Author: admin

  • Caltech Researchers Create Highly Absorbing, Flexible solarCells with Silicon Wire Arrays,

     

    This is a photomicrograph of a silicon wire array embedded within a transparent, flexible polymer film. [Credit: Caltech/Michael Kelzenberg]

    The light-trapping limit of a material refers to how much sunlight it is able to absorb. The silicon-wire arrays absorb up to 96 percent of incident sunlight at a single wavelength and 85 percent of total collectible sunlight. “We’ve surpassed previous optical microstructures developed to trap light,” he says. 

    Atwater and his colleagues — including Nathan Lewis, the George L. Argyros Professor and professor of chemistry at Caltech, and graduate student Michael Kelzenberg — assessed the performance of these arrays in a paper appearing in the February 14 advance online edition of the journal Nature Materials.

    Atwater notes that the solar cells’ enhanced absorption is “useful absorption.”

    “Many materials can absorb light quite well but not generate electricity — like, for instance, black paint,” he explains. “What’s most important in a solar cell is whether that absorption leads to the creation of charge carriers.”

    The silicon wire arrays created by Atwater and his colleagues are able to convert between 90 and 100 percent of the photons they absorb into electrons — in technical terms, the wires have a near-perfect internal quantum efficiency. “High absorption plus good conversion makes for a high-quality solar cell,” says Atwater. “It’s an important advance.”

    The key to the success of these solar cells is their silicon wires, each of which, says Atwater, “is independently a high-efficiency, high-quality solar cell.” When brought together in an array, however, they’re even more effective, because they interact to increase the cell’s ability to absorb light.

    “Light comes into each wire, and a portion is absorbed and another portion scatters. The collective scattering interactions between the wires make the array very absorbing,” he says.

    This is a schematic diagram of the light-trapping elements used to optimize absorption within a polymer-embedded silicon wire array. [Credit: Caltech/Michael Kelzenberg]

    This effect occurs despite the sparseness of the wires in the array — they cover only between 2 and 10 percent of the cell’s surface area.

    “When we first considered silicon wire-array solar cells, we assumed that sunlight would be wasted on the space between wires,” explains Kelzenberg. “So our initial plan was to grow the wires as close together as possible. But when we started quantifying their absorption, we realized that more light could be absorbed than predicted by the wire-packing fraction alone. By developing light-trapping techniques for relatively sparse wire arrays, not only did we achieve suitable absorption, we also demonstrated effective optical concentration—an exciting prospect for further enhancing the efficiency of silicon-wire-array solar cells.”

    Each wire measures between 30 and 100 microns in length and only 1 micron in diameter. “The entire thickness of the array is the length of the wire,” notes Atwater. “But in terms of area or volume, just 2 percent of it is silicon, and 98 percent is polymer.”

    In other words, while these arrays have the thickness of a conventional crystalline solar cell, their volume is equivalent to that of a two-micron-thick film.

    Since the silicon material is an expensive component of a conventional solar cell, a cell that requires just one-fiftieth of the amount of this semiconductor will be much cheaper to produce.

    The composite nature of these solar cells, Atwater adds, means that they are also flexible. “Having these be complete flexible sheets of material ends up being important,” he says, “because flexible thin films can be manufactured in a roll-to-roll process, an inherently lower-cost process than one that involves brittle wafers, like those used to make conventional solar cells.”

    Atwater, Lewis, and their colleagues had earlier demonstrated that it was possible to create these innovative solar cells. “They were visually striking,” says Atwater. “But it wasn’t until now that we could show that they are both highly efficient at carrier collection and highly absorbing.”

    The next steps, Atwater says, are to increase the operating voltage and the overall size of the solar cell. “The structures we’ve made are square centimeters in size,” he explains. “We’re now scaling up to make cells that will be hundreds of square centimeters — the size of a normal cell.”

    Atwater says that the team is already “on its way” to showing that large-area cells work just as well as these smaller versions.

    In addition to Atwater, Lewis, and Kelzenberg, the all-Caltech coauthors on the Nature Materials paper, “Enhanced absorption and carrier collection in Si wire arrays for photovoltaic applications,” are postdoctoral scholars Shannon Boettcher and Joshua Spurgeon; undergraduate student Jan Petykiewicz; and graduate students Daniel Turner-Evans, Morgan Putnam, Emily Warren, and Ryan Briggs.

    Their research was supported by BP and the Energy Frontier Research Center program of the Department of Energy, and made use of facilities supported by the Center for Science and Engineering of Materials, a National Science Foundation Materials Research Science and Engineering Center at Caltech. In addition, Boettcher received fellowship support from the Kavli Nanoscience Institute at Caltech.

    Lori Oliwenstein is Senior Science Writer in the Media Relations office at Caltech.

