Author: Neville

  • Improving Crop Yields in a World of Extreme Weather Events

    Improving Crop Yields in a World of Extreme Weather Events

    July 1, 2013 — When plants encounter drought, they naturally produce abscisic acid (ABA), a stress hormone that helps them cope with the drought conditions. Specifically, the hormone turns on receptors in the plants. Botanists have identified an inexpensive synthetic chemical, quinabactin, that mimics ABA. Spraying ABA on plants improves their water use and stress tolerance, but the procedure is expensive. Quinabactin now offers a cheaper solution.


    Share This:

    Farmers in the United States witnessed record-breaking extremes in temperature and drought during the last two summers, causing worldwide increases in the costs of food, feed and fiber. Indeed, many climate scientists caution that extreme weather events resulting from climate change is the new normal for farmers in North America and elsewhere, requiring novel agricultural strategies to prevent crop losses.

    Now a research team led by Sean Cutler, a plant cell biologist at the University of California, Riverside, has found a new drought-protecting chemical that shows high potential for becoming a powerful tool for crop protection in the new world of extreme weather.

    Named “quinabactin” by the researchers, the chemical mimics a naturally occurring stress hormone in plants that helps the plants cope with drought conditions.

    Study results appear online this week in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

    All land plants have intricate water sensing and drought response systems that are tuned to maximize their fitness in the environments they live in. For example, plants in environments with low water grow slowly so that they do not consume more water than is available.

    “But since farmers have always desired fast-growing varieties, their most valued strains did not always originate from drought-tolerant progenitors,” explained Cutler, an associate professor of plant cell biology. “As a result, we have crops today that perform very well in years of plentiful water but poorly in years with little water. This dilemma has spawned an active hunt for both new drought-tolerant crops and chemicals that farmers might use for improving crop yield under adverse conditions.”

    Working on Arabidopsis, a model plant used widely in plant biology labs, Cutler and his colleagues focused their efforts on tinkering with one of the plant endogenous systems involved in drought responses. Plant leaves are lined with tiny pores, called stomata, which dynamically open and close to control the amount of water lost to the environment by evaporation. So that the plants can acquire carbon dioxide from the atmosphere, the pores need to be open some of the time, resulting in some loss of water.

    During drought the stomata close firmly to limit water loss. Behind the scenes, a small hormone called abscisic acid (ABA) orchestrates the opening and closing of the pores. Cells throughout the plant produce increasing amounts of ABA as water levels decrease. ABA then moves throughout the plant to signal the stressful conditions and close the stomata. Inside plant cells, ABA does its job by turning on a special class of proteins called receptors. The discovery in 2009 of ABA receptors by the same team behind the current breakthrough was heralded by Science magazine as one of the top breakthroughs of 2009 because of its relevance to the drought problem.

    “If you can control the receptors the way ABA does, then you have a way to control water loss and drought-tolerance,” Cutler said. “It has been known for many years that simply spraying ABA on plants improves their water use and stress tolerance, but ABA itself is much too expensive for practical use in the field by farmers.”

    To address this problem, Cutler and his team searched through many thousands of molecules to identify inexpensive synthetic chemicals that could activate the receptors by mimicking ABA. The team found and named quinabactin, a molecule they show is almost indistinguishable from ABA in its effects, but much simpler chemically and therefore easier to make than ABA. By studying how the new molecule activates the ABA receptors that are involved in drought tolerance, the team also has learned more about the underlying control logic of the stress response system and provided new information that can be used for others interested in developing similar molecules,

    “This is a competitive arena that includes agrichemical giants who are busily working to bring similar drought-protecting molecules to market, so this is a landmark discovery because quinabactin is the first-in-class synthetic molecule of its kind,” Cutler said.

    The work reported this week is the first in a multistep process of bringing a new agricultural product to market. Given the complexity and costs of such a process, the UCR Office of Technology Commercialization (OTC) is working with an agricultural leader, Syngenta Biotechnology, Inc., to develop the technology.

    Joyce Patrona, a licensing officer in OTC, is coordinating UCR’s licensing efforts for quinabactin.

