Author: Neville

  • This is how we win, for solar and for Australia SOLAR CITIZENS AUSTRALIA

    Click here to enable desktop notifications for Gmail.   Learn more  Hide
    AdI want to retire abroadwww.escapologist.com.au – Now you can live in luxury for less These 3 countries are safe & cheap

    This is how we win, for solar and for Australia

    Inbox
    x

    Claire, Solar Citizens <info@solarcitizens.org.au>

    4:34 PM (11 minutes ago)

    to me

    Dear NEVILLE,

    When the government began its attack on solar and the Renewable Energy Target around six months ago the outlook for solar was dire.

    Their dodgy, hand-picked Warburton review was threatening Australians’ ability to go solar and take control of their power bills, wrecking business confidence and putting thousands of jobs and billions in investment at risk.

    Yesterday, things turned a corner, with reports that Federal Cabinet has rejected the Warburton review of the Target.*

    This is a huge development, and it came less than two weeks after we rallied in our thousands outside Cabinet Ministers’ offices around the country in a show of strength for solar like they’ve never seen.

    This year together we stood up to the government and big power companies to protect the Target. We’ve presented the 25,000+ signature Keep Solar Strong petition to the Government, hand written hundreds of letters to MPs and senators and conducted 2,000 community conversations around Australia. And our politicians are hearing us, loud and clear.

    Not only has Cabinet rejected the Warburton review, but Palmer United has also reaffirmed its pledge to maintain the Target – when leader Clive Palmer made the announcement last month he spoke about the hundreds of hand written letters he’d received**.

    But there is still a long way to go. The Government and Labor are negotiating on the future of the Target right now, and vested interests that want the Target gone are knocking at the door***. At Tamworth’s rally event Friday before last, Barnaby Joyce told the crowd outside his office that he won’t confirm there won’t be changes to the Target****.

    We must make sure our politicians realise that Australians overwhelmingly want the Target protected. We need to make our call on them to protect solar even louder right when they’re about to make their final decision on the fate of the Target.

    Help us continue the pressure – sign up to visit your local MP and make sure the voices of everyday Australians speak louder than vested interests and are heard by our politicians.

    Our leaders are starting to realise just how much Australians love their solar and how much they want to see a strong future for solar and renewables. We won’t let up – will you join us?

    Yours for a strong solar future,

    Claire O’Rourke, Campaigns Director

    P.S. When we put the call out to protect the Renewable Energy Target we immediately saw the passion and readiness of thousands of Australians like you who wanted to stand up for solar. Together we’ve helped unite the community, the renewables industry and politicians to leave the government totally isolated in its desire to destroy the Target. Become a monthly supporter today and help make sure we put even more pressure on so that our politicians stand up for solar.

    https://www.businessspectator.com.au/news/2014/10/8/renewable-energy/cabinet-rejects-warburton-report

    ** https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B-qBrKwg4Fg&feature=youtu.be

    *** http://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/climate/ret-costs-causing-a-heavy-burden-miners/story-e6frg6xf-1227084267571

    **** https://au.prime7.yahoo.com/n2/news/a/-/local/25121157/climate-change-rally-video/

    Solar Citizens
    http://www.solarcitizens.org.au/

    -=-=-

    Solar Citizens is working to protect the rights of million of Australian solar owners to cut bills, create cleaner power and take energy generation back into our own hands. You can also keep up with Solar Citizens on Twitter or like us on Facebook.

  • Daily update: Will smart meters follow poles and wires as new white elephant?

    1 of 3
    AdKleenheat Gaskleenheat.com.au/GasOnline – Easy & Convenient Online Ordering. Low Cost LPG Delivered to Your Door

    Daily update: Will smart meters follow poles and wires as new white elephant?

