Category: Uncategorized

  • Ahmadinejad teases’big’ new nuclear announcerment

    Ahmadinejad teases ‘big’ new nuclear announcement

    .topPhoto, .photo { width: 440px; } Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad gestures as he deliver his speech at a rally to mark the 33rd anniversary of the Islamic Revolution that toppled the country's pro-Western monarchy and brought Islamic clerics to power, Tehran, Saturday, Feb. 11, 2012. (AP Photo/Vahid Salemi)

    Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad gestures as he deliver his speech at a rally to mark the 33rd anniversary of the Islamic Revolution that toppled the country’s pro-Western monarchy and brought Islamic clerics to power, Tehran, Saturday, Feb. 11, 2012. (AP Photo/Vahid Salemi)

    Updated: Sat Feb. 11 2012 06:37:37

    The Associated Press

    TEHRAN, Iran — Iran will soon unveil “big new” nuclear achievements, President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said Saturday while reiterating Tehran’s readiness to revive talks with the West over the country’s controversial nuclear program.

    Ahmadinejad spoke at a rally in Tehran as tens of thousands of Iranians marked the 33rd anniversary of the Islamic Revolution that toppled the pro-Western monarchy and brought Islamic clerics to power.

    Ahmadinejad did not elaborate on the upcoming announcement but insisted Iran would never give up its uranium enrichment, a process that makes material for reactors as well as weapons.

    The West suspects Iran’s nuclear program is aimed at producing atomic weapons, a charge Tehran denies, insisting it’s geared for peaceful purposes only, such as energy production.

    Four rounds of UN sanctions and recent tough financial penalties by the U.S. and the European Union have failed to get Iran to halt aspects of its atomic work that could provide a possible pathway to weapons production.

    “Within the next few days the world will witness the inauguration of several big new achievements in the nuclear field,” Ahmadinejad told the crowd in Tehran’s famous Azadi, or Freedom, square.

    Iran has said it is forced to manufacture nuclear fuel rods, which provide fuel for reactors, on its own since international sanctions ban it from buying them on foreign markets. In January, Iran said it had produced its first such fuel rod.

    Apart from progress on the rods, the upcoming announcement could pertain to Iran’s underground enrichment facility at Fordo or upgraded centrifuges, which are expected to be installed at the facility in the central town of Natanz. Iran has also said it would inaugurate the Russian-built nuclear power plant in the southern port of Bushehr in 2012.

    Iran’s unchecked pursuit of the nuclear program scuttled negotiations a year ago but Iranian officials last month proposed a return to the talks with the five permanent UN Security Council members plus Germany.

    “Iran is ready for talks within the framework of equality and justice,” Ahmadinejad repeated on said Saturday but warned that Tehran “will never enter talks if enemies behave arrogantly.”

    In the past, Iran has angered Western officials by appearing to buy time through opening talks and weighing proposals even while pressing ahead with the nuclear program.

    Washington recently levied new penalties aimed at limiting Iran’s ability to sell oil, which accounts for 80 per cent of its foreign revenue, while the European Union adopted its own toughest measures yet on Iran, including an oil embargo and freeze of the country’s central bank assets.

    Israel is worried Iran could be on the brink of an atomic bomb and many Israeli officials believe sanctions only give Tehran time to move its nuclear program underground, out of reach of Israeli military strikes. The U.S. and its allies argue that Israel should hold off on any military strike on Iranian nuclear facilities to allow more time for sanctions to work.

    Before Ahmadinejad spoke Saturday, visiting Hamas prime minister from Gaza, Ismail Haniyeh, also addressed the crowd, congratulating Iranians on the 1979 anniversary and vowing that his militant Palestinian group would never recognize Iran’s and Hamas’ archenemy, Israel.

    Also at the Tehran rally, Iran displayed a real-size model of the U.S. drone RQ-170 Sentinel, captured by Iran in December near the border with Afghanistan. Iran has touted the drone’s capture as one of its successes against the West.

    The state TV called the drone is a “symbol of power” of the Iranian armed forces “against the global arrogance” of the U.S.

    The report broadcast footage of other rallies around Iran, saying millions participated in the anniversary celebrations, many under heavy snowfall.