    “It has become very apparent to industry engaged in this area of technology of the robustness of Dr. Cutler’s research,” she said. “This is a credit to Dr. Cutler and his team as well as to UCR for its commitment to bring innovative research to the marketplace.”

    Cutler’s collaborators on the research project are Brian Volkman and Francis Peterson at the Medical College of Wisconsin, who helped unravel the mechanism by which quinabactin mimics ABA by determining the atomic structure of the new molecule bound to one of its cellular receptors. Others who worked with them are Masanori Okamoto (first author of the research paper), Andrew Defries and Sang-Youl Park at UCR; and Akira Endo and Eiji Nambara at the University of Toronto, Canada.

    Share this story on Facebook, Twitter, and Google:
  • Coastal Regions Experiencing Dramatic Changes in Climate

    Coastal Regions Experiencing Dramatic Changes in Climate

    Jul 01, 2013 09:06 AM EDT
    man

    (Photo : REUTERS/Stringer )

    According to a new study, coastal regions are experiencing greater climatic changes when compared to other regions. The study included analysis of data of coastal ocean temperatures over the past three decades.

    The researchers, Dr. Hannes Baumann of Stony Brook University School of Marine and Atmospheric Sciences (SoMAS) and Dr. Owen Doherty of Scripps Institution of Oceanography, found that there was a dramatic change in climate conditions in the coastal regions. The South American Pacific coasts, for example, have been cooling in the past few years due to colder water from the deeper part of the ocean being pushed to the coastal region, a phenomenon called upwelling.

    Like Us on Facebook

    However, some areas have gotten warmer such as the North Pacific and North Atlantic coasts, where researchers found the temperatures were three times higher than the global average.

    Scientists say that diversity in the temperatures could lead to dramatic changes in the population of native marine life. Oceans are complex and delicate systems and a recent study has shown that marine organisms will require centuries to adapt to current changes in the environment.

    According to another study, State of Maryland sea level could rise by as much as two feet by 2050.

    “The world is getting flatter,” said Baumann in a news release. “Coastal waters at high (cold) latitudes warm much faster than at low (warm) latitudes, hence the majority of the world’s coastal temperature gradients are getting shallower.  This could cause dramatic reorganization of organisms and ecosystems, from small plankton communities to larger fish populations.

    Many organisms that live in the northern coasts differ genetically from the southern organisms so that they can adapt to their habitat. With further study, we want to explore how changes in coastal ocean temperature gradients could predict large-scale changes in the ecosystem,” Baumann added.

    The study “Decadal Changes in the World’s Coastal Latitudinal Temperature Gradients,” is published in the journal PLOS One.

  • Coastal Ocean Temperatures Changed Dramatically Over The Past Three Decades, Research Finds

    Coastal Ocean Temperatures Changed Dramatically Over The Past Three Decades, Research Finds

    Posted on July 2, 2013 by
    Print Friendly
    0 Share 5 Tweet 0 Share 6 6 Share

    Local changes in coastal ocean temperatures have been much more dramatic over the past 30 years than than global averages imply, new research has found. The research suggests that there are very distinct regional differences — differences which have significant ecological implications.

    Image Credit: Coastline via Wikimedia Commons

    Image Credit: Coastline via Wikimedia Commons

    The new research was done by mapping and analyzing the differences amongst the world’s coastlines with regards temperature changes over the past three decades. The analysis led to the realization that there is great regional diversity in warming and cooling patterns. “For example, the South American Pacific coasts have been cooling over the last few decades. To some, these cooling trends may be counterintuitive, but they are consistent with global climate change predictions, such as increases in upwelling (i.e., a process that brings cold, deep ocean water to the coast).”

    But then over in the North Pacific and North Atlantic, there has been a very clear and obvious warming trend. Including some areas where detected changes in temperature were as high as +/-2.5 degrees Celsius, that’s three times higher than the global average. “Climate change is happening everywhere — just not necessarily at the same rate, or even in the same direction. For example, if you live on Cape Cod, your conditions are warming three times faster than global averages imply, while in Santiago, Chile, coastal waters have been getting cooler.”

