Author: Neville

  • Rising sea level restrictions ‘ridiculous’

    Rising sea level  restrictions ‘ridiculous’

    By DAMON CRONSHAW

    June 30, 2013, 11:14 p.m.

    • DENIED: Steve Turner's plan for his property at Belmont South has been hampered by the council's sea-level-rise measure. Picture: Peter StoopDENIED: Steve Turner’s plan for his property at Belmont South has been hampered by the council’s sea-level-rise measure. Picture: Peter Stoop

    A BELMONT South resident says building restrictions placed on his property because of Lake Macquarie City Council’s concern about rising sea levels are ridiculous.

    Steve Turner sought to build a dual-occupancy and two-lot subdivision on his Beach Street property.

    “We wanted to make some money for our retirement,” he said.

    The property is about 200 metres from the lake.

    A waterfront reserve, the Pacific Highway and a couple of houses sit between it and the lake.

    The plan was to knock down a shack on the site, build two houses, live in one and sell the other.

    The council has consistently argued that it has a duty of care to consider sea-level rise in planning and development decisions.

    A council document about Mr Turner’s plan, dated April 2013, said the site’s ground level was 1.24 metres above sea level.

    “Council has a sea-level-rise policy, which applies to this property,” the council document said.

    “The policy does not permit the construction of new dual occupancies on lots that are lower than two metres [above sea level]. The construction of a new single dwelling would still be permissible.”

    Mr Turner could not afford to build only one house.

    He will be among residents to attend a Lake Macquarie Ratepayers Action Group meeting on Wednesday at 7pm at Marks Point Bowling Club to discuss concerns about the council’s sea-level-rise measures.

    Residents believe these are causing property prices to fall, despite the council’s denials.

    Group spokeswoman Barbara Davis said residents’ concerns about sea-level-rise planning were being ignored.

    Mrs Davis said the council had placed “damaging information on property planning certificates before any real opportunity to discuss how to manage predictions of future flooding and inundation”.

    A council statement said there had been “no change in the number of properties with flood notations [which includes sea-level rise] since 2009”.

    “Of the 9800 properties, there are 7700 properties in low-lying parts of the city that have had a flood-risk notation on their properties since 1997 [or before].”

  • limate Change Threatening The Continued Survival Of Low-Elevation Forests In Arid Regions

    Climate Change Threatening The Continued Survival Of Low-Elevation Forests In Arid Regions

    Posted on June 30, 2013 by
    Print Friendly
    0 Share 5 Tweet 0 Share 5 5 Share

    Climate change may result in the inability of low-elevation forests which are located in arid regions to regenerate, according to new research from Oregon State University.

    "A decade after a stand-replacement forest fire on the Metolius watershed in Central Oregon, almost no trees have begun to regenerate on one of the dry sites at lower elevation." Image Credit: Oregon State University

    “A decade after a stand-replacement forest fire on the Metolius watershed in Central Oregon, almost no trees have begun to regenerate on one of the dry sites at lower elevation.”
    Image Credit: Oregon State University

    With rising temperatures and increasing aridity, many regions may see the disappearance of their forests. “Predicted increases in temperature and drought in the coming century may make it more difficult for conifers such as ponderosa pine to regenerate after major forest fires on dry, low-elevation sites, in some cases leading to conversion of forests to grass or shrub lands.”

    The researchers “concluded that moisture stress is a key limitation for conifer regeneration following stand-replacing wildfire, which will likely increase with climate change. This will make post-fire recovery on dry sites slow and uncertain. If forests are desired in these locations, more aggressive attempts at reforestation may be needed.”

    The new research was based on work “done in a portion of the Metolius River watershed in the eastern Cascade Range of Oregon, which prior to a 2002 fire was mostly ponderosa pine with some Douglas-fir and other tree species. The research area was not salvage-logged or replanted following the severe, stand-replacing fire.”

    “A decade after this fire, there was almost no tree regeneration at lower, drier sites,” said Erich Dodson, a researcher with the OSU Department of Forest Ecosystems and Society. “There was some regeneration at higher sites with more moisture. But at the low elevations, it will be a long time before a forest comes back, if it ever does.”

    The Oregon State University press release continues:

    Similar situations may be found in many areas of the American West in coming decades, the researchers say, and recruitment of new forests may be delayed or prevented — even in climate conditions that might have been able to maintain an existing forest. While mature trees can use their roots to tap water deeper in the soil, competition with dense understory vegetation can make it difficult for seedlings to survive.