    Inbox
    x

    Renew Economy editor@reneweconomy.com.au via mail77.atl71.mcdlv.net 

    3:21 PM (32 minutes ago)

    to me
    Smart wires to follow poles and wires as new white elephant?; Last hurrah for nuclear?; AGL targeted in protests; CSIRO appoints cleantech venture as new CEO; VIC council joins fossil fuel divestment movement; Business leaders want stronger climate action; Boundary Dam CCS a success story?; IEA marks energy efficiency as world’s first fuel; and SolarCity on solar power plus energy storage – don’t leave the grid.
    Is this email not displaying correctly?
    View it in your browser.
    RenewEconomy Daily News
    The Parkinson Report
    The utility industry is making a big push for smart meters to be rolled out across the country, partly because it hopes this will enable them to lock in customers, and help introduce flexible tariffs. But smart innovators are literally blowing Raspberries at these best laid plans, with new technologies that allow consumers to control their home systems.
    Costs for Hinkley nuclear reactor jump 50% to $45bln, as EC approves subsidies and FT describes it as last hurrah for industry.  Meanwhile, UK plans to end subsidies for solar by 2020.
    More than 60 protesters target AGL’s Sydney HQ over its efforts to scrap the RET, investments in coal, and gas fracking plans for NSW.
    Physicist turned MD of venture capital firm Southern Cross Partners, Dr Larry Marshall, will be the new CEO of the CSIRO in 2015.
    City of Moreland becomes Victoria’s first local govt to rule out fossil fuel investment, Australia’s first to break from banks who fund fossil projects.
    National survey finds Australian business community wants steeper emissions reduction targets, and connects economic health to low-carbon adaptation.
    Despite all the backslapping, the Boundary Dam plant illustrates the huge challenges that CCS faces in progressing any further.
    IEA estimates global energy efficiency market to be worth at least $310 billion annually.
    SolarCity is coupling Tesla’s battery-based energy storage hardware with its rooftop solar systems.
  • Nuclear waste in Australia Sign petition

    desktop notifications for Gmail.   Learn more  Hide
    1 of 6
    AdI want to retire abroadwww.escapologist.com.au – Now you can live in luxury for less These 3 countries are safe & cheap

    Nuclear waste in Australia

    Inbox
    x

    Stephanie Hosler via Change.org

    1:25 PM (4 minutes ago)

    to me
    Change.org

    NEVILLE — There’s a new petition trending on Change.org, and we think you might be interested in signing it:

    Ian Macfarlane, MP, Minister for Federal Resources: To keep any kind of nuclear waste away from pastoral areas, where it could contaminate agricultural land.

    Stephanie Hosler
    ., Australia
    With nuclear power stations across the globe, deciding where to store nuclear waste safely is a priority that seems to have slipped under the media radar for awhile now. However, now that MP Ian Macfarlane has re-introduced plans for a nuclear waste dump in NT after changing the original location for the dump on Aboriginal land at Muckaty station, it seems more than likely that the government will settle on using a pastoral station.

    A pastoral station with stored nuclear waste? What if the storage leaks? How are we to know if there is the possibility for this?

    Firstly, information as to the details of how the waste will be stored and where it will be stored on one of these stations is not readily available to the public; problem number one. Secondly, keeping this dump on a property full of livestock that will eventually be available as meat for consumers to purchase in supermarkets is undeniably a problem. Farmers have agreed that the benefits financially from creating this dump will outweigh the ‘low-risk’, but is that good enough? Although cattle would not be raised directly on the location where the dump was, who is to say how far away a location would need to be to be safe from contamination if there were any issues?

    The ABC has covered articles here for further information on the plans proposed by Ian Macfarlane:

    http://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-10-02/nuclear-waste-dump-muckaty-station-pastoral-ian-macfarlane/5786338

    http://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-10-03/cattlemen-pastoralist-nuclear-waste-dump/5788312

    And here is a news report from the ABC on Thursday October 2nd:

    http://www.abc.net.au/worldtoday/content/2014/s4099009.htm

     

    We need more facts. Sign this petition to urge for more information or a halt on plans until we can get some details.

     

    image sourced from http://fopnews.wordpress.com/2010/02/24/containing-uncertainity-design-for-infinite-quarantine/

  • New secret report Catherine KING

    here to enable desktop notifications for Gmail.   Learn more  Hide
    More

    1 of 4
    AdI want to retire abroadwww.escapologist.com.au – Now you can live in luxury for less These 3 countries are safe & cheap

    New secret report

    Inbox
    x

    Catherine King via sendgrid.info 

    6:21 PM (2 minutes ago)

    to me
    .

    “GP co-payment would crush NSW emergency departments: report” — The Sydney Morning Herald, October 8 2014

    Neville, The evidence is growing: Tony Abbott’s $7 GP tax will hurt Australians and destroy our universal health care system.