    “The world is getting flatter,” stated Dr Hannes Baumann of the Stony Brook University School of Marine and Atmospheric Sciences. “Coastal waters at high (cold) latitudes warm much faster than at low (warm) latitudes, hence the majority of the world’s coastal temperature gradients are getting shallower. This could cause dramatic reorganization of organisms and ecosystems, from small plankton communities to larger fish populations.

    “We already know, in general, that marine life changes in its characteristics along these North-South temperature gradients,” Baumann continues. “For example, many coastal fish populations differ genetically from north to south, an adaptation to grow best a local temperature conditions. With further study, we want to explore how changes in coastal ocean temperature gradients could predict large-scale changes in the ecosystem.”

    The new research is a good reminder of just how much the effects of climate change will vary by region — we’re used to certain weather patterns which could very well completely change with the changing climate. Something to keep in mind.

    The new research was just published in the journal PLoS ONE.

    Read more at http://planetsave.com/2013/07/02/coastal-ocean-temperatures-changed-dramatically-over-the-past-three-decades-research-finds/#g8V6FX5YBThhFQfQ.99

  • Obama’s Climate Pledge: The Keystone XL Fracking Double Standard

    Obama’s Climate Pledge: The Keystone XL Fracking Double Standard

    Repost This
    Comment on this StoryEmail this story

    President Obama, during his climate speech last week, surprised many observers by his unexpected remarks about the Keystone XL pipeline.   The President, for the first time, placed a clear condition on the pipeline’s approval – its impact on the climate.

    “The net effects of the pipeline’s impact on our climate will be absolutely critical to determining whether this project is allowed to go forward” he said, calling on the United States to |lead international efforts to combat a changing climate.”

    Later in the speech, Mr. Obama spoke in favor of the increased use of natural gas as a ‘transition fuel’ and called on the United States to “strengthen our position as the top natural gas producer because, in the medium term at least, it not only can provide safe, cheap power, but it can also help reduce our carbon emissions.”

    In a speech focused entirely on climate change, however, these two positions – placing climate change conditions on one fossil-fuel (tar sands oil) project while ignoring the climate implications (indeed touting the merits) of another fossil fuel industry (natural gas) – contradict each other and call into question Mr. Obama’s pledges, “as President, as a father, and as an American,” to take meaningful action on climate change.

    Mr. Obama cited, correctly, that natural gas emits far less carbon than oil or coal when burned. This is true, but carbon is not the only potent greenhouse gas contributing to climate change.  If the goal is fighting climate change, the President thus omitted an inconvenient truth: Methane – the principal component of natural gas – is a potent greenhouse gas, with some reports suggesting its global warming potential is greater than carbon.

    There have been few scientific studies that examine the global warming effects of natural gas, but the few that have been published are significant.  A 2011 study out of Cornell University concluded that methane has a “global warming potential that is far greater than that of carbon dioxide” and warned that methane’s short-term properties (its effect on climate during the first twenty years after emission) are considered even more significant than the carbon emissions from oil or coal.   The report summarized its findings this way:  “Methane contributes substantially to the greenhouse gas footprint of shale gas…”

    Another study, co-authored by climate researcher Ken Caldeira, of the Carnegie Institution for Science, and physicist Nathan Myhrvold (the former lead technology officer at Microsoft), and published in the journal, Environmental Research Letters, concluded that natural gas is “worthless for fighting climate change.”

    Gavin Schmidt, a climate model scientist with NASA, explained how methane, in addition to its own direct warming effects, also contributes to global warming indirectly by decreasing an important atmospheric coolant, OH (hydroxyls):

    “we found that methane’s (warming) impacts increased even further since increasing methane lowers OH (hydoxyls) and so slows the formation of sulphate aerosol and, since sulphates are cooling, having less of them is an additional warming effect. This leads to an increase in the historical attribution to methane (by a small amount), but actually makes a much bigger difference to the GWP (Global Warming Potential) of methane.”