  • Geothermal: Getting energy from the earth

     

    Beyond geothermal electrical generation, an estimated 100,000 thermal megawatts of geothermal energy are used directly — without conversion into electricity — to heat homes and greenhouses and as process heat in industry. This includes, for example, the energy used in hot baths in Japan and to heat homes in Iceland and greenhouses in Russia.

    An interdisciplinary team of 13 scientists and engineers assembled by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) in 2006 assessed U.S. geothermal electrical generating potential. Drawing on the latest technologies, including those used by oil and gas companies in drilling and in enhanced oil recovery, the team estimated that enhanced geothermal systems could be used to massively develop geothermal energy. This technology involves drilling down to the hot rock layer, fracturing the rock and pumping water into the cracked rock, then extracting the superheated water to drive a steam turbine. The MIT team notes that with this technology, the United States has enough geothermal energy to meet its energy needs 2,000 times over.

    Though it is still costly, this technology can be used almost anywhere to convert geothermal heat into electricity. Australia is currently the leader in developing pilot plants using this technology, followed by Germany and France. To fully realize this potential for the United States, the MIT team estimated that the government would need to invest $1 billion in geothermal research and development in the years immediately ahead, roughly the cost of one coal-fired power plant.

    Even before this exciting new technology is widely deployed, investors are moving ahead with existing technologies. For many years, U.S. geothermal energy was confined largely to the Geysers project north of San Francisco, easily the world’s largest geothermal generating complex, with 850 megawatts of generating capacity. Now the United States, which has more than 3,000 megawatts of geothermal generation, is experiencing a geothermal renaissance. Some 152 power plants under development in 13 states are expected to nearly triple U.S. geothermal generating capacity. With California, Nevada, Oregon, Idaho, and Utah leading the way, and with many new companies in the field, the stage is set for massive U.S. geothermal development.

    Indonesia, richly endowed with geothermal energy, stole the spotlight in 2008 when it announced a plan to develop 6,900 megawatts of geothermal generating capacity. The Philippines is also planning a number of new projects.

    Among the Great Rift countries in Africa — including Tanzania, Kenya, Uganda, Eritrea, Ethiopia, and Djibouti — Kenya is the early leader. It now has over 100 megawatts of geothermal generating capacity and is planning 1,200 more megawatts by 2015. This would nearly double its current electrical generating capacity of 1,300 megawatts from all sources.

    Japan, which has a total of 535 megawatts of generating capacity, was an early leader in this field. Now, following nearly two decades of inactivity, this geothermally rich country — long known for its thousands of hot baths — is again beginning to build geothermal power plants.

    In Europe, Germany has five small geothermal power plants in operation and some 150 plants in the pipeline. Werner Bussmann, head of the German Geothermal Association, says, “Geothermal sources could supply Germany’s electricity needs 600 times over.”

    Beyond geothermal power plants, geothermal (ground source) heat pumps are now being widely used for both heating and cooling. These take advantage of the remarkable stability of the Earth’s temperature near the surface and then use that as a source of heat in the winter when the air temperature is low and a source of cooling in the summer when the temperature is high. The great attraction of this technology is that it can provide both heating and cooling and do so with 25-50 percent less electricity than would be needed with conventional systems. In Germany, for example, there are now 178,000 geothermal heat pumps operating in residential or commercial buildings. This base is growing steadily, as at least 25,000 new pumps are installed each year.

    In the direct use of geothermal heat, Iceland and France are among the leaders. Iceland’s use of geothermal energy to heat almost 90 percent of its homes has largely eliminated coal for this use. Geothermal energy accounts for more than one third of Iceland’s total energy use. Following the two oil price hikes in the 1970s, some 70 geothermal heating facilities were constructed in France, providing both heat and hot water for an estimated 200,000 residences. Other countries that have extensive geothermally based district-heating systems include China, Japan, and Turkey.

    Geothermal heat is ideal for greenhouses in northern countries. Russia, Hungary, Iceland, and the United States are among the many countries that use it to produce fresh vegetables in the winter. With rising oil prices boosting fresh produce transport costs, this practice will likely become far more common in the years ahead.

    Among the 22 countries using geothermal energy for aquaculture are China, Israel, and the United States. In California, for example, 15 fish farms annually produce some 10 million pounds of tilapia, striped bass, and catfish using warm water from underground.

    Hot underground water is widely used for both bathing and swimming. Japan has 2,800 spas, 5,500 public bathhouses, and 15,600 hotels and inns that use geothermal hot water. Iceland uses geothermal energy to heat 135 public swimming pools, most of them year-round open-air pools. Hungary heats 1,200 swimming pools with geothermal energy.