    Openings in ponderosa pine forests created by wildfire have persisted for more than a century on harsh, south-facing slopes in Colorado, the researchers noted in their report. And fire severity is already increasing in many forests due to climate change — what is now thought of as a drought in some locations may be considered average by the end of the next century.

    If trees do fail to regenerate, it could further reduce ecosystem carbon storage and amplify the greenhouse effect.

    Restoration treatment including thinning and prescribed burning may help reduce fire severity and increase tree survival after wildfire, as well as provide a seed source for future trees. These dry sites with less resilience to stand-replacing fire should be priorities for treatment, if maintaining a forest is a management objective.

    Higher-elevation, mixed conifer forests in less moisture-limited sites may be able to recover from stand-replacing wildfire without treatment.

    The new research was just published in Forest Ecology and Management.

    Read more at http://planetsave.com/2013/06/30/climate-change-threatening-the-continued-survival-of-low-elevation-forests-in-arid-regions/#kSEXQzbUZUbRVGBe.99

  • Greens push to boost renewable energy target to 90%

    Greens push to boost renewable energy target to 90%

    Date
    July 1, 2013 – 1:49PM
    • 11 reading now
    • (10)

    The Greens have launched a pitch to increase Australia’s renewable energy target to 90 per cent by 2030 and tip an extra $20 billion into Australia’s clean energy finance corporation, but have rejected an earlier move to an emissions trading scheme being considered by cabinet.

    Speaking on Monday morning, Greens leader Christine Milne said the minor party wanted to see all of Australia’s electricity come from renewable energy sources as soon as possible.

    She said the first step should be to increase Australia’s renewable energy target to 90 per cent by the end of the next decade. The target is currently set to ensure 20 per cent of Australia’s electricity comes from renewables by 2020.

    A study by the Australian Energy Market Operator released in April found moving to 100 per cent renewable energy was technically feasible, but would come with costs and significant challenges.

    Advertisement

    It found moving to an 100 per cent renewable energy system would cost $219 billion to $338 billion and require wholesale electricity prices to double from current rates. The operator did not compare these costs with other future scenarios including business as usual.

    Asked whether a move to 90 per cent renewables in effectively 15 years was realistic, Ms Milne said: ”When the the 20 per cent renewable energy target was set for 2020, people said it was way ambitious, it wouldn’t be able to be achieved.

    ”But once you put in place a roadmap then the technology development and business got behind it and you have seen the roll out very fast.”

    The Greens also want the Clean Energy Finance Corporation – which was set up as part of a deal between Labor and the Greens on carbon pricing – to received an extra $20 billion over ten years.

    That would lift its overall funding to the finance corporation to $30 billion. Senator Milne said the Greens proposed the extra money would come from borrowing – which would sit off the government’s budget – and would detail how to pay for the interest on the extra money in its yet to be released election policy costings.

    The finance corporation on Monday announced its second deal, investing $50 million to help New Zealand government-owned Meridian Energy to refinance its debt in the MacArthur wind farm in south-west Victoria. The debt refinancing came ahead of Meridian selling its share in Macarthur to Malaysian energy company Malakoff Corp.

    The Coalition has vowed to scrap the finance corporation alongside the carbon price, and says it will not honour any contracts its signs between now and the election.

    Speaking in Melbourne, Senator Milne also criticised considerations by Labor on ending the carbon price’s three-year fixed tax period early and moving quicker to an emissions trading scheme with a floating price and international linkages.

    The move has been largely backed by industry, who says the current carbon tax price of $24.15 a tonne is out of kilter with lower international prices at around $6 and resulting in higher the necessary costs.

    But new Climate Change Minister Mark Butler conceded to Fairfax Media on Sunday that moving earlier to an emissions trading would also have budget implications that need to be considered, with revenue expected to fall by billions of dollars.

    Senator Milne said in considering the move Prime Minister Kevin Rudd was making a populist pitch to business groups such as the Australian Industry Group by making it cheaper for companies to pollute.