    Addressing the industry’s assertion, repeated by President Obama, that natural gas is a logical, safe ‘transition fuel’ the author of the Cornell report, Robert Howarth, said, “The large greenhouse gas footprint of shale gas undercuts the logic of its use as a bridging fuel over coming decades, if the goal is to reduce global warming.”

    Thus, Mr. Obama’s climate speech last week contained two opposing principals:

    He conditions one fossil fuel project (Keystone XL) on its climate implications, while he ignores the significant climate implications of another fossil fuel – natural gas.

    The rules of science will not accommodate such conflicting principals.

    President Obama will either combat climate change… or he won’t.

    Photo credit: Forward on Climate rally via Shutterstock

  • Robber Barons ( MONBIOT )

    Monbiot.com


    Robber Barons

    Posted: 01 Jul 2013 12:26 PM PDT

    Why do we ignore the most blatant transfer of money from the poor to the rich?

     

    By George Monbiot, published in the Guardian 2nd July 2013.

    It’s the silence that puzzles me. Last week, the Chancellor stood up in parliament to announce that benefits for the very poor would be cut yet again(1). On the same day, in Luxembourg, our government battled to maintain benefits for the very rich. It won. As a result, some of the richest people in Britain will each continue to receive millions of pounds in income support from taxpayers.

    There has been not a whimper of protest. The Guardian hasn’t mentioned it. UK Uncut is silent. So – at the other end of the spectrum – is the UK Independence Party.

    I’m talking about the most blatant transfer of money from the poor to the rich that has occurred in the era of universal suffrage. Farm subsidies. The main subsidy – the single farm payment – is doled out by the hectare. The more you own or rent, the more money you receive.

    Since 1999, more progressive European nations have been trying to limit the amount of public money a farmer can capture under the Common Agricultural Policy(2). It looked as if, this year, they might at last succeed. But two governments in particular resisted, throughout the negotiations that ended last week: those resolute champions of the free market, Germany and the United Kingdom(3,4,5). Thanks to their lobbying, any decision has yet again been deferred(6).

    There were two proposals for limiting handouts to the super-rich, known as capping and degressivity. Capping means that no one should receive more than a certain amount: the proposed limit was €300,000 a year(7). Degressivity means that, beyond a certain point, the rate received per hectare begins to fall. This was supposed to have kicked in at €150,000(8). The UK’s environment secretary, Owen Paterson, knocked both proposals down.

    When our government says “we must help the farmers”, it means “we must help the 0.1%”. Most of the land here is owned by exceedingly wealthy people.

    Some of them are millionaires from elsewhere: sheikhs, oligarchs and mining magnates who own vast estates in this country. Though they might pay no taxes in the UK, they receive millions in farm subsidies. They are the world’s most successful benefit tourists. Yet, amid the manufactured terror of immigrants living off British welfare payments, we scarcely hear a word raised against them.

    The minister responsible for cutting income support for the poor, Iain Duncan Smith, lives on an estate owned by his wife’s family. Over the past ten years, it has received €1.5m in income support from taxpayers(9). How much more obvious do these double standards have to be before we begin to notice?

    Thanks in large part to subsidies, the value of farmland in the UK has tripled in ten years(10): it has risen faster than almost any other speculative asset. Farmers are exempted from inheritance tax and capital gains tax. They can build, without planning permission, structures which lesser mortals would be forbidden to erect, boosting both their capital and income. And they have a guaranteed income from the state. Yet all we hear from their leaders is one long whinge(10).

    I have yet to detect a word of gratitude from the National Farmers’ Union to the hard-pressed taxpayers who keep its members in such style. The NFU, dominated by the biggest landowners, has a peculiar genius for bringing out the violins. It pushes forward small, struggling hill farmers. The real beneficiaries of its policies are the arable barons hiding behind them.

    An uncapped subsidy system damages the interests of small farmers. It reinforces the economies of scale enjoyed by the biggest landlords, helping them to drive the small producers out of business. A fair cap (say €30,000) would help small farmers compete with the big ones.