    If the four most populous countries located on the Pacific Ring of Fire — the United States, Japan, China, and Indonesia — were to seriously invest in developing their geothermal resources, they could easily make this a leading world energy source. With a conservatively estimated potential in the United States and Japan alone of 240,000 megawatts of generation, it is easy to envisage a world with thousands of geothermal power plants generating some 200,000 megawatts of electricity by 2020. For direct use of geothermal heat, the 2020 Plan B goal is 500,000 thermal megawatts. All together, the geothermal potential is enormous.

    Adapted from Chapter 5, “Stabilizing Climate: Shifting to Renewable Energy,” in Lester R. Brown, Plan B 4.0: Mobilizing to Save Civilization.

  • The population discussion going on behind closed doors

    The population discussion going on behind closed doors

    There are two population debates going on in Australia.

    The first is the public debate that has inundated the media in recent weeks; all about forecasts, sustainability, infrastructure, economics, demographics and really serious-sounding matters.

    The second is the subterranean debate that’s rarely discussed in public because it contains two unpalatable truths that require … oxymoron coming … really careful handing by politicians and media.

    Unpalatable Truth #1: The majority of Australians are opposed to meaningful population growth, dislike the idea of high levels of immigration and want political refugees refused entry. These unfortunate attitudes are supported in poll after poll — this one and this one in recent days and weeks.

    Unpalatable Truth #2: There is private acknowledgement among government and strategic decision-makers that Australia has a moral responsibility, as the richest and most underpopulated nation in the Asian region, to be seen to be growing its population and assuming its share of humanitarian migration. This is partly because of the terrible optics of a fortress Australia approach, and partly because such an approach is so out of sync with population trends in our region that it could generate enough resentment among our neighbours to present a serious security risk to Australia.

    Of course our political leaders are aware of these unpalatable truths, and talk about them privately. But they also know they are dynamite issues that, if raised in public, need to be handled with care so that they don’t incite the wrong kind of populist debate that wedges politicians into make the wrong kinds of decisions for Australia’s long-term interests.

    The unnerving part of where we are now is not the existence of the unpalatable truths. It’s the spectre, six months or so from a federal election, of the growing temptation on one side of politics to deploy the dog whistle for a purely electoral dividend.

  • Pew report: China overtakes US as top clean tech investor

    Pew report: China overtakes US as top clean tech investor

    Major new study finds China is fast emerging as new clean tech superpower as US slips down the competitiveness league table, falling below UK, Spain and Germany

    Rachel Fielding for BusinessGreen, part of the Guardian Environment Network

    • Datablog: get the full data behind this story

    Windfarm in China

    A windfarm in China – a new report by Pew said the country has overtaken the US as the top clean technology investor. Photograph: Keren Su/Getty Images/China Span RM

    China has overtaken the US for the first time in a league table of investments in low-carbon energy among the G-20, according to a new report by not for profit group the Pew Charitable Trusts published this week.

    The report found that despite an overall 6.6 per cent global decline in clean energy investments last year, China invested almost twice as much as the United States in clean energy during 2009.

    Pew blamed the worst financial downturn in over half a century for the reduction in clean techinvestments, but echoed growing confidence in the sector, predicting investments will bounce nback to around $200bn this year.

    The report, entitled Who’s Winning the Clean Energy Race?, said that last year China invested $34.6bn in the clean energy economy, placing it top of the clean energy investment league and well ahead of the US in second place with investment of $18.6bn.

    Phyllis Cuttino, director of Pew Environment Group’s US Global Warming Campaign, criticised the US government for failing to deliver stronger national policies to support renewable energy. “I’m worried that we are going to fall further down the list next year,” she said. “We really need to pass policy.”

    The US administration has been locked in a year long battle to pass a climate change bill that would impose a national carbon pricing mechanism and introduce new incentives for low carbon projects. However, the bill has faced staunch opposition from Republicans and some Democrats and while a compromise version of the legislation is expected to be unveiled in the next few weeks commentators remain sceptical that the bill can pass this year.

    The Pew report also expressed concern about America’s competitive position in the clean energy marketplace, noting that relative to the size of its economy the US clean energy finance and investments lag behind many of its G20 partners.