    Follow the National Times on Twitter

    Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/opinion/political-news/greens-push-to-boost-renewable-energy-target-to-90-20130701-2p6nk.html#ixzz2Xlpvv39X

  • Spotlight on dealings haunts NSW Labor

    Spotlight on dealings haunts Labor

    Date
    July 1, 2013
    • 696 reading now
    • (695)

    Kate McClymont, Linton Besser

    EXCLUSIVE

    Joe Tripodi, Janice Crosio,Sam Bargshoon,Kim Beasly,unidentified man believed to be business partner  of David Tanevski,far right David Tanevski.In the spotlight: Best friends Joe Tripodi (left) and David Tanevski, far right. Photo: Brendan Esposito

    NSW Opposition Leader John Robertson says he has no idea who was behind the mysterious British Virgin Islands entity which bankrolled a private company in which he was a director.

    Hoping to make a motza out of the dotcom boom, Getonboard was established in 2000 as a joint venture between the Labor Party, Unions NSW and David Tanevski, a former ALP branch stacker and best friend of controversial Labor powerbroker Joe Tripodi.

    Mr Robertson said he had no duty … to alert a probity auditor.

    Also involved in the deal to tap into the unions’ database to sell computer and internet packages to the members was the property developer Allen Linz.

    Beach front and one of the cottages at Currawong. Under scrutiny: The sale of Currawong. Photo: Paul Miller

    A further spotlight on commercial dealings involving NSW Labor is an unwelcome distraction for Prime Minister Kevin Rudd. NSW Labor is already on the nose with voters after the explosive revelations surrounding the millions of dollars the family of powerbroker Eddie Obeid received from a government coal tender presided over by then resources minister Ian Macdonald.

    Advertisement

    This week Mr Robertson said he had no duty when head of Unions NSW to alert a probity auditor about the Getonboard business associations between himself, Mr Linz and Mr Tanevski. A conflict of interest was raised over Mr Robertson’s later sale of the union-owned cottages Currawong to Mr Linz, in a deal brokered by Mr Tanevski.

    ”It would be highly inappropriate to alter a report of an independent probity auditor,” Mr Robertson said in an emailed response about whether he had alerted the probity auditor of the trio’s previous involvement in Getonboard.

    NSW Opposition Leader John RobertsonNSW Opposition Leader John Robertson.

    Getonboard was the brainchild of Mr Tanevski, then Labor Council boss Michael Costa and then party chieftain Eric Roozendaal. Mr Robertson was a director for four years from 2001.

    Getonboard, run from Mr Tanevski’s Martin Place office, was a private company with only five shareholders: the Australian Labor Party (NSW) Branch Gifts, the Labor Council, two companies associated with Mr Tanevski, Mr Linz and businessman Michael Braham and, finally, the mysterious Good Century Assets Ltd, which lists its address as PO Box 957, Tortola, British Virgin Islands (BVI).

    New details about BVI companies have surfaced in the leaked cache of secret tax haven data that have rocked the world of private banking in the past few months.

    But none of the Getonboard’s directors contacted by Fairfax Media, including Mr Roozendaal, his alternate director Mark Arbib, Mr Costa or Mr Robertson claimed to have any idea of the identity of the secret company bankrolling their business.

    “Company directors are rightly expected to fulfil their duties with the utmost care and due diligence, but this does not – and in many instances – simply cannot extend to the undertaking of extensive inquiries into whoever has purchased shares in their company,” Mr Robertson said in an emailed response to Fairfax Media.

    He suggested that questions about Good Century ”should be directed to the company itself.” This is impossible due to the secrecy provisions of companies domiciled in offshore tax havens.

    This year, the veil of secrecy was partially lifted from offshore banking after a massive leak of data to the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists, which exposed politicians, celebrities and even suburban accountants who were benefiting from offshore companies registered in zero tax rate jurisdictions.

    Other directors of Getonboard included Mr Tanevski’s business partners Mr Braham, who was later appointed by Mr Costa to the Sydney Ports Authority, and Mr Linz, who later bought Currawong from Unions NSW.

    Mr Braham said he had no idea who was behind Good Century but suggested that because of its name ”it sounds like [the] Labor Party.”

    Mr Tanevski also claimed no knowledge of the matter. ”I do not know who the shareholders or officers of the Great Century Assets were,” he said in an email. He suggested the capital invested in Getonboard came from Hong Kong.

    Despite the millions of dollars in capital, some of which came from Good Century, Getonboard was a failure.