  • Need for new coal-fired power plants based on a big lie

    Need for new coal-fired power plants based on a big lie
     
    The NSW government’s approval for two new giant fossil fuel power
    stations is based on the big lie that they are needed to keep the lights
    on. They will drive up the state’s greenhouse gas emissions and destroy
    jobs in the renewable energy industry, according to Greens NSW MP John
    Kaye.
     
    Commenting on Planning Minister Tony Kelly’s approval of the concept
    plans for 2,000 MW power plants at Mt Piper near Lithgow and Bayswater
    in the Upper Hunter, Dr Kaye said: “NSW does not need more baseload
    electricity generation to keep the lights on.
     
    “The Owen inquiry was manufactured by the Iemma government to justify
    its privatisation agenda. The exaggerated claims of generation capacity
    shortages have been completely discredited.
     
    “The latest data from the Australian Energy Market Operator (AEMO)
    shows that NSW has sufficient baseload capacity for reliable supply
    beyond 2016.
     
    “It is highly improbable that Mt Piper will be gas powered given the
    distance to the nearest pipeline and the costs of connecting up supply.
     
    “Even Bayswater is much more likely to be coal-fired. Risks of
    substantial price rises resulting from an East Coast gas export terminal
    will make gas a much less attractive fuel, even if the Senate passes the
    Rudd government’s highly ineffective Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme.
     
    “Coal-fired stations will increase the state’s greenhouse gas emission
    by 15.1 per cent and gas by 7.1 percent.
     
    “This is an unacceptable increase to the state’s burden on the
    climate.
     
    “The Keneally government is turning NSW into an international
    greenhouse pariah.
     
    “The future of jobs in the clean energy industry has been dealt a
    savage blow.
     
    “Thousands of jobs in solar thermal energy, wind power and energy
    efficiency are being sacrificed to the myth that only coal can keep the
    lights on.
     
    “The NSW government continues to trade on the clean coal fairy tale.
     
    “Carbon capture and storage will not be available in the time scale
    needed to respond to global climate change. If it ever works, it is
    likely to be very expensive.
     
    “Clean coal and gas are nothing but green-wash for a climate killing
    policy of swamping the state with excess coal-power.
     
    “The approval of new power plants shows the Keneally Government is not
    serious about addressing the threat of climate change.
     
    “If they were, they would be announcing planning approval and direct
    public investment for large-scale solar thermal power plants to replace
    the state’s highly polluting coal-fired generators,” Dr Kaye said.
     
    For more information: John Kaye 0407 195 455
     

    Background
     
    Planning Minister Tony Kelly has announced his approval for the concept
    plans for two new coal or gas fired power stations, each of 2,000 MW.
     
    This is the end product of the power privatisation process started by
    former Treasurer Michael Costa.  The sites with concept plan approval
    will be offered for sale  to the private sector with the aim of luring
    them into developing $10 billion of new baseload capacity.
     
    Even with a $30 per tonne CO2 cost, coal is likely to be more
    attractive to a private sector developer than gas. The carbon price
    impacts on a coal fired power station would be about $24 per MWh and
    about $10 per MWh on gas. The $14 per MWh carbon price benefit of gas
    would be swamped by probable surge in gas prices from the construction
    an East Coast export terminal.
     

    Green gas emissions
     
    Figures based on the project environmental assessments. Percentages
    based on 2007 National Greenhouse Accounts, NSW Inventory total
    (excluding LULUCF) of 151.6 Mt CO2e in 2007
     

                                      Coal (Mt CO2e) Gas(Mt CO2e)
    Mt Piper                      10.5                 4.9
    Bayswater B  1             2.4                  5.9
    Total                           22.9                10.8
    Incr in NSW emissions  15.1%             7.1%
     

  • Rudd’s on the nose

     

    Daily Telegraph

    Simon Benson: Prime Minister Kevin Rudd losing support in western Sydney

    The chance of Australia going to an early election has lessened, with internal Labor research exposing a negative shift in mood toward Prime Minister Kevin Rudd in key marginal seats in Sydney’s west.

    The Australian

    Matthew Franklin: Rudd and states set for battle on health

    Kevin Rudd is headed for a confrontation with the states as he seeks to boost his flagging political stocks by taking federal control of health and hospital funding and launching local management.

    Editorial: Be wary of centralising health

    Remote as it is from the people and geared to policy development, the Canberra bureaucracy is not adroit at service delivery.

    Paul Kelly: Rudd’s deeds need to be as bold as his ambitions

    There is a confusion about this government’s character, its convictions and its beliefs. If insiders are unsure about this, the public can hardly be expected to know.

    The Age

    Shaun Carney: PM’s mea culpa: fact or fiction?

    In a sign of the poor condition of political dialogue and the lack of faith within the community about our politicians in contemporary Australia, Rudd’s introspections and apologies have been met with perplexity.

    The Punch

    Brendan Brown: All ready to go to the election with no-one to vote for

    But Labor has been more disappointing in recent years than this summer’s One Day cricket.