    A secret report out today from NSW Health has found that an extra 500,000 people a year would choke NSW emergency departments at a cost of $80 million if the Abbott Government proceeds with its $7 GP tax.

    That’s because Australians can’t afford a GP tax.

    That’s why we’ve have been fighting against it — we’ve signed petitions and held community rallies.

    But we need to do everything we can to keep up the pressure to stop the Abbott Government from dismantling Medicare and make sure everyone knows what this awful policy would mean. Can you share this graphic on Facebook and help get out the facts to your friends and family?

    medicare_7GP_tax.png

    Because of the thousands of other people just like you who get this email we know that together we can reach millions. That’s why it’s so important we do little things like sharing graphics on Facebook — your actions form part of a bigger picture. Click here to share it today.

    And if you don’t have Facebook, please email it to your friends. We can keep up the fight and together we can make a difference.

    Thanks for your support,

    Catherine King
    Shadow Minister for Health

  • The Toll-Booth Economy – monbiot.com

    nable desktop notifications for Gmail.   Learn more  Hide
    More

    1 of 3
    AdI want to retire abroadwww.escapologist.com.au – Now you can live in luxury for less These 3 countries are safe & cheap

    The Toll-Booth Economy – monbiot.com

    Inbox
    x

    George Monbiot news@monbiot.com via google.com 

    6:05 PM (11 minutes ago)

    to me

    The Toll-Booth Economy – monbiot.com


    The Toll-Booth Economy

    Posted: 07 Oct 2014 01:05 PM PDT

    Corporate power is the real enemy within, but none of the major parties will confront it.
    By George Monbiot, published in the Guardian 8th October 2014

    The more power you possess, the more insecure you feel. The paranoia of power drives people towards absolutism. But far from curing them of the conviction that they are threatened and beleaguered, it becomes only stronger.

    On Friday, the Chancellor of the Exchequer, George Osborne, claimed that business is under political attack on a scale it has not faced since the fall of the Berlin wall(1). He was speaking at the Institute of Directors, where he was introduced with the claim that “we are in a generational struggle to defend the principles of the free market against people who want to undermine it or strip it away.”(2) A few days before, while introducing Osborne at the Conservative party conference, Digby Jones, formerly the head of the Confederation of British Industry, warned that companies are at risk of being killed by “regulation from Big Government” and of drowning “in the mire of anti-business mood music encouraged by vote-seekers.”(3) Where is that government and who are these vote-seekers? They are a figment of his imagination.

    Where, with the exception of the Greens and Plaid Cymru, who have four MPs between them, are the political parties calling for greater restraints on corporate power? When David Cameron boasts that he is “rolling out the red carpet” for multinational corporations, “cutting their red tape, cutting their taxes”, promising always to set “the most competitive corporate taxes in the G20: lower than Germany, lower than Japan, lower than the United States”(4), all Labour can say is “us too”.

    Its shadow business secretary, Chuka Umanna, once a fierce campaigner against tax avoidance, is now sponsored by a company which delivers “tailored tax solutions to individuals and organisations internationally”(5,6). The shadow chancellor, Ed Balls, cannot open his lips without clamping them around the big business boot. There’s no better illustration of the cross-party corporate consensus than the platform the Conservatives gave to Digby Jones to voice his paranoia. Jones was ennobled by Tony Blair and appointed as a minister in the Labour government. Now he rolls up at the Conservative conference to applaud George Osborne as the man who “did what was right for our Country. A personal pat on the back for that.”(7) A pat on the head would have been more appropriate – you can see which way power flows.

    The corporate consensus is enforced not only by the lack of political choice, but by an assault on democracy itself. Steered by business lobbyists, the European Union and the United States are negotiating a Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership(8). If it goes ahead it will suppress the ability of governments to put the public interest ahead of profit. It could expose Britain to cases like El Salvador’s, where an Australian company is now suing the government before a closed tribunal of corporate lawyers for $300m (nearly half the country’s annual budget) in potential profits foregone(9). Why? Because El Salvador has refused permission for a gold mine that would poison people’s drinking water.

    Last month the Commons public accounts committee found that the British government has inserted a remarkable clause into contracts with the companies to whom it is handing the probation service (one of the maddest privatisations of all). If a future government seeks to cancel these contracts (Labour has said it will) it would have to pay the companies the money they would otherwise have made over the next ten years(10). Yes, ten years. The penalty would amount to between £300m and £400m.

