company Gunns issued 20 writs against three environmental organisations and 17 individuals, totalling almost $6.4 million. The 20 defendants included the Wilderness Society and its executives, Senator Bob Brown, Tasmanian Greens leader Peg Putt, two filmmakers, two university students, a doctor, a dentist and a grandmother who builds kitchens. You can read about the background to the case here and here.
Challenging times for climate science
Challenging times for climate science
- The Guardian, Wednesday 27 January 2010
- Article history
You report (Cold snap does not undermine climate case – scientist, 12 January) that Professor Mojib Latif of Kiel University, a leading member of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, has attacked as “misleading” my article in the Mail on Sunday (10 January), stating that I wrongly claimed that his work “undermines the scientific case for manmade global warming”.
At no point in my piece did I say that it does. I merely quoted him, accurately, saying that his team’s work suggests that up to half the global warming observed in recent decades was due not to greenhouse gases but long-term ocean temperature cycles. These, he went on, have now entered a “cold” mode, and that as a result, we can expect more cold winters and a slight, though temporary, cooling. Prof Latif told me: “Global warming has paused,” adding that the extreme glacial retreats and icecap melting seen recently would for the time being cease.
$300 cost for meter to measure solar feed
$300 cost for meter to measure solar feed
BEN CUBBY AND ANDREW SMALL
January 28, 2010
THOUSANDS of people with solar panels will have to pay an extra $300 to get a new meter installed in their home to access the state’s new solar feed-in tariff, eating up most of their annual return.
But meters capable of measuring how much power a household feeds back into the electricity grid will not be available until next month, Energy Australia said, despite the scheme starting on January 1.
From July, power companies must pay people the full rate of 60 cents per kilowatt hour to comply with the solar tariff legislation, the Government said.