    While Mr Tanevski claimed to have no idea about who was behind Good Century, he did not reply to further questions about another of his companies, KWC Capital Partners, which was also half-owned by a BVI company, Shine Gate Investments, which shares the same post box in the offshore tax haven as Good Century. The other half of KWC was owned by Mr Linz, who did not return Fairfax Media’s calls.

    KWC Capital Partners and its sole director Mr Tanevski were at the centre of a furore in early 2007 when it emerged that Mr Robertson, then head of Unions NSW, had engaged Mr Tanevski’s firm KWC Capital Partners to handle the sale of Currawong. And the buyer was Mr Tanveski’s business partner Allen Linz.

    Election Funding Authority records reveal KWC Capital Partners donated $45,000 to NSW Labor between 2003 and 2007.

    In the wake of critical stories including that Mr Linz’s offer of $15 million for Currawong was half that of other offers, Mr Robertson appointed Rory O’Connor to do a probity report on the sale.

    Mr O’Connor was routinely called upon to sprinkle holy water over some of the most contentious decisions of the NSW Labor government including the sale of Doyles Creek training mine by Mr Macdonald to his friend the union-boss John Maitland.

    The report, which has been obtained by Fairfax Media, shows that Mr Robertson specifically asked Mr O’Connor to review the relationship between KWC Capital Partners, Mr Tanevski and Mr Linz.

    Mr O’Connor’s report failed to ascertain that Mr Linz owned 50 per cent of the very company engaged to broker the sale – a fact easily unearthed by an ASIC company search.

    No attempt was made to find who was behind the mysterious BVI company Shine Gate Investments and the probity auditor also failed to note that Mr Linz, Mr Tanevski and Mr Robertson had been in business together with Getonboard.

    Mr O’Connor has previously defended this report as having been conducted in ”good faith”.

    The Currawong deal came under further scrutiny in late 2011 when the Independent Commission against Corruption found that in the dying days of the Labor government in March 2011, the Land department chief, Warwick Watkins, and planning minister Tony Kelly had acted corruptly in backdating a letter to allow Mr Linz to sell Currawong to the government.

    Although Mr Robertson defended the 2007 sale to Mr Linz as being unconditional, the ICAC inquiry revealed that apart from an initial deposit of $1.5 million, Unions NSW never received the claimed $15 million.

    Title deeds show that Mr Linz’s company paid $9.5 million for Currawong in early 2011 and, less than two months later, the government – through Watkins – bought it for $12.2 million.

    Do you know more?

    investigations@smh.com.au

    Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/nsw/spotlight-on-dealings-haunts-labor-20130630-2p5ex.html#ixzz2Xloiln27

  • Business ticks carbon trading option

    You are here: Home National Times Political News Article

    Search smh:

    Search in:

    Business ticks carbon trading option

    Business preference: Emissions trading scheme.Revealing: A new survey shows a strong preference by businesses for an emissions trading scheme. Photo: Wayne Taylor

    A significant section of business prefers an emissions trading scheme to a fixed carbon tax to cut Australia’s greenhouse gases, a survey has found, as federal cabinet considers on Monday an earlier move to carbon trading.

    The survey was commissioned by Businesses for a Clean Economy – a pro-carbon pricing industry group – with 570 companies approached from among its own members, the ASX 100, and those paying the carbon tax. All up, 180 responses were received.

    Asked to consider their support for a carbon price to reduce Australia’s emissions, 64.7 per cent of respondents said they favoured a trading scheme with a floating price, while only 28.8 per cent favoured a fixed tax.

    The survey, conducted by consultants AECOM, suggested little support for the Coalition’s direct action climate policy. Only 3.3 per cent said they did not want any form of carbon price, and another 3.3 per cent said they were unsure.

    Advertisement

    Monday will mark the one year anniversary of the carbon price taking effect, which was negotiated between Labor, the Greens and independent MPs by former prime minister Julia Gillard. The price for emitting a tonne of greenhouse gas will also rise on Monday from $23 to $24.15.

    Prime Minister Kevin Rudd said the scheme’s future would be a significant issue when his new cabinet met. Mr Rudd had previously indicated his support for ending a three-year fixed-tax period early, bringing forward an emissions trading scheme with a floating price.

    If implemented, the price would likely fall from $24.15 a tonne to a mark close to the European carbon price of about $6. But it would have major budget implications, as it would slash billions of dollars from government revenue.

    A number of lobby groups, such as the Australian Industry Group, called for the move, saying it would reduce business costs.