    Windfalls like this are everywhere: think of the billion pounds the government threw into the air when it sold Royal Mail(11), or the massive state subsidies quietly being channelled to the private train companies(12). When Cameron told the Conservative party conference “there’s no reward without effort; no wealth without work; no success without sacrifice”(13), he was talking cobblers. Thanks to his policies, shareholders and corporate executives become stupendously rich by sitting in the current with their mouths open.

    Ours is a toll-booth economy, unchallenged by any major party, in which companies which have captured essential public services – water, energy, trains – charge extraordinary fees we have no choice but to pay(14). If there is a “generational struggle to defend the principles of the free market”, it’s a struggle against the corporations, which have replaced the market with a state-endorsed oligarchy(15).

    It’s because of the power of corporations that the minimum wage remains so low, while executives cream off millions. It’s because of this power that most people in poverty are in work(16), and the state must pay billions to supplement their appalling wages. It’s because of this power that, in the midst of a crisis so severe that the world has lost over 50% of its vertebrate wildlife in just 40 years(17), the government is organising a bonfire of environmental protection. It’s because of this power that instead of innovative taxation (such as a financial transactions tax and land value taxation(18)) we have permanent austerity for the poor. It’s because of this power that billions are still pumped into tax havens. It’s because of this power that Britain is becoming a tax haven in its own right(19).

    And still they want more. Through a lobbying industry and a political funding system successive governments have failed to reform, corporations select and buy and bully the political class to prevent effective challenge to their hegemony. Any politician brave enough to stand up to them is relentlessly hounded by the corporate media. Corporations are the enemy within.

    So it’s depressing to see charities falling over themselves to assure George Osborne that they are not, as he alleged last week, putting the “counter view” to the “business argument”. “We don’t recognise the divide he draws between the concerns of businesses and charities,” says Oxfam(20). People “should be celebrating not denigrating the relationship between business and charities”, says the National Council for Voluntary Organisations(21). These are good groups, doing good work. But if, in the face of a full-spectrum assault by corporate power on everything they exist to defend, they cannot stand up and name the problem, you have to wonder what they are for.

    There’s a generational struggle taking place all right: a struggle over what remains of our democracy. It’s time we joined it.

    www.monbiot.com

    References:
    1.    Transcript sent by email. The Institute of Directors tells me it will be on their website shortly.

    2.    Transcript sent by email.

    3.    http://www.digbylordjones.com/lord-jones-introductory-speech-conservative-party-conference-2014.html

    4.    http://blogs.spectator.co.uk/coffeehouse/2014/10/david-camerons-speech-to-the-conservative-conference-full-text/

    5.    http://www.thetimes.co.uk/tto/news/politics/article4193839.ece

    6. http://www.signaturetax.co.uk/

    7.    http://www.digbylordjones.com/lord-jones-introductory-speech-conservative-party-conference-2014.html

    8.    http://www.monbiot.com/2013/11/04/a-global-ban-on-left-wing-politics/

    9.    http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/oct/03/australian-mining-is-poisoning-el-salvador-it-could-soon-send-it-broke-too

    10.    http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2014/sep/11/poison-pill-probation-contracts-moj-serco-g4s

    11.    http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2014/feb/07/royal-mail-privatised-city-estimates-value

    12.    http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/sep/01/great-british-railway-rake-off-rolls-on

    13.    http://blogs.spectator.co.uk/coffeehouse/2014/10/david-camerons-speech-to-the-conservative-conference-full-text/

    14.    http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2014/aug/22/sale-of-century-privatisation-scam

    15.    https://www.opendemocracy.net/ourkingdom/colin-crouch/dealing-with-corporate-political-power

    16.    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-25287068

    17.    http://www.theguardian.com/environment/georgemonbiot/2014/oct/01/george-monbiot-war-on-the-living-world-wildlife

    18.    http://www.monbiot.com/2013/01/21/a-telling-silence/

    19.    http://www.theguardian.com/society/2014/sep/15/how-super-rich-got-richer-10-shocking-facts-inequality

    20.    http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2014/oct/03/george-osborne-charities-business-chancellor

    21.    http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2014/oct/03/george-osborne-charities-business-chancellor

  • Burning off fossil fuel investments

    «
    »

    Burning off fossil fuel investments

    Victoria Thieberger
    43 min ago

    Industries
    Resources and Energy
    Climate
    Markets

    Be afraid. Be very afraid. That’s the message to companies involved in the exploration, extraction and production of fossil fuels following the sudden snowballing effect of funds announcing divestments from these industries just this week.