    So here’s the question: why do we keep deferring to Big Farmer? Why do its sob stories go unchallenged? Why is this spectacular feudal boondoggle tolerated in the 21st Century?

    Here are three possible explanations. A high proportion of the books aimed at very young children are about farm animals. There is usually one family of every kind of animal, and they live in harmony with each other and the rosy-cheeked farmer. Understandably, slaughter, butchery, castration, separation, crates and cages, pesticides and slurry never feature. The petting farms which have sprung up around Britain reify and reinforce this fantasy. Perhaps these books unintentionally implant, at the very onset of consciousness, a deep, unquestioned faith in the virtues of the farm economy(11).

    Perhaps too, after being brutally evicted from the land through centuries of enclosure, we have learnt not to go there, even in our minds. To engage in this question feels like trespass, though we have handed over so much of our money that we could have bought all the land in Britain several times over. Perhaps we also suffer from a cultural cringe towards people who make their living from the land and the sea, seeing their lives – however rich and cossetted they are – as somehow authentic while ours feel artificial.

    Whatever the reason may be, it’s time we overcame these inhibitions and confronted this unembarrassed robbery of the poor by the rich. The current structure of farm subsidies epitomises the British government’s defining project: capitalism for the poor, socialism for the rich.

    www.monbiot.com

    References:

    1. https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/spending-round-2013-speech

    2. http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_MEMO-13-631_en.htm

    3. The UK government laid out its negotiating position here. http://archive.defra.gov.uk/foodfarm/policy/capreform/documents/110128-uk-cap-response.pdf It stated “the UK is opposed to the Commission’s suggestion that direct payments to large farms should be capped. The CAP should encourage greater competitiveness, including by consolidation, which capping would discourage.”

    4. The BBC reported last week that the UK and Germany crushed the capping proposal: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-22986953

    5. On July 1st 2013, Defra confirmed to me in a phone call that it has been lobbying to ensure that any capping or degressivity remain voluntary: in other words, if they are applied at all, the UK and other nations will be able to opt out of them.

    6. Officially, these issues will now be “dealt with separately within the negotiations on the Multi-Annual Financial Framework (MFF) for 2014-2020”.  http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_MEMO-13-621_en.htm Given the record to date, that is likely to mean “never”.

    7. http://ictsd.org/i/news/biores/170846/

    8. http://ictsd.org/i/news/biores/170846/

    9. http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2013/may/30/hugh-muir-diary-iain-duncan-smith

    10. “New Bio-Waste Spreader”, 12th June 2013. The Agri Brigade. Private Eye.

    11. Something like this was proposed by “Charlemagne”, writing in the Economist. He or she called it the Richard Scarry rule: “politicians will rarely challenge interests that feature in children’s books.” But while it seems to apply to farmers, it doesn’t seem to apply to other sectors: they willingly do battle with train drivers and doctors, for example. Charlemagne, 30th October 2008. Europe’s baleful bail-outs. http://www.economist.com/node/12510261

    You are subscribed to email updates from George Monbiot
    To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now.
    Email delivery powered by Google
    Google Inc., 20 West Kinzie, Chicago IL USA 60610
  • We said never again ( avaaz )

    Dear friends,

    Most people didn’t know who the Rwandans were until 800,000 had been killed. Now, the fate of the Rohingya people of Burma is hanging by a thread as mobs attack them while the police look on. The Burmese President could stop the violence – all he has to do is approve a plan to protect them and ensure it is enforced, while granting them citizenship. Let’s appeal to European leaders to press him when he visits them in days, and stop the next Rwanda:

    Sign the Petition

    Most people didn’t know who the Rwandans were until it was too late, and 800,000 of them were dead. Right now, the fate of Burma’s Rohingya people is hanging by a thread. Racist thugs have distributed leaflets threatening to wipe out this small Burmese minority. Already children have been hacked to death and unspeakable murders committed. All signs are pointing to a coming horror, unless we act.

    Genocides happen because we don’t get concerned enough until the crime is committed. The Rohingya are a peaceful and very poor people. They’re hated because their skin is darker and the majority fear they’re ‘taking jobs away’. There are 800,000 of them, and they could be gone if we don’t act. We’ve failed too many peoples, let’s not fail the Rohingya.