    In relative terms, the UK invested three times more than the United States last year, and overall 10 other G20 members devoted a greater percentage of gross domestic product to clean energy than the United States in 2009.

    The Pew report said those countries with strong, national policies aimed at reducing global warming and encouraging the use of renewable energy – including the UK, Germany and Spain – had succeeded in establishing stronger competitive positions in the clean energy economy.

    “Nations seeking to compete effectively for clean energy jobs and manufacturing would do well to evaluate the array of policy mechanisms that can be employed to stimulate clean energy investment,” the report stated. “This is especially true for policymakers in the United States, which is at risk of falling further behind its G20 competitors in the coming years absent adoption of a strong national policy framework to spur more robust clean energy investment.”

  • 22 – Reject packaged drinks

    Packaged drinks are a perfect example of how cheap energy has warped us into consuming resources for no good reason other than it makes money for someone else. We pay over 1,000 times the price of tap water to drink essentially the same water from a plastic bottle.

    It has been revealed with monotonous regularity that the perceived health benefits of bottled water are illusory and some soft drink companies simply bottle tap water and sell it. Drink bottles are a huge waste problem. Only about one third of the bottles sold are recycled – high by world standards – and the rest end up in landfill or the oceans. Because they are hollow, they take up a lot of space in landfill (around 30%) and kill animals that crawl inside them.

    It is marginally more convenient to buy a drink in a disposable container than in a re-usable one, but it is environmentally expensive.

    Reality check

    498 billion litres of packaged drinks were sold world wide in 2005. That is about 77 litres of bottled drink per person on the planet. This amount is growing at around seven per cent every year, with the largest growth being for bottled water.

    The resources associated with those numbers are enormous.

    • Each kilogram of PET plastic consumes 17.5 litres of water and around three litres of oil to make.

    • Drink factories use up to 3.5 litres of water for every litre of drink they sell.

    • All told, every 600ml bottle of water consumes around 1.5 Megajoules of energy.

    • Globally, bottled drinks are responsible for around 100 million tonnes of carbon dioxide released annually into the atmosphere.

    In 2006 Prime Minister John Howard protested that the dental health of the nation is being harmed by the growth in drinking bottled water. Most bottled water does not contain flouride.

    While many people would see this as an good reason to drink bottled water, it illustrates the point that many people only drink fluids delivered to them in cans or bottles.

    What I do

    I keep all the plastic bottles that come into the house and fill them about 90 per cent full of water. I keep about ten of them in the freezer, for picnics or school lunches and another half a dozen of them in the fridge.

    Once a week I nearly fill a saucepan with white sugar, and cover the sugar with filtered tap water. I boil that until clear and then bottle the syrup in glass bottles. During the week we make cordials using that syrup with citrus juice, or whatever juicy fruits are in season. It has all the dental and other negatives associated with sugar, but it is my alternative to packaged drinks.

    I make all my tea in a teapot. I empty the teapot into a jug during the day, then put syrup, lemon juice, ice-cubes and water into the jug, and let it ‘brew’ until the evening. Uncle Joe’s iced tea is legendary. Chinese home-stay students have taken the recipe back to China.

    Hidden traps

    You’re in the car and you’re hot. You’re filling up with petrol. The fridge beckons.

    What can I say?

    Get into the habit of taking home-bottled water with you.

    Search terms

    oil bottled water calculate

    PET plastic water

    Contamination bottled water

    Hard Facts

    Over 25,000 tonnes of PET bottles are used in Sydney every year wasting 475 megalitres of water. That is almost the volume of water that flows down the Darling River.

  • Hero or Boofhead? – Professor Ian Plimer

    PlimerHis claim to fame is that he took on the Creationists and won accolades from the scientific community and thoughtful members of the clergy.

    His disgraces are legion, however. In 1997 as many scientists and engineers dug through slow and freezing mud to discover the causes of the landslide in Thredbo, Plimer announced from the comfort of his ivory tower that they were all looking in the wrong place and that he knew the cause of the landslide. His announcement got a lot of media attention and diverted funds away from the work on the ground.

    When he was subsequently proved wrong he had earned the ire and disgust of his colleagues and the distrust of many politicians and old friends in the media.

    Since then he has been busy earning money from fossil fuel lobby groups.

    You can read more about him in the following articles and vote on his value in our poll at the left.

    NFF bets the farm on climate denier.