    But former climate change minister Greg Combet said on Sunday that, while possible, moving to a floating price sooner would present significant administrative challenges.

    Business for a Clean Economy spokeswoman Jennifer Lauber Patterson said the results showed a strong preference by business for a market-based carbon price.

    ”These results appear to be consistent with the Australian Industry Group’s support for a move to a market-based trading scheme as the most effective way of achieving outcomes,” she said.

    Members of Business for a Clean Economy include Westpac, AGL, Ikea and multinationals

  • All change as RailCorp is disbanded

    “Let me see.   NSWGR- PTC-SRA-Countrylink Citylink and yet another name change. All these have been at high cost in altered administration and stationery and achieved no improvement in services.”

    All change as RailCorp is disbanded

    All change: Newly appointed head of State Rail Howard Collins with State Transport Mnister Gladys Berejiklian.All change: Newly appointed head of Sydney Trains Howard Collins with State Transport Mnister Gladys Berejiklian. Photo: James Alcock

    It is the day everything changes on Sydney’s train system – or, depending on how you look at things, the day very little changes.

    RailCorp is disbanded. In its place are two new organisations, with some new executives, new uniforms, and according to the minister, new approaches to moving people about and telling people how they are doing it.

    ”It’s really two years of work that has got us to this point and we still have a lot to do,” Transport Minister Gladys Berejiklian said of the operating companies, Sydney Trains and NSW Trains that, from July 1, take the place of RailCorp and its brand CityRail.

    Sydney Trains will run most trains that move through Sydney and its suburbs. NSW Trains will run Countrylink and outer services to the central coast, Blue Mountains and Illawarra.

    Advertisement

    Behind the scenes, the creation of the two new agencies has been a wrenching overhaul for RailCorp’s formerly 15,000-strong workforce.

    About 750 middle managers have already taken redundancy, hundreds more have applied for jobs that they are still not certain of getting, and many positions remain unfilled, except by those on temporary contracts.

    For people using the trains, however, the changes might be less apparent. Ms Berejiklian says there will be better use of information screens, a higher ratio of staff helping customers as back office work is rationalised and, as the Opal card spreads across the system, a new approach to ticketing.

    Commuters on the Western and North Shore lines might also notice different seats. Two carriages in one Tangara have had their seats re-aligned, allowing more standing room but fewer spots to sit down.

    The new chief executive of Sydney Trains, Howard Collins, who until recently had been running the London Underground, said he was keen to see the results of the seating trial, which mirrored a change he made on London’s Metropolitan Line.

    ”We had a lot of people saying ‘save our seats’ … but since the trains have come in actually people have changed their minds and said, ‘Actually I can get in, I can get out, it is much quicker’,” Mr Collins said.

    Ms Berejiklian said customers had complained about the middle seat in the current three-seat pattern. In the refashioned Tangara, the three-seater is replaced by benches and two-seaters.

    To date, Ms Berejiklian has faced minimal overt union resistance to her train overhaul, in part because redundancies have been mostly voluntary.

    But passenger organiser in the Rail, Tram and Bus Union, Bob Newham, said one concern was that many staff appointed to new area management positions had little rail experience but tended to have human resource backgrounds. This could lead to problems when train operations went wrong, he said.

    Mr Collins, who arrived in Australia on Thursday night, will have plenty of opportunity to get abreast of problems. Now ensconced in the Sutherland Shire, he will be on the Illawarra line to and from work.

    Ads by Google

    The 2013 Crash is Coming

    www.Fool.com.au

    The Stock Market Crash Is Imminent Avoid It With Tips From Motley Fool

    We find water

    www.geo9.com.au

    Drought-proof your property with scientific groundwater surveys

    Georg Jensen AU Shop

    www.GeorgJensen.com/au

    See The Full Collection Here! Elegant Wrapping & Fast delivery.

    64 comments so far

    • The seating is an issue ? What about the filthy carriages , consistantly late running trains , lack of ticket machines at Town Hall ? Sydney’s trains are a disgrace !

      Commenter
      Amanda
      Location
      Date and time
      July 01, 2013, 7:52AM
      • We must be using different rail networks… I think the trains run on time & are relatively clean with the occasional exception caused by messy commuters travelling on the same service.

        Commenter
        HighlyDubious
        Location
        Date and time
        July 01, 2013, 9:06AM
      • Sydney is much large in area than European-Asian metros hence rail commute takes on average much longer needing more seats not less.