    Investment bank UBS says in a new report that, following a series of meetings with clients, it sees the fossil fuel divestment campaign as significant and potentially effective.

    “Many of those engaged in the debate are the consumers, voters and leaders of the next several decades. In our view, this single fact carries more weight than any other data point on the planet for this issue,” UBS said in the report out of London.

    In just one week, more than $40 million has been earmarked to be pulled out of target companies.

    The latest mandates from three key sectors of the Australian institutional investor landscape – university, local government and church funds – have decided to opt out of some or all of their coal and fossil fuel related investments.

    So far, the dollar amounts are modest. But they may multiply as the divestment movement gains momentum.

    In the past week, the Australian National University has said it will sell its stakes in seven resource companies after a student-led campaign that lasted several years. While press reports have bandied about the $1.1 billion total value of the ANU’s investment portfolio, it is actually selling a total of $16.025 million worth of shares, or 5.5 per cent of the Australian equities component of its entire portfolio.

    At the weekend, the Anglican Diocese of Perth said it would switch its investments from fossil fuels and towards renewables instead. The Uniting Church has taken a similar stand.

    The New South Wales local council employees’ super fund, Local Government Super, says it will sell $25 million of shares in companies that derive over a third of revenue from coal mining or coal-fired electricity generation, including AGL Energy and Whitehaven Coal.

    Last month, HESTA, the super fund for health and community services with $29 billion in funds under management, announced it is progressively implementing a restriction on investments in thermal coal, becoming the first major Australian super fund to do so across all of its investment options.

    So while each super fund’s investment decision will have a negligible impact on any single resource company’s share register, this appears to be the start of a structural shift out a sector based on ethical investment principles.

    “There is a massive increase in public scrutiny from the members of super funds and the clients of financial advisers,” said Simon O’Connor, chief executive of the Responsible Investment Association Australasia.

    RIAA is the peak industry body for responsible investors, claiming some 160 members that manage a collective $500 billion and include the country’s 50 largest super funds.

    In some ways, this is a logical progression from the trends towards conscientious consumption (fair-trade coffee, free-range eggs) as well as the move by super funds out of other ethically dubious investments in gambling or tobacco. University endowment funds in the US such as the one run by Stanford and more than 30 cities including Seattle and San Francisco have made such ethical calls.

    Figures from the RIAA show that 16 Australian super funds divested a total of $1.2 billion from tobacco stocks over a two-year period.

    Ten years ago, fund managers argued that pulling out of tobacco would be costly and interfered with modern portfolio theory. Now, advisers at Mercer believe that the key argument for super funds to divest out of a sector is connected with the reputation of the fund.

    The risk is that the super fund will be perceived to be disconnected from their members’ attitudes if they continue with status quo investment practices.

    When UniSuper refined its approach to its $1.4 billion sustainable investment options last month, it added alcohol, gaming, weapons and companies involved in fossil fuel exploration and production to its screening of tobacco, as exclusions from its funds.

    While it is too early to aggregate industry figures from the fossil fuel divestment campaign, it’s clear that companies are feeling the pressure to respond.

    The Minerals Council has set up a committee to develop low emissions technologies for fossil fuels.

    Sandfire Resources, one of the companies to lose ANU as an investor, has threatened to sue the advisers behind the decision, according to media reports.

    “It’s basically a Pandora’s box,” one fund manager told me. The question is whether investors wanting to take the ethical high ground avoid pure-play fossil fuel producers, explorers, and/or mining services companies. Or is it companies with a certain threshold of revenues from these activities? What about diversified miners?

    He added, with a note of cynicism, that it is “easy to make these investment decisions” with coal prices where they are now. Investment returns are unlikely to be damaged by such decisions taken at the low point of the cycle.

    But for the longer term, there is a greater issue at play. Australia’s superannuation system holds around $1.8 trillion in funds, and about 40 per cent of the super savings are managed by investment managers.

    If domestic institutional investors, pressured by their members, systematically withdraw from certain sectors over time, those companies will have a diminishing pool of domestic capital on which to rely. And that may create an opening for investors from other countries, with different thresholds and different long-term goals, to move in.