  • Prime Minister Kevin Rudd losing support in Western Sydney

    Prime Minister Kevin Rudd losing support in western Sydney

     

    Kevin Rudd

    That sinking feeling … Prime Minster Kevin Rudd. Source: The Daily Telegraph

    THE chance of Australia going to an early election has lessened, with internal Labor research exposing a negative shift in mood toward Prime Minister Kevin Rudd in key marginal seats in Sydney’s west.

    A separate poll has also revealed that a growing number of voters believe that the Prime Minister was complacent and superficial.

    While Labor sits comfortably ahead in the national polls, senior Labor Party officials have confirmed that there had been a softening of support for Mr Rudd in the marginal seats of western Sydney where Labor must hold ground to win an election.

    There was an overriding message of “deliverability” and “believability”, said a senior Labor source, particularly on health.

    “While they give him credit for his handling of the global financial crisis, there was a strong undercurrent of dissatisfaction around the idea of broken promises, particularly on health.”

    The party’s national secretariat would not comment, however, several senior Labor sources confirmed that MPs have been partially briefed on ongoing focus group research which began late last year and continued over Christmas and into the new year.

    “It is the first time we’ve seen a dual message come through in the research,” they said.

    It is also understood that a secret strategy meeting was held in Canberra last Wednesday night between Mr Rudd and NSW powerbroker Senator Mark Arbib over concerns about the Government’s flagging credibility – where it was decided that the axe would fall on Environment Minister Peter Garrett over the failed home insulation scheme.

    The research, which is believed to have been conducted across key marginal Labor held seats including Lindsay and Macquarie as well as marginal Coalition seats of Greenway and Macarthur, also revealed that women had also begun to sour on Mr Rudd and that mixed messages were now starting to show up on the Government’s climate change policy.

    Yesterday Mr Rudd continued his theme of getting “whacked” in the polls, despite a Newspoll proving not to be as dire as he had predicted.

    “The bottom line is this, as I’ve said yesterday and the day before, the Government needs to do better, needs to deliver more, and get back to basics,” he said.

     

  • Labor to axe drought relief

     

    Under the existing Exceptional Circumstances drought assistance scheme, producers in areas declared affected by drought are eligible for direct government income support as well as interest rate subsidies.

    As at December 31, taxpayers were spending $61 million a month supporting drought-declared farmers through the EC program, with as many as 17,168 producers having received interest subsidies during the past two years. Some farmers have been granted up to $500,000 in interest rate subsidies — money which has gone directly to the banking industry.

    But according to Mr Burke, the subsidies discourage farmers in marginal areas from making “hard decisions” about their futures and penalise farmers who use the good times to pay off their debts.

    “I think we need to be brave enough to acknowledge that just because we are giving people money does not mean we are doing them a favour,” he said.

    “Government support and assistance is conditional upon how much debt you are in. If, for whatever reason, you’ve made some really hard decisions during the good times and are not in debt, your reward for that is to get no government assistance.”

    Mr Burke has been working on drought reform since Labor took office in 2007, based on advice that climate change will increase the problem of drought.

    He wants a system that will encourage farmers to use good times to insulate themselves against future drought, by changing agricultural practices or switching crops. But he has stressed no changes will affect existing recipients of assistance, with any new system to apply to the next drought.

    NFF chief executive officer Ben Fargher told The Australian last night his organisation wanted drought assistance reform, provided farmers currently receiving assistance were not “cut off at the knees”. “If it’s genuine reform, we will engage.”

    Opposition agriculture spokesman John Cobb said Mr Burke was no friend of the farmer.

    “Even the best farmers have found themselves in debt following three failed wheat crops in a row,” he said. “Without the EC interest rate subsidy it is doubtful whether some farmers would even be able to get carry-on finance to plant this year’s wheat crop or buy sheep or cattle to restock.”

    Mr Burke also strongly defended the government’s recent decision to allow beef imports from nations where mad cow disease had existed in the past.

  • More would install solar if power paid for: report

     

    A national tariff has been backed by retailer Woolworths and the Property Council of Australia.

    The states have already introduced tariff schemes, although they vary in design. In Victoria, for example, the government opted for a net tariff that pays households for electricity fed into the grid only. A gross scheme pays a premium for energy whether it is fed into the grid or used at home.

    The analysis found a national gross tariff could push rooftop solar power to a capacity of 1000 megawatts – roughly equivalent to the Latrobe Valley’s Loy Yang B coal-fired power station – within 20 years. It would cost $4.47 billion and put solar photovoltaic units on 650,000 homes. The $1 billion spent on rebates over the 18-month period to June installed 67,452 rooftop solar units.

    Climate Change Minister Penny Wong backed the government’s rebate scheme over a national tariff.

    A ministerial spokeswoman said: ”It takes longer for households to recoup the cost of their solar panels and other technologies through a feed-in tariff.”

     

    Source: The Age