        10 carriages with full seatings instead of 8 will reduce crowdedness and need only to extend platform lengths which could be done with relative ease and current time table could be kept. Town Hall-Wynyard platforms could then also have entrances-exits at both ends of platforms for faster passenger loading-reloading-movement on platforms.

        Sydney network needs CRISS-CROSS links from North to South-West directly, and from West to St George-Sutherland directly without going to the City. London, e.g., has excellent criss-cross links. Criss-cross lines would take large car volume off Sydney roads.

        Central Coast-Blue Mountains-Wollongong services seem to be on the ‘PRIVATISATION’ initiative now they are no longer part of Sydney metro services. This is similar to the UK system. Privatisation would mean poorer services for outer suburb services and hence higher unemployment as commute to the City would be too costly and inconvenient. The public there should air their displeasure with their votes. The media should follow this up.

        Sydney needs 2nd northern rail-road crossing over Hawkesbury east of Wiseman Ferry linking Central Coast hinterland-Wyong-Newcastle to West-Parramatta-City in more direct manner. Current rail line and F3 are too twisty and too steep for freight and fast rail. New rail-road lines would go directly to the centre of Sydney basin. This new rail-road link could be linked to M2 and the new North-West rail plus a second Parramatta river crossing. Central Coast should have own new local line to the coastal districts and link back to the main line.

        Another link to Wollongong-Illawarra from Campbeltown perhaps should be considered for better access to and from SW Sydney and South Coast.

        Commenter
        JJ
        Location
        Hornsby
        Date and time
        July 01, 2013, 9:13AM
      • JJ,
        Sydney already has some criss-cross line (eg. the Northern line which circles up to Hornsby)

        As for platform extension – practically impossible at CBD stations. Other buildings basically stop this.
        Biggest issue SydneyTrains has is the CBD stations which were never built wide enough and hence are very dangerous, but trying to change this is near impossible without massive cost and disruption.

        Commenter
        Matt Adams
        Location
        Date and time
        July 01, 2013, 9:38AM
      • Easy Amanda. who needs clean, on time trains when you have clean shaven male staff, and, female staff all in new pretty skirts.

        Commenter
        TommyP
        Location
        Date and time
        July 01, 2013, 9:56AM
      • JJ
        Just which magic hat will the govt pull the money out of for your grand plan what you are talking about is unfeasible and enormously expensive we need to improve the current infrastructure and the general reliabity of it not be spending vast amounts of money on unfeasible and fanciful notions

        Commenter
        ned
        Location
        Date and time
        July 01, 2013, 10:24AM
      • Most of the delays I always find is related to commuters blocking the entrance… You always see people standing at the door who are not even embarking onto that train and not allowing people to exit. Then you get the ones that push in to the front just to stand in the middle carriage not allowing people to go into the top or bottom carriages. zzz

        Commenter
        Volmix
        Location
        Sydney
        Date and time
        July 01, 2013, 10:26AM
      • Linking newcastle ports to sydney’s west is an interesting idea

        Commenter
        mylo
        Location
        bondi
        Date and time
        July 01, 2013, 10:36AM
      • Why are the getting rid of seats??? I have an hour long commute either way, and I already have to be the very first person onto the carriage to get one as it is.

        And maybe they should think about running a Central Coast train all stops down the Northern Line instead of the North Shore every once in a while, so I don’t have a 20-30 minute wait for the train.

        Commenter
        H
        Location
        Date and time
        July 01, 2013, 10:55AM
    • And yet the service still stinks.
      The staff have no idea what is happening, and the trains are more unreliable.
      Just because you cut costs doesnt mean you have fixed anything.
      And there is no point making laws such as stopping people from smoking on platforms if nobody will enforce it

      Commenter
      Glenn
      Location
      Sydney
      Date and time
      July 01, 2013, 7:58AM

    More comments

    Would you like to comment?

    You will need Javascript enabled to use our Commenting Feature.

    Make a comment

    You are logged in as [Logout]

    All information entered below may be published.

    Error: Please enter your screen name.

    Error: Your Screen Name must be less than 255 characters.

    Error: Your Location must be less than 255 characters.

    Error: Please enter your comment.

    Error: Your Message must be les

    Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/nsw/all-change-as-railcorp-is-disbanded-20130630-2p5b6.html#ixzz2XkiUJ7hA