    Burmese President Thein Sein has the power, personnel and resources to protect the Rohingya, all he has to do is give the word to make it happen. In days, he’ll arrive in Europe to sell his country’s new openness to trade. If EU leaders greet him with a strong request to protect the Rohingya, he’s likely to do it. Let’s get 1 million voices and plaster images of what’s happening in Burma outside his meetings with key EU heads of state:

    https://secure.avaaz.org/en/we_said_never_again_b/?bBYMjdb&v=26519

    Torture, gang rape, execution style killings — human rights groups are using the term “ethnic cleansing” to describe the brutality in Burma. Already more than 120,000 Rohingya have been forced to flee, many to makeshift camps near the border, while others have fled in boats only to drown, starve, or be shot at by coastguards from neighboring countries. Reports show that violence is escalating — earlier this year President Thein Sein declared a state of emergency after another round of deadly attacks, and it’s just a matter of time until there is a large scale massacre.

    Genocides don’t happen when governments oppose them, but the Burmese regime has been leaning the wrong way. Recently, a government spokesperson admitted that authorities were enforcing a rule that limits the Rohingya population to having only two children and forces couples seeking to get married to obtain special permission. And experts report that government authorities have stood by or even participated in acts of “ethnic cleansing.” President Sein has finally been forced to acknowledge what’s happening to the Rohingya, but he has so far refused to implement plans to stop the violence and protect those at risk.

    Until he does, the risk of genocide hovers like a dark cloud over not just Burma, but the world. Through their trade relations, UK PM Cameron and French President Hollande have massive leverage with Sein — if they press him to act when he meets with them this month, it could save lives. Let’s make sure they do. We’ve failed too many peoples, let’s not fail the Rohingya. Join the call now and share this with everyone:

    https://secure.avaaz.org/en/we_said_never_again_b/?bBYMjdb&v=26519

    Time and again, the Avaaz community has stood with the people of Burma in their fight for democracy. When the regime brutally cracked down on Buddhist monks in 2007, Avaazers donated hundreds of thousands of dollars/euros/pounds to provide technical support and training to activists to fight a communications blackout. In 2008, when a devastating cyclone killed at least 100,000 Burmese, but the venal military regime stopped all official international aid from coming in, our community donated millions directly to monks on the front line of the aid effort.

    Our community didn’t exist when genocide was committed in Rwanda, 20 years ago. Would we have done enough to stop it? Let’s show the Rohingya our answer to that question.

    With hope and determination,

    Luis, Jeremy, Aldine, Oliver, Marie, Jooyea and the whole Avaaz team

    PS – Many Avaaz campaigns are started by members of our community! Start yours now and win on any issue – local, national or global: http://www.avaaz.org/en/petition/start_a_petition/?bgMYedb&v=23917

    MORE INFORMATION

    Burma riots: Video shows police failing to stop attack (BBC)
    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-22243676

    Burma: End ‘Ethnic Cleansing’ of Rohingya Muslims (Human Rights Watch)
    http://www.hrw.org/news/2013/04/22/burma-end-ethnic-cleansing-rohingya-muslims

    Video shows Burmese police standing by as Buddhists attack Muslims (The Guardian)
    http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/apr/22/burmese-police-buddhists-attack-muslims

    The unending plight of Burma’s unwanted Rohingyas (BBC)
    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-23077537

    Dalai Lama Pleads for Myanmar Monks to End Violence Amid Damning Rights Report (ABC News)
    http://abcnews.go.com/International/dalai-lama-pleads-myanmar-monks-end-violence-amid/story?id=19013148#.UXV3vCt4a5w

    Thein Sein to visit Britain, France in July (AFP)
    http://www.dvb.no/news/thein-sein-to-visit-britain-france-in-july/28815

    Support the Avaaz Community!
    We’re entirely funded by donations and receive no money from governments or corporations. Our dedicated team ensures even the smallest contributions go a long way. Donate to